User talk:King G.A/Archive 1
B in the Mix: The Remixes Vol. 2
[edit]Please, go to the talk page to discuss the info that is being added. - Saulo Talk to Me 14:43, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
September 2011
[edit]Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at B in the Mix: The Remixes Vol. 2. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Xwomanizerx (talk) 19:31, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Criminal (Britney Spears song), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Xwomanizerx (talk) 19:32, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Born This Way, you may be blocked from editing. — Legolas (talk2me) 07:14, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
October 2011
[edit]Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Lena Katina. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 23:05, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Here I Am (Kelly Rowland album), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 02:00, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
You shouldn't repeatedly reverting someone without explanation. You can explain an edit by using the edit summary, or by leaving an explanation on the talk page of the article in question. Especially when the editor you're reverting gives an explanation, if you continue to revert without explanation your edits are likely to be viewed as disruptive or vandalism. Gimmetoo (talk) 17:08, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
There is nothing here. It cannot be used as a reliable source. Do not revert me, again, unless you have another source.—Ryulong (竜龙) 06:27, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi
[edit]Hi, wanna be friends?.....Do you have Facebook?
Tara1717 (talk) 14:44, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
What's your name on Facebook? 18:56, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
November 2011
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Here I Am (Kelly Rowland album). When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 23:09, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Britney Spears Live: The Femme Fatale Tour. Your edits have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in you being blocked from editing. Xwomanizerx (talk) 22:51, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Here I Am (Kelly Rowland album). Your edits have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in you being blocked from editing. Dan56 (talk) 21:35, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lady Gaga Presents the Monster Ball Tour: At Madison Square Garden, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Legolas (talk2me) 17:09, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
December 2011
[edit]This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Lady Gaga Presents the Monster Ball Tour: At Madison Square Garden, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Legolas (talk2me) 10:35, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Nyttend (talk) 13:19, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
January 2012
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Britney Spears discography, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Extraordinary Machine (talk) 12:27, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Masterpiece (Madonna song), you may be blocked from editing. — Legolas (talk2me) 15:26, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
- This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Masterpiece (Madonna song), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 23:21, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
February 2012
[edit]This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at MDNA (album), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - eo (talk) 15:33, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at MDNA (album) shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.
If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 00:44, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pink Friday. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 12:54, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
You've already received multiple warnings, as I can see above, and yet you still vandalized the Teenage Dream page. Please stop. Peterbrabel (talk) 17:38, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Teenage Dream (Katy Perry album), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 20:24, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Teenage Dream (Katy Perry album), you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Read WP:IBX Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 19:54, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
March 2012
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 19:42, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Pink Friday, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 17:37, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
April 2012
[edit]This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Spandex on the Distant Horizon, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 23:33, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
May 2012
[edit]Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to The MDNA Tour. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Binksternet (talk) 16:01, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
July 2012
[edit]Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to We Run the Night. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Oz talk 03:06, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Shakira. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Erick (talk) 21:07, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
STOP CHANGING #WILLPOWER
[edit]Stop getting rid of the recorded tracks section on the #willpower (album by will.i.am) article. I am NOT destroying the article at all. I'm reporting you to Wikipedia. (Eleventhblock (talk) 23:40, 31 July 2012 (UTC))
A reminder about WP:Verifiability
[edit]Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Lady Gaga. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Since you deleted a comment reminding users that they must provide a source if they're going to add a title for her third album, it raises the question of whether you are trying to intentionally disrupt Wikipedia with your edits. —C.Fred (talk) 15:02, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
October 2012
[edit]Unless you have a reliable source confirming the existence of a song with will.i.am, please stop re-adding this.
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Britney Spears discography. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - eo (talk) 14:40, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Britney Spears discography, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - eo (talk) 16:44, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. TexasAndroid (talk) 14:01, 15 October 2012 (UTC)November 2012
[edit]Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 16:48, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 30
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Scream & Shout, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diddy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
March 2013
[edit]Please do not add or change content, as you did to The Mrs. Carter Show World Tour, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 0z (talk) 21:31, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
#willpower
[edit]can you please discuss rather than revert. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 20:53, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
July 2013
[edit]Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Marry the Night. Your edits have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Generally I let this go, but the constant warns in your talk page demostrate bad editing. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 23:52, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
- Will enter the album and you'll see that it says Gaga's song not only applause!!! Gabiarakelian (talk) 23:56, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
- The "Lady Gaga song" disambiguation is used only if there is another song which shares the title, there is no single song other than Gaga's. The article must go at Applause (song). Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 00:00, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
August 2013
[edit]Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Prism (Katy Perry album). Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 16:42, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Unexplained revert on Paris Hilton discography
[edit]Would you please explain your revert on Paris Hilton discography? Discography entries are generally only added for released items, not for planned ones.
In any case I insist on a reliable source confirming existence and a fixed release before having these items on that page. Paris Hilton claims since 2008 that her second album will be released any day now. We've sometimes displayed that information, but it never happened, so in the end all that we've achieved is misinforming our readers and spreading rumors. That's not what we want to do here, we're not doing them a service by claiming uncertain information as fact, amd our reliability suffers from things like that.
So: Can you present an independent, reliable source confirming those items you added back to the discography? If not I'll remove them again.
Thanks, Amalthea 22:02, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
September 2014
[edit]Please do not add or change content, as you did to Calvin Harris discography, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SN▲P • SN▲P 21:30, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
Possible Inna hoax
[edit]Hi. With this edit you added "Body and the Sun" to Inna's discography. Do you have an independent source for that? If you based it on the recently created article Body and the Sun, I have just deleted that as a hoax created by a blocked user. Its text started "Body and the Sun is the second studio album by Romanian Iran recording artist Inna", and the references were all about I Am the Club Rocker, the actual second album. Its purpose was to introduce the name Javad Ramezani, a persistent self-promoter, over 70 socks to date, all of whose titles have been protected so that he is reduced to creating articles about albums or songs by real artists and inserting his name as co-performer or writer or producer.
If the album is real, feel free to re-create the article but watch it, in fact keep an eye open for anyone inserting the name into any Inna article, he seems to like her. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 20:18, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
September 2015
[edit]You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Britney: Piece of Me. livelikemusic my talk page! 12:54, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
August 2016
[edit]You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Britney: Piece of Me. livelikemusic talk! 23:21, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Gabiarakelian. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Gabiarakelian. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
July 2018
[edit]Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 17:21, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
September 2018
[edit]You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Clean Bandit. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:12, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Gabiarakelian. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
May 2019
[edit] Hello, I'm Ss112. I noticed that you made one or more edits to an article, Netta Barzilai, concerning the updates of review statistics, box office numbers, sports statistics, or some other frequently updated data with a fixed web address, but you did not update the |access-date=
parameter in the citation template. The |access-date=
parameter is the full date when the content pointed to by the URL was last verified to be working and supporting the text being cited in the article. This means that the parameter needs to be updated whenever the content is updated. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ss112 12:14, 19 May 2019 (UTC)