User talk:Khoa41860

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, Khoa41860, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! HiLo48 (talk) 22:24, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

December 2022

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to Erling Haaland, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. TylerBurden (talk) 00:32, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Vandalism warning

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Greg Olsen (American football). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ostealthy (talk) 23:40, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

I get it now. Khoa41860 (talk) 00:40, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

February 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Al Sadd SC. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Roundish ⋆tc) 22:56, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Adnan Al Talyani. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 23:14, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Al Jazira Club. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 23:18, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

I need to be careful. Khoa41860 (talk) 23:19, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Khalifa Al Hammadi a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 00:43, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 00:59, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

March 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ralph Mellanby, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 20:08, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

April 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Deadman137 (talk) 15:44, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Khoa41860, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Deadman137 (talk) 15:24, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Deadman137 (talk) 23:24, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi Khoa41860! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of 2022 Stanley Cup playoffs several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:2022 Stanley Cup playoffs, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Deadman137 (talk) 19:31, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Trying to hide behind IP addresses to disguise your edit war is a very serious violation of site policy and given your continued efforts to push your viewpoint you've earned the following warning. Do yourself a favor, walk away from this because if you push it again you will be reported.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Deadman137 (talk) 02:18, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

I need to stay consistent. Khoa41860 (talk) 02:31, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Comma usage

You're treading a thin enough line right now so stop adding unnecessary punctuation. Read this [1] to better understand the standards are used in these articles. Deadman137 (talk) 16:01, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

The comma is needed before and because not including it doesn't make sense. In English grammar, when listing three or more things, commas are needed before the last thing on the list. Khoa41860 (talk) 17:50, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

What's the source on that claim? Because what you describe just sounds like a MOS:OXFORDCOMMA, which is by no means mandatory and more down to personal preference. TylerBurden (talk) 05:22, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

I should refer back to Oxford comma. Khoa41860 (talk) 12:40, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

The Oxford comma is not a rule--not in American, nor in Canadian or British English. Drmies (talk) 16:37, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Stanley Cup Playoffs Announcers Section

I'm just going to say I don't care about this section in its entirety. However, I do care that games are listed over cities. Viewing the city makes me have to go backtrack. Viewers only need the games, not the cities they're announcing from. So, stop with the cities. Enough reverts should tell you that your edits are non-constructive. Also, please fill the summary line when completing your edits that way other editors know what you're doing. Conyo14 (talk) 18:52, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

We need consistency. Khoa41860 (talk) 19:30, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Thanks, no cities then. Conyo14 (talk) 21:57, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

No cities on List of Stanley Cup Finals broadcasters unless they are local television either. It's much more consistent to the reader to view the game numbers. Conyo14 (talk) 20:09, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

May 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Arsenal F.C.. Arsenal is a British club: we use British English. Last warning for such violations of the manual of style. If you can't stick to [{WP:ENGVAR]] you can't be editing such articles for spelling and grammar. Drmies (talk) 16:44, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

July 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Masked Singer (American season 9). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 23:44, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

August 2023

Please do not create malicious redirects, as you did with Al Nassr FC. They are disruptive and are considered vandalism, and have been reverted or deleted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Dl2000 (talk) 23:14, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 09:59, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Hockey Night in Canada commentating crews (1990s) has been accepted

List of Hockey Night in Canada commentating crews (1990s), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ortizesp (talk) 18:45, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Over citing

Hi there! I first want to thank you so much for assisting in enhancing Wikipedia articles. However, I would like to draw your attention to WP:CITEOVERKILL. In regards to your recent edit to Ray Ferraro, I do not think adding all of those sources was necessary. BUT there are other parts of the article that could’ve used some. Please be aware of this for the future. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 04:34, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

October 2023

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Flyers–Rangers rivalry. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. As of October 12, 2023, Philadelphia leads the overall series with a 166–154–37–12 record (136–130–37–12 in regular season and 30–24 in playoffs), while New York's record is 166–155–37–11 (142–125–37–11 in regular season and 24–30 in playoffs). – sbaio 11:53, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

How do I discuss the Flyers-Rangers rivalry on talk page? Khoa41860 (talk) 14:43, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

What do you want to discuss? You now changed rivalry statistics to incorrect format, which I have reverted. Please stop this behavior, because you have already been blocked once for being disruptive and looking at all the warnings it looks like you have not change your editing habits. – sbaio 15:10, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

2023 Stanley Cup playoffs

Please do not edit at 2023 Stanley Cup playoffs anymore. Your edits have been disruptive over the past five months with countless grammar mistakes. If you see an error, please discuss it on the talk page. Thank you. Conyo14 (talk) 19:26, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

November 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2023 MLS Cup Playoffs‎. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. SounderBruce 20:45, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

December 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at MLS Cup 2023, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SounderBruce 05:25, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Additionally, do not change the headlines in citations without good reason. SounderBruce 05:30, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

1981 Stanley Cup Finals

added a link pointing to KMSP

NHL on USA

added a link pointing to KMSP

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

January 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Foster Hewitt. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Flibirigit (talk) 00:02, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of List of Stanley Cup Eastern Conference Finals broadcasters

Hello Khoa41860,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged List of Stanley Cup Eastern Conference Finals broadcasters for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 17:51, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of List of Stanley Cup Western Conference Finals broadcasters

Hello Khoa41860,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged List of Stanley Cup Western Conference Finals broadcasters for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 17:54, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Khoa41860! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. This is in relation to your two Eastern and Western Stanley Cup Finals broadcaster articles (notices above). They appear to be largely copied from icehockey.fandom.com. While that site has a CC-by-SA licence, it requires attribution - you can't just copy text from there, you must also credit the original author(s), which can be done in the edit summary that introduces the copied content. Thank you. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 18:05, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Slovakia national team

Hello. With regard to your edits concerning the Slovakia national football team and its inheritance of the records of the former Czechoslovakia, please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Czechoslovakia's records now, where we are currently discussing the matter. --Theurgist (talk) 17:18, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Join discussion at WP:HOCKEY

Hello. We're having a discussion at WP:HOCKEY, concerning the pages you keep restoring. Recommend you take part in that discussion, otherwise your 'edit-warring' might be viewed as disruptive & you may end up blocked. GoodDay (talk) 17:20, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Redundant clips need to be removed Khoa41860 (talk) 17:24, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

The article you've restored has been nominated for deletion here. Conyo14 (talk) 17:48, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited NHL on Global, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Phoenix.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:49, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Monday Night Miracle (ice hockey), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages CTV and Mike Vernon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Empty short descriptions

Don't delete empty short descriptions, they serve a (very minor) purpose to tell editors not to add one in the future! -1ctinus📝🗨 23:22, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Heidi Game

I wanted to discuss with you your moving sources into the individual references. It seems to me WP:CITEVAR applies and you should seek consensus to do this As it says, "Editors should not attempt to change an article's established citation style, merely on the grounds of personal preference or to make it match other articles, without first seeking consensus for the change." That seems to me to be what you are doing, without any real explanation for what you are doing. Also, references 2, 12, 32, 36, 37, 38, and 47 now show with referencing errors which did not exist before. I appreciate the time you spent, but how is this an improvement? Wehwalt (talk) 02:25, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

I tried to improve them by fixing as many errors as possible. Khoa41860 (talk) 02:39, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Still problems with refs 31, 35, 36, 37, 47. They are showing up with red Harv errors. It's because you removed the books from the sources area and did not put the full citation in those references. Still would be grateful for an explanation as to why this is better than having a sources section and short citations. Wehwalt (talk) 02:52, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

I will fix them all by adding some citations of books. Khoa41860 (talk) 03:05, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

I'd like to advise you of MOS:ELIPSIS. "Generally, use a non-breaking space before an ellipsis, and a regular space after it: But where an ellipsis is immediately followed by any of . ? ! : ; , ) ] } or by a closing quotation mark (single or double), use a non-breaking space before the ellipsis, and no space after it" You on the other hand are removing the non-breaking spaces from before ellipses. This is not a good idea, and is in violation of our Manual of Style.--Wehwalt (talk) 18:12, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Remove all redundants. Khoa41860 (talk) 18:17, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

I've reverted you. Could I ask that you start discussions at Talk:Heidi Game of anything you want to do? Because Featured Articles tend to be well-watched and if you don't do things by the book (in this case the MOS), there's likely to be discussions. Wehwalt (talk) 18:22, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Yes Khoa41860 (talk) 18:46, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Panthers–Seahawks rivalry for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Panthers–Seahawks rivalry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Panthers–Seahawks rivalry (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

2023 Stanley Cup playoffs again

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. You were warned about editing the 2023 Stanley Cup playoffs announcers section and take your complaints about the section to the talk page. Conyo14 (talk) 23:39, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

March 2024

Hello, I'm Achmad Rachmani. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to UEFA Nations League have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Achmad Rachmani (talk) 07:40, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at 2023 Stanley Cup playoffs shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.   Aloha27  talk  02:44, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello Aloha27. The editor did ask me for permission to edit a couple specific points in the table which I agreed could be changed.

Khoa41860 please use your sandbox before changing the announcers again. Seeing the edits without a summary is very disruptive. Conyo14 (talk) 03:41, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

What is a sandbox? Khoa41860 (talk) 03:43, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

User:Khoa41860/Sandbox there you go. That's a sandbox. Consider it a play test for any edits you do. Conyo14 (talk) 04:37, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Wham2001. I noticed that you recently removed content from Raiders–Seahawks rivalry without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wham2001 (talk) 14:28, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Conyo14. I noticed that you recently placed an unreliable source into Islanders–Rangers rivalry here [2]. As a general rule of thumb, there is no need to add more citations than necessary. Please view WP:OVERCITE for more information on that. As for what sources can and cannot be used, this article provides some clarity: Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources. Just search for the source or website name then you can see if it is reliable. WP:BLOG are rarely if ever reliable, along with fan sites, gambling sites, or general databases. Conyo14 (talk) 18:09, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

@Conyo14: I think that Khoa41860 should be reported at WP:AN or WP:ANI, because this citation overkill behavior is getting out of hand despite multiple warnings from other editors. Not long ago I tagged Detroit Red Wings page for excessive citations. – sbaio 12:34, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Discuss at the project page. Conyo14 (talk) 19:43, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from History of ESPN on ABC into History of the National Hockey League on United States television. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:56, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Categories

I have noticed that you have been adding team categories to rivalry pages where they already have a sub-category within the larger team category. As an example Category:Green Bay Packers rivalries already exists within Category:Green Bay Packers. There is no need to duplicate the category and sub-category. Also, whenever you see text after a bar ( | ), that is used to organize the category in a larger category. Please don't remove that text. As an example Packers–Seahawks rivalry would be automatically organized under "P" (the first letter of the category name) in Category:History of the Green Bay Packers, but that isn't exactly helpful. What's better is to categorize it under the name of the rival, thus adding |Seattle Seahawks at the end of the category name will organize it as such. As a general recommendation, if you aren't sure what you are changing, don't make the change, or ask first. Thanks. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 23:24, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Overusing citations

Hello, I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Jim Schoenfeld (or any of the other articles) have been partially undone because they had WP:OVERCITE issues. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks." Gymrat16 (talk) 22:04, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I wanted to let you know that one of your recent contributions to Bruins–Canadiens rivalry have been undone because they had WP:OVERCITE issues. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Conyo14 (talk) 19:46, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

I'm considering this your first official warning as your behavior is becoming disruptive. Please review WP:OVERCITE. For general purposes, citing a sentence is fine, but when you add on too many, it becomes cluttered. Please consider what you are trying to cite then limit the source to one or two at most. Also, the lead (first paragraph) typically does not need citations, or it is limited to one. Conyo14 (talk) 05:09, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

May 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Deadman137 (talk) 21:59, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

List of NHL overtime game sevens

I've restored the redirect to List of NHL game sevens, your edit(s) that were done to the article will need to be done to the corresponding one. Thank you. Conyo14 (talk) 23:01, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Got it Khoa41860 (talk) 23:08, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Circular refs

Please stop adding book links to material published by 'PediaPress', as you did here, here and here. This material is copied from Wikipedia and noted as such. Please be more careful in the future; I'm noting that you've received a large number of warnings above, and the responses are pretty limited. Sam Kuru (talk) 23:10, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

June 2024

Stop repetitive disruptive edits under false pretenses in the Edit summary ! This is not an "update formatting", e.g.Diff, which you always claim in the edit summary, but a rough change to the article that does not correspond to the consensus in several discussions. See last discussion in Talk:FIFA World Cup records and statistics#Slovakia is not a successor to Czechoslovakia.
Stop this behaviour or you may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Miria~01 (talk) 16:56, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Please stop editing any Stanley Cup playoff article going forward as you all you do is create a mess. Deadman137 (talk) 14:23, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Is it OK if I include Wild Card codes: "WC1" for the first wild card and "WC2" for the second Wild Card? Khoa41860 (talk) 23:51, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 15

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

HTV9

added links pointing to Korean, Central, Southern, Southern Region, HTV and Central Highlands

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:22, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Football kits

Hi there. Just wanted to tell you that per established consensus using manufacturer and other logos should be avoided from the team kit templates. So your updates to the kits were not improvements. Thank you. --BlameRuiner (talk) 08:31, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Updates to kits with kit manufacturers and suppliers are added to avoid confusions. Khoa41860 (talk) 18:03, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

What confusions are you talking about exactly? Wikipedia football kits were intended to be a simplified representation without excessive details. Logos also break copyright violations. Like I said, addition of logos in cases where logoless version exist will be reverted.--BlameRuiner (talk) 09:16, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

Brazil and France kits specifically Khoa41860 (talk) 14:04, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

What exactly are you confused about? Can you give an example? --BlameRuiner (talk) 14:18, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

The kits of Brazil, France, Switzerland, Germany, Czechia, and Slovakia, without kit suppliers people will not understand them. Khoa41860 (talk) 14:49, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

I'm sorry, you're not making any sense. What is there to understand? You see a kit represented by tshirt, shorts and socks, they are of certain color and may include some lines or stripes. Team name is always written in bold below the kit. --BlameRuiner (talk) 18:16, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2024 Stanley Cup playoffs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NHL Network.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:10, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Stanley Cup Western Conference Finals broadcasters for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Stanley Cup Western Conference Finals broadcasters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Stanley Cup Western Conference Finals broadcasters (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Conyo14 (talk) 01:29, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

Re-creating deleted pages

Howdy. Your habit of re-creating pages that have been deleted, is becoming disruptive. Please stop it. GoodDay (talk) 14:25, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

No disruptive, but only added new citations. Khoa41860 (talk) 17:12, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Liverpool F.C. 2005–06 UEFA Champions League qualification

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Liverpool F.C. 2005–06 UEFA Champions League qualification requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liverpool F.C. 2005–06 UEFA Champions League qualification. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Finngall ^talk 16:38, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of List of Stanley Cup Western Conference Finals broadcasters

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on List of Stanley Cup Western Conference Finals broadcasters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Stanley Cup Western Conference Finals broadcasters. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jdcomix (talk) 19:13, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of List of Stanley Cup Eastern Conference Finals broadcasters

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page List of Stanley Cup Eastern Conference Finals broadcasters has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. UtherSRG (talk) 11:07, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

August 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page. UtherSRG (talk) 11:10, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

How long will it last? Khoa41860 (talk) 14:09, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Do not take time of block into account to determine what your actions moving forward will be. Do the right thing, regardless. The warning indicates you are on the wrong path. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:47, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Who Wants to Be a Millionaire (American game show). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. GSK (talk • edits) 20:48, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited NHL on CTV, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Times Union.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

SD removal

Just wondering why you removed the short description at 1981–82 NHL season? Masterhatch (talk) 17:08, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

I want citations on there. Khoa41860 (talk) 17:22, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

I'm confused. You added citations (which I did not revert) and you removed the SD. Still not sure why you removed the SD. Masterhatch (talk) 17:53, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

Put back the SD please. Khoa41860 (talk) 18:11, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

Already done. I did it when I saw it. Anyways, removing the SD was probably just a boo boo. We make boo boos. Goodness knows, I've made lots. Sometimes I catch my own and sometimes other people catch 'em. Happy editting! Masterhatch (talk) 18:59, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

Nations League

Official dates. Island92 (talk) 22:14, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

October 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 15:27, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

• Specifically, for this edit: the editor should have known better, esp. given their track record and, judging from the unblock request, their ongoing issues with sourcing. But the Show Me edit--there is an AfD (closed as redirect), there were reverts and reverts of those reverts, protection was applied by an administrator: this is clearly editing against consensus, without so much as a "by your leave". Drmies (talk) 15:57, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Khoa41860 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was blocked for disruptive editing even though I did few incorrect procedures (added nonreliable sources). Specifically, I only added citations to news publications and remove all dead links Khoa41860 (talk) 15:41, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you:
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 15:49, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Phillies–Pirates rivalry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WPEN.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)