User talk:Kelmaa

This is Kelmaa's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Panto glasses (November 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Storchy were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources are all WP:BLOGS aimed at promoting this model of glasses.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Panto glasses and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Storchy (talk) 09:04, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kelmaa! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Storchy (talk) 09:04, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Liposome extruder has been accepted

Liposome extruder, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Alpha3031 (t • c) 12:59, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sulemana Abdul Samed has been accepted

Sulemana Abdul Samed, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:55, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kelmaa. Well done on getting the article accepted. I hope you don't mind that I added a sentence pointing out that Samed is not nearly as tall as originally supposed. This article would make a good entry to the WP:DYK section on the main page (see link for details). However, it may be a little too short at present to meet the requirements. You'll have a week from today to develop it, which would be good experience for you and will drive readers to the article. Good luck if you decide to go ahead with this! Mike Turnbull (talk) 18:14, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your edits. I appreciate that. I also noted that they some articles are reporting different lengths for his height.

Also, I did not know about WP:DYK before this. I will work on the article and see if it will qualify to make entry to the WP:DYK section. Thank you Kelmaa (talk) 18:23, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Sulemana Abdul Samed

Hello, Kelmaa,

Thank you for creating Sulemana Abdul Samed.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Phrases like "That has seen his height grow is" is grammatically incorrect and confusing. There numerous other grammar mistakes. A nice article about a notable subject. Thank you for contributing!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Shushugah}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 02:19, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Vorcaro moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Daniel Vorcaro. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jamiebuba (talk) 21:58, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review. I had stated in the talk page of the article that "I wish to disclose it is a paid contribution by someone known as Mino Mazzamati." I never noted earlier the parts that appeared as promotional but I have since edited. I will also look at it again. Thank you! Kelmaa (talk) 22:19, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The solution here should have been to improve the draft article, not do what you did which was to request deletion of the draft and then recreate the exact same article. Do anything similar again where you have a conflict of interest, and you will be blocked from editing. SmartSE (talk) 16:51, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And oh look, you did the exact same thing at Draft:Panto glasses. SmartSE (talk) 16:56, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Smartse I made some changes and removed parts that may have read as promotional. I also did not think that the process I used was wrong and I apologize for that. Kelmaa (talk) 16:57, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello Kelmaa. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Kelmaa. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Kelmaa|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. UtherSRG (talk) 18:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the message. The only article I have a conflict of interest is the latest one that has been draftified on Daniel Vorcaro and I have disclosed that in the talk. All the other edits have been voluntary and no compensation was received. Kelmaa (talk) 18:06, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The disclosure needs to go on your userpage, as instructed above. - UtherSRG (talk) 18:13, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I just did it. I thought I only needed to do it in the articles talk page. Kelmaa (talk) 18:27, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Panto glasses (February 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Twinkle1990 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Panto glasses and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Twinkle1990 (talk) 08:02, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Panto glasses has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Panto glasses. Thanks! Twinkle1990 (talk) 08:03, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Restoque. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 13:25, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kelmaa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block, but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is _______ (I'm not sure where to get my IP). I just tried to make some changes, and it says my IP has been blocked. I have not changed anything except ISP. I changed my initial ISP (Liquid Telkom) and now I'm using the internet that is installed in our apartment (Safaricom fibre). I'm not sure exactly why my IP have been blocked from editing. Please help me understand what is the issue and also unblock the IP. cc: User:ST47 .... Kelmaa (talk) 14:20, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The IP should appear in the message you get when you attempt to edit. If not, you can use a tool like whatismyip dot com to determine it, googling "what is my ip" may work too. 331dot (talk) 16:25, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Daniel Vorcaro moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Daniel Vorcaro, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:19, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there is conflict of interest which I already disclosed in the article, my user page and article's talk page that this is paid editing. I have referenced almost all information and in some cases, I used multiple references to verify the information. Kelmaa (talk) 11:35, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charlene Ruto has been accepted

Charlene Ruto, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 09:58, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Panto glasses

Hello, Kelmaa. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Panto glasses, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Denyse Plummer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Calypso. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Panto glasses (November 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by M4V3R1CK32 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources added since last decline do not add to notability of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Panto glasses and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

M4V3R1CK32 (talk) 02:23, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sallie Ellington Middleton has been accepted

Sallie Ellington Middleton, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 04:45, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jim Rogers (Oklahoma politician)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jim Rogers (Oklahoma politician) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Rogers (Oklahoma politician). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wikishovel (talk) 17:20, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikishovel I realized the article had been deleted previously when I was linking the article with the 2012 Democratic Party presidential primaries. My article was largely a translation of the German article but I sourced for different references. I will not contest the nomination ~~~ Kelmaa (talk) 17:26, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I'm surprised it was deleted, and only noticed the previous deletion after linking to the new article from several other ones. Wikishovel (talk) 17:29, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Machine-generated text

Hello. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/ is a collection of machine-generated text. Please don't use it as source. Nemo 23:29, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Audiobook Creation Exchange

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Audiobook Creation Exchange, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:32, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of James Grier

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on James Grier requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Alex (talk) 17:47, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Alex B4 I never wrote the mentioned article. I also don't think I wrote anything on the article except moving it. I don't intend to contest the nomination as I don't know much about the said article. Thank you Kelmaa (talk) 17:55, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your page move created the redirect, see [1] and [2], which was what was tagged for speedy deletion, not the article. The redirect did not meet the criteria for WP:G14 as it does not end in "disambiguation", so I removed the tag due to lack of eligibility. The redirect may still be deleted for other reasons, for example to make way for a move. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:24DE:F159:39FF:48EF (talk) 18:04, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:24DE:F159:39FF:48EF I get it. Thank you for clarifying that Kelmaa (talk) 18:08, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of K. Annamalai (politician)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on K. Annamalai (politician) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K. Annamalai (I.P.S). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:05, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ANI discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:21, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: K. Annamalai (politician) (December 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Aviram7 was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, K. Annamalai (politician), which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:K. Annamalai (politician) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 05:22, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Spicy (talk) 11:01, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked your account because of private evidence indicating that you have not been honest about the extent of your paid contributions and have engaged in sock- or meatpuppetry. Spicy (talk) 11:05, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Panto glasses

Hello, Kelmaa. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Panto glasses".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:42, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tushy (company) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tushy (company) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tushy (company) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alpha3031 (t • c) 10:50, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]