User talk:Keith Okamoto/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Edit War

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Steam Iron 06:03, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Edit War

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Steam Iron 00:02, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Archive

If its ok with you can I set up your talk page to where it can be archived please respond on my talk page.--Steam Iron 00:05, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Ok your archive is set up, if there are any sections that have not had a new comment on them in seven days time a bot well archive them to Archive 1 you wont need to do anything the bot we take care of it all. Your first talk page archive is almost full up so in a few days I will be back to see if it needs to be switched to Archive 2 the bot should do this for you but just to make sure I'll take a look at the code. If you have any questions feel free to ask me on my talk page.--Steam Iron 08:05, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

John Cena article

Please do not undo my edits. If you haven't noticed, the 2010 (present) section cannot seen after the first few words. Also, I edited the correct punctuation. Again, Do Not Undo My Edits, Please. --Radiokid1010 (talk) 23:53, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

September 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on WWE NXT. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Muhandes (talk) 18:09, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 21:48, 26 September 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 22:01, 26 September 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

List of World Wrestling Entertainment employees

Just Karlee Perez name that do not have the accent mark. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.15.88.207 (talk) 21:03, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 08:16, 11 October 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 08:30, 11 October 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Stu Bennett

Hello, I was wondering if you could help me out, please? I made a new section for Stu Bennett and I went to try to add the citing of two websites and I don't know what happened. I followed what I have done and I just don't know. I was trying to make sure that if there any media on him, it should be added on the section that I tried to created and not the section of his personal life. Please make sureif need to be corrected and if you need the website addresses on where I found them are in the discussion tab. Thank you. Misslindsie (talk) 09:11, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Can you Fix my archive system

I'm using Mizabot III to archive my talk page and I don't know If I set it up right. I noticed you use Mizabot to archive your talk page so I was wondering if you could look at my talk page and see if I did my Archiving System right and if I didn't, could you fix it or tell me how to fix it for future reference?--Nascarking 23:48, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Reverting

I just wanted to warn you, you've already broken WP:3RR multiple times it seems within the past 24 hours with your excessive use of reverting, the reversions which have brought this to my attention include your reversions to some good faith edits on WWE Bragging Rights (2010) ([1] [2] [3]) and within a 48 hour span you've also reverted on List of Total Nonstop Action Wrestling employees ([4] [[5] [6] [7]). If you're having trouble defining when is correct to revert please see Help:Reverting. Afro (Talk) 11:02, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

The Gregory Brothers

I reverted this edit of yours because a video must have more than two million views to be included on that list. (Setting the threshold lower than that dramatically increases the number of listed videos; I expect it will need to be raised to 3 million in the near future for that reason.) Thank you. —Bill Price (nyb) 04:27, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Reply

If they have the same problem I don't see why other PPV articles can't be re-edited. Listen its the same guideline we follow on Featured Lists, its why you no longer see FL's with the small template in the notes section. Afro (Talk) 10:45, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 10:02, 25 October 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 10:23, 25 October 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Harris/McGillicutty

Husky Harris and Mike McGillicutty are now officially members of Nexus.

Thus they should be added to the main roster.

They aren't part time hangers on anymore now that they're part of the group.

They belong on the main roster.

Vjmlhds 03:55, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Undoing edits

Hi. Looking at your history of undoing edits on my watchlist, it looks like you're undoing successive edits one at a time. The proper way to do this is by clicking the Date/Time of the edit you want to revert to in the Page history, click "Edit" then click "Save Page." Or you could use twinkle. See Help:Reverting for more info. --Jtalledo (talk) 23:39, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Survivor Series (2010)

I have already explained this to you my edits are to comply with MOS:TEXT, your edit here is what prompts me to bring this up to you. Encase you do not know which part of the MOS this is to comply with "Increased and decreased font size should primarily be produced through automated facilities such as headings or through carefully designed templates.", we do not use the small template on FL's anymore for this very reason. Afro (Talk) 01:27, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Re: Question

Got it. Thanks for pointing that out. --☆ Antoshi ☆ ^{T | C} 22:54, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Re: Question

Dude, What else besides a source do you want Do I need a personal email form the WWE creative team or 100 unicorns to tell you?K.O.K Kev (talk) 03:42, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Goukaiger

Do not add anything to the project to support this show's existance.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 20:53, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, since it's the next sentai, so I made it on the Super Hero Time page. What's wrong with putting the info on the page?--Mikeymike2001 (talk) 20:57, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Because it's not confirmed.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 20:58, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Re: Come on!

To Jackson Andrews move to Raw roster, first he needs a profile on the Raw roster page. It is simple. Brett DiBiased appeared on Raw, but never make it into the main roster. You have to wait.

Yes I know. Daniel Bryan has his profile there too even after he was released. So a profile in WWE.com do not represent anything, unless if it is on the roster page of the shows. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.15.143.23 (talk) 04:36, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

No. You understand everything in a wrong way. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.15.143.23 (talk) 04:45, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Why does every PPV need a overview of what wrestling is?

I'm just wondering why you went and reverted the deletion of the background. It is pointless and is not needed —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.193.144.102 (talk) 20:27, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

hello, this iankevinsevilla. I swear, this is no spam

I would like to invite you to help me edit torchpedia-survivor.wikia.com. survivor.wikia was so messed up, so i created a new one.

I'm desperate to find contributors, because i work the site alone. Your help will be very much appreciated. thank you :D

iankevinsevilla@yahoo.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iankevinsevilla (talk • contribs) 08:58, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

STOP THE VANDALISM!

Do not delete the Million Dollan Championship on List of former championships in World Wrestling Entertainment again! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.15.89.67 (talk) 03:47, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Please start using edit summaries more often. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 05:05, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Mikey

Why do you keep deleting my post for Nexus (professional wrestling)? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.245.32.210 (talk) 17:30, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Gokaiger

Unless you have a reliable source to back up your edits, do not change the Anglicizations on the article.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 21:41, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

I was just updating the names because of this from the Premiere shows that are going right now. Sorry for not adding the source.--Mikeymike2001 (talk) 21:49, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Thank you. I was questioning it because you were changing Dokkoiyaa to Dogoier.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 21:52, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Jerry Lawler

The 2 months of work I mentioned was Lawler's in ring work over the last 2 months.

He wrestled in 5 matches (TLC, 2 singles, a tag, and a 6 man), plus was involved in a run-in/beatdown.

My whole point is that lately he has become more of a featured player and active wrestler due to the Miz feud, thus his placement on the active list.

He has wrestled too much in recent weeks to be relegated to occasional status.

That's all I've been saying from the start.

Vjmlhds 20:12, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

If you're in the ring wrestling with an opponent in a match 5 times in 8 weeks, plus have a long and documented career doing such, then it qualifies you as a wrestler.

Common sense would dictate that Lawler's contract is as both a wrestler and a commentator, or else he wouldn't be in the ring at all (like say Micheal Cole).

Occasional means doing like he has usually done (1 match every 3 or 4 months), when you do soething more and more frequently, it goes above occasional.

He does both--wrestle and commentate.

Lately, he's been more of a wrestler who commentates than a commentator who wrestles.

It's a fine line, but his recent increased activity justifies his place on the active list.

Vjmlhds 20:22, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

What I don't get is why the fact he also does commentary is such a big bug-a-boo.

Other on-air employees is desinged specifically for non-wrestling personnel, that's why they have their own listings seperate from the wrestlers.

Lawler is far from non-wrestling personnel.

Vjmlhds 20:33, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Royal Rumble 2011 - Time for Semiprotection

Hey, I saw you edit the Royal Rumble 2011, and I wanted to see your opinion of semiprotection of that page. There seems to be loads of vandalism there. I just wanted your opinion on this case before I propose at WP:RPP. It's mostly edit warring and vandalism from IPs and new users. Cheers! ► Wireless Keyboard ◄ 02:14, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Reliable sources

The reliable sources are the people that move their backs from the chairs and went to watch the TV tapings. Not the ones that some internet guy aproves. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.15.106.114 (talk) 03:51, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

You can be a member of FBI, CIA, INTERPOL or UN. But you cannot change the reality. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.15.106.114 (talk) 04:05, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

I will not wait to some geek decides what is reliable or not. The websites gain nothing putting wrong information. It would be unreliable if it was just one of them. It is not the case here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.15.106.114 (talk) 04:14, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from deleting real facts until you finished your stupid crusade.

Edit War

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --SteamIron 04:27, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

187.15.x.x update

Just so that you know, I have reported this IP for edit warring. He was blocked for 24 hours, then another 72 for continuing the edit war from a different IP during the block, then 2 weeks for continued block hopping (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/187.15.30.150). I am hoping this will put an end to the unreliable sources on Lucky Cannon, Taylor Rotunda, and Barri Griffiths. If he continues during the block, though, it should be reported to an administrator (I'll take care of it if I notice anything). GaryColemanFan (talk) 19:03, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Undoing my edit at List of WWE personal

Why did you undo my edit of removing unsourced info? Its unsourced get a source if you want to keep it. STATic message me! 03:50, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

February 2011

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to List of World Wrestling Entertainment personnel. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. STATic message me! 02:32, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to List of World Wrestling Entertainment personnel. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. STATic message me! 18:19, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. STATic message me! 02:25, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Re:

Sorry, but I avoid that article like the plague. It's always a mess – full of rumours and unsourced, unverifiable information. NiciVampireHeart 00:31, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

February 2011

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Florida Championship Wrestling. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
NiciVampireHeart 17:45, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

My talk page

First of all, if you want to talk with me do not do it in "CAPS". And use correct words. And no, the information was not all correct. I corrected the wrong ones to help improve the article. WWEJobber (talk) 17:49, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

umm

why didnt you say why you reverted my edit about cole being the voice of the wwe other ppl have said he is making it not self proclamed if you disagre you could at lest have the courtsy of saying why not just reverting and expecting me to go with it ♥Fighting for charming Love♥ (talk) 15:38, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

WWE work

Not at all. Just as freelancer. WWEJobber (talk) 20:46, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

why

why do you revert my edit about cole being the voice of the WWE the GM gave the name to him! its not self proclamed cos other people have proclamed it him. You are very rude Iv left a messege asking why its reverted nothing I asked on the edit summary if you can explane..nothing so you not telling me your resions is just plain ignorent! ♥Fighting for charming Love♥ (talk) 01:19, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

March 2011

This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of World Wrestling Entertainment personnel, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You need to provide sources for your changes to this page. This is at least your forth time doing this in less then a month. STATic message me! 02:55, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Daniel Case (talk) 03:43, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Keith Okamoto (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

All I was doing was updating the roster. I wasn't doing vandalism, I was just doing the necessary update. Mikeymike2001 (talk) 01:03, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You don't seem to understand the reason for your block, or indicate that you have any plan to begin citing sources for your edits in the future, so there isn't a good reason for me to overturn this block. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:01, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Keith Okamoto (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was going to source it, but I didn't know how to do the proper source code on the page. I'm sorry for not sourcing my info. Mikeymike2001 (talk) 00:52, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You've been told to provide sourcing for your edits by many others previsouly, so there is no evidence that you were "going to source it". Take some time while blocked to learn about how to provide sources at WP:CITE. Stephen 01:14, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Additions

Because all of them are important employees. All of them appears onscreen (except Joey Styles). I expect you understand. Thanks for asking before reverting. WWEJobber (talk) 21:21, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Not exactly. There is just one "Other personnel" section. The other "Other personnel" is a subsection of the "Company officials" section. The referees and WWE En Español and WWE.com personnel are part of WWE roster and not officials of the company. Do you understand? And about Jack Korpela WWE.com can answer it to you. SmackDown roster: http://www.wwe.com/superstars/smackdown/ (no Jack Korpela) / WWE.com personnel: http://www.wwe.com/subscriptions/wweclassics/personalities/ (Jack Korpela here). Thanks again. WWEJobber (talk) 22:07, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Alex Riley and STATicVerseatide

Can you please help me explain to STATicVerseatide that Alex Riley was fired and is not assigned to the RAW brand anymore? I think that he does not understand it. Sorry if you cannot. Thanks for the attention. WWEJobber (talk) 22:18, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Reply

Yeah i Tried to explain it to him when I edit the page but he ignores it. Like you said on his page, The Queen of FCW is defended like a title and was even defended at a recent show where all titles were on the line. And even though the Champions Roll call page calls it Queen Of Florida, it is never called that anywhere else. Ill see what happens when he replies to you and try to talk to him, thanks for your help. Wrestling0101 (talk) 23:05, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Queen Of Florida

First of all, the name is Queen Of Florida. Second, it is not a title, it is an accomplishment. The fact that the crown can be defended do not make it a title. Accomplishments can be defended too. Some examples: Miss Wrestlemania was defended by Santino Marella against Vickie Guerrero (and even got a rematch, just like a title); Money In The Bank contract was denfended by Mr. Kennedy against Edge; Shawn Michaels (who won the 1996 Royal Rumble) defended his championship opportunity against Owen Hart; Seth Rollins defended his Florida 15 medal against Richie Steamboat on March Of Champions (the FCW special episode where all the championships and accomplishments were put on the line). So, it is very simple to understand. WWEJobber (talk) 08:15, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Reply

If he watched the show then he would know it is always been called the Queen of FCW, all that takes it simple hearing and listening. The difference between the Florida 15 and Queen Of FCW is that FCW lists the Queen of FCW as a title on their site and has been defended as a title in FCW for years now. They even have had unification matches for the Queen of FCW and Divas title, but ended in a no contest. If it was an accomplishment then it wouldnt be able to be unified, but since they are both titles, they can be unified. That is my side of this. Wrestling0101 (talk) 19:30, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Keith Okamoto. You have new messages at Evilgohan2's talk page.
Message added 00:20, 17 March 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

WWE Template

See WP:NAVBOX. Navagation boxes are "collection of internal links." Everything must have an article if it doesn't it doesn't belong there. STATic message me! 03:12, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

A little help?

Hey do you think you could help me out in stopping WWEJobber's vandalism of some of the FCW info on numerous wiki pages? As you know he always changes the Florida/FCW names even though the Queen of FCW and Divas championship have never used the 'Florida' name ever, the FCW website is actually wrong and that is the only place where they incorrectly call it that. He also changes Serena's Mia Mancini name and makes Angela Fong show up as Savannah, even though she was never Savanah when she had the crown and even though Serena was Mia for most of her title run. And with the AJ/Naomi last name thing, since NXT they go by both the first names and by the first/last name together, so that isn't as big of a deal but I do think the last names could be there, and they use the last name on headlines on website sometimes. He is vandalizing the pages and makes no compromises, so could you help me out in keeping these pages clean? The other thing is Eve's last name, on Raw they always say 'Eve Torres' so that is her ring name too. I know I'm right with this stuff, its obvious from watching FCW that the titles are NOT called Florida Divas and Queen of Florida. I thought i should ask you since you try to keep the wrestling pages up to date and clean. Thanks. Wrestling0101 (talk) 03:25, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

If more than one person is reverting his vandalism, but not doing it more than 3 times in the 24 hours, than we will probably be fine from 3RR and at the same time keeping the pages mostly clean. (especially since we are only trying to prevent incorrect info.) Thanks for whatever you can do. Wrestling0101 (talk) 03:38, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

List of World Wrestling Entertainment personnel

Using sources which report from a third party which can not be verified is not a reliable source. Please wait until Friday after smackdownn to make the change. Intoronto1125 (talk) 04:45, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Barrett did beat Kofi yesterday for the title.

Intoronto is in the wrong here. We can use spoilers as long as they're from the list that Wiki says is A-OK.

Vjmlhds 17:38, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

List of World Wrestling Entertainment personnel (Talk Page)

How is disagreeing vandalism? It's a talk page. You don't allow dissenting opinion? 174.27.14.36 (talk) 18:58, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

The user attacked me first by cursing at me. 174.27.14.36 (talk) 19:02, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

List of current champions in World Wrestling Entertainment

Hello, I have proposed a merge of the page with the list of former championships. Since you're quite active in maintaining both lists, I thought you might like to chip in here. Thanks, Scorpion⁰⁴²² 20:42, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Reverting without an edit summary

Hello. I'm curious why you reverted two of my edits without an edit summary?--Rockfang (talk) 19:52, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Colored templates

I'm just dressing the templates up a little bit by using the company colors.

You look at templates for sports teams, they're done in the team colors, so why not for the wrestling companies?

It doesn't affect the content at all, plus it adds a little zing to an otherwise dull standard issue template.

Vjmlhds 23:29, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

It won't let me make Raw red and SD blue (it's either all one way or the other), so to save my sanity, I'll skip it.

Vjmlhds 23:41, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Edit war

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --SteamIron 19:40, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

April Fool's

If you're going to revert a big edit like this, you must explain in the edit summary why you're undoing it. I explained why I removed it in my edit summary — it's a ginormous WP:EXAMPLEFARM without any criterion as to what constitutes "well known". Don't blindly revert edits, especially ones of that magnitude. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 19:41, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

• Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 19:58, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

AJ Lee

She said on twitter that Jeanette is not her last name Wrestling0101 (talk) 19:43, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Why did you go and revert all my recent edits? Wrestling0101 (talk) 19:55, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Her name is April Mendez. Check the dates on Mason Ryan's reign it is like six months and a week. And I added a source for Husky Harris, WP:PW says 411mania can be used. Wrestling0101 (talk) 20:26, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Template colors

I tried doing it to the WWE roster template, but we need 2 diferent set of colors for that, and it wouldn't work.

I'd just leave them alone.

Vjmlhds 19:50, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

If you can make it work, go for it. If not, it ain't the end of the world.

Vjmlhds 19:53, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Your call. I tried, but couldn't figure out how, if you can do it, more power to you.

Vjmlhds 20:01, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Miami Gardens is an incorpated city in Miami-Dade County it is not a subdivison of MiamiSmith03 (talk) 16:59, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

news flash source information is not always correct. The stadium is located in Miami gardens not miami, just as Uof Phoenix stadium is in Glendale not Phoenix and Cowboys Stadium is in Arlington not Dallas if it helps you I will source the location via the stadiums webpage and the city's webpage Smith03 (talk)

[8] [9] [10]

if you read the article by the miami herald it does not refer to the city of miami it talks about about Miami-Dade County or South Flordia landing the event Smith03 (talk) 17:27, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Dancing With The Stars

Please don't update until we on the West Coast have seen the entire program.

EoGuy (talk) 01:42, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

TNA Template

Any reason you undone my edit? Zanwifi (talk) 01:50, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

RE

Source? Zanwifi (talk) 02:04, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

RE

TNA has different logos for example this logo is black http://i.imgur.com/w3M8e.png Zanwifi and also the silver makes the template look ugly the black brings it out A LOT. (talk) 02:09, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Mr Wrestlemaina

Buddy Rodgers and Ric Flair are both the nature boy HBK and Cole are both Mr Wrestlemania —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.222.227.22 (talk) 20:25, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

RE TNA

TNA Main Colors Red and Black and it's alternative colors is Red and Silver/Black/White TNA logo fits TNA posters, TNA has 3 logos the first one is the one on the Wikipedia the second one is the one I linked and the third one is the logo on this poster Zanwifi (talk) 00:24, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Question

Was I not supposed to restore this notice to Kaizoku Sentai Gokaiger: Do not add characters unless they are explicitly credited in the episode. Because that's what I did in my last edit to the page. Or at least, that's what I attempted to do.Crboyer (talk) 16:49, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Please stop undoing edits without edit summaries. The Místico was the third time you've corrected something of mine that was actually the right thing to do. If you click on the Face (professional wrestling), you will clearly see that técnico has an accent. BarryTheUnicorn (talk) 18:49, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

reply

If they get split and start to have different history then yes, we cant do it now based on them "maybe" being split one day Wrestling0101 (talk) 23:19, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Legends

Because the template is about the WWE Personnel only. If they will just make an occasional or special appearance they are not part of the personnel/roster. It is very simple to understand. Jim Ross will just do a match on Extreme Rules. Diesel, as you said, is just a plan now. And D"TR"J is not going to promote his match all year (because he do not need to). Legends are like Alumni or HOFs. They are not part of the personnel. WWEJobber (talk) 22:00, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

I think that no one belong in the "active" legends list. This list do not have to exist. WWEJobber (talk) 11:50, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Rumble 2012 Toronto

Hello. Just wondering why you keep removing the Rumble as being at the Air Canada Centre in Toronto in 2012 on the upcoming WWE PPV list when it's been confirmed by LAW radio. KaceCC (talk) 20:52, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Reply

The reason you were wrong like I said about 5 times is explained at WP:NOTBROKEN. Wrestling0101 (talk) 00:51, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Once again read what I linked you to. Actually read it please. You are allowed to link to the actual wiki page and its redirects, but there is no point in changing redirect links. Read it and youll understand. Wrestling0101 (talk) 00:57, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Invitation to take part in a study

I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Wikipedia contributors." I would like to invite you to Main Study. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates about 20 minutes. I chose you as a English Wikipedia user who made edits recently through the RecentChange page. Refer to the first page in the online survey form for more information on the study and me.cooldenny (talk) 02:12, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

WWE World Heavyweight Championship

Christian is still listed as the champion (http://www.wwe.com/inside/titlehistory/worldheavyweight) on WWE.com, not Randy Orton. Please do not alter the "current WWE champions" page until Smackdown airs and the title change is OFFICIALLY announced by the WWE. TySoltaur (talk) 21:34, 4 May 2011 (UTC) Please don't violate the 3-RR rule on this. Surely you can wait until Friday when the show airs and the change is officially recognized by the WWE? —Preceding unsigned comment added by TySoltaur (talk • contribs) 23:38, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Kuru (talk) 00:31, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Keith Okamoto (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

All I was trying to do is removing Ty's vandalism with correct infomation. Randy Orton is the current champion because Christian lost in an official match. While WWE.com lists Christian as the current champion, it's Randy Orton who's champion now. Ty should know that WWE.com is mostly kayfabe. Mikeymike2001 (talk) 9:22 pm, Today (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

It doesn't matter what you think the article should look like, you are not permitted to edit war about it. TNXMan 02:09, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Couldn't care less about your content dispute. I see no vandalism by our policy. Kuru (talk) 01:27, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Probably not the best idea to use wrestling lingo when attempting to contact a secondary admin for review. Mikeymike, I suggest you simply rest easy and wait until the block expires. Chill, watch Fast Five, or catch the Lakers game. Cheers!^{--UnquestionableTruth--} 01:32, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Your Revert of my edit to List of WWE Personnel

Please don't revert any edits that are not vandalism. It was a valid edit and there was no need to revert it, especially without an explanation. Thanks GShton (talk) 05:40, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Re to Alert on WT:PW

Ive had the page semi protected.--SteamIron 03:06, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Randy Orton

Randy Orton does not compete under his real name his name is Randal not Randy is just a ring name Randy is the same thing as the Undertaker (they're both ring names and not real names) --27.3.18.100 (talk) 05:40, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

My edit is not vandalism

I do not appreciate being the subject of false accusations of vandalism. I added information and included a link to a reliable source. Cluebot made a mistake. The continuous removal of the character's verified sexual orientation is homophobic censorship. Stop it. Matty Dean (talk) 21:17, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Out (magazine) is a completely reliable source and has been one for almost 20 years. Your claim that it's not is ridiculous. I don't know why you're so bound and determined to keep this information out of the article but the constant lies and attacks that I've been subjected to suck and lead me to believe that it's based in bigotry. Matty Dean (talk) 02:46, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Please see the Warehouse 13 discussion page. The proposed addition is going to be added to the page. Please do not change the main article without adding the discussion. CSLoomis ( talk | contribs ) 03:43, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

July 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article CM Punk, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. I don't disagree with you. It most likely is a worked shoot. But it still needs a reliable source that states such - else wise, it's just original research. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ② 00:23, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on CM Punk. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

In particular, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. At this point, more than one user has chimed in that it is incorrect to link it to "Worked shoots" - especially without a source. You have a previous record of edit warring and I would've hoped that you'd have learned and be able to engage in proper dialogue and dispute resolution without engaging in such activities but it seems you have not. This here is the final warning I'll be giving. I have started a topic on the CM Punk talk page related to this at Talk:CM Punk#July 2011 Speech Content Dispute. Hopefully, you will contribute and maybe we can come to an agreement. But reverting constantly without even the courtesy of providing an edit summary and then finally screaming (with caps lock to boot) in the first one you do provide - while still failing to adhere to WP:BLP policy, let alone basic Wikipedia policy is wrong and by now, I would hope you have realized that. I'll also be making an official third party opinion request into the subject, but at this point, I'm stepping back. Once my post is out, I'll leave it there. If you, however, continue upon your current path, my only option will be to this time report you to the AIV. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ② 07:45, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Gokaiger and future info

Do not add new information at the start or during the middle of an episode as it cannot be reliably sourced. Wait 20 minutes for the show to end.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 22:40, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Can I at least have the info on there, but put it in as hidden text?--Mikeymike2001 (talk) 22:48, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

No. We are no longer doing any hidden text. Just wait 10 minutes to put it back.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 22:49, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

WWE Raw

You removed the content that I added to the page, but there is a source from the calendar showing the date of the 1000th episode, July 30, 2012. Though if this isn't a reliable source to you, it may stay off. ZZero4K 23:54, 21 July 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZZero4K (talk • contribs)

CM Punk

Thank you for reverting the edits on the WWE personnel page. I'm curious though- what do we do about CM Punk's actual page? The opening paragraph lists him as a former employee, and there is no "kayfabe" listed anywhere regarding the current storyline. Kjscotte34 (talk) 20:21, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Zack Ryder on Smackdown roster

I went to undo my change after I realized I misread the site but you beat me to it. The previous editor made the change though based on tonight's Smackdown tapings in which Ryder was featured. It looks like Ryder will be on the roster as of Friday's show and will be changed then. NJZombie (talk) 02:39, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Dude not again

Layoff on the reverts to the wwe page you have already reverted five times that's well over the three that are allowed, take it easy its not the end of the world.--Dcheagle 00:59, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

In Mike's defense, he did NOT make five reverts, he only made three, which is the max allowed by WP:3RR.   ArcAngel   (talk) ) 11:46, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

I didn't mean anything by it I was just telling him to cool down before he gets in to another unnecessary edit war which at the time was about to happen.--Dcheagle 15:21, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

WWE '12

I have requested full protection to try and stop the edit war, and left a message on Freshman's talk page advising him to stop.   ArcAngel   (talk) ) 01:19, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Raw SuperShow

It might be a new Raw feature, but I don't believe that they'll have a live "Super Smackdown" every time...They usually only do the one live, televised show a week due to economic reasons...
BlueChainsawMan (talk) 06:04, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Internet Championship

Hi. Sorry it is just that he has appeared with on RAW and has defended it one at least one occasion against Primo at a live event. This title is as important in my opinion as the Million Dollar Belt which was also an unsanctioned title. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edshaft (talk • contribs) 16:49, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

The Million Dollar Championship was spotlit for a long time and worn by Ted DiBiase, then contended by Virgil over a period of three years, and revived twice. The Internet Championship is a toy Ryder legitimately had made for himself that he has never worn in a TV segment where he is one of the main characters. Even when he has claimed to defend it in WWE live events, the ring announcers haven't taken notice, he had to announce himself still champion. It looked like WWE were going to acknowledge it about a month ago, but have since completely forgotten about it again. Tony2Times (talk) 17:08, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

The original was a toy but has since been replaced with a custom made belt and true DiBiase's belt was held over time but this title is still fairly new and DiBiase wasn't always announced as the Million Dollar champion back then and he didn't defend it that often only in the brief feud with Virgil. Let's not forget the WWE's mindset they push things one day, not the next, and the next day it is back again. Look at the light heavyweight belt, while true this was a sanctioned title, it vanished when Gillberg left but when he returned it was as if it never left the WWF. While this is an unsanctioned title in my opinion this belt is still an important piece of WWE history.(Edshaft (talk) 17:25, 1 September 2011 (UTC))

The difference between the Light Heavyweight and Million Dollar Championship is that the WWF a) recognised and spotlighted the belts' existences to begin with and b) paid for them to be made. The WWE's fickle mindset on whether or not they push things isn't what I want it to be like, but that's the way it is and if they've abandoned talking about the Internet Championship before they even showed it on TV, then it's not a WWE championship, unsanctioned or not. It's just a toy (an expensive one or not childs replica, either way a personal toy) Zack Ryder had made and got incredibly popular. But from an encyclopedic standpoint, it's of no concern. Tony2Times (talk) 17:28, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

PS I just saw my message page Mikey; I thought Edshaft's talk page was redded out so I left the message here rather than at his own one. Tony2Times (talk) 17:30, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

James Storm image

It'd be a fine image if he was looking straight at the camera. I think it just looks stupid to have the main picture of an article being of a guy's profile.TheFBH (talk) 01:17, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Old Discussions

They still use the last names on FCW TV but I didnt add those names, they were in a different revision. But since they still show up in the name column when they make their entrances on FCW television, the last names technically should be there.

The divas title is referred to with the FCW name on TV, the Florida name is only on occasion and on the website, so I don't really care about that.

The crown IS a championship, it is defended on television and has been the main title of the division for a while before the divas title was brought. The website also calls it a championship and the way it is treated in the division says so as well.

Also I had nothing to do with the Riley thing, that was in the revision I used — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wrestling0101 (talk • contribs) 19:40, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

---

I'd like to discuss a potential revision I made previously that was undone. It was this particular revision regarding the WWE Raw Wiki article:

02:46, 10 February 2011 209.237.94.89 (talk) (77,432 bytes) (→The Monday Night Wars and Raw is War: incorrect and un-sourced statement, replaced with sourced version) (undo).

There seems to be some confusion regarding the statistic claimed in the article (and several other wiki articles, likely from a misquoted and un-sourced factoid in a Brian Alvarez "Death of WCW" book). Having a look over quarter-hour ratings for the shows in question, there is no evidence that "600,000" people changed the channel from one show to another, and in fact the 600,000 figure actually represents (roughly, though also somewhat inaccurately) the difference in the viewers between two HOURLY ratings periods, and not specifically two moments in time (the Nielsen Ratings track ratings in quarter hours).

Furthermore, it seems confusion has arisen from the fact that the shows were staggered in terms of starting times and a fact that is often missed is that the infamous "butts in the seats" statement came almost an hour before the actual match occurred on RAW. Nitro lost only one tenth of a point between the two quarter hours.

Here is something I wrote up to discuss the situation in detail as far as examples of often believed but untrue facts in Pro-Wrestling:

1. 1) "When Tony Schiavone said "I just heard Mick Foley is going to become their champion... yeah, that'll put butts in the seats" 600,000 viewers changed the channel from Nitro to Raw."

This is probably the best one I can think of, because it's not a simple stretch of the truth -- but is totally inaccurate in every possible way -- as Raw actually lost viewers instead of gaining them.

If you look at the quarter hour breakdown of Raw and Nitro from the January 4, 1999 telecast, it looks like this:

      2nd Head To Head Hour
            Q3    Q4    Overrun
     Nitro  4.1   4.6   6.5
     Raw    6.2   5.9   5.1

The Mick Foley/Rock match took place between Q4 and the overrun, with the "Finger Poke of Doom" taking place in almost the same space of time, with Nitro ending a couple of minutes before Raw went off the air. As you can see, Nitro actually gained viewers between Q3 and Q4, while RAW lost viewers and then Nitro hit a big rating in the overrun, making the claim completely impossible.

More than likely, confusion arose out of the fact that Nitro lost about as many viewers as attributed to the Rock/Foley match between the unopposed hour and the first head to head hour, when Nitro’s rating shot down a full nine-tenths of a point from 5.5 to 4.6. (which amounts to a difference of about 300,000 households) Furthermore, the perceived bad taste of WCW’s move in giving away the title-switch gave this little “factoid” traction, despite what the numbers have to say about it. The rest is history of course. It's pure fantasy though, and the number has shifted around from 300,000 to 600,000 depending on what you read (viewers vs households). The Death of WCW book by Bryan Alvarez is often sourced for this stat, but he himself provides no source for the assertion.

In his book he asserts that "The biggest gap, not surprisingly, immediately followed Schiavonie's announcement that Foley The Joke would win the belt, as Raw hit a 6.2 opposite Nitro's 4.1."

This quote from the Death of WCW book is probably most responsible for perpetrating this story.

It's also untrue -- Tony's comment came right at 10:00pm, the start of Nitro's 3rd hour, opposite the start of Raw's second (end of the Hulk Hogan interview opposite the HHH vs Mankind match on Raw) The head to head rating at the start of the hour was a 5.1 (Nitro) to 5.7 (Raw). The previous quarter had Nitro at a 5.2, so they lost one-tenth of a rating point on Tony Schiavone's announcement.

Even if he meant to say the start of the Foley/Rock MATCH was what popped the big rating and not Tony's announcement, he'd be wrong too. Rock/Mankind started 5 minutes into Q4 of the last hour, nearly 50 minutes after Tony's announcement, where the head to head rating of Raw went down from the previous quarter. The Foley/Rock match averaged a rating of 5.50 if you average together the quarter hour and overrun it took place in. The "Fingerpoke of Doom" averaged a 5.60. I would certainly make the case that the Fingerpoke of Doom was the symbolic turning point of WCW into the point of no return (well, maybe we should reserve that for David Arquette) but the infamous statement is untrue no matter what angle you approach it from -- which makes it ever the more ridiculous that it's hung around for so long and is more or less taken as the gospel truth of this event.

So what popped the big rating, the 6.2 on Raw versus 4.1 on Nitro? The Al Snow versus Road Dogg match opposing Brian Addams and DDP on Nitro (Q3 of the final head to head hour).

So Road Dogg put butts in the seats, so to speak.

Here is the full-breakdown (These should be duplicated in the Observer Newsletter archives, and intimated in the link I provided previously as well):

January 4, 1999 - Nitro versus Raw - Quarter Hour Ratings

            Q1   Q2   Q3   Q4    Q1   Q2   Q3   Q4    Q1   Q2   Q3   Q4  Overrun
    Nitro   4.9  5.6  5.9  5.8   4.4  4.4  4.5  5.2   5.1  4.7  4.1  4.6  6.5
    Raw                          5.9  5.6  5.0  5.2   5.7  5.7  6.2  5.9  5.1 

209.237.94.89 (talk) 22:19, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

---