User talk:Kayau/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Kayau. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Welcome!
Hello, Kayau, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Fwend 18:57, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Notability of Supreme Master Television
A tag has been placed on Supreme Master Television requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 59.167.48.220 (talk) 05:51, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
Kayau (talk) 07:46, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the person who removed the tag.Kayau (talk) 14:40, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 07:44, 9 April 2009 (UTC) Thanks for reminding. I know that, but I'm very sorry to say that I forgot.Kayau (talk) 07:46, 9 April 2009 (UTC) (sorry, I forgot again)
Speedy deletion of Supreme Master Ching Hai Day
A tag has been placed on Supreme Master Ching Hai Day requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Riotrocket8676 You gotta problem with that? 13:48, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Just to let you know, I've added the history of Sup. Mas. C. H. Day and a couple of references. I hope that helps.
Proposed deletion of The Noble Wilds
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Noble Wilds, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- Non-notable book per Wikipedia:Notability (books), unreferenced, part of WP:Walled garden, possible WP:COI
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. MuffledThud (talk) 13:55, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
I've added a citation while I forgot to log in. But may I ask what I can do next? Kayau (talk) 14:19, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Now, I don't see why a number-one bestseller is not notable.
Proposed deletion of A Journey Through Aesthetic Realms
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article A Journey Through Aesthetic Realms, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- Non-notable per WP:Notability, unreferenced, part of WP:Walled garden, possible WP:COI
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. MuffledThud (talk) 13:59, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Yes, thanks. But may I ask what I can do to improve?Kayau (talk) 14:18, 10 April 2009 (UTC) Can anyone tell me what I can do to the Walled Garden? I want to know why it causes a conflict of interest. I need to know that as to improve!Kayau (talk) 14:52, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Perhaps I couls merge it with Noteworthy News?
Proposed deletion of Supreme Master Ching Hai Day
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Supreme Master Ching Hai Day, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- Non-notable holiday, unreliable sources per WP:RS
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. MuffledThud (talk) 18:33, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Noteworthy News
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Noteworthy News, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- Non-notable per WP:Notability, unreferenced, part of WP:Walled garden, possible WP:COI
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. MuffledThud (talk) 19:35, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
TfD nomination of Template:Supreme Master Ching Hai
Template:Supreme Master Ching Hai has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. MuffledThud (talk) 06:52, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Barbara Parham, What's Wrong with eating meat?
In book references, can you add the relevant page number please because you can't expect people to read the whole book to verify a claim. Thanks. Betty Logan (talk) 13:02, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 14:22, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 00:04, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
Otto Undercover
Thankyou for the barnstar!
I think what you need to to do is establish the books' notability - awards they have won and been nominated for, book sales, and any discussion of them in the national press or book magazines or TV interviews. Some of these articles may be of use:
http://archive.womansday.com/home/11284/q-a-with-rhea-perlman-rhea-perlman-on-her-family-and-career-page2.html
http://www.nymetroparents.com/newarticle.cfm?colid=8130
http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/culture/2007/03/03/2007-03-03_kid_lits_new_star_-2.html
Betty Logan (talk) 01:21, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Thanks a lot! I always feel so lonely when I edit the article!Kayau (talk) 02:37, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
If you are not busy with those lists, Miss Logan, could you help me actually add the references in the article?Kayau (talk) 03:24, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Alix Bushnell
I think you are confused in your comment at Talk:Alix Bushnell. She is a mainstream actress, and not as far as I know a pornographic one. Please amend your comment. You can remove my reply there when you've done so.
I've also removed the prod tags from this article and from Bronwyn Turei, as these two actresses have very recently starred in a popular New Zealand television series. If you believe they are not notable, an AFD is appropriate.-gadfium 05:55, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
All right. However, I will choose not to remove your reply here. It shows what mistakes I have made so that I can improve later. Kayau (talk) 06:43, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Category links
To link to a category page without putting the current page in that category, precede the link with a colon: [[:Category:Category name]]. See the fix in [1]. PrimeHunter (talk) 03:08, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Thanks a lot! You are the most helpful wikipedian I've ever encountered (mostly because you're the only one who gives me wiki tips.) Kayau (talk) 03:10, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks, and thanks for the Administrator's Award! PrimeHunter (talk) 11:13, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Merge/deletion proposal
Please see the comments I made at Talk:List_of_Mr._Men#Merge proposal and Talk:Mr._Men#Merge_proposal regarding those articles. In general, deletion is never a good idea when a merge would suffice. I would be wholly in favor of merging all of these articles, as the creator doesn't seem to be interested in Wikipedia anymore and in any case neither he nor anyone else could significantly improve any of the articles. Soap Talk/Contributions 01:50, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Why thank you!
It must be 2 in 1 week. Abce2|AccessDenied 23:22, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
No problem! All the best, Kayau (Talk to me! See what I've done! Sign my guestbook!) 02:50, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
Oh, so now free lemonades are FREE!?!? What has the world come too!?!? :)Abce2|Free LemonadeOnly 25 cents! 02:52, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
You sound funny. All the best, Kayau (Talk to me! See what I've done! Sign my guestbook!) 01:35, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Adoptee
Hi Kayau
I accept your offer to become your adoptee. I look foward to working with you. Thanks, Dranster Dranster
Hi Kayau,
Thank you for adopting me. I would like to learn more about wiki markup. I am not quite sure what that means
Thanks,
Dranster Dranster
Hi Dranster! Put simple, wiki markup is the code wikis use. There is no standard wiki markup, but you'll use the Wikipedia version here - of course. You've used some of it before. For example, [[this]]is a link, and looks like this. '''That''' is bold, and looks like that. Simple enough. Even the <ref></ref> tag is a Wiki markup. Thanks for your attention! All the best, Kayau (talk) 02:27, 26 June 2009 (UTC) P.S. ~~~~, which you use in talk pages, is also a wiki markup.
Good Morning, Kayau. I am little unclear on the citations. I am continuing to read through the information on in line citations, but will need your help and assistance on this one. I tend to be more visual and need to see something before I completely understand it.
I am also in the process of loading my first image. It is an image of John Franklin Gray. Let me know if I have uploaded the image correctly.
Enjoy your weekend.
I must remind you to do one thing after you write in talk pages: Sign with four tides. You must do that at all costs. (Which looks like ~~~~) All the best, Kayau (Talk to me! See what I've done! Sign my guestbook!) 14:05, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
Thank you. I will remember to add the four tides.--Dranster (talk) 15:21, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
I am looking at your contributions. You have been quite busy. --Dranster (talk) 15:25, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Recent Edit
Kayau, I have made a correction to the footnotes on David Brewster. Please review at your convenience and let me know if the correction I made is correct way to cite. I want to make sure these are correct before changing others.--Dranster (talk) 16:38, 29 June 2009 (UTC)--Dranster (talk) 19:36, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi Dranster! I'm afraid that is still not quite appropiate. Remember to add inline citations, and that means you need to tell people which source the fact comes from. For example, you have the fact: Albert Einstein is the Father of Relativity. People will want to know where this comes from. When they look at the references, they will see 'Yahoo', 'Google', 'Ask.com', and 'Sina'. They have no idea which one the fact comes from. Compare:
Version A (wrong): Dranster is very clever. He always helps others. Everyone likes him.
References:
- Yahoo, P.10
- Google, P.15
Version B (right): Dranster is very clever.[1] He always helps others. [2] Everyone likes him. .[1]
References and footnotes
When we look at version B, we know that 'Dranster is very clever' and 'everyone likes him' are facts from yahoo, while 'he always helps others' is from google. That's what ver. A lacks. I hope this is cleaerer. All the best, Kayau (Talk to me! See what I've done! Sign my guestbook!) 02:29, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Sarah Palin
I need to solict your advice and feedback. What is the proper way/process to engage someone to to resolve a dispute? How do I engage them without it turning into a battle? see Sarah Palin --Dranster (talk) 20:44, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
- What a surprise! I'm sorry I am replying so late. I never noticed this message before. Really, I thought you got uninterested after I tried really hard to teach you the inline citations. I will try to improve your understanding further in that area. If you have any problems, especially those regarding citations and references, just ask me. Kayau David Copperfield MOBY DICK the great gatsby 05:17, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
This might help a bit:
All information in Wikipedia articles should be verified by citations to reliable sources. Our preferred method of citation is using the "cite.php" form of inline citations, using the <ref></ref> elements. Using this method, each time a particular source is mined for information (don't copy word-for-word!), a footnote is placed in the text ("inline"), that takes one to the detail of the source when clicked, set forth in a references section after the text of the article. In brief, anywhere you want a footnote to appear in a piece of text, you place an opening <ref> tag followed by the text of the citation which you want to appear at the bottom of the article, and close with a </ref> tag. Note the closing slash ("/"). For multiple use of a single reference, the opening ref tag is given a name, like so: <ref name="name"> followed by the citation text and a closing </ref> tag. Each time you want to use that footnote again, you simply use the first element with a slash, like so: <ref name="name" />. In order for these references to appear, you must tell the software where to display them, using either the code <references/> or, most commonly, the template, {{Reflist}} which can be modified to display the references in columns using {{Reflist|colwidth=30em}}. Per our style guidelines, the references should be displayed in a separate section denominated "References" located after the body of the article. | |
Inline citation code; what you type in 'edit mode' | What it produces when you save |
Two separate citations.<ref>Citation text.</ref><ref>Citation text2.</ref>
{{Reflist}} |
|
Templates that can be used between <ref>...</ref> tags to format references {{Citation}} • {{Cite web}} • {{Cite book}} • {{Cite news}} • {{Cite journal}} • Others • Examples |
Follow the method stated there. Kayau David Copperfield MOBY DICK the great gatsby 05:41, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
KCTJ
I have removed the {{prod}} tag from KCTJ, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! By way of clarification, the redlink relates to a radio station; fully-licensed radio stations are generally held to be notable. As a result, the redlink represents an article that could be created, and likely will be. Disambiguation with the similarly-coded airport is therefore useful. Mlaffs (talk) 02:13, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Exuase me
Check out your guestbook. Abce2|Free LemonadeOnly 25 cents! 03:22, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
Metal ions in Life sciences
You placed a tag in Metal Ions in Life Sciences. This article is about a series of books. All the information regarding these books can be verified on the publishers' web-site which are cited. Please consider removing the tag. Petergans (talk) 14:30, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi Petergans! I'm afraid I am not going to remove the tag yet. My own article, Otto Undercover, has a tag on it as well. Maybe you can use the publisher's website instead. Thank you. All the best, Kayau (Talk to me! See what I've done! Sign my guestbook!) 00:35, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- This is not a good reason. I will remove the tag myself with a comment. I suggest that you do the same for Otto Undercover, though I suggest that you first add ISBN numbers to the book titles to verify the existence of the books. Petergans (talk) 07:48, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- Why, thanks for reminding me. I keep forgetting the ISBNs. By the way, I must insist that you add the references. As you know, notability and verifiability are the very soles of a good article. Thanks again. All the best, Kayau (Talk to me! See what I've done! Sign my guestbook!) 13:52, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- By the way, in case you didn't know, the reason why your article didn't make its way to the DYK is the fact that it is unreferenced. So I'm not the only one who wants you to cite the article. All the best, Kayau (Talk to me! See what I've done! Sign my guestbook!) 13:53, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- I must disagree. There is no way a series of books can be referenced other than by giving the ISBNs which verify the existence of the books. Also, the publisher's web site provides details of content etc. Therefore an "unreferenced" tag serves no purpose. Petergans (talk) 09:01, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi Petergans! I appreciate your article. I really do. But I am afraid I must insist that you add the references. Both Chamal and Scarce think that you should cite the article. And here is the evidence: Click here Again, please add the references! And don't get me wrong: another editor put that tag for the second time. Thank you for your attention. All the best, Kayau (Talk to me! See what I've done! Sign my guestbook!) 09:17, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
WP:EFD
I'm not sure if you noticed, but WP:EFD is purely a humorous page. Nothing on there is real, as we cannot possible delete editors. :-) Killiondude (talk) 19:14, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
LOL! You're the one who doesn't understand. It can be more humourous if you do things the proper way in a page that is supposed to be humourous. All the best, Kayau (Talk to me! See what I've done! Sign my guestbook!) 00:11, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the cat
Thanks for adding that category to my page :). I never bothered with the userbox as my user page as it is at the moment fits perfectly on my computer screen. But categories are no problem :). Cheers - Kingpin13 (talk) 13:31, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
Why, that's fast. :) All the best, Kayau (Talk to me! See what I've done! Sign my guestbook!) 13:33, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
- Ha, have to be to keep the vandalism off it ;). See you around - Kingpin13 (talk) 13:34, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Jesse Lee Kercheval
Wikiproject DYK 11:43, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
I afford it to them
I don't know if they will respond any time soon. Cheers, Abce2|Free LemonadeOnly 25 cents! 02:52, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
About WikiProject HK Transport
Don't worry, I was just occupied with school work, although school is suspended, so I didn't have time editing Wikipedia in the past week. But now that I have return, I will try to do whatever I can, including adding the template to talk pages (now doing). Also, I have just made an image File:WPHKT pic.png to be used in templates related to the WikiProject. Thank you for your hard work! KX675 =]Talkbox 10:44, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
I'm sorry if I had insulted you with my comments. I would like to discuss an important matter about the new WikiProject: We have too few members. Everyone else is focusing on something: some photographs, others a single area. One is even planning to do nothing but raise Cathay Pacific to GA status! So you see, with so few members, I dare say it will be the first of september before we tag, categorise and reference all the articles in the scope. That's why we need more members. I have tried to advertise the fact that we lack participants in the Wikipedia Community (at least, that's what I think it's called,) but I do fear that the work will still be too much, even if we have an extra member - perhaps five or six will work out better. Perhaps I could do the light-rail stops and you do the MTR (you know, the only lines called MTR before the merge.) Feel free to object if you wish to. All the best, Kayau (Talk to me! See what I've done! Sign my guestbook!) 01:23, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
Hazel Walker
I agree the college section was pretty thin. I added some material, and removed the template, your call if it wasn't enough. --SPhilbrickT 15:29, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
FL
Hi, I saw this at the help desk. If you are thinking of going for a FL, you might want to try with something that could be more 'complete' and easy to source. Maybe something that you're familiar with. If you need any help, please feel free to ask. Chamal talk 14:40, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
What exactly is this about?
What exactly is this Hong Kong thing? It looks interesting, and it would be a welcome break from writing my articles on the Warriors books, and I'd like to kind of branch out in the subjects that I can write about. Melkittycat (talk) 14:45, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
If you are interested, you may like to go to our page to see what you can do. We need participants to tag pages, assess their quality, add photographs, etc. There is also an issue you may want to discuss, as I've written on the project talk page. You are also welcome to do anything on the to-do list. Simply add your name to this and this page! Hope you will want to help out! All the best, Kayau (Talk to me! See what I've done! Sign my guestbook!) 00:33, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Here is a simple task you may be interested in:
- Go to Template:MTR.
- Click on any link you may find.
- When you see the article, look at the top right corner. If there is a star, remember it. If there is an oval with a '+' sign, remember that as well. Ignore any other icons.
- See if the article is short. If it is, remember that.
- Click on 'edit this page'. If the article was short, put the {{asia-rail-stub}} code on the bottom.
- Save the page. Go to the discussion, or talk page. Click on edit this page. Add the following code to the page:
{{WikiProject Hong Kong Transport |class=(class) |importance=(importance) }}
- Here is a rough guide to filling in the bits in the brackets:
- Class:
- If the article was short, put 'stub' after class.
- If there was a star icon on the top right corner, put 'FA' (or 'FL' if the article happens to be a list.)
- If there was an oval with a '+' sign, put 'GA' after class.
- If the article was long but not very good, put 'start'.
- Other grades available are A, B, and C. (See my guildlines at Wikipedia:WikiProject Hong Kong Transport/Assessment.)
- Importance:
- See my guildlines at Wikipedia:WikiProject Hong Kong Transport/Assessment.
- Do NOT add the brackets!
- Class:
7. Save the page. There you go. You're done! Note:If any of the above processes are already done, you don't have to redo it! Have fun! All the best, Kayau (Talk to me! See what I've done! Sign my guestbook!) 10:10, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks I'll get started on that when I get a chance! I've already put my user name on both participant lists. Ttyl! Melkittycat (talk) 18:34, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Sea Wolf
Thanks very much for the Barnstar! I'll check out the other refs shortly. Gordonofcartoon (talk) 02:36, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
talkback
Message added Srinivas→ 08:45, 14 July 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Message added Srinivas→ 08:54, 14 July 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Celebrations for 2nd Anniversary of Wikimedia Hong Kong
Thanks and signature
Hello. Thanks for your kind copyediting award. It's always nice to have one's work appreciated. While I'm here, I'd like to voice a concern about your signature. It uses raw pipe characters (|); these have the potential to disrupt templates and should be avoided. I encourage you to use <nowiki> tags for the pipes, or to perhaps consider removing them. Thanks again. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 17:15, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks. (I'll do anything a crat says.) Kayau Jane Eyre PRIDE AND PREJUDICE les miserables 12:39, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Kick the bucket
Royalbroil 00:00, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for making WP:NODRAMA a success!
Thank you again for your support of the Great Wikipedia Dramaout. Preliminary statistics indicate that 129 new articles were created, 203 other articles were improved, and 183 images were uploaded. Additionally, 41 articles were nominated for DYK, of which at least 2 have already been promoted. There are currently also 8 articles up for GA status and 3 up for FA/FL status. Though the campaign is technically over, please continue to update the log page at WP:NODRAMA/L with any articles which you worked during the campaign, and also to note any that receive commendation, such as DYK, GA or FA status. You may find the following links helpful in nominating your work:
- T:TDYK for Did You Know nominations
- WP:GAC for Good Article nominations
- WP:FAC for Featured Article nominations
- WP:FLC for Featured List nominations
- WP:FPC for Featured Picture nominations
Again, thank you for making this event a success! --Jayron32.talk.say no to drama 02:29, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks anyway, although all I have done in Wikipedia during the dramaout was improving the stuff on literary forms - I escaped to Wikbooks! Kayau Jane Eyre PRIDE AND PREJUDICE les miserables 02:32, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
- From the editor: Welcome to the build-your-own edition of the Signpost
- Board elections: Board of Trustees elections draw 18 candidates for 3 seats
- Wiki-Conference: Wikimedians and others gather for Wiki-Conference New York
- Wikipedia Academy: Volunteers lead Wikipedia Academy at National Institutes of Health
- News and notes: Things that happened in the Wikimedia world
- Wikipedia in the news: Assorted news coverage of Wikipedia
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Oregon
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 10:53, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Airlines of Hong Kong
Hi Kayau,
Thought I'll drop you a note letting you know that I am in the processing of taking all (current) 'Airlines of Hong Kong' articles to GA status. Cathay Pacific and Dragonair are completed and already listed as GA status, Air Hong Kong and Hong Kong Airlines are currently under review, with updates awaiting final review. I will start the final one of Hong Kong Express Airways shortly. Aviator006 (talk) 15:10, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
- Kayau, hello there again, just to confirm that all 5 'Airlines of Hong Kong': Cathay Pacific, Dragonair, Air Hong Kong, Hong Kong Airlines and Hong Kong Express Airways; are now promoted to GA status. Thank you for the Barnstar, I look forward to see the 'new' one that you're going to replace it with! Cheers. (small request: would you be able to update the description of the Barnstar with the topic in question, rather than talking about the Barnstar, so I can put it in my Awards page?) Off I go to venture to other Airline articles... Aviator006 (talk) 05:12, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
Long ago User:BetacommandBot created the Category pages as List even though the Project name is Lists. I noticed you changed the name of the List assessment department, even though that was the name required by Template:WPBannerMeta. Will we have to change the names of all of our Categories now? Will you be doing that? The bot isn't picking up Category:Top-importance List articles anymore, and I was trying to find the bug, did you do that? Are you reverting all edits User:BetacommandBot did back in 2007? Or are you just changing the end results of those edits? It was quite a mess, but it seems our work-around is wrong? What should we do??? Prapsnot (talk) 01:44, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- I'm sorry. I did not know that there were such cats related to the project page. I moved the page back to its original title. I hope that is OK for you. Kayau David Copperfield MOBY DICK the great gatsby 04:51, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- I noticed that User:BetacommandBot had bot privilages permanently revoked by the Administrators; presumably because of this type of damage! Not your fault, we've got to figure a better way to get the bugs that bot created worked out; it's absolutely stupid and illogical to have it say List. Thank you Prapsnot (talk) 05:41, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Barnstar
As I said here, you made an excellent choice. But don't diminish the Barnstar with an apology; go back and change your message to something that explains why he's getting it, like "For all the amazing work you've done at Wikiproject Hong Kong Transport." That way it's personalized and is distinguished from others that he has or will receive. Just a suggestion. Hey, take a look here, to see what I'm talking about. Cheers! Unschool 04:18, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
- News and notes: WMF elections, strategy wiki, museum partnerships, and much more
- Wikipedia in the news: Dispute over Rorschach test images, and more
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:49, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Something for you...
Hi, Kayau. I thought you would be ready to receive your first barnstar by now :)
The Resilient Barnstar | ||
This barnstar is presented in recognition of your hard work, dedication and most of all, your enthusiasm to learn and do the right thing. Keep up the good work. ≈ Chamal talk 06:06, 4 August 2009 (UTC) |
This is well deserved IMO. ≈ Chamal talk 06:06, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
- I'll second that. Unschool 06:34, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
I must express my most extreme gratitude, partly towards your barnstar, but mostly because of your willingness to teach me to 'learn to do the right thing'. Thank you. Kayau Wuthering Heights VANITY FAIR paradise lost 08:03, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
re:Jimmy Wales
I respect your revert but im curious why I cannot change quotes. It is common edit etiquette to edit quotes with inproper grammar with brackets inserting text that was not said so the reader better understands the statement. Is this just for Jimmys page? I see it like this on wikipedia everywhere and in newspapers. What rule did I break?
Thanks
wait a second. you were not the one that reverted the edit. Please refrain from commenting on my userspace about my edits unless you are the one making the change or are curious on an edit I cerated and wish to have a consenus discussion. It is unnecessary.
Ivtv (talk) 21:43, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
- So what's wrong with giving you a little reminder? To edit quotes, as you said, you use put them in brackets. I don't think you did that, no? (Correct me if I'm wrong.) Besides, famous Chinese poets turn adjectives into verbs, so what's wrong with Larry if he does the same with prepositions? :) Sorry, anyway, if I hurt your feelings. Kayau Wuthering Heights VANITY FAIR paradise lost 07:12, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
I just do not appriciate it nor am I farmiliar with the chinese language. It is not applicable to the english wikipidia. I am not offended. Ivtv (talk) 21:05, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
Users Who Turned Up In Places I Least Expected Them
I just found this section on your userpage. I chuckled at the fact that I'm on the list, and the comment beside it. I've always had the slight tendency to show up unexpectedly, and then disappear just as quickly, because I'm so quiet in real life. It's apparently quite startling whenever it happens.
By the way, when I "hit the wall", what it means is "I'm having (allergies/a breakthrough minor depressive episode/just plain bonkery) and should be napping, playing games, reading blogs, exercising, or something more productive than editing wikipedia. Please ignore the fact that I'm editing wikipedia anyway, because I'm not really here. Expect me to not be here as much." So, heh, yeah. It doesn't help that I tend to not put the {{bonked}} until I'm almost over it. I dream of horses @ 02:47, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
- Hah. Didn't you see that little template I put up on the 'life as a wikipedian section'? I love to play with my userpage. As you look more into my userpage, you'll discover a lot more humorous stuff. Did you realise, for example, that I'm a 'native speaker of sarcasm'? :) Kayau Wuthering Heights VANITY FAIR paradise lost 02:49, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
- Your user page looks fun. :-) I'll poke around.
- By the way, what was the other time I turned up unexpectedly? Just curious, of course. I dream of horses @ 02:52, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
- I never remember. I always keep a record of that, and forget precisely where. Common places are prod tags and fighting vandalism. Oh, I forget that I just saw Kingpin two days ago... I'll keep a record of that. Kayau Wuthering Heights VANITY FAIR paradise lost 02:54, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, heh, okay.
- I never remember. I always keep a record of that, and forget precisely where. Common places are prod tags and fighting vandalism. Oh, I forget that I just saw Kingpin two days ago... I'll keep a record of that. Kayau Wuthering Heights VANITY FAIR paradise lost 02:54, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
- I have a wondrous associative memory due to my atypical brain. If I had kept the list, it'd be so much more useful. (kidding, of course). I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 03:01, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Categories for discussion nomination of Category:User en-hk
Category:User en-hk, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. VegaDark (talk) 01:39, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
Great work!
Hey Kayau, It’s Artichoke-Boy. You may or may not know me from MOTD. I was just looking through your contributions and stalking your userpage ;) , and I thought you really deserved this:
The Editor's Barnstar | ||
I, Artichoke-Boy, hereby award this shiny blue barnstar to Kayau, for your substantial contributions to Wikiprojects, your work at Motto of the Day, and your all around good attitude towards Wikipedia. Keep it up! ARTICHOKE-BOY (Talk) 15:27, 7 August 2009 (UTC) |
ARTICHOKE-BOY (Talk) 15:27, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
Indeed, Artichoke-Boy, I have seen you at the MOTD. Thank you ever so much for your barnstar. FYI, I will edit less regularly from September, when the school year starts. But I will be back next July for sure. Again, thanks! Kayau Wuthering Heights VANITY FAIR paradise lost 01:14, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
A message to everyone
As you may know, I am trying to start the WikiProject Hong Kong Transport. And as you should know, starting a new wikiproject isn't an easy job. So, I would like to invite everyone that's interested to help out! Here is the entire process:
- If you are interested, tell me at my talk page.
- I will tell you what I would like you to do at my talk page and put a talkback in mine.
- If you like it, tell me so on my talk page. Then, put your name on Wikipedia:WikiProject Hong Kong Transport/Participants as well as Wikipedia:WikiProject Hong Kong Transport#Supporters. Then you can start helping out!
- If you make a mistake, I will tell you in your talk page so that you can improve.
- And, since most of those 'jobs' you will do are repetitive ones, I will give you the Tireless Contributor's Barnstar. For exceptional cases, I will pick the best barnstar for you.
Thanks a million! All the best, Kayau (Talk to me! See what I've done! Sign my guestbook!) 09:43, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
- Special story: Tropenmuseum to host partnered exhibit with Wikimedia community
- News and notes: Tech news, strategic planning, BLP task force, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Shrinking community, GLAM-Wiki, and more
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:10, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Wu Gang
Orlady (talk) 02:15, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
Congrats!
The WikiChevrons | ||
For suggesting the World War barnstar I hereby award you the WikiChevrons. TomStar81 (Talk) 10:17, 15 August 2009 (UTC) |
- Thanks, but I don't think it's finished yet. My first attempt was a pistol pointing at the globe. Obviously didn't work with Nutiketaiel. My second attempt was the Churchill-roosevelt-Stalin thingy, with a transparent barnstar before it, and spitfires occupying the corners. Didn't work. Finally, Kingpin, despite the obvious lack of concencus, moved his flags proposal to the WP:* page. I'm not particularly fond of it, but Kingpin is right that there's got to be one out there, first -- like, there could be dozens of people contributing at World Wars without getting the barnstar. :P Again, thanks! Kayau Wuthering Heights VANITY FAIR paradise lost 00:56, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
- From the editor: Where should the Signpost go from here?
- Radio review: Review of Bigipedia radio series
- News and notes: Three million articles, Chen, Walsh and Klein win board election, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Reports of Wikipedia's imminent death greatly exaggerated, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:41, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Dramaonly
I attempted the dramaonly, and then I realized something. I have no arguments to resolve, really. An apology to give, perhaps, but I have already apologized a few times (albeit, a little awkwardly, perhaps). Maybe I applied don't give a fuck a little too much to really participate.
So yeah. It's not the WikiGnomes who will have problems participating in the DramaOnly--it's those like myself who just put a brick in a building (or a few edits to an article), and move on.
Nonetheless, I find the Dramaonly to be a fascinating concept. --I dream of horses @ 17:48, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter. You can actually drop out when you think the work is finished, but thanks for your participation anyway. Kayau Wuthering Heights VANITY FAIR paradise lost 12:52, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks. I actually felt somewhat guilty, but I did do some anti-vandalism work and took a semi-wikibreak anyway. :-) --I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 16:25, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
- News and notes: $500,000 grant, Wikimania, Wikipedia Loves Art winners
- Wikipedia in the news: Health care coverage, 3 million articles, inkblots, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 05:06, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
- Flagged protection and patrolled revisions: Misleading media storm over flagged revisions
- Flagged protection background: An extended look at how we got to flagged protection and patrolled revisions
- Wikimania: Report on Wikimania 2009
- News and notes: $2 million grant, new board members
- Wikipedia in the news: WikiTrust, Azerbaijan-Armenia edit wars
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 17:48, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Overcoloured
Template:Overcoloured has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Beland (talk) 20:56, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Adopt me
I want to be adopted. Attinio (talk) 07:18, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 September 2009
- From the editor: Call for opinion pieces
- News and notes: Footnotes updated, WMF office and jobs, Strategic Planning and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Wales everywhere, participation statistics, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Video games
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Birthday
December21st2012Freak , (talk to me, or else...) 01:15, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 September 2009
- Opinion essay: White Barbarian
- Localisation improvements: LocalisationUpdate has gone live
- Office hours: Sue Gardner answers questions from community
- News and notes: Vibber resigns, Staff office hours, Flagged Revs, new research and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Stunting of growth, Polanski protected and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: WikiProject National Register of Historic Places
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 October 2009
- New talk pages: LiquidThreads in Beta
- Sockpuppet scandal: The Law affair
- News and notes: Article Incubator, Wikipedians take Manhattan, new features in testing, and much more
- Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia used by UN, strange AFDs, iPhone reality
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: New developments at the Military history WikiProject
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 October 2009
- From the editor: Perspectives from other projects
- Special story: Memorial and Collaboration
- Bing search: Bing launches Wikipedia search
- News and notes: New WMF hire, new stats, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: IOC sues over Creative Commons license, Wikipedia at Yale, and more
- Dispatches: Sounds
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Tropical cyclones
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
RfD nomination of User en-hk
I have nominated User en-hk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:10, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 October 2009
- News and notes: WikiReader, Meetup in Pakistan, Audit committee elections, and more
- In the news: Sanger controversy reignited, Limbaugh libelled, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 October 2009
- Interview: Interview with John Blossom
- News and notes: New hires, German Wikipedian dies, new book tool, and more
- In the news: Editor profiled in Washington Post, Wikia magazines, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 November 2009
- Article contest: Durova wins 2009 WikiCup
- Conference report: WikiSym features research on Wikipedia
- Election report: 2009 ArbCom elections report
- Audit Subcommittee: Inaugural Audit Subcommittee elections underway
- Dispatches: Wikipedia remembers the Wall
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: Project banner meta-templates
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 November 2009
- New pages experiment: Wikipedians test the water at new page patrol
- German controversy: German Wikipedia under fire from inclusionists
- Multimedia usability: Multimedia usability meeting concludes in Paris
- Election report: Arbitration Committee candidate nominations open 10 November
- News and notes: Ant images, public outreach, and more
- In the news: Beefeater vandalism, interview, and more
- Sister projects: Meta-wiki interview
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
MOTD contributions
This is a general message to get people to contribute as we are running out again so if you could please do. Please also see Wikipedia talk:Motto of the day#The Future. Note to anyone who reads this, WP:MOTD/N. Simply south (talk) 15:57, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
I have nominated List of lists related to William Shakespeare, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of lists related to William Shakespeare. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Gunnar Hendrich (talk) 00:23, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 16 November 2009
- Fundraiser: "Wikipedia Forever" fundraiser begins
- Bulgarian award: Bulgarian Wikipedia gets a prestigious award
- Election report: Arbitration Committee Election: Several candidates standing
- In the news: German lawsuit, Jimbo interview and more
- Sister projects: Wiktionary interview
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 23 November 2009
- Uploading tool: New tool for photo scavenger hunts
- Election report: Arbitration Committee Election: Nominations closing November 24
- Fundraiser: "Wikipedia Forever" fundraiser continues
- News and notes: Government stubs, Suriname exhibit, milestones and more
- In the news: The Decline of Wikipedia, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 30 November 2009
- Election report: ArbCom election begins December 1, using SecurePoll
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
2010 WikiCup Signups Reconfirmation!
To ensure that everyone who signed up is still committed to participating in the 2010 WikiCup, it is required that you remove your name from this list! By removing your name, you are not removing yourself from the WikiCup. This is simply a way for the judges to take note of who has not yet reconfirmed their participation. If you have not removed your name from that list by December 30th, 2009 (by 23:59 (UTC)) then your name will be removed from the WikiCup.
It's worth noting the rules have changed, likely after you signed up. The changes made thus far are:
- Mainspace and/or portal edits will not be awarded points at all.
- Did you know? articles (which were worth 5 points last year) will now be worth 10 points.
- Good articles (which were worth 30 points last year) will now be worth 40 points.
- Valued pictures will be now awarded points, however the amount (5 or 10 points) is still being discussed.
- Featured lists (which were worth 30 points last year) will now be worth 40 points.
- Featured portals (which were worth 25 points last year) will now be worth 35 points.
- Featured articles (which were worth 50 points last year) will now be worth 100 points.
- Featured topics (which were worth 10 points per article last year) will now be worth 15 points per any article in the topic that you were a major contributor to.
- Good topics (which were worth 5 points per article last year) will now be worth 10 points per any article in the topic that you were a major contributor to.
- In the news will still be awarded points, however the amount (5 or 10 points) is still being discussed.
If you have any final concerns about the WikiCup's rules and regulations, please ask them now, before the Cup begins to avoid last minute problems. You may come to the WikiCup's talk page, or any of the judge's user talk pages. We're looking forwards to a great 2010 WikiCup! On behalf of the WikiCup judges, iMatthew talk at 03:44, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 December 2009
- From the editors: 250th issue of the Signpost
- Editorial: A digital restoration
- Election report: ArbCom election in full swing
- Interview: Interview with David G. Post
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
2010 WikiCup Signups Reconfirmation! (reminder)
To ensure that everyone who signed up is still committed to participating in the 2010 WikiCup, it is required that you remove your name from this list! By removing your name, you are not removing yourself from the WikiCup. This is simply a way for the judges to take note of who has not yet reconfirmed their participation. If you have not removed your name from that list by December 30th, 2009 (by 23:59 (UTC)) then your name will be removed from the WikiCup. Note: this is the same message from last week, but you are receiving it because you have not removed your name from the list yet! Please do so if you still plan on participating. iMatthew talk at 22:21, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi! As you have expressed an interest in the initial The Great Wikipedia Dramaout, you're being notified because we are currently planning another one in January! We hope to have an even greater level of participation this time around, and we need your help. If you're still interested please sign up now at Wikipedia:The Great Wikipedia Dramaout/2nd. Thanks, and Happy Holidays! JCbot (talk) 04:39, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 December 2009
- Election report: Voting closes in the Arbitration Committee Elections
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 December 2009
- Election report: ArbCom election result announced
- News and notes: Fundraiser update, milestones and more
- In the news: Accusation of bias, misreported death, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
Last chance to confirm your WikiCup participation!
Hi Kayau! This is the last message that will go out to remind you that in order to participate in the 2010 WikiCup, you MUST remove your name from this list! Again, the reason for this reconfirmation is to ensure you've looked over the updated point values (which were different at the time you signed up) and to ensure that you are still interested in competing! If you don't have time to participate or no longer wish to, ignore this message and leave your name on the list. All names on the list will be removed from the contestants list before the Cup starts. Cheers! iMatthew talk at 14:23, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 December 2009
- News and notes: Flagged revisions petitions, image donations, brief news
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 January 2010
- News and notes: Fundraiser ends, content contests, image donation, and more
- In the news: Financial Times, death rumors, Google maps and more
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
An open proposal for a WikiProject Talk Pages
I noticed you were involved in a past proposal for a WikiProject that dealt with talk pages, and I wanted to let you know that a similar proposal is now open. If you would support such a project, I would appreciate your vote.
-Garrett W. {☎ ✍} 09:15, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 11 January 2010
- From the editor: Call for writers
- 2009 in review: 2009 in Review
- Books: New Book namespace created
- News and notes: Wikimania 2011, Flaggedrevs, Global sysops and more
- Features and admins: Approved this week
WIkibreak enforcer
There was a message at the help desk, which seems to have come from you, asking for your enforced wikibreak to be removed. I've done this. Please leave me a message on my talk page as soon as you read this to confirm that everything is OK. BencherliteTalk 10:28, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
Did you see the note I left you?
...concerning my WikiProject proposal? I noticed you archived it without responding to it so I wasn't sure if you actually read it or not.
-Garrett W. {☎ ✍} 22:31, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
- I've read it, but I was a bit busy fighting vandalism and doing what I usually do in wikipedia :-P Yes, I will comment on the talk pages thingy sometime, but there's an important school project to do. (Thanks to the EDB! If not, we wouldn't be studying Liberal studies in form one!) I'll try to consider the talk pages proposal later. Thanks for reminding me. Cheers, Kayau Wuthering Heights VANITY FAIR paradise lost BACK FROM EXAMS 01:41, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, ok. No rush.
-Garrett W. {☎ ✍} 05:40, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, ok. No rush.
Just a quick reminder that the Second Great Wikipedia Dramaout has begun. Please log any work you do at Wikipedia:The Great Wikipedia Dramaout/2nd/Log. Good luck! --Jayron32 02:04, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
- I would like to admit that I'll be mostly in Wikbooks at the time, though I will try to do Reagent bottles while I'm at it. Kayau Odyssey HUCK FINN to the lighthouse BACK FROM EXAMS 03:31, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 18 January 2010
- News and notes: Statistics, disasters, Wikipedia's birthday and more
- In the news: Wikipedia on the road, and more
- WikiProject report: Where are they now?
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 25 January 2010
- BLP madness: BLP deletions cause uproar
- Births and deaths: Wikipedia biographies in the 20th century
- News and notes: Biographies galore, Wikinews competition, and more
- In the news: Wikipedia the disruptor?
- WikiProject report: Writers wanted! The Wikiproject Novels interviews
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Something you might find useful
There is a whole matrix of vandalism templates at Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace#Multi-level templates which are much easier to use than one-off warnings. - Denimadept (talk) 15:30, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Motto of the Day
I don't think you've been given one before, so...
The MOTD Barnstar | ||
You've had opinions on almost all the mottos recently! These vital opinions count! :-) (Spread the WikiLove!)Smaug123 (talk) 21:45, 28 January 2010 (UTC) |
- Thanks very much! Smaug123 (talk) 18:20, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
DYK for John Smith (housebreaker)
Materialscientist (talk) 12:00, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 February 2010
- From the editor: Writers wanted to cover strategy, public policy
- Strategic planning: The challenges of strategic planning in a volunteer community
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Dinosaurs
- Sister projects: Sister project roundup
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
re: Thanks
Hey, looks like a fairly nice page you have there, although I only skimmed through since I'm not really familiar with MotD. As to the vandalism reversion, no problem at all :) - Kingpin13 (talk) 15:01, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Talkback
Message added 23:44, 6 February 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Koman90 (talk), A+ (Verify) 23:44, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
re: WT:WPWPA
Hey Kayau, and thanks for your support in my RfA :). Sorry I haven't been spending as much time around WPAwards as I used to, I've been busy with WP:Graphics lab, among other things. I'll try to make sure I keep my eye on there :). Best, - Kingpin13 (talk) 11:25, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
The MOTD Barnstar
The MOTD Barnstar | ||
for your tireless contributions to MOTD and for “picking up” the new Guidelines –pjoef (talk • contribs) 13:29, 8 February 2010 (UTC) |
Thanks! Kayau Odyssey HUCK FINN to the lighthouse 13:33, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
- Oh /o\ ... it was not necessary... but greatly appreciated \o/!!! Thank you so very much! –pjoef (talk • contribs) 14:41, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 February 2010
- News and notes: Commons at 6 million, BLP taskforce, milestones and more
- In the news: Robson Revisions, Rumble in the Knesset, and more
- Dispatches: Fewer reviewers in 2009
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Olympics
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Doc Quintana (talk) 16:07, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Doc Quintana (talk) 04:01, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Yes, I know
I know it is not common practice to delete messages from talk pages when they have been read. It is allowed and since the IP addresses I use have all been shared with others I think it makes sense in this case.
(No, I don't intend to register. No, I don't want to discuss why.)
--Anonymous (currently using 208.76.104.144 (talk) 06:39, 12 February 2010 (UTC) ).
- Sorry, I didn't know that. Cheers, Kayau Odyssey HUCK FINN to the lighthouse 06:51, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
Rollback Granted
Hey their Kayau,
I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback correctly, and for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. Mifter (talk) 15:16, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
Your signature...
... is annoying, can you please shorten it? Thanks in advance, Geschichte (talk) 11:30, 15 February 2010 (UTC) Yeah, I agree. KOF :) 13:18, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
- OK, if I must. Kayau Voting IS evil 02:55, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
Vandal? No, not me
When you spoke to me on my talk page User talk:KingofFilm, you said I was a vandal. You, however, didn't say what I vandalized. Please tell me and I'll see if I considered that vandalism, if I thought it was nothing, or if someone hacked into my account. KOF :) 13:18, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 February 2010
- News and notes: New Georgia Encyclopedia, BLPs, Ombudsmen, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Singapore
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News