User talk:Katieh5584/Archive 1

Archive 1

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar for you.

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Dear Katieh5584; Thank you for your most impressive dedication to the task of reverting vandalism! With kind regards; Patrick. ツ Pdebee. (talk) 14:59, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Keep up the good work, Katie. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:33, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Huggler Barnstar for you.

	The Huggler Barnstar
	Apparently my warning did not help, and as promised I now give you a barnstar! I would also recomend that you archive old discussions on your talk pag instead of just removing the, making old post more accesible. (t) Josve05a (c) 19:40, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop beating me to it! (Just kidding!)

STOP! This is the last warning you will receive for beating all of us. The next time you beat me to reverting vandalism, you will be awarded a barnstar and praised repeatedly without further notice. But keep up the great work at reverting vandals almost instantly! (t) Josve05a (c) 17:35, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree!! :) Wikipelli ^Talk 18:08, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well done, guys!

With kind regards;

Patrick. ツ Pdebee. (talk) 21:17, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Message from IP 131.107.159.27

How do I contact you through talk? there is no "talk" button to chat or etc... can I mail your or find some communications means? I've been trying to update a page for a friend, you keep calling it vandalism, when in fact it is not. How is posting accurate info a form of vandelism? sorry to put it in this post, but again, you don't make it easy to contact you.

Thanks, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.107.159.27 (talk • contribs) 20:45, 26 March 2014 (UTC) [reply]

Strongly-worded response

---ok, maybe this will work---- hey asshole! I am not vandalizing the fucking Hater page that you keep warning me about. Can you read? HAVE YOU NOT READ ANY OF THE INFO I AM SUPPLYING YOU? fuck it ban me! I don't care, the post update was for a friend, the original album artist, who deserves credit. Do some fact checking before calling that vandalism. I know you deal with a lot of spammers and vandals, and keeping them at bay is appreciated. This is not that case. Since the wiki polices you are siting specifically call for you to read the post, maybe you should do your job. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.107.159.27 (talk • contribs) 21:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Explanatory note: I have refactored this conversation. At first I thought the above was just a personal attack, but I think it's possible you missed their reply; they didn't sign, the bot didn't sign for them, and they didn't create a new section header. Meteor sandwich yum (talk) 21:21, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Message from IP 217.43.35.27

why u delete my edits? 217.43.35.27 (talk) 20:46, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Because they're plain vandalism - unless you expect us to believe a nuclear bomb was dropped on Staffordshire. BethNaught (talk) 21:33, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yatsenyuk

I wonder, why you are keep reverting this trash that Yatsenyuk has Jewish origins. I presume that Yatsenyuk knows better who were his parents. His site states that they are Ethnic Ukrainians. Please, stop helping Russian propaganda which found its roots to "Guardian". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.49.101.203 (talk) 23:12, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Message from IP 2601:B:480:619:B12F:5DF1:BF21:F970

KATIE, NO IDEA WHERE YOU EXPECTED ME TO REPLY, BY TO DELETE MY EXPLANATION OF THE BST WAS SIMPLY IGNORANT, AS THE TERM HAS BEEN AROUND FOR GENERATIONS. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:B:480:619:B12F:5DF1:BF21:F970 (talk) 23:14, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm an Arsenal fan so I am completely neutral to Norwich City, I don't see why you have removed it.

Edit Warring

Please refrain from edit warring. I believe it is against Wiki policy to repeatedly revert edits especially with no explanation. I also believe it is frowned upon to log out of your account to edit from an IP address.

92.8.29.253 (talk) 12:28, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Er... the edits referenced do not fit vandalism - what I see is simple edit warring. Simply stop, both of you, and take it to the talk page. Vsmith (talk) 12:55, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've restored the initial edit by the ip as it was not vandalism. Please visit talk:Marianne Faithfull and discuss. Note: I considered blocking both editors for edit warring, and I suggest you address the bit above about the other ip edits. Vsmith (talk) 13:43, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I forgot to Log back in, it won't happen again. Katieh5584 (talk) 13:55, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bayer Corporation question

I was attempting to make some corrections to the "Bayer" pages on Wikipedia. There exists a page called "Bayer Corporation" that redirects to "Bayer". There is also a page called "Bayer USA", which describes the US subsidiary of Bayer AG (Bayer Ag is described on the "Bayer" page). Unfortunately, Bayer USA is no longer the name that the US subsidiary uses, it now goes by Bayer Corporation (see http://www.bayerus.com/About/BayerInUS/BayerCorp.aspx). So... Bayer Corporation should not redirect to Bayer and Bayer USA should redirect to Bayer Corporation. Simple ;-). Littleboybrew (talk) 17:10, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To be more clear, the Bayer USA page should be moved to Bayer Corporation and the redirect there eliminated.

sorry

Noah movie

I've read the story in the bible and seen a preview screening of the film. and while it is a good show it has noting to do with the tail in the bible other than they used some names out of the book and built a boat. I don't remember any rock people or war lords with epic battles in the original noah story. Calling it Biblical is a load of bunk. It is a Non biblical Hollywood adaptation of the Noah story. Calling it biblical is just false advertisement. All I wanted to change was "the biblical" to "non biblical Hollywood adaptation" in the plot line. Here and I thought you here at wik were trying to be accurate not politically correct. Apparently I was mistaken. I'd really like to end this on a positive note and not be a jerk. So I do understand your reason and since you are a mod here you do what you feel is right. Just understand that I disagree. Later.

(talk page stalker) In this context I believe the word biblical means that it is the Noah from the Bible. It does not mean that the story follows the Bible. I have boldly removed "the biblical" as it is unnecessary in that place in the article. Feel free to disagree. BethNaught (talk) 17:26, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I am not going to press the issue. You didn't agree with my total edit but you did make a decision and edit the post yourself. I thank you for understanding my edit if not agreeing with it and I will bugger off now. :)

Saint Mary's University legacy. I did cite my sources at the bottom near the insert section.

I feel I'm getting censored. I cited my sources and you removed my revisions. Do you have a personal bias in this legacy. PeterMcGuigan 140.184.82.27 (talk) 18:09, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Katie H - how do we remove anything from our sandbox? I'm trying to re-create the post for a user.

I'm afraid I don't know how to reply to your message about editing the opium article. I was removing 2 photographs that are actually not of what the description says they are. Within seconds you had put back, before I had a chance to explain in the talk section of the article. Pleae be a little more patient. Thank you.

Thanks, from the Pararescue Community

Thanks for helping us keep the vandals from adding fake info to our page! Larry Dumlao, USAF Pararescue, 1983-2004 Heavydpj (talk) 18:30, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi what was the change? there is a person who is changing stuff in the Karan Singh Grover page for no apparent reason, and the changes are not right, wondering if you could help me? He keeps on adding qubool hai to his biography when it can easily come under his work! He is not letting me do the necessary changes!

Hello I would like to delete the Qubool Hai bit from the biography section, as that is already listed under his work

why wont you let me edit it?

why????

Katie, It was not a trial, since we are using the same brand name for different use, it's important that people who get into the Pango page will be redirected to the Pango Mobile Parking web-site in case they are looking for Pango for parking. Thanks, Dani — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.249.151.61 (talk) 17:42, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't vandalize the article ,I just highlight the important and interesting points of the article so that the reader can take interest on the article. (Vivekanand Raizada)

       — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.58.96.9 (talk) 17:56, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Jonathan Winters

Mr. Winters' cause of death being 'natural' is sourced in Reference 34. Note sure why cause isn't showing up on the page except that this article uses "Infobox comedian' which does not seem to have a 'cause of death' parameter. Shearonink (talk) 19:03, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for repeating what Mike V posted above, didn't notice that until after I hit 'Save'. Shearonink (talk) 19:05, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Katie

Why won't u let me edit anything I think is importantl. There's no point for a edit button if we can't use it silly — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.103.206.224 (talk) 20:22, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I am wondering why you would not include in bibliography on Audubon my award winning book. The NYHS link is here. please add to bibliography:

Olson, Roberta J.M. (2012). "Audubon's Aviary: The Original Watercolors for 'The Birds of America.'" New York: Skira/Rizzoli and the New-York Historical Society.

Not that it means anything as this is a scholarly book, but I am a frequent user and contributor to Wikipedia.

Roberta Olson rolson@nyhistory.org — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.245.126.201 (talk) 20:36, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

So sorry I am really a rookie and was attempting to add the magazine Absolute Underground.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by DJ ALPEROVITZ (talk • contribs) 21:30, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Use of Huggle

Hi,

It appears from your recent edits (1, 2, 3) that you are not using the Huggle tool for its intended use. Huggle is strictly for reverting vandalism edits only. Jonathan Winter's passing as being due to natural causes was already listed in the death subsection of the article and was already properly sourced with this reference. Please be more careful with the use of Huggle, as performing automated edits in such a fashion can lead to revocation of the tools or blocks for edit warring. Please let me know if you have any questions or if I can be of any help. Mike V • Talk 18:58, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, that was a mistake, it won't happen again.Katieh5584 (talk) 10:17, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Editing

Hello, Katie. I'm sorry to bother you. I've been trying to edit articles but you keep telling me that my edits are unsourced, even when I add sources. I am only trying to correct the information. I was wondering, what would count as an acceptable source when editing? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ParallelLights (talk • contribs) 22:32, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

HI. Sorry if my post didn't seem constructive, but it was. Ted Mosby is from there. 97.127.67.194 (talk) 22:53, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi for this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karan_Singh_Grover

The last sentence for KSG'S biography is unneeded! As KSG has done a lot more work, and only qubool hai is mentioned? why so? in addition the article should also include his Birthday! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nkapoor21 (talk • contribs) 15:01, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Editing CASA

Hello Katieh5584,

I thought I did put a reason in the second time I tried to edit the page. The reason I was editing it is that I am Liam Arbuckle and I did not resign because of any wrong doing. I could have in fact stayed onto finish my contract but the environment was no longer a positive one to be in. The student newspaper who printed that story has in fact taken that story down as it had no basis in fact. I hope you can understand why I am trying to edit that as it was recently brought to my attention that it had wrong information in it.203.142.174.35 (talk) 16:08, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Editing 1974

Hello, you seem to have reversed my edits, stating they were a test? They were not a test, I was making actual edits to the page. Thank you. 76.184.87.209 (talk) 16:56, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Princess Beatrice was born in 1988, not 1974 as per the Duke of York's website.Katieh5584 (talk) 16:57, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alonzo Elliot is buried at Pine Grove Cemetery in Manchester NEW HAMPSHIRE not CT — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:558:6017:57:2528:FF6D:5B9D:8B74 (talk) 17:23, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew melville hall

I did not believe there would be a need for a citation as, in fact, I am a current resident and student of St Andrews University. I can honestly say that I speak on behalf of all of my fellow students in saying it is a much-loved building in the local community and I feel the current statement is not only incorrect, but an unjust representation of our proud town.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.251.240.52 (talk) 18:30, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

PVCC edit

Christian Weston Chandler is the most well known person to have matriculated from Piedmont Valley Community College. Removing him off of the page is an affront to all all that Wikipedia stands for; the truth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.246.33.77 (talk) 20:35, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

He's not notable enough.Katieh5584 (talk) 20:38, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not notable enough? He has an entire encyclopedia devoted to him! sonichu.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.246.33.77 (talk) 20:47, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alastair Campell

Hi, you recently messaged me to say you've removed an update I added to the Alastair Campbell wikipedia article. However, I think it adds value to the wealth of information available on the page and the sentence I added was absolutely correct - all evidence can be found in this interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D6-Y8dDzvhI. Hope you'll be kind enough to re-add my update and cite the interview if you wish. Cheers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.149.239.236 (talk) 21:14, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mistakes Happens

I'm sorry about that edit on Sgt. pepper's lonely hearts club band! It's just that I'm new to this whole editing! Sorry about that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.179.226.64 (talk) 22:09, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Katieh,

I'm trying to edit a page that was obviously trolled. Can you stop reverting/reporting as I'm in the middle of trying to fix it? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Catfish10 (talk • contribs) 22:11, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"graduated high school"

Is not proper English. You graduate from high school. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.36.237.164 (talk) 05:25, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"hello there"

Hello there, sorry for the abuse you suffered from the IP address the other day - my teenage nephew thought it prudent to abuse my computer. I hope he didn't upset you too much. Kind regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.1.93.26 (talk) 18:33, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No, problem.Katieh5584 (talk) 19:38, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mistakes happen 2

I'll make sure I be careful next time I edit! It would help If I sign up for sure but I'll learn to be careful! Friends? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.179.226.64 (talk) 22:13, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, no problem.Katieh5584 (talk) 19:39, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Limmy Edits

The edits made here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limmy under the career tab 'Berates fans for using bad grammar' are correct. Limmy himself has even joked about this is in the past on his web chats.

West Brit

I posted an alteration to a comment on the page of Mr Graves, the comment that he was an ' Irishman '. It's misleading to fail to differentiate between an Irish man and someone who is on Irish shores as part of an Empirical regime which claims ownership over Irish lands, an Empirical regime which engineers a Malthusian population experiment which results in the displacement and starvation ( aka ethnic cleansing ) of millions of real Irish men, women and children. In that sense, my alteration IS constructive in that it helps the reader to distinguish between an Irish man on Irish shores and a British man on Irish shores as part of a collonial expedition ( West Brit ). I would not expect a wiki mod to appreciate the importance of the point being made but thought I'd waste my time informing you anyhow.

wtf Nipples#In_male_mammals link in Masculinity

so yea its that i vandalize wiki i share my view and make a link i think relevant

idk what the problem with this is

hi

hi idk what wikipedia is someone tell mme

I see that you edited my edit on The Dandy

I'm very sorry about not giving a reliable source about The Dandy. But the Dandy did tell me on their facebook page that the Digital Dandy will return. I will make sure this doesn't happen again! :)

I see that you edited my edit on The Dandy

I'm very sorry about not giving a reliable source about The Dandy. But the Dandy did tell me on their facebook page that the Digital Dandy will return. I will make sure this doesn't happen again! :)

"Fit" Finlay

if you are to look to Finlay's other ring names, the very first one is "Fit Finlay." I ask you to not remove my next edit. Thanks

User:EricaBrownEntertainment

Hello, Katie. My name is Gloria, and I do not have a wiki account, but I am trying to edit an article about "Erica Brown" that was started by my colleague, Stacey. She and I are afraid that we are doing this whole wiki thing incorrectly. We think maybe the editors who have rejected our article believe that we are Erica Brown, but we are not. We are trying to make a legitimate entry about a well-known musician in the Denver area that we both know personally. Maybe we should not have named our sandbox "EricaBrownEntertainment" -- see it at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ericabrownentertainment/sandbox. Apparently everyone thinks this is a conflict of interest. We are new to wikipedia, and greatly confused, so we are thinking we should delete everything and start over again. Can you advise? Thank you for your help.

denizli

hi,

i just wanted to remove the names of some ordinary athletes listed under the notable natives content. i don't know why they were added in the first place. i think someone was into inflating that list. these names don't fit into being "notable". believe me, i am from the area.

Problem with the current content and source

The current information has some severe irregularities that has to be corrected since this represents all the people sharing this surname.

Tunnel of Love Expess tour

Hello I am not trying to start some argument I just had a good article regarding the Radrenbahn Weissensee Concert. Here is the link : http://thesciencebookstore.com/2009/05/crowds-series-expectations/ The article "Crowds Series: Berlin Expectations. Zeppelin 1909 vs. Springsteen 1988" and the text. Perhaps a similar sized crowd (some estimates putting the number at a million) showed up to listen to Bruce Springsteen perform in East Berlin in 1988. I have no idea what the East German government was thinking when they allowed him to perform. Listening to hundreds of thousands of people singing along to "Born in the USA" is monumental and very emotional–the video stays like that the whole way through, but the crowd really seems to find its voice at 2:52.

Everyone nows that there were a whole lot more people than 160 000 there. Read Erik Kirchbaums book "Rocking the wall" he states that there were between 300 000 to 500 000 people there based on various souces and interviews. They could not report that many people because the Eastgerman government had only allowed 160 000 people.But at lest the double entered and the organisers had to take away the gates so people would not hurt themseves while running into the ground without tickets.

Martin Demichelis

Hi Keith, Thank you for your message. It is a well known fact that Martin Demichelis has been reportedly simultaneously nicknamed 'athletically challenged' and 'better than Lionel Messi' as well as 'almost as good as Heskey' among his Manchester City teammates. I regarded this a truly substantial achievement and felt it was worthy of a mention on his Wikipedia page. However, if this does violate the terms and conditions of Wikipedia, then I apologize to both you and the mighty Martin Demichelis! Thank you for your time, Have a lovely day :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:630:53:F0:49A4:AFA7:289E:E43E (talk) 11:34, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Serena Williams.

Serena Williams is still continuing to Dominate in her 20th year to I don’t see why that information would be misleading? It’s not my personal opinion, its fact. If you have a lo of knowledge on the WTA tour and think differently, you are clearly mistaken as she is still the most dominant player on the tour by some margin. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.103.63.154 (talk) 12:03, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hawk Nelson

Check Hawk Nelson's Facebook page and sorta scroll their history. It says on there.

You need to add the source to the page, but Facebook isn't a reliable source. Katieh5584 (talk) 13:11, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My comment

I disagree I think my addition was very constructive. Kudos on the quick edit, that was impressive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.167.127.23 (talk) 13:29, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

about Spring Love (Come Back to Me)

the rhythm used by the singer "MC Fornalha" in his cover is funk carioca, see a video here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aSdpN9txdDg — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.34.71.211 (talk) 16:31, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sayyid Qutb edit

I'd like this edit to remain because I'm not sure that Sayyid Qutb's view of Greeley, CO should be listed alongside his name as though that is the defining characteristic of his importance. The section of the source that was block copied into the references was removed so that readers can view the original article in its entirety. The original article uses that passage as an example of Qutb's conservative views. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Twfds (talk • contribs) 17:55, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

why aren't u warning the person who is making the unnecessary changes? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nkapoor21 (talk • contribs) 17:58, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mo Shariff

Hi, a number of sources list Shariff as being born in Newham rather than Burundi. The ever-reliable Find My Past lists an Abdulla Mohamed Sharif as being born in Newham in 1993, a very similar name to the one registered with the Premier League (cited on the page). Based on this, I would say it is too much of a coincidence and that he was probably born in Newham rather than Burundi. Given that pretty much every source lists him as English too, I think it is most likely that the QPR website is wrong on this one. 18:31, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

The content of electronic cigarette liquid

Polyethylene glycol (PEG) was used in electronic cigarette liquid at the time of their birth, but has not been a component in any major eliquid brands for more than a decade. The claim that eliquid generally contains PEG is outdated worldwide by 10-15 years and has NEVER been true inside the United States. Thus, since this information is entirely false in the major consumers of electronic cigarettes, and outdated by approximately the life of wikipedia worldwide, it should be removed or at least edited to clearly indicate that it is not currently accurate. I am in the process of compiling my sources and will word the edit better and remove the mention of fear mongering. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.252.72.21 (talk) 19:44, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete page

I want to delete this page to make a new one — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aryannagarber (talk • contribs) 19:53, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the information from the Last Changes page because some of it was false

The written article was mainly from the hater's of How I Met Your Mother so I was obliged to change it,I must request you to not restore the old content.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.98.118.213 (talk) 20:00, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

National Dance Company Wales

Hi Katieh5584. The NDCWales entry is now about 3 years out of date, and has led to some unfortunate misunderstandings. Every section does need to be updated, but for today it is the staff list and list of work that we do. DavidNDCWales (talk) 20:57, 1 April 2014 (UTC) DavidNDCWales[reply]

Makkah and Madinah

There are two edit I made with Mosques. I changed "Mecca" to the correct spelling "Makkah" because the two meanings are very, very different and because it's the right way. And I also changed "Medina" to the correct spelling "Madinah". I simply made these changes because that's the way Muslims spell them and that's how they should be pronounced. :)

75.72.37.79 (talk) 21:11, 1 April 2014 (UTC)Zain[reply]

This is the English Wikipedia, so we use English spellings. Katieh5584 (talk) 21:13, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tommy Malone

It was a mistake when I blanked the page on an edit, sorry I am new to Wikipedia. I had originally added information to the Tommy Malone page as requested by Tommy Malone, I work for the record label M.C. Records, which he is signed to. The other edit I did today was to revert the Tommy Malone page back to this edit 17:09, 19 March 2014 because of this edit, 21:51, 23 March 2014‎ Bearcat. Bearcat claims this is a promotional profile in which it is actually an informational profile for the musical artist Tommy Malone. I am not sure why they cleared all of the content I added, if there are certain sections/content that should not be included I will gladly remove them. If you could help me with this page and getting the content back I would appreciate it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michellem024 (talk • contribs)

delete page

I want to delete this page to make a new one

22 Female Kottayam

Hi, this is about the reversion of the word 'penectomises' to 'castrates' in plot summary. In the movie, Tessa informs Cyril that she has "surgically removed [his] male organ." Later she also says that "until now, you have only known pleasure through it; now you will know pain". It is clear that she has removed his penis not his testicles. Since castration(removal of testes) and penectomy(removal of penis) are widely different medical procedures, in the interest of factual accuracy, I request you to let the change remain. Kakku023 (talk) 12:32, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

it seems the conversion to christianity page was already tampered with. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.188.46.55 (talk) 12:32, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

i'm afraid i do not follow. Kakku023 (talk) 04:44, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Talbot

Swim coach Scott Talbot prefers to known as Scott Talbot not Scott Talbot-Cameron — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.158.48.19 (talk) 12:38, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New Fathers 4 Justice

New to this. Have been requested to point out that New Fathers 4 Justice is not affialated to the official group so was trying to edit

You can't edit on behalf of an organization, as it's against Wikipedia rules.Katieh5584 (talk) 12:53, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks I'm only 14 so yeah

A kitten for you!

thanks for that

Bossman3423 (talk) 13:20, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

UCS - University College School

Hi Katieh

You have removed a reference to Finkelstein in UCS page. Can you clarify why? He is current, notable, and UCS old boy.

Regards

If he's that notable create an article for him.Katieh5584 (talk) 13:33, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

John Birch Society Edit by Katie

Hi Katieh,

A few weeks ago you deleted two sentences I added to the JBS page and sent me the nice note immediately below. I responded to your edit very quickly, but never got a reply back. Yesterday I re-posted one of the two sentences that you deleted, but it was quickly deleted again. I don't know if it was you again or not. I do not want to be involved in an editing war, but I do expect at least an attempt from whoever deletes what I post to weigh my thoughts and respond to defend their action. Given your mature, friendly attitude on this page and the fact that I don't see my first reply to you here, I assume I made a mistake and you never saw it because I am just getting familiar with joining the talking/editing discussions and stumbling through the process. (In particular I don't know how to insert footnotes or even insert text near an existing footnote, which makes editing a challenge for me.) Anyway, here's your first note with my original response underneath:

Hello, I'm Katieh5584. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to John Birch Society seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Katieh5584 (talk) 19:01, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi Katieh, I'm Brian. I respect your view but would appreciate you considering my response to it and taking the time to reply with more thoughts. There are lots of reasons to criticize the society, but there are lots of lies spread about it as well. I understand why they are considered a political advocacy group and won’t quibble with that edit you made - they definitely want to affect the political process. That said, they do not endorse parties or candidates, they focus on educating people about the Constitution and their interpretation of it and history. I think it would be fair, neutral, and helpful for the public to know that.

I do not understand why you deleted my note that, while they are considered radical right by some, they often agree with liberals and the even more progressive left, is not fair, neutral, and helpful for the public. When most people think of the "radical right" they instinctively think of the religious right and Republican Party. Yet the JBS has been consistently and vehemently critical the GOP on foreign policy and corporate welfare for decades, and their suggestions are to move towards the center, i.e. our Constitution, not the radical right. Would providing a long list of citations make a difference, or do you have another perspective that you can help me to understand?

It is my firm conviction that the mainstream politicians on both halves of the political coin have some strong, tangible differences, but generally agree that they don't want to rock the boat and stem the flow of power and money to DC, where they both feed at the trough. It seems obvious to me that both benefit by keeping average Americans divided and conquered. Like me, the JBS actually respects principled socialist people such as Bernie Sanders and Dennis Kucinich and agrees with them about many problems even though they disagree strongly about how to resolve them. Creating an artificial box called the "radical right" seems to prevent the building of the bridges we need to broker the practical, common sense political compromises that I personally have devoted my life to.

For the record, if forced to use the artificial, flat, "right vs left" political labels, the JBS is more right wing than left because of gay marriage and abortion, but on the vast majority of issues they stand with me on the high moral and intellectual high ground here in the Constitutional center. I’d prefer to move to the more dynamic and useful political map used here: http://theadvocates.org/quiz/quiz.php (Disclaimer: the questions seem to be designed to produce a high % of libertarian answers; I’d like to see a much longer list.)

Best, Brian — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.189.166.173 (talk) 14:17, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:UAA

Hi Katieh5584. I fixed a report you submitted at Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention. I think you mistakenly copied the nowiki tags in your submission, which made it display as raw code. Anyway, it's fixed now. If you haven't got Twinkle installed, I highly recommend it. It makes article tagging, nominating for WP:SPEEDY and reporting to UAA and other places so much faster and easier! --Drm310 (talk) 15:16, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks.Katieh5584 (talk) 15:37, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

7 Days to Die

Well done on reverting all the vandalism at 7 Days to Die. I'm surprised it went on as long as it did with out a block being implemented until now. Mkdw ^talk 15:57, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MistyAsh

This is a confirmed sock of Smauritius. We are currently awaiting a block. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 16:43, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks.Katieh5584 (talk) 16:43, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Was that for me?

Let me know if you intended to put that warning in my page really... A m i t 웃 19:59, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No, I didn't. Sorry about that.Katieh5584 (talk) 20:01, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No issues, I know it happens with the tools, but was still making sure. A m i t 웃 20:01, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dissident republicans

The page states that eirigi and RNU seek a united Ireland through peaceful means. This is a well known LIE. RNU is well known for is association with violent dissidents, and members of eirigi have recently been found guilty and convicted of weapons, ammunition and explosives charges. I understand how me edit could be seen as biased. But at least edit the page to reflect the reality than RNU and eirigi are violent dissidents.

From a pro-ceasefire republican. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.24.57.95 (talk) 20:05, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Milkweed Editions page

Hello, I just received this message from you: "This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Milkweed Editions." My edit was that I changed the wording from one of my own sentences I wrote to make it less promotional, as was requested, and as is referenced in the flag on top of the page. Please advise. Satellitewalls (talk) 20:46, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

hi

hi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnsmith isweird (talk • contribs) 20:55, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

CCBC

Hello, You removed the most recent edits due to objectivity. The edits were not yet completed before you removed them however. We were in the process of making it sound more neutral when you removed the text. Please advise what parts made it not neutral enough in your opinion — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.85.236.228 (talk) 21:19, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You need to read WP:COI. Katieh5584 (talk) 21:21, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are right!

Hey Katieh5584, you were right in making the change, I was just trying out something with wiki. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.219.127.82 (talk) 12:39, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

i want to remove my user

i want to remove my user how to do? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kyriakosano (talk • contribs) 12:52, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Siege of Charleston

There is, at least on my reading of this page, a duplicate paragraph in the first section. Do you see it?

Dacama (talk) 13:17, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I do. That revert was a mistake. Sorry.Katieh5584 (talk) 13:18, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can I delete it?

Yes, go ahead.Katieh5584 (talk) 13:24, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User talk:Martinshone

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User talk:Martinshone, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Theroadislong (talk) 13:32, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Are you able to block this ip?

If you are able to block this ip from editing (im assuming you are a moderator), you should do so, as this is a school computer and i have recieved multiple messages that this ip has vandalized wikipedia. So, if you can, stop this computer from editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.180.209.66 (talk) 13:35, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea - there's never been anything but vandalism from here. I've blocked it for a year. —SMALL JIM 13:40, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.

Wikipedia is an intriguing mystery to this user, who wondered, "When edits are made by a person offering counter information, is there a volunteer over sight committee in place to review such edits?" Thank you for your deletion. Though I can confirm the veracity of the statements made--somewhat in jest--as a first-hand witness, I actually believed that comments could never be posted without prior registration. Respectfully,

98.218.12.166 (talk) 16:36, 3 April 2014 (UTC)Elga[reply]

How can u believe in those wrong narrated Hadiths also i have given you enough sources: [Al-Tabi'qaat Al-Kobra le Ibn Sa`d, Vol.7, Pg.59]. Tahdheeb al asma of Nawawi Vol.2 Page 329 a true sources and the fact that If it would be true,when Aisha would have been 6-9Years old when she was married by the Prophet, how old was she when she was engaged to Jubayr ibn Mut'im? 3-4years of age old?Like it is mentioned before?Please anwer Me how can someone believe in false narrations?Dont delete my edits! Greetings Moe

A kitten for you!

I would Love if you would gave me the chance to post the truth only somehow!

MoAzrael (talk) 17:54, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not allowing to remove rediraction from [Mera Sultan]

Removing redirection from page [Mera Sultan]

To remove this link was not incorrect or mistake because article [Mera Sultan] should exist as a separate Article from [Mehtesem Yuzil].The redirection also confuses Pakistani readers about real link between 2 articles.[Mera Sultan] is Urdu dubbed drama version of drama [Mehtesem Yuzil]^[1] their should be a separate page of Mera sultan because Article Mehtesem Yuzil contains certain Turkish words which limits the reader knowledge about characters which name are changed in mera sultan^[2].Article Mehtesem Yuzil also contain many different information from Mera Sultan such as names of characters and it also contained the edited scene plots;A separate page for this drama will let Pakistani reader enjoy to read the information about schedule,present season and ongoing plot of drama and will also provide Pakistani public review regard article.So to welcome wikipedia article to make a separate page i removed this redirection if my act was suitable so please allow me to do so by informing me.

Question

Why are you saying i am being disruptive? Have you heard of a deletion template, it is used to propose article deletions. I put it on the article because the article was too short and the person doesn't seem to be notable. One more thing and I am going to have to inform the administrators. Doctornickel (talk) 18:58, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A PROD may be removed at anytime if an editor does not think it is needed. Propose a Speedy or an XFD if you believe the page need to be deleted.TheMesquito (talk) 19:04, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if i have attacked or disturbed you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by MoAzrael (talk • contribs) 19:10, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You placed a deletion template on Dolly Parton, saying she wasn't notable.Katieh5584 (talk) 19:02, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please can you Help me with this to can edit it correctly to Wikipedia?

Sorry again for my bad english

The Bakhris narrated that the Prophet married Aisha ,while she was between 6 or 9 years old(as they claim).It is recommended not to believe in the creditibility of this Narration from the Sahih al Bukhari[24],because if it is narrated that she was already betrothed to Jubayr ibn Mut'im before the marriage with the Prophet of Islam.How old was she,when she was engaged by Jubayr ibn Mut'im then?3-4Years of age?And if we factor in the date in which she died, and her age we can conclude that she was around the age of 20, because her marriage to the Prophet was before the Hijrah.[Refer to Al-Ma`rif le Ibn Qutayba, Pg. 59] [25]. Ibn Hajr has also narrated, from Abi Na`eem about 'Asma bint Abu Bakr -- the sister of Aisha -- that was born 27 years before the Hijra of the Holy Prophet.This would mean that Aisha was about 20 years old, when the Messenger of Allah married her (since it has been narrated that 'Asma is about 10 years older then Aisha)[Refer to Al-`Esabi le Ibn Hajr, Vol. 8, Pg. 15] [26]. From these sources we can conclude that the Prophet had married Aisha and she had already passed the age of puberty, and maturity.Meaning she was not a child at the age of 6 or 9 as she claims in the narrations present.When the Messenger of Allah married Aisha, Abu Bakr said: I was about to marry her to Jubyar son of Mut'im, let me ask them for permission. He asked permission from them, and divorced Aisha from Jubayr ibn Mut'im, and the Messenger of Allah then married her.[Al-Tabi'qaat Al-Kobra le Ibn Sa`d, Vol.7, Pg.59]. [27]. So, from this we can see that Aisha was married (engaged), and then she divorced then married again (from the Messenger of Allah). This also shows us that she did reach an age of maturity, and she had passed puberty, and that she was not a child. Looking at the narrations, Abu Bakr said that 'He gave her to Jubyar', and at the time of Jahilliyyah, they would not wait for intercourse if they were married, for it would be an act done.If we look at Aisha's biography we see she had innovated in her life time,it is to notice that she was never patient meaning it is possible to expect from Aisha that she did lose her virginity. In conclusion,that she married the Prophet while she was not a virgin, by looking at verses of the Holy Qur'an whilst marrying the Prophet. Some sources prove that Aisha was 19-20 Years Old,when the Prophet married her.Tahdheeb al asma of Nawawi Vol.2 Page 329 [28]Biography of Asma daughter of Abu Bakr Sister of Aisha.Asma was 10 Years older then Aisha and Hafeez Abi Na'eeem says:Asma was born 27 Years before the Migration of the Messenger of Allah.According to this and other sources,Asma the older Sister was 10 Years older then Aisha,Asma was born 27 Years before the migration of the Hijra,so Aisha was 17 Years old in the Year of the Migration.Aisha were Married from the Prophet in the second Year of the Migration,when she was about 20 Years old. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MoAzrael (talk • contribs) 19:01, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Doctornickel (talk) 19:06, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I attempted to edit the page "Joel Selwood" in order to make the page readable. I removed content not because I'm a vandal but because the page needs editing. The current page is ridiculously long, convoluted and unwieldly. It is full of unnecessary detail and padding. It is written more in the style of a fan club shrine than as an objective encyclopaedic page. I would appreciate if you could read the restored page and then compare it with my final edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.161.41.19 (talk) 19:33, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I was only trying to see what the little edit button thing did because I barely use Wikipedia. I now know what it does so sorry I didn't mean to cause any big issues with the page. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.156.76.195 (talk) 19:45, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yom kippur edit.

I tried putting a reason but everytime i messed up the page view, i have links for the Refs, cuz the result of the war is extremly wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ali Osama (talk • contribs) 20:20, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistan as a nation-state

Hi Katieh. I'm not sure of how to use this, so I'm hoping that I'm sending you a message in the right place. The reason I removed Pakistan from the list is because it is not considered to be a nation state from any angle. The country was created on the basis of the population being predominantly Muslim and that is the ONLY thing that binds them. It is one of the most culturally, ethnically, economically and linguistically diverse states on earth and it is just that; not a nation. There are barely any common cultural values and drastically varied historical heritage. Urdu is an amalgamation of various regional languages and is enforced upon the country, with many still preferring to speak their regional languages over it. Lastly, it is very foolish to think that Pakistanis have joint political, strategic and economic interests. The ones on the east are too caught up with posing India to be Lucifer and furthering their own economic and political interests as they make up the majority. The ones in the west have been wanting to separate since partition. The ones in the north-west are caught up in a wave of militancy and religious extremism, while the ones in the north are forgotten. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.44.154.187 (talk) 20:44, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No

I ment to make the changes I made on the Aztec page I noticed the page said basalts so I changed it to basalt because that is what the Aztec Sun Stone is made of. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.3.124.243 (talk) 21:38, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

removal of section

Sorry, I thought I left a message explaining why I removed the "personal" section. Young's personal life is of no importance and should not be included. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.87.140.221 (talk) 23:10, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Katieh can you please add this somehow to Prophet Mohammads Wifes under the narrative: Aisha bint abu Bakr ?I didnt understand everything whats important to Post this truth as real narrative here on Wikipedia ,but i think that it deserves to be be Posted,Sorry for my bad English Katieh!

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	I seem to have dealt with a whole bunch of AIV reports from you today, all of them good calls. Nice Huggling! Yunshui 雲‍水 15:00, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you!

Since you already got a barnstar for your vandal reverting today, I'll have to settle for just giving you some food. Nice job at beating me to quite a few vandals! RA0808 ^talk _contribs 17:45, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.Katieh5584 (talk) 17:46, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar

I've seen you around a lot recently. I figured I'd get back to my old self and start dishing out barnstars again! Oh... don't be fooled by the lack of, um, "detail" on this thing. This barnstar was created by both an experienced vandal fighter and a real-life vandal - and I assure you the vandal was wasted, er, "dealt with appropriately". Whatever, here you go! K6ka (talk | contribs) 11:08, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.Katieh5584 (talk) 17:47, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar

During the past few days i just keep running into your username for hours on end. I've seen it pop up during Huggle patrol, at AIV, UAA... It has actually been quite a while since i saw a specific username pop into view so often.

Seeing your talk page i am not the only editor who's recently been impressed by your excellent work and somehow that does not surprise me. Either way, another star is definably well deserved! Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 13:32, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ThanksKatieh5584 (talk) 13:53, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine. I corrected the change after I made it. Had the titles of two films mixed up in my head, and realized it after the fact. But thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.96.179.135 (talk) 13:34, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

hi you reversed my Dersingham edit

( He (Phil Collins) does not nor ever has had a home in Dersingham) that info was originally added by someone who lives in the village as a joke and still stands - it is very annoying to the people who live there and know it is not true. How does one get this removed - unfortunatley all the other info on the web referring to this stem from your page! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.176.105.135 (talk) 14:13, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have just Googled Phil Collins and Dersingham and there is enough evidence to suggest that he does own a house there. Katieh5584 (talk) 14:19, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Grace Mang page

Hi, I recently discovered this page, and I'm concerned that it was prepared by a stalker from my university days at University of Sydney. There was alot of personal information mixed with my work at International Rivers. I wonder if I have any recourse I have to have the page deleted. I don't believe I am a notable figure of any sort, at the very least it is only transitory because of my current position. Appreciate any comments you may have. Feel free to contact me on my email at grace@internationalrivers.org. Kind regards, Grace — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.126.93.8 (talk) 11:11, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) I have declined a G10 speedy and a PROD on this article, and will reply shortly on the IP's talk page referring them to WP:BLP/H. JohnCD (talk) 15:06, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks.Katieh5584 (talk) 15:07, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

This is a constructive edit, as map. Please no revert my edit, please. It's an distrital conflict. Regards, 201.240.32.171 (talk) 14:56, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please DON'T revert my edit, in Santiago de Surco. This is constructive. 201.240.32.171 (talk) 14:58, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Again? I will revert if you follow, please reply me: Why revert? There are no vandalism. 190.232.193.24 (talk) 15:07, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't appear at first glance to be vandalism. Also please see [[1]] you weren't notified it appears. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 15:54, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted it because the previous map and information was correct. I can't find any sources for the IP's claims.Katieh5584 (talk) 16:11, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Removed my external link

Please explain what is the difference between my link you removed and the CodeBunk-Link a few lines above, you did not remove. I don't understand.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.32.64.180 (talk) 15:54, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I removed your link because it appeared to be spam and I didn't see the other link.Katieh5584 (talk) 19:04, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Error fixed on Exxon Valdez page

The word "idea" was spelled as "i dea" with a space. That was the only change and correction I made. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.189.120.50 (talk) 19:10, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I can't see your IP on the page history.Katieh5584 (talk) 19:12, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Until There's A Cure

I made the changes because the logo/trademark is a capital A....all of the entries had a lower case a Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.6.2.147 (talk) 20:07, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for removing all the vandalism on the 7 Days to Die wiki page. I usually keep an eye on the page but haven't for a while, so thanks. LaimWMcKenzie (talk) 00:10, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No problem.Katieh5584 (talk) 11:02, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re: April 2014 (regarding modifications in Heartbreaker (Dionne Warwick album))

Katieh5584, I think you did a mistake in restoring the contents. I removed stuff which had already gained a main article (The Heartbreaker Demos), being therefore redundant repeat it all in an umbrella article (Heartbreaker (Dionne Warwick album)). Sorry, anyway, have I forgotten to explain my changes in the article. I ask you to undo your restoration. Thank you. 200.244.52.21 (talk) 22:34, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that you also reverted editions on Guilty (Barbra Streisand album). The explanation to that changes is the same of above. There is redundant content from The Guilty Demos.

Speedy deletion declined: A New House

Hello Katieh5584, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of A New House, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Deacon Blue are a well-known musical act and have had a number of Top 10 albums and singles. This article most certainly is not a WP:A9 candidate. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 12:46, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

who r u?

r u a malaysian?

I'm another user and no I'm not Malaysian.Katieh5584 (talk) 13:14, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

reversion of edit to "shock troop" page

I realize my correction of the article was not supported by citation (neither were his incorrect assertions), since the information is common knowledge among military analysts and I genuinely do not recall where I first heard/read it. That was why I did not delete his erroneous section, but simply added the correct information so that someone more familiar with wiki-standard form and with the time and desire to find some citations on the internet could integrate my post with his to create a better article. Perhaps you could do that rather than simply delete my corrections and leave his errors intact. 2602:30A:2EA3:60F0:D897:3A43:D792:7A1B (talk) 13:28, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You should have written your opinion of the article on the talkpage.Katieh5584 (talk) 13:30, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kid Rock

He was one kid. He has no daughter, if you have the language changed on that link,the daughter is the chicks current boyfriend. Kid Rock has one kid with Kelly Russell. Robert James Junior born in 1994. He thought he had a daughter but that was not his kid in 1992 names Liberty. Listen to the song Black Chick,White Guy or Single Father its well documented. Vandalism for removing an edit, dumb. He has one kid ,he his 20, attends Belmont in Tennessee and is a rapper just like daddy started out. He has opened for daddy and the rapper Yelawolf. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.33.102.192 (talk) 17:20, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

You send me a message about conflict of interests. It is very clear that I have a definite point of view, but not a conflict of interest. I have spend 14 years working on Bacula, only to see the Bacula Wikipedia page "defaced" by propaganda for Bareos, who do have a strong conflict of interest. I would appreciate it very much if you would carefully read what I consider non-appropriate matterial that Maik Aussendorf has been putting on the Bacula wikipedia page -- perhaps in better wikipedia terminology it should be called spam. They forked the Bacula project and now go to every public place they can and put negative comments about Bacula. If you actually read what they wrote rather than fixing on the fact that I removed their inappropriate comments and will continue to do so, you will understand that the matterial they added is negative and is not at all a help to wikipedia. If they have or had a Bareos wikipedia page, I would never dream of defacing it with Bacula propaganda, so all I ask is to be left alone. KernSibbald (talk) 19:45, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't see what happened in between, but the last undo you did puts back text that is closer to being neutral but is still incorrect. It essentially implies that Bacula is not 100% free, which is untrue. I see that in the last few minutes, what you put back (better than before) was removed, then the whole slanderous material was put back again. KernSibbald (talk) 21:31, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to the Edward Ka-spel page

Constructive or not, I've heard many questions about the artists personal life. After looking into it and researching, I added what was found. Just because you don't find it constructive, doesn't mean it isn't or shouldn't be added. The truth is ugly sometimes and fan or not, you have to deal with it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.35.18.135 (talk) 02:49, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://jang.com.pk/thenews/jun2013-weekly/nos-23-06-2013/instep/article4.asp

[2] ttp://www.thefridaytimes.com/beta3/tft/article.php?issue=20130809&page=16

[1]

[2]