User talk:Kashifpisces

The dawood group

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The dawood group, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Dawood Group of Companies. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Wikipedia:Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:56, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When i was creating a dawood group page i have seen another page which was dawood group of companies, this page has been modified accidently because wikipedia was not allowing me to create a page dawood group. Dawood Group of companies is totally different sector from The Dawood Group. Dawood Group is in Fertilizer, Insurance, Textiles, Not for Profit organizations. so this was duplicated mistakenly.

Proposed deletion of Dawood group

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Dawood group, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Borderline advertising article. Quick search reveals some basic possibility of Notability, yet this is not reflected in the article.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 09:07, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have requested this deletion because i want to recreate the dawood group web page according to wikipedia standards. because when i have updated the information of dawood group on wiki, it was changed day by day i thought that somebody is playing with me but truly i was not sure that this has been done by wiki staff.

Blanking

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Dawood Group of Companies. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a page should be deleted, please follow the appropriate process as described at Wikipedia:Deletion policy. Thank you. R'n'B (call me Russ) 09:54, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When i saw the redirection of dawood group from dawood group of companies i thought that by blanking that page would be result in favour of me and will stop further redirection and dawood group of companies will also exist.

July 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dawood Group of Companies, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Dawood Group of Companies was changed by Kashifpisces (u) (t) blanking the page on 2009-07-22T05:40:32+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 05:40, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please know that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors on Dawood Group. If you create or edit an article, know that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 12:42, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not assume ownership of articles such as Dawood group. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 14:43, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would also invite you to explain why you are removing sourced material from the article at the article's talk page talk:Dawood Group. -- Whpq (talk) 14:44, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not assume ownership of articles. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 11:07, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please dot not revert the material without dcisussion on the article talk page - talk:Dawood Group. -- Whpq (talk) 11:12, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop assuming ownership of articles such as Dawood Group. Doing so may lead to disruptive behavior such as edit wars and is a violation of policy, which may lead to a block from editing. Whpq (talk) 11:34, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Dawood Group, you will be blocked from editing. -- Whpq (talk) 11:25, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dawood Hercules

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Dawood Hercules, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Dawood Hercules Chemicals Limited. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:45, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmed dawood

i have read all the policy matters of wikipedia regarding information updation. I have tried with other username as well to update the website properly but was blocked. now i am requesting you to please unblock me so that i reflect my group properly because there is lot more information on dawood gorup to be placed also advise me how can i avoid this conflict regarding redirection, constructive writeup.

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Ahmed dawood, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.pakistaneconomist.com/issue1999/issue37/cover5.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:41, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmed dawood

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Ahmed dawood, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.pakistaneconomist.com/issue1999/issue37/cover5.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:49, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dawood Group, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 13:02, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 13:04, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dawood Group, you will be blocked from editing. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 13:07, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Dawood Group. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 13:13, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 13:14, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Interest guideline

If you have a connection with Dawood Group, please read the following guidelines:

The section Wikipedia's Law of Unintended Consequences is particularly relevant. Although you created the article Dawood Group you cannot now control its contents, and cannot demand the removal of information which is verifiable from reliable sources. If your changes are reverted, do not edit-war, or you are likely to be blocked again: discuss on the talk page changes you would like to make, and try to reach WP:Consensus with other editors; failing consensus, use WP:Dispute resolution. JohnCD (talk) 19:02, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Interest Noticeboard

There is a thread concerning your edits at WP:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#Dawood Group. JohnCD (talk) 19:41, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking - your email

I received your email and I am not going to unblock you. You have not been removing incorrect or unsourced information but have been attempting to revert back to a older version of the article that does not contain certain information that it appears you do not want known by the general public. Especially as you did not attempt to discuss the problem in any way. Be aware that every time you open a page for editing there is a notice that says, in part, "You irrevocably agree to release your contributions under the CC-BY-SA 3.0 License and the GFDL." and "If you do not want your writing to be edited, used, and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here." Basically anything you post can and probably will be edited by other including the addition of information, depending on sources, that reflects badly on the company. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 20:39, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Block extended

Kindly dont block me so that i could properly put information on wikipedia regarding my dawood group page. before i post any article i will confirm it from wiki staff.Kashifpisces (talk) 07:58, 14 January 2010 (UTC) You have clearly and unambiguously evaded your block placed on you and continued to engage in disruptive editing, which includes extreme article ownership. I have extended your block to end two weeks from now. Regards, –MuZemike 03:13, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Staff

I told you that i was thinking that somebody is trying to fool me and revert my changes again and again, i was not sure that wiki staff has done this. as i was a new user i didn't noticed it but when i was blocked i really go through with the policies of wikipedia. But can you help me out what was the reason that my information of dawood group was modified again and again because if there is any errors i will remove it according to wiki standards.

Best RegardsKashifpisces (talk) 08:04, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Further work on Dawood Group article

Kashifpisces,

When your block expires, I suggest that prior to any editting with respect to Dawood Group, or any related articles, you first discuss the changes with other editors on the article's talk page, Talk:Dawood Group. I am willing to help you in improving the article, and explaining why your editting actions have caused difficulties. I have your talk page (this page), and the Dawood Group talk pages both on my watch list so I will see that messages have been left. Regards. -- 14:43, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Improvement in Article

Dear i have posted my article on talk page kindly review it so that i could able to upload dawood group Talk:Dawood Group page