Jump to content

User talk:Kartsriv

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I am deeply saddened for everyone who have lost their lives to Hurricane Laura and the Jolo Bombings. Please accept my deepest sympathy which will always be there for them and their families. I wish them peace and comfort as they grieve - Karthik Srivijay


Welcome to my Talk Page


John Dawson-Damer moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, John Dawson-Damer, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 15:59, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Dawson-Damer (August 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. Nathan2055talk - contribs 18:23, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Robot Kerl! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Nathan2055talk - contribs 18:23, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft with 1 unquoted sentence is deleted under usage of copyrighted work (Draft:John Dawson-Damer)

[edit]

Hey, @Justlettersandnumbers! I had a talk with KSFT at the Kiwi IRC regarding this issue and he/she tried to contact an admin. He/she had told me that "it looks like one sentence was copied and not marked as a quote, but it doesn't look like a copyright violation to either of us (KSFT and Admin)". I just wanna access my article so that I can fix it. Thanks in advance Robot Kerl (talkcontribs) 04:56, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, Robot Kerl, the copying was more extensive than that. Much of it was from here, including the sentence "John Dawson-Damer owned one of the world’s best private collection of Lotus racing cars" (note the missing "s" of "collections", as in the source). The sentence "After the crash it was discovered Mr Dawson-Damer's helmet had also not been MSA approved but this was not a contributing factor in the accident or the outcome" is verbatim from here.
If you like, I can email you the content of the page, but it can't be added back to Wikipedia without substantial changes – everything you write here must (with a very few exceptions) be entirely in your own words. Or, if you prefer, I can restore the page without the running text. Let me know? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:38, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seems fair enough, Justlettersandnumbers. It would be nice of you if you can put the original draft in my Sandbox. Really sorry to bother you! Robot Kerl (talkcontribs) 04:56, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Robot Kerl, I can't do that – we don't restore copyright violations. I've partially restored the page at Draft:John Dawson-Damer. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:56, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Should we change the Category from 1 to 4?

[edit]

I got some reliable source form CBS and others that Laura is a Category 4 Hurricane but why isn't it changed in the infobox yet even though the contributors mentioned it in the body. Is there a reason? Should we change it? Call me Karthik 😉🤞 (talkcontribs) 15:10, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Kartsriv: That infobox shows the current storm status. It was a Category 4 hurricane but isn't anymore.--Jasper Deng (talk) 15:21, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Jasper Deng: What about this Article? Is the current data outdated? Thanks Call me Karthik 😉🤞 (talkcontribs) 15:29, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Kartsriv: It hit as a cat 4, but has since weakened. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 16:39, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Destroyeraa: But the articles I mentioned are posted hardly minutes ago... Maybe be the Hurricane has regained its strength!? Not an expert when it comes to geographical stuff rather just a nice guy trying to provide accurate information to people. Call me Karthik 😉🤞 (talkcontribs)
@Kartsriv: For Wikipedia's purposes, the data for the intensity of the hurricane/tropical cyclone always comes from the NHC or other such RSMC/TCWC, not news articles which maybe outdated or talking in the past tense when being published. At the moment, NHC is saying that Laura has weakened from a Category 4 at its peak intensity into a tropical storm and is forecasting it to continue weakening - as a result, there is practically no chance of Laura regaining its strength as a Category 4 hurricane. Hope this helps. :) Jason Rees (talk) 17:10, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Jason Rees: Thank you for clarifying this. I actually learned something today. Here after will follow the NHC for similar events. Call me Karthik 😉🤞 (talkcontribs)
[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Robot Kerl, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Amphid salts have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 11:03, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Really nice of you for pointing it out, Diannaa! I will look forward to put some quality work into creating article here onward. Thanks a lot, Call me Karthik 😉🤞 (talkcontribs)

Speedy deletion nomination of FitzGerald–Lorentz transformation

[edit]

Hello, Kartsriv,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Govvy, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged FitzGerald–Lorentz transformation for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative. Also, you may want to consider working on future articles in draft space first, where they cannot be deleted for lacking content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Govvy}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Govvy (talk) 12:38, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

{{Re|Govvy}} Hey, Govvy! I was actually planning on working regarding FitzGerald–Lorentz transformation but at last I changed my mind and started working on Lorentz transformation. I actually went to discard my page creation but due to my crazy good attention on doing stuff, I some how clicked on the blue save button. Totally my bad and this won't happen again. Sorry for any inconvenience caused. Call me Karthik 😉🤞 (talkcontribs)

August 2020

[edit]

Information icon Hello. In a recent edit to the page Mathematics, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you.

If you think an article is inconsistent and needs to be corrected, first look at its talk page to see if a preferred variety is specified. If not, then carefully examine the article to determine which variety is prevalent. — Anita5192 (talk) 16:40, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red

[edit]

Hi there, Kartsriv, and welcome to Women in Red. It's good to see you are interested in improving the way women are presented on Wikipedia. I see you have created a few articles but have not yet written any biographies. When you feel ready to do so, you might find it useful to look through our Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 08:55, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ipigott: Hey, Ipigott! I have created a new stub about Andrea H. Japp. I am browsing the Redlist Index for more women with no pages. I am looking forward to make a significant impact towards the way people pursue women at Wikipedia. Thanks for welcoming me! Call me Karthik 😉🤞 (talkcontribs)

When using the {{WIR 2020}} template, please put it on the article talk page and not on the article itself. power~enwiki (π, ν) 06:02, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@power~enwiki: Sorry bout that. Will correct it next time for sure. Call me Karthik 😉🤞 (talkcontribs)

Test

[edit]

Testing new layout

September Women in Red edithons

[edit]
Women in Red | September 2020, Volume 6, Issue 9, Numbers 150, 151, 176, 177


Online events:


Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red | Opt-out of notifications

Social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Discussion regarding possible hoax: Article does not meet GNG, BASIC, ANYBIO or NPOL

[edit]

Unelected politician and social worker. Article does not meet GNG, BASIC, ANYBIO or NPOL. Sources in the article do not meet RS (wikis), do not mention the subject or a brief mention. BEFORE showed no SIGCOV that addresses the subject directly and in-depth.   // Timothy :: talk  07:31, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy :: talk  07:31, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy :: talk  07:31, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
{{|TimothyBlue}} There is a high chance that this Article could be used for malicious practices or any wrongful acts. After a minor research, I have found out that majority of the data is either a hoax or not cited. As said before, There seemed to be a potential for misusing this article for scam or such so the process of deletion should be done fast. Call me Karthik 😉🤞 (talkcontribs)
{{|Bharats20101998}} If you think there is a valid reason to prevent this article from deletion or there is some way you could improve it then feel free to join the discussion.
{{|BD2412}}, The above concerns raised by Kartsriv are beyond my experience to handle, so I'm pinging you for assistance. Karthik, I think its a good idea to wait for guidance from BD2412, they will know how to properly handle your concerns. Thanks all.   // Timothy :: talk  08:08, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
{{|TimothyBlue}} Appreciate your help a lot. Thank you! Call me Karthik 😉🤞 (talkcontribs)

October editathons from Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red | October 2020, Volume 6, Issue 10, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 179


Online events:


Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red | Opt-out of notifications

Social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Contributions to Republican Party

[edit]

Hi - I noticed that edits regarding McPhee's financial contributions to the republican party are being undone. They were properly cited and seemed to be in the proper section (personal life). The information seems relevant - when someone mentioned that she was a Republican, wikipedia was the first place I looked to verify the information and found that it wasn't there. I've added the information back in. PupGoomba (talk) 19:17, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@PupGoomba: Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, PupGoomba! It has been noticed that there is a certain disagreement between users regarding her contributions to the republican party which led to persistent vandalism but as you mentioned the citation is still relevant and reliable hence will not be removing the the phrase. To prevent such vandalism, LuK3 has added a persistent vandalism protection to the page which allows only autoconfirmed or confirmed users to edit until 2nd of October, 2020 which is till the expiry of the protection. Once the protection expires, permissions would revert back to normal. If any further vandalism is detected then the protection would be extended. To reply in talk pages, insert this template {{Reply to|USERNAME}} and replace the USERNAME with the desired user you want to reply to and add : for indentations. Thank you - Call me Karthik 😉🤞 (talkcontribs)

Please comment at Talk:Suzuki Hayabusa

[edit]

--Dennis Bratland (talk) 16:58, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Spaceflight newsletter notification

[edit]
The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
WikiProject Notification
This is a one-time notification to all active WikiProject Spaceflight members.
The Downlink project page
I am notifying you, that thep The Downlink newsletter is starting up again, the first new issue will be published on the 1 November 2020.

Thanks, Terasail [Talk]

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November edit-a-thons from Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red | November 2020, Volume 6, Issue 11, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 180, 181


Online events:


Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red | Opt-out of notifications

Social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:51, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

November 2020

[edit]

Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. On Project Tuva.Diannaa (talk) 14:47, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December with Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red | December 2020, Volume 6, Issue 12, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 182, 183


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:42, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

[edit]
The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
1 November 2020 — 30 November 2020

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:41, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Expanding and correction

[edit]

Hi, Kartsriv I am Conner Richell. Thank you for replying to my question. Can I ask another question? Why does (mostly) everyone in Wikipedia actually cold and neutral? Is it because I'm new, or because I immediately tried to create a Draft? Thank you for your help, Theobliviaf (talk) 14:01, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Theobliviaf: Hey, Conner! You can call me Karthik. I totally understand what you're saying. I too was new to Wikipedia like 5 years back. To be honest, this is my 4th account which I created. Wikipedia has contributed to my life significantly and I always wanted to give back the help I received. So, I decided to become an editor. I initially did around 50 edits in my first account until it got blocked. What actually happened was I never really understood the syntax of Wiki markup then which caused my edits to mess up the formatting of the pages. 5 years back, I never really was aware of the visual editor so you can imagine how it went. The admins blocked me claiming the I was a vandal and I didn't come to improve the encyclopedia. I indeed made mistakes but it felt bad when people judge you like that. In April 2015, the Visual Editor was made as default so I ended up creating my second account but you know what happened? My entire IP was blocked from creating an account. Which made me even sad. So, what I did instead was connect to my mobile hotspot and created a new account. I was successful in creating it only to get it blocked by connecting to my wifi network again. Still didn't give up! Took my girlfriend's phone and made sure not to connect to my house network again. Voila! But I was already exhausted and really had no clue how to be a good editor in Wikipedia. I made few more controversial edits and the admin started kicking my a**. It kinda sucked and I formed this hatred towards all admins. This was all gonna change when I got a bot message in my talk page regarding Teahouse (The place where we met). I tried explaining my issue and they told me a similar answer to what I told you. This is when I started making constructive edits and started getting barnstars from other editors. All of a sudden, The admins seemed too nice to me. I now understood why Wikipedia felt cold and neutral. It's me! I was being an idiot. The Admins have decades of experience editing Wikipedia and they would have seen thousands of guys like me. They have to be cold and neutral because they have a huge responsibility. They are safe guarding the biggest encyclopedia in the world. It's gotta be perfect but it isn't. The admins are doing their best to bringing the encyclopedic content close to perfection. The Encyclopedia Britannica which is the largest written encyclopedia is almost perfect because it's been purified for centuries and the content hasn't increased as dramatically as in Wikipedia that is because Wikipedia is evolving which resulted it in being 2,796.5 times the size of Encyclopedia Britannica. This is achieved by giving editorial access to everyone in the world. Not everyone are good and not everyone are bad. To keep the bad guys away, the admins have to be cold and neutral. Once, you have proved them that you're here to improve then they would do anything to help you. Stuff I think you should know.

1. Admin are not really cold anymore when you proved them that you're a good samaritan. If they bark at you then don't hesitate to ask why cause they are 99.9999% of the time correct.
Example: This is Liz, an Admin who rejected my CSD (process of deleting an article). I simply went and asked her why and she was nice enough to explain things to me.

2. You got the power to change the world's largest encyclopedia. While doing that, you can easily ruin your credibility. Example: This is Destroyeraa, a nice guy obsessed with weather. He has done 8k+ edit and he got blocked due to controversial reason which I refuse to comment.

3. Personal Opinion: Some admins forgot how once they were noobs. Some admins (Not mentioning anyone specific) are quite rude and unforgiving when noob editors such as ourselves make a mistake. Not all of them and an obvious example would be the hosts of TeaHouse who are super nice. (Recent help I received from sweet TeaHouse hosts). So, here I am trying to be a friend. A pal who would come when you need any help whatsoever. A person who would support when admins have misunderstands you. A person who can be just a buddy to simply have a chat. I want to make Wikipedia a bit more human and forgiving. It is not a cold or neutral place. It's a beautiful place filled with nice people. New editors experience the bad side of the pedia and I wanna stand by their side and encourage them.

As I said before, you just got yourself a friend who's not cold rather a charming guy I suppose.
Make yourself home - Call me Karthik 😉🤞 (talkcontribs) 17:45, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Karthik. I understand my mistake. They have a huge responsibility, and therefore act cold neutral, and I shouldn't judge them for that. Thank you for explaining this to me. I really like the fact that you want to be my friend. You're really warm and encouraging that it was hard to miss your point. Your friend, Conner Theobliviaf (talk) 16:03, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I just noticed. It's urgent. Dangled6 just vandalized Etzedek24's user page Theobliviaf (talk) 16:09, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Recovered User Page of User:Etzedek24

[edit]

@Theobliviaf: Hey, Conner! I confirmed that User:Dangled6 has been vandalizing User:Etzedek24's user page so I did the following.

1. Fixing the vandalism: I reverted all the stuff which the vandal did. You can check his user page now. For further reference you can see the edit I've made.
2. Warning the vandal: I have issued a warning to the vandal. You can see that from clicking here.
3. Reporting the vandal to the administrators: I have reported the vandal to the admins. You can see the request and response over here. I quoted the following Revision IDs: 991925045 and 982880765.

You did a great job! The admins should block him soon. If you have any questions the feel free to ping me back - Call me Karthik 😉🤞 (talkcontribs) 16:52, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Update: User:Dangled6 has been blocked by admin Widr. You can see the vandal's talk page confirming the former.

Thanks for catching this, folks. Sure was interesting to wake up to. This is definitely the farthest someone's gone in a Wikibeef, they even tried to hack my account. Etzedek24 (I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 17:13, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Etzedek24: It's alrighty, mate! You should indeed thank Theobliviaf for catching the vandal. Try keeping long password as suggested in this comic. Makes it close to impossible for hackers to break in. Just my 2 cents - Call me Karthik 😉🤞 (talkcontribs) 17:26, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I'm glad that everything is ok. Give Etzedek24 my regards. Theobliviaf (talk) 09:25, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Theobliviaf: Sure, dude! I already did. If you have any emergency like this one then you can ping me on Discord (KartSriv#0851) if you have an account - Call me Karthik 😉🤞 (talkcontribs) 10:20, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, are you OK? My user page just got "blocked, and vandalized by Cthonastur, whom, by the comments, I'm assuming is Dangled6. I didn't realize Wikipedia had a serious Joker vandal problem. The articles and users get attacked everyday?

  • With best regards,
  • Conner Richell

Theobliviaf (talk) 13:35, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Theobliviaf: Sorry for the late reply, matey! I was studying. Admins have access to IP addresses of users and they have confirmed that Cthonastur is a sockpuppet of Dangled6. You can find more about the investigation here. They have blocked him indefinitely and have blocked his IP for 2 weeks initially for Etzedek24's user page vandalism and have added another 2 weeks for the recent incident. I hope you understood why Admins tend to be a bit cold and neutral. It's to prevent people like him from messing up our encyclopedia. I have encountered a handful of people like him but what I understood after years of being here was to realize even they are humans. We should try to warn them in a peaceful and explanatory way. They reason I had to go hard on Dangled6 was he crossed the limits but what I failed to realize was I fueled his Anger. So much that he put effort into creating another account to vandalize your page. Another thing I want to point out was I mentioned you while reporting to admins for the sole reason for you to get the credit and I am gonna assume that the vandal would have caught your username from there. I never knew it would go this wrong. I want to apologize for that. If at all he's gonna vandalize again then it's gonna be my account I guess. Your Friend, Karthik.
Call me Karthik 😉🤞 (talkcontribs) 15:08, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Drafting

[edit]

Did you ever make a draft on a novel you like, but had to keep it neutral? Do you have any advice?

@Theobliviaf: I read your draft on A Curse so Dark and Lonely yesterday. You have put a lota work into it, dude. I personally think it's possible to write an unbiased article on a novel you like but it's gonna take a lot of effort from you when you're writing the plot and stuff. Gotta make sure that we don't over/under exaggerate any content of the storyline. Try asking someone the story of the first Harry Potter. Everyone will have their own version. So, it's best you create a framework plot by not expressing much about the characters or the story and let the other editors express their opinions. This is how I'd ideally deal with Novel related Articles but I don't do those. I am not an expert when it comes to novels. I create stuff like this. Your friendly neighborhood Spiderman - Call me Karthik 😉🤞 (talkcontribs) 11:07, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. Ok. Thanks, Karthik. I'll use your advice. Theobliviaf (talk) 08:05, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Kartsriv! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, XTools not showing any stats, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good call on the PROD. Given that it's plausible, even likely, that this school passes WP:NCORP or WP:GNG, I turned it into a redirect. This way, if an editor DOES have good sources to make an WP:AFD-resistant article, he doesn't have to start from scratch or request a WP:REFUND. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 15:45, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Davidwr: Thank you for responding at such sort notice. I totally agree that it should be a redirect. I still am a very armature editor but may I know how this particular article stayed active for so long. It would be really nice of you if you can explain how to respond to similar articles when I come around them. Is PROD/CSD the right choice or do you recommend anything else? Thank you once again - Call me Karthik 😉🤞 (talkcontribs) 03:18, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Until a few years ago, just about every school that was the equivalent of a High school in the United States was "presumed" to have enough local coverage in newspapers that if you tried, you could demonstrate that the school met Wikipedia's notability guidelines. This meant it was very hard to get articles about such schools deleted. Things changed a few years ago. Had this gone to WP:AFD 10 years ago it would've been met with "it's a high school, there's a reference that proves it exists, keep." davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 03:22, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Davidwr: Really sweet of you to explain it to me. I hope I am not bothering you but I also have another question. If an editor can creates an article about something which qualifies for WP:NCORP but provides zero sources to back it's claims then anyone can misuse it, right? Hypothetically speaking, maybe someone can add edits suggesting that the high school has a large 50 meter swimming pool and making false claims that it got many bogus awards and such. This will attract parents to this school more than the others. I couldn't come up with a nice example but I hope you can understand what I mean. This could be used for false advertisement I suppose. I encountered a similar situation few months back where an editor created a high quality article stating some 19 year old kid as a political party leader. Nobody noticed it until I "mistakenly" clicked into the article while I was browsing the Special:NewPagesFeed. I know Wikipedia is not perfect but this is dangerous for regular naive users who assumes that everything in Wikipedia is true. What should we do to prevent these kinda article to stay cause the article I PRODed on was active for more than a decade with no citations whatsoever. That school houses 2000+ students. This is worrying to me. Thank you and I am really sorry for bothering you. Noob users don't get chance to talk to admin that often. Please excuse my curiosity, I just want to make our encyclopedia better - Call me Karthik 😉🤞 (talkcontribs) 03:43, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This is the reason why Wikipedia requires sources. Unsourced information which is "questionable" for whatever reason, maybe because it is flattering, maybe because it is disparaging, should be flagged with {{cn}} or a similar template "on sight." Editors are free to remove the information outright, but usually it's better just to "tag it." If it's something "run of the mill" like "ACME high school has 500 students" and there's no reason to believe otherwise, you don't even have to tag it, you can just assume good faith on the part of whoever put it there.
If it's in a biolgraphy of a living person, disparaging content that isn't backed up should be removed "on sight." If it's really harmful, WP:OVERSIGHT may be needed.
A better place to ask such questions is the WP:Teahouse.
If you haven't read Help:Contents and Wikipedia:About yet, they may prove informative. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 04:02, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Article

[edit]

Hey, man. Can I bother you with a question? Do I need to read any specific articles to make my draft? Also, can you write two drafts, or does it work if you focus on one at a time?

@Theobliviaf: Hey, Conner! I will always recommend focusing on one draft at a time cause it's easy for those to get rejected. Imagine putting hours of work into an article only to see it get rejected. It's better to perfect one article at a time and another mistake I personally did was create multiple drafts and lose track of them. I don't mind helping you with your draft. You can ping me if you want. Your friendly friend - Call me Karthik 😉🤞 (talkcontribs) 15:07, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes

[edit]

You could help, if you want. I would like the help. Only if ya want it.

Collaboration for Draft:Killing of Casey Goodson

[edit]

I can help you. I will. You can count on me,

@Theobliviaf: I am genuinely touched, Conner. I mean I have no relation with Goodson. He is not from my Country or my Race or Anything. It took three days for anyone to be bother about this case. The County tried to put this under the carpet but thankfully the Feds are involved now. Even George Floyd passed a counterfeit $20 bill, what did Casey do? Confusing a Subway sandwich with a gun is just unbelievable. What happened to his family was injustice and I am trying to bring awareness to a wide range of people. I am proud to have a friend like you who would support me for a good cause. I tried asking for help in Wikipedia's Discord Server (A Group with 2K+ people) and nobody volunteered. I felt bad. The worse part is people were volunteering for some rich Ghana dude instead. Thanks a lot once again and together let's put some light and try to bring justice a step closer for Goodson and his family.
Thanks and Regards,
A Proud Friend,
- Call me Karthik 😉🤞 (talkcontribs) 03:54, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A New Year With Women in Red!

[edit]
Women in Red | January 2021, Volume 7, Issue 1, Numbers 182, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Happy new year

[edit]

Happy new year karthik Theobliviaf (talk) 11:43, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Theobliviaf: Thanks a lot, Conner! You too have a fantastic new year! 🥳🥳 - Call me Karthik 😉🤞 (talkcontribs) 13:23, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
1 December 2020 — 31 December 2020

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:52, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021 at Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red | February 2021, Volume 7, Issue 2, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 189, 190, 191


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 14:59, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

[edit]
The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
1 January 2021 — 31 January 2021

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:21, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:John Dawson-Damer

[edit]

Hello, Kartsriv. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "John Dawson-Damer".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:00, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021 at Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red | March 2021, Volume 7, Issue 3, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 192, 193


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:48, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

[edit]
The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
1 February 2021 — 28 February 2021

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April editathons from Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red | April 2021, Volume 7, Issue 4, Numbers 184, 188, 194, 195, 196


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter


--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:16, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

[edit]
The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
1 March 2021 — 31 March 2021

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:16, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021 at Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red | May 2021, Volume 7, Issue 5, Numbers 184, 188, 197, 198


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 21:36, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

[edit]
The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
1 April 2021 — 30 April 2021
Volume 1 — Issue 7
Spaceflight Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Open tasks • Popular pages • The Downlink
In the News!
Article of the month.

Michael Collins was an American astronaut who flew the Apollo 11 command module Columbia around the Moon in 1969 while his crewmates, Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin, made the first crewed landing on the surface. He was selected as part of NASA's third group of 14 astronauts in 1963 and flew in space twice.

Image of the month.

The unofficial flag of earth day which is made of the "Blue Marble" image taken onboard of the Apollo 17 spacecraft with a blue background.

Members

New Members:

Number of active members: 112.
Total number of members: 325.


April Launches
All times stated here are in UTC.


  1. United States Falcon 9 – Starlink V1.0-L23 (7th at 16:34:18) Success Success
  2. China Long March 4B – Shiyan 6-02 (8th at 23:01) Success Success
  3. Russia Crewed mission Soyuz-2.1aMS-18 (9th at 07:42:40) Success Success
  4. United States Crewed mission Falcon 9 – Crew-2 (23rd at 22:14:08) Success Success
  5. Russia Soyuz-2.1b – OneWeb 6 (25th at 22:14:08) Success Success
  6. United States Delta IV Heavy – NROL-82 (26th at 20:47) Success Success
  7. China Long March 6 – Qilu 1 & Qilu 4 (27th at 03:20) Success Success
  8. European Union Vega – Pléiades Neo 3 (29th at 01:50:00) Success Success
  9. China Long March 6 – Tianhe 1 (29th at 03:23:15) Success Success
  10. United States Falcon 9 – Starlink V1.0-L24 (29rd at 03:44) Success Success
  11. China Long March 6 – Yaogan 34 (27th at 03:20) Success Success

May Launches
Launch dates can change. See a current list: here.


  • Falcon 9 – Starlink V1.0-L25
  • GSLV Mk.2 – GISAT 1
  • Long March 7 – Tianzhou 2
  • Atlas 5 – SBIRS GEO Flight 5
  • Soyuz – OneWeb 7
Article Statistics
This data reflects values from the 30 April 2021.

Monthly Changes

Since March, 39 new pages have been added to Spaceflight. There is 1 less GA-class, with 3 more files, 4 more B-class, 6 more C-class, 7 more start-class and 5 new stub-class articles.

Discuss & propose changes to The Downlink at The Downlink talk page. To unsubscribe from the newsletter remove your name from the Mailing list.
Newsletter contributors: Balon Greyjoy and Terasail

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:51, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification

[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

331dot (talk) 20:22, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Thanks for tirelessly bringing the SSR topic to limelight and leaving no stone unturned to prove your point. Not all efforts attain success, but your work has surely increased our love, respect and support for you, bro. A big thanks for representing a large group of Indians.

p.s. your user page is wild!! I would love to talk more :)

Amratjeet Singh Insan (talk) 05:53, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, @Amratjeet Singh Insan:! Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you so much for the Barnstar 😘. SSR's Articles got Extended Confirmed Protection hence new Wikipedians/Angry Indians can't edit it. The more experienced Indian Wiki editors seems to be not bothered at all regarding this issue. If you've read my thread then you might know how I got into all this. There's a lotta people's hopes tied to this and I can't afford to break it. Will work relentlessly on this. Once again thank you so much for your words, it's really sweet of you 🥰!

PS: My user page is just a reflection of what's going on inside my head. A COMPLETE MESS 😂🤣. Man, I'd love to talk more. Feel free to ping me up anytime, if you need my two cents. Take care - Call me Karthik 😉🤞 (talkcontribs) 04:05, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021 at Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red | June 2021, Volume 7, Issue 6, Numbers 184, 188, 196, 199, 200, 201


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:50, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

[edit]
The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
1 May 2021 — 31 May 2021
Volume 1 — Issue 8
Spaceflight Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Open tasks • Popular pages • The Downlink
In the News!
  • The Crew of SpaceX Crew-1 had a successful splashdown in the Gulf of Mexico on 2nd May at 06:56:33 UTC. After they launched in November 2020 and had spent 167 days in space.
  • A LongMarch 5B rocket had an uncontrolled re-entery into the atmosphere on 4th May. With any debris being reported to have landed in the Indian Ocean.
  • One of Rocket Labs Electron rockets expierienced a launch malfunction 2:30 into launch causing the mission to result in failure.
  • Images have been released after the landing of Zhurong rover on Mars on 14th May.

Featured Content


Article of the month.

Creola Katherine Johnson was an American mathematician whose calculations of orbital mechanics as a NASA employee were critical to the success of the first and subsequent U.S. crewed spaceflights. The space agency noted her "historical role as one of the first African-American women to work as a NASA scientist".

Image of the month.

Astronaut Clayton Anderson wis shown as a water bubble floats in the middeck of space shuttle Discovery during the STS-131 mission.

Members

New Members:

Number of active members: 116. Total number of members: 329.

May Launches
All times stated here are in UTC.


  1. United States Falcon 9 – Starlink V1.0-L25 (4th at 19:01:07) Success Success
  2. China Long March 2C – Yaogan 30-08 (6th at 18:11) Success Success
  3. United States Falcon 9 – Starlink V1.0-L27 (9th at 06:42) Success Success
  4. New Zealand Electron – "Running Out of Toes" (15th at 11:11) Failure Failure
  5. United States Falcon 9 – Starlink V1.0-L26 (15th at 22:56) Success Success
  6. United States Atlas 5SBIRS-GEO 5 (18th at 17:37) Success Success
  7. China Long March 4BHaiyang 2D (19th at 04:03) Success Success
  8. United States Falcon 9 – Starlink V1.0-L28 (26th at 18:59) Success Success
  9. Russia Soyuz-2.1b – OneWeb 7 (28th at 17:38:39) Success Success
  10. China Long March 7Tianzhou 2 (29th at 12:55:29) Success Success

June Launches
Launch dates can change. See a current list: here.


Article Statistics
This data reflects values from the 31 May 2021.

Monthly Changes

Since April, 45 pages have been added to Spaceflight. 1 article reached FA-Class and 1 image reached FM-Class. There is 1 more GA class article, with 2 more B-class, 8 more C-class, 1 less start-class and 5 new stub-class articles.

Discuss & propose changes to The Downlink at The Downlink talk page. To unsubscribe from the newsletter remove your name from the Mailing list.
Newsletter contributors: StarshipSLS & Terasail

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:37, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Kartsriv. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Killing of Casey Goodson, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021 at Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red | July 2021, Volume 7, Issue 7, Numbers 184, 188, 202, 203, 204, 205


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 16:05, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

[edit]
The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
1 June 2021 — 30 June 2021
Volume 1 — Issue 9
Spaceflight Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Open tasks • Popular pages • The Downlink
Featured Content!
Article of the month.

Lisa Marie Nowak is an American aeronautical engineer, and former NASA astronaut and United States Navy captain. Nowak was selected by NASA for NASA Astronaut Group 16 in 1996. She flew in space aboard Space Shuttle Discovery during the STS-121 mission in July 2006. In 2007, Nowak was involved in an incident that led to her dismissal from NASA and the Navy.

This article was promoted to featured status last month!

Article Statistics
This data reflects values from the 30 June 2021.
Image of the month.

Offical portrait of Edwin E. Aldrin Jr. (Buzz Aldrin) who was the pilot on the Apollo 11 mission.

This image was promoted to featured status last month!


Members


New Members:

Number of active members: 118. Total number of members: 331.
Monthly Changes

Since May 28 pages ahve been added to Spaceflight. 1 article reached FA-Class, 1 list reached FL-class & 2 images reached FM-Class. There is 1 more GA class article, as well as 1 more file page. There are 4 more B class articles, 20 more C class articles, 10 less start class articles & 1 less stub article.

BOOKS are no longer supported by the WikiProject and are in the process of being deleted! See WP:BOOKSDEP & here for more.

Discuss & propose changes to The Downlink at The Downlink talk page. To unsubscribe from the newsletter remove your name from the Mailing list.
Newsletter contributor: Terasail

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August Editathons from Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red | August 2021, Volume 7, Issue 8, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 206, 207


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:26, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

[edit]
The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
1 July 2021 — 31 July 2021
Volume 1 — Issue 10
Spaceflight Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Open tasks • Popular pages • The Downlink
In the News!
  • On 11th July Virgin Galactic had their first fully crewed mission to the edge of space with Richard Branson onboard in SpaceShipTwo VSS Unity.
  • On 17th July NASA announced that scientific observations from the Hubble Space Telescope had resumed on a backup computer after being placed in a "safe mode" since June 13.
  • On 20th July Blue Origin had their first fully crewed mission to the edge of space with Jeff Bezos onboard in a New Shepard capsule.
  • On 26th July The Pirs module was the first permanent ISS module to be decommissioned. After docking to the ISS on 17th September 2001, just under 20 years ago.
  • On 29th July The ISS was moved out of its normal orientation after the Nauka module (a new Russian module) was docked and started firing its thrusters.
Article of the month.

Shuttle-Centaur was a version of the Centaur upper stage rocket designed to be carried aloft inside the Space Shuttle. Two variants were developed: Centaur G-Prime and Centaur G. The powerful Centaur upper stage allowed for heavier deep space probes, and for them to reach Jupiter sooner. However, neither variant ever flew on a Shuttle.

Image of the month.

This is an Extreme Deep Field image taken from the Hubble Space Telescope, released by NASA on September 25th, 2012. With exposure dates from July 2002 to March 2012.

Members

New Members:

Number of active members: 120. Total number of members: 333.

July Launches
All times stated here are in UTC.


  1. Russia Soyuz-2.1b – OneWeb 8 (1st at 12:48:33) Success Success
  2. China Long March 2DJilin-1 (3rd at 02:51) Success Success
  3. China Long March 4CFengyun 3E (4th at 23:28) Success Success
  4. China Long March 3C/ETianlian I-05 (6th at 15:53) Success Success
  5. China Long March 6 – Ningxia 1 (9th at 11:59) Success Success
  6. China Long March 2CYaogan 30-10 (19th at 00:19) Success Success
  7. Russia Proton-MNauka (21st at 14:58:25) Success Success
  8. China Long March 2D – Tianhui-1D (29th at 04:01) Success Success
  9. United States Electron – Monolith (29th at 06:00) Success Success
  10. European Union Ariane 5 ECASO-D2 & Eutelsat (30th at 21:00) Success Success

August Launches
Launch dates can change. See a current list: here.


Article Statistics
This data reflects values from the 31 July 2021.
Spaceflight articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
FA 7 19 5 7 38
FL 1 4 4 9
FM 102 102
GA 11 24 34 54 123
B 2 48 40 52 142
C 56 160 545 510 12 1,283
Start 36 157 1,106 2,244 374 3,917
Stub 9 244 2,188 233 2,674
List 14 126 79 218 1 438
Category 1,032 1,032
Disambig 49 49
File 207 207
Portal 55 55
Project 68 68
Redirect 2 1 1 1,134 1 1,139
Template 501 501
Other 31 31
Assessed 126 546 2,058 5,278 3,179 621 11,808
Unassessed 3 1 74 78
Total 126 546 2,058 5,281 3,180 695 11,886

Monthly Changes

Since June: 24 pages have been added to spaceflight. There are 4 more files. There is 1 more B class article, 5 more C class articles, 10 more start class articles & 2 more stub class articles.
The 2 additional FM class have been FM for a few years, they just registered this month.

Discuss & propose changes to The Downlink at The Downlink talk page. To unsubscribe from the newsletter remove your name from the Mailing list.
Newsletter contributor: Terasail

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
1 July 2021 — 31 July 2021
Volume 1 — Issue 10
Spaceflight Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Open tasks • Popular pages • The Downlink
In the News!
  • On 11th July Virgin Galactic had their first fully crewed mission to the edge of space with Richard Branson onboard in SpaceShipTwo VSS Unity.
  • On 17th July NASA announced that scientific observations from the Hubble Space Telescope had resumed on a backup computer after being placed in a "safe mode" since June 13.
  • On 20th July Blue Origin had their first fully crewed mission to the edge of space with Jeff Bezos onboard in a New Shepard capsule.
  • On 26th July The Pirs module was the first permanent ISS module to be decommissioned. After docking to the ISS on 17th September 2001, just under 20 years ago.
  • On 29th July The ISS was moved out of its normal orientation after the Nauka module (a new Russian module) was docked and started firing its thrusters.
Article of the month.

Shuttle-Centaur was a version of the Centaur upper stage rocket designed to be carried aloft inside the Space Shuttle. Two variants were developed: Centaur G-Prime and Centaur G. The powerful Centaur upper stage allowed for heavier deep space probes, and for them to reach Jupiter sooner. However, neither variant ever flew on a Shuttle.

Image of the month.

This is an Extreme Deep Field image taken from the Hubble Space Telescope, released by NASA on September 25th, 2012. With exposure dates from July 2002 to March 2012.

Members

New Members:

Number of active members: 120. Total number of members: 333.

July Launches
All times stated here are in UTC.


  1. Russia Soyuz-2.1b – OneWeb 8 (1st at 12:48:33) Success Success
  2. China Long March 2DJilin-1 (3rd at 02:51) Success Success
  3. China Long March 4CFengyun 3E (4th at 23:28) Success Success
  4. China Long March 3C/ETianlian I-05 (6th at 15:53) Success Success
  5. China Long March 6 – Ningxia 1 (9th at 11:59) Success Success
  6. China Long March 2CYaogan 30-10 (19th at 00:19) Success Success
  7. Russia Proton-MNauka (21st at 14:58:25) Success Success
  8. China Long March 2D – Tianhui-1D (29th at 04:01) Success Success
  9. United States Electron – Monolith (29th at 06:00) Success Success
  10. European Union Ariane 5 ECASO-D2 & Eutelsat (30th at 21:00) Success Success

August Launches
Launch dates can change. See a current list: here.


Article Statistics
This data reflects values from the 31 July 2021.
Spaceflight articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
FA 7 19 5 7 38
FL 1 4 4 9
FM 102 102
GA 11 24 34 54 123
B 2 48 40 52 142
C 56 160 545 510 12 1,283
Start 36 157 1,106 2,244 374 3,917
Stub 9 244 2,188 233 2,674
List 14 126 79 218 1 438
Category 1,032 1,032
Disambig 49 49
File 207 207
Portal 55 55
Project 68 68
Redirect 2 1 1 1,134 1 1,139
Template 501 501
Other 31 31
Assessed 126 546 2,058 5,278 3,179 621 11,808
Unassessed 3 1 74 78
Total 126 546 2,058 5,281 3,180 695 11,886

Monthly Changes

Since June: 24 pages have been added to spaceflight. There are 4 more files. There is 1 more B class article, 5 more C class articles, 10 more start class articles & 2 more stub class articles.
The 2 additional FM class have been FM for a few years, they just registered this month.

Discuss & propose changes to The Downlink at The Downlink talk page. To unsubscribe from the newsletter remove your name from the Mailing list.
Newsletter contributor: Terasail

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:42, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021 at Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red | September 2021, Volume 7, Issue 9, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 207, 208


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 22:30, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

[edit]
The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
1 August 2021 — 31 August 2021
Volume 1 — Issue 11
Spaceflight Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Open tasks • Popular pages • The Downlink
In the News!
  • On 12th August a GSLV Mk.2 rocket with the EOS-03 Earth observation satellite as a payload encountered a third stage failure and crashed back into the ground after reaching a maximum altitude of 140km (87 miles).
  • On 20th August a 5 hour 55 minute spacewalk was completed by chinese astronauts Nie Haisheng and Liu Boming on the Tiangong space station.
  • On 28th August an Astra rocket had an engine failure at launch, but managed to recover and fly to the upper atmosphere before leaving its flight corridor, resulting in flight temination.
Article of the month.

Apollo 7 was the first crewed flight in NASA's Apollo program, and saw the resumption of human spaceflight by the agency after the fire that killed the three Apollo 1 astronauts. The Apollo 7 crew was commanded by Walter M. Schirra, with command module pilot Donn F. Eisele and lunar module pilot R. Walter Cunningham.

Image of the month.

Official portrait of Ilan Ramon, an astronaut killed during the failed re-entry of the Space Shuttle Columbia.

Members

New Members:

Number of active members: 122. Total number of members: 335.

August Launches
All times stated here are in UTC.


  1. China Hyperbola-1Jilin-1 (3rd at 07:39) Failure Failure
  2. China Long March 6 – KL-Beta A/B (4th at 11:01) Success Success
  3. China Long March 3B/EChinaSat 2E (5th at 16:30:05) Success Success
  4. United States Antares 230+Cygnus NG-16 (10th at 22:01:05) Success Success
  5. India GSLV Mk II – EOS-03 (GISAT-1) (12th at 00:13) Failure Failure
  6. Europe France VegaPléiades-Neo 4 (17th at 01:47:06) Success Success
  7. China Long March 4B – Tianhui-2 02 (18th at 22:32) Success Success
  8. Russia Kazakhstan Soyuz-2.1bOneWeb 9 (21st at 22:13:40) Success Success
  9. China Long March 2C – RSW-01 (24th at 11:15) Success Success
  10. China Long March 3B/E – TJSW-7 (24th at 15:41) Success Success
  11. United States Rocket 3STP-27AD1 (28th at 22:35) Failure Failure
  12. United States Falcon 9CRS-23 (29th at 07:14:49) Success Success

September Launches
Launch dates can change. See a current list: here.


Article Statistics
This data reflects values from the 31 August 2021.
Spaceflight articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
FA 7 19 5 7 38
FL 1 4 4 9
FM 102 102
GA 10 24 34 54 122
B 4 48 41 53 146
C 57 160 546 530 1,293
Start 34 157 1,106 2,262 374 3,933
Stub 9 244 2,197 1 234 2,685
List 14 124 79 225 1 443
Category 1,033 1,033
Disambig 1 49 50
File 206 206
Portal 55 55
Project 58 58
Redirect 2 1,140 1,142
Template 504 504
Other 22 22
Assessed 126 544 2,059 5,333 3,170 609 11,841
Unassessed 53 53
Total 126 544 2,059 5,333 3,170 662 11,894

Monthly Changes

Since July: 8 pages have been added to spaceflight. There is 1 less file. There is 1 less GA class article and are 4 less B-class, 10 more C-class, 17 more start-class and 11 new stub-class articles.

Discuss & propose changes to The Downlink at The Downlink talk page. To unsubscribe from the newsletter remove your name from the Mailing list.
Newsletter contributor: Terasail

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:25, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021 at Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red | October 2021, Volume 7, Issue 10, Numbers 184, 188, 209, 210, 211


Online events:


Special event:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 01:35, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Nomination of Sandip Ghose for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sandip Ghose is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandip Ghose until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Usedtobecool ☎️ 02:50, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021 at Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red | November 2021, Volume 7, Issue 11, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 212, 213


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Innisfree987 (talk) 21:30, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

[edit]
The Downlink The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
1 September 2021 — 31 October 2021
Volume 1 — Issue 12
Spaceflight Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Open tasks • Popular pages • The Downlink
Featured Content!
Members

New Members: No new members.

Number of active members: 127. Total number of members: 340.

October Launches
All times stated here are in UTC. See a current list: here.


  1. Russia Kazakhstan Crewed mission Soyuz-2.1aSoyuz MS-19 (5th at 08:55:02) Success Success
  2. Russia Soyuz-2.1bOneWeb (14th at 09:40:10) Success Success
  3. China Long March 2D – Solar Explorer (14th at 10:51) Success Success
  4. China Long March 2FShenzhou 13 (15th at 16:23:56) Success Success
  5. United States Atlas VLucy (16th at 09:34:00) Success Success
  6. South Korea NuriDummy payload (21st at 08:00) Failure Failure
  7. China Long March 3B/E – Shijian-21 (24th at 01:27:03) Success Success
  8. Europe France Ariane 5SES-17 (24th at 02:10) Success Success
  9. Japan H-IIAQZS-1R (26th at 02:19:37) Success Success
  10. China KuaizhouJilin-1 Gaofen-02F (27th at 06:19) Success Success
  11. Russia Kazakhstan Soyuz-2.1aMS-18 (28th at 00:00:32) Success Success

November Launches
Launch dates can change. See a current list: here.


Article Statistics
This data reflects values from the 31 October 2021.
Spaceflight articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
FA 7 21 6 7 41
FL 2 4 4 10
FM 103 103
GA 11 27 36 54 128
B 4 47 40 56 147
C 58 159 560 587 1,364
Start 33 160 1,108 2,331 334 3,966
Stub 11 243 2,186 217 2,657
List 15 126 85 230 1 457
Category 1 1,042 1,043
Disambig 51 51
File 212 212
Portal 55 55
Project 59 59
Redirect 1 1,147 1,148
Template 505 505
Other 23 23
Assessed 128 553 2,082 5,457 3,197 552 11,969
Total 128 553 2,082 5,457 3,197 552 11,969

Monthly Changes

Since August: 75 pages have been added to spaceflight. There are 3 more FA class articles, 1 more FL class page and 1 more FM class file. There are 6 less files. There are 6 more GA class articles and 1 more B-class article, 71 more C-class, 33 more start-class and 28 less stub-class articles.

Discuss & propose changes to The Downlink at The Downlink talk page. To unsubscribe from the newsletter remove your name from the Mailing list.
Newsletter contributor: Terasail

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:28, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021 at Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red | December 2021, Volume 7, Issue 12, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 214, 215, 216


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Innisfree987 (talk) 00:12, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

January 2022 with Women in Red

[edit]
Happy New Year from Women in Red Jan 2022, Vol 8, Issue 1, Nos 214, 216, 217, 218, 219


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

  • Encourage someone to become a WiR member this month.
Go to Women in RedJoin WikiProject Women in Red

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:02, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

February with Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red Feb 2022, Vol 8, Issue 2, Nos 214, 217, 220, 221, 222


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

March editathons

[edit]
Women in Red Mar 2022, Vol 8, Issue 3, Nos 214, 217, 222, 223, 224, 225


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:37, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

April Editathons from Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red Apr 2022, Vol 8, Issue 4, Nos 214, 217, 226, 227, 228


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:45, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

May Women in Red events

[edit]
Women in Red May 2022, Vol 8, Issue 5, Nos 214, 217, 227, 229, 230


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:53, 30 April 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

June events from Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red June 2022, Vol 8, Issue 6, Nos 214, 217, 227, 231, 232, 233


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:21, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red in July 2022

[edit]
Women in Red July 2022, Vol 8, Issue 7, Nos 214, 217, 234, 235


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:48, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red August 2022

[edit]
Women in Red August 2022, Vol 8, Issue 8, Nos 214, 217, 236, 237, 238, 239


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:59, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red in September 2022

[edit]
Women in Red September 2022, Vol 8, Issue 9, Nos 214, 217, 240, 241


Online events:


Request for help:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:36, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hello, Kartsriv. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Killing of Casey Goodson".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:13, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red October 2022

[edit]
Women in Red October 2022, Vol 8, Issue 10, Nos 214, 217, 242, 243, 244


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 14:59, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Nomination of David Ferrer (racing driver) for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Ferrer (racing driver) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Ferrer (racing driver) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Tvx1 12:42, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red November 2022

[edit]
Women in Red November 2022, Vol 8, Issue 11, Nos 214, 217, 245, 246, 247


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:34, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red in December 2022

[edit]
WiR Women who died in 2022
WiR Women who died in 2022
Women in Red December 2022, Vol 8, Issue 12, Nos 214, 217, 248, 249, 250


Online events:

See also:

Tip of the month:

  • Remember to search slight spelling variations of your subject's name,
    like Katherine/Katharine or Elizabeth/Elisabeth, especially for historical subjects.

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:55, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red January 2023

[edit]
Happy New Year from Women in Red | January 2023, Volume 9, Issue 1, Nos 250, 251, 252, 253, 254


Online events:

See also:

Tip of the month:

  • De-orphan and incorporate an article into Wikipedia using the Find Link tool

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:02, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red in February 2023

[edit]
Women in Red Feb 2023, Vol 9, Iss 2, Nos 251, 252, 255, 256, 257, 259


Online events:

Tip of the month:

  • Explore Wikipedia for all variations of the woman's name (birth name,
    married name, re-married name, pen name, nickname)

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:28, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red March 2023

[edit]
Women in Red Mar 2023, Vol 9, Iss 3, Nos 251, 252, 258, 259, 260, 261


Online events:

See also:

Tip of the month:

  • Mobile phone readers may only see the article "lead" – take some time to make it shine!
    Include something to keep people reading.

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:53, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red April 2023

[edit]
Women in Red Apr 2023, Vol 9, Iss 4, Nos 251, 252, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266


Online events:

See also:

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:52, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red May 2023

[edit]
Women in Red May 2023, Vol 9, Iss 5, Nos 251, 252, 267, 268, 269, 270


Online events:

See also:

Tip of the month:

  • Use the Google translate app and camera on your phone to translate text from an article or book

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:28, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red - June 2023

[edit]
Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 6, Nos 251, 252, 271, 272, 273


Online events:

See also:

Tip of the month:

  • Looking for new red links? Keep an eye out for interesting and notable friends, family, or associates of your last article subject, and re-examine group photos for other women who may still need an article.

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:16, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red July 2023

[edit]
Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 7, Nos 251, 252, 274, 275, 276


Online events:

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:43, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red 8th Anniversary

[edit]
Women in Red 8th Anniversary
In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap!

--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:01, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red August 2023

[edit]
Women in Red August 2023, Vol 9, Iss 8, Nos 251, 252, 277, 278, 279, 280


Online events:

See also:

  • Wikimania 2023 will be held in Singapore, 16–19 August, and will be facilitated by the
    affiliates in the ESEAP (East/South East/Asia/Pacific) region.

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:25, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

September 2023 at Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red September 2023, Vol 9, Iss 9, Nos 251, 252, 281, 282, 283


Online events:

Tip of the month:

  • The books she wrote might be notable, too; learn 5 quick tips about about book articles.

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Victuallers (talk) 16:54, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red October 2023

[edit]
Women in Red October 2023, Vol 9, Iss 10, Nos 251, 252, 284, 285, 286


Online events:

See also

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red - November 2023

[edit]
Women in Red November 2023, Vol 9, Iss 11, Nos 251, 252, 287, 288, 289


Online events:

See also

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red December 2023

[edit]
Women in Red December 2023, Vol 9, Iss 12, Nos 251, 252, 290, 291, 292


Online events:

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:23, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red January 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | January 2024, Volume 10, Issue 1, Numbers 291, 293, 294, 295, 296


Online events:

Announcement

  • In 2024 Women in Red also has a one biography a week challenge as part
    of the #1day1woman initiative!

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red February 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | February 2024, Volume 10, Issue 2, Numbers 293, 294, 297, 298


Online events:

Announcement

  • Please let other wikiprojects know about our February Black women event.

Tip of the month:

  • AllAfrica can now be searched on the ProQuest tab at the WP Library.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red March 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | March 2024, Volume 10, Issue 3, Numbers 293, 294, 299, 300, 301


Online events:

Announcements

Tip of the month:

  • When creating a new article, check various spellings, including birth name, married names
    and pseudonyms, to be sure an article doesn't already exist.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:22, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red April 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | April 2024, Volume 10, Issue 4, Numbers 293, 294, 302, 303, 304


Online events:

Announcements

  • The second round of "One biography a week" begins in April as part of #1day1woman.

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 19:42, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red May 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | May 2024, Volume 10, Issue 5, Numbers 293, 294, 305, 306, 307


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Use open-access references wherever possible, but a paywalled reliable source
    is better than none, particularly for biographies of living people.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 06:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red June 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | June 2024, Volume 10, Issue 6, Numbers 293, 294, 308, 309, 310


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 07:05, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red August 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | July 2024, Volume 10, Issue 7, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 312, 313


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • A foreign language biography does not guarantee notability for English Wikipedia.
    Check the guidelines before you start.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 14:28, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red August 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | August 2024, Volume 10, Issue 8, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 313, 314, 315


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

  • TBD

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 19:57, 25 July 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

September 2024 at Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red | September 2024, Volume 10, Issue 9, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 316, 317


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Rosiestep (talk) 19:00, 26 August 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red October 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | October 2024, Volume 10, Issue 10, Numbers 293, 294, 318, 319, 320


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Unsure how to expand a stub article? Take a look at this guidance

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:06, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red November 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | November 2024, Vol 10, Issue 11, Nos 293, 294, 321, 322, 323


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:43, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]