User talk:Trinity112233

Request Unblocking November 2023

I agree to avoid editing or creating articles about Petar Tsankov. There is no need of confusion, I know and follow the Wiki policy. In summary, I avoid creating articles with conflict of interest. I am extremely saddened to experience blockage for a year.

Trinity112233

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, I am Trinity112233, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. For help, discuss on Talk page.

Regarding Mori Rajputs

I have reverted your move of Mori Rajputs as moving an article to draft space should only be done if there significant concerns (such as notability or lack of sourcing) which need to be addressed outside of article space. However, this long standing article does not meet this as the article can be improved in article space. Moving this article back to draftspace without discussion on the talk page may lead to a warning or a block. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 20:12, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dreamy Jazz, this user is repeatedly trying to get Mori Rajputs article deleted without any apparent reason or any discussion whatsoever. First he tried WP:PROD on the article [1], when I removed the tag explaining him that this is not Imperial Maurya dynasty who ruled from Patliputra but another one that ruled from Chittor. In the meantime I also improved the article a little bit. He didn't reply but later without any explanation he put WP:PROD again on the article [2] despite clear rules that WP:PROD must never be used a second time. Alongwith this he also inserted WP:G1 for speedy deletion while the article has clear cut sources and one administrator @utcursch has already given google book links on the talk page that the existence of this clan is supported by multiple sources. I removed the tag again asking him to discuss the matter beforehand. Now he moved the article to draft again without any reason, which you reverted. This user should be banned for his repetitive misdoings, the user is 3 year old account and should have known the rules of WP:PROD and moving an article to draft yet doing it. Sajaypal007 (talk) 12:57, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sajaypal007 if this user continues the behavior then a block is on the table. If you believe further action is needed now (such as a block or community ban), you can go to WP:ANI or WP:AN. However, I would note that as this user has not made further edits since the above warning I'm assuming for the time being that the message has been understood. Therefore, I'm not wanting to take further action for the time being. I've watchlisted the page and if further issues occur, I may intervene with page/move protection or blocks as necessary. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 13:08, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I agree, I am not going to report him for now as he must have understood the warning and hopefully don't try it again. Sajaypal007 (talk) 13:19, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dilip Mandal moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dilip Mandal, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:27, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Mobile computing. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Meters (talk) 16:51, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, right. I won't let it happen again. Trinity112233 16:57, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:INDICSCRIPT

Hi Trinity112233. You may want to read WP:INDICSCRIPT which will explain why Indic scripts are removed from leads and infoboxes. Happy editing. --Muhandes (talk) 10:08, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Maharaja Pateshwari Prasad Inter College

The article Maharaja Pateshwari Prasad Inter College has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Muhandes (talk) 10:09, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a non-profit transcript providing a government high school. It has a verified record in the government directory. Trinity112233 18:53, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Having a verified record does not show notability. Please see WP:NSCHOOL, WP:NORG, WP:GNG. --Muhandes (talk) 17:27, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Fi.Money

Hello, Trinity112233. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fi.Money, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:02, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Fi.Money

Hello, Trinity112233. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fi.Money".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:26, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dilip Mandal

Hello, Trinity112233. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dilip Mandal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dilip Mandal

Hello, Trinity112233. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dilip Mandal".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:59, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kannaujiya moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kannaujiya, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:14, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review, it can have provide independent references. Trinity112233 08:33, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Peter Tsankov

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Peter Tsankov requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 20:48, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Petar Tsankov

The article Petar Tsankov has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no real demonstration of notability. Being a CEO I think is enough to overcome WP:A7 but I still don't feel that notability has been established.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 20:50, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Petar Tsankov

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Petar Tsankov requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.

There only seems to be one reliable secondary source showing significant coverage (WP:GNG). If you are interested in this topic, may I suggest creating an article for LatticeFlow as the subject seems to meet general notability guidelines. For reliable sources see this google search. - GA Melbourne (talk) 06:49, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict - November 2022

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:46, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Trinity112233 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why do I always see that I am being compensated for this article?, This article has been deleted or subjected to advertisement or promotion, it is not like that, please unblock me, and also move the page from draft to article Trinity112233 18:11, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Wikipedia is not going to lower its notability and quality standards for articles so that you can collect a pay check. Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:23, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Trinity112233 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No issues, if I am not being unblocked, I am aware of Wikipedia is known for it's notability and free information, but the work is done by blocking me is not a privilege of admins - User:Ponyo, I am not getting a pay cheque, first of all, correct the spelling of 'check' to 'cheque' : Trinity112233 18:37, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are confused. Basically the primary benefit of being an admin is the ability to block users. Yamla (talk) 19:01, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Trinity112233 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am really sorry, but what I did was not a paid article seriously (in fact, it is okay, if the article is being deleted), I just use to Google the name of well known scientists, researchers, and engineers, whenever I think to create article, I sometimes create for scientists, edit government officials (India), and I also edit for Computer Science, Mathematics, etc. I request you to unblock me (because I edit for many topics in India, that is not covered by many editors, for again I am not going to anything that violates the policy of Wikipedia, I used combative style comments previously (I was frustated of being blocked) Trinity112233 18:28, 11 November 2022 (UTC)Trinity112233 18:28, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I have difficulty believing that you have found these subjects at random. Maybe someone else will believe it. 331dot (talk) 08:00, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note that as Wikipedia is global, spellings will differ depending on where people are from; in the United States where I live, we spell "check" or "paycheck". If you do it differently, that's fine, and will be respected, but please return that respect. 331dot (talk) 08:00, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I said, I refrain from editing in such an ambiguous manner, but if I am still not unblocked, then no issues, I should bye-bye as an editor. Trinity112233 10:39, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have many projects in science and technology. Please unblock me. I will not create a page for those who are notable, but not that high. Trinity112233 14:45, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Noting CU-verified block evasion using Aryeh Hanan (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki). --Blablubbs (talk) 14:14, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Trinity112233 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me, I said many times, I wasn't paid for articles, see my edit history, I am Software Engineer, so I created an article for these people, without strong evidence, only for writing articles with a lot of independent citations, still blocked. I have there are hundreds of fringe pages to be deleted, but they are still visible on Wikipedia, how could it be? Trinity112233 14:30, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Block evasion = automatic no. I've also removed your ability to edit this page, this is your fourth declined appeal. You can appeal to WP:UTRS in six months time with no additional sockpuppetry. MER-C 19:52, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UTRS appeal #66484

declined. WP:SO will be available on 2023-06-09, provided no further edits or requests before then. Remember, WP:SO is not a guarantee, the reasons for the block must still be addressed. -- Yamla (talk) 09:49, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kannaujiya

Hello, Trinity112233. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kannaujiya, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:02, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kannaujiya

Hello, Trinity112233. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kannaujiya".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:53, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Petar Tsankov

Hello, Trinity112233. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Petar Tsankov, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:33, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Chet Kanojia

Hello, Trinity112233. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chet Kanojia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:12, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #74601

is in progress. Restoring talk page access so user can request unblocking here. User agrees to not create BLP's or return to the expired BLP drafts. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:50, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Request Unblocking with Apology

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Trinity112233 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It took me longer to realise that it was my mistake, I didn't read the WP:BLP and WP:LIVE policy, and started a biography of living person. From now, I will read several policies before creating any article. I waited for 6 months, but realisation took time, instead of arguing, I should have read WP:BLP & WP:LIVE, it would have been a good idea for me. Thank you

Decline reason:

You've haven't addressed the confirmed sockpuppettry, and I don't think you're being forthright about your WP:COI. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:28, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Trinity112233 13:37, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Request unblocking again

It took me longer to realise that it was my mistake, I didn't read the WP:BLP and WP:LIVE policy, and started a biography of living person. From now, I will read several policies before creating any article. I waited for 6 months, but realisation took time, instead of arguing, I should have read WP:BLP & WP:LIVE, it would have been a good idea for me.

Thank you

Trinity112233 12:10, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting to : Deepfriedokra 12:08, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Request for unblocking with apology (3rd time)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Trinity112233 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As mentioned above, I apologize for being unware of WP:LIVE and WP:BLP, I rethinked of what I did was wrong (I opened a new account for editing). I opened account for contributing, not for violating the Wikipedia policy. There are hundreds of improvement remaining to be acted upon. I agree of that I come under sockpuppetry for creating new accounts to avoid detection or sanctions, because the mistake I made was, having no idea of WP:LIVE and WP:BLP, I shouldn't have created an article like that.

Please unblock me.

Decline reason:

You weren't blocked for BLP violations (certainly, you shouldn't do those either, but that wasn't the block reason), and not even for sockpuppetry (you got in hot water for that after you were already blocked and used a sock to evade it). You were blocked for promotional activity, and you haven't addressed that at all. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 18:48, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Trinity112233 21:46, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Appealing for unblocking with a strong reason

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Trinity112233 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As I mentioned above, additionally, I would like admins to tell that I wrote article for Petar Tsankov because he was my friend on LinkedIn, he is a computer science researcher, there are many pages of living scientists, so I thought should create one for him, it was seriously not a promotional, if it was promotional according to admins, how can I prove it?. Whatever it is, I am making a serious promise will not do it again. I never in my life asked for a money in return for doing anything, then why for article. If you see all my edits, I worked on important articles. I sometimes create articles for those who I think is necessary, but it violates the policy WP:BLP, I wasn't aware of it.

Thank you! Trinity112233 21:32, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The user has not agreed to avoid editing or creating articles about Petar Tsankov, which is a non-starter for me to unblock. Also, in their response below they say that they will keep in mind to "Draft Creation and Review" and "Approval and Publication", which doesn't make sense to me, causing me to have WP:CIR concerns. Z1720 (talk) 15:55, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi Trinity112233, please read WP:COI (a short version is at WP:COIE) and answer the following questions:

Why was your editing of Petar Tsankov considered a conflict of interest on Wikipedia? (Hint, it's not just about being paid to edit content.)
How should editors declare their conflict of interest?
How can editors with a conflict of interest propose new articles, and do you commit to using this process if unblocked?
What articles would you like to edit on Wikipedia if you are unblocked? Please list specific articles.

Please ping me if you have any questions. Z1720 (talk) 02:36, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

1. I can see as per WP:COIE, it is a bad act to edit articles for friends, families, clients, and closely attached members. Only reliable and strong presence on the Internet can assure if the article is to be there or not.

2. The editor should declare COI by placing this tag {{connected contributor}}, and {{UserBoxCOI}} on User Page.

3. As per COI summary, one should place requests, suggestions, sources on Article page or User Page to propose new articles.

4. I mostly edit articles such as Elections, Budget, University, Software, Computer Science, Mathematics, Culture, Religion, Race, etc.

I would like to contribute :

Indian National Congress

and many more like these. Trinity112233 22:13, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Additional questions:

Regarding question 3, while editors with a COI should propose changes on the talk page of the articles, a person without an article does not have a talk page. What process do we use for COI editors to create articles?
Why did you delete multiple Also, if unblocked, do you commit to not creating or editing any pages relating to Petar Tsankov? Z1720 (talk) 22:46, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

1. When editors with a Conflict of Interest (COI) want to create articles on Wikipedia, they are encouraged to follow a specific process to maintain the site's integrity and neutrality.

Disclosure of Conflict of Interest : If one has a COI regarding the subject one wants to create an article about, it's essential to be transparent about it. One should declare their conflict of interest on user page.

I will keep in mind to :

Request for Article Creation

Draft Creation and Review

Approval and Publication

Maintaining Neutrality

2. I deleted because of remark I got from so many editors, I didn't do it to save myself from admins, but it was not looking good. I regret doing things that breaks the rules of Wikipedia. From now, I would maintain the neutrality, verifiability, and reliablity.

I hope to be unblocked by administrators. I would like to do things like creating, editing, patrolling, handling sockpuppetry, etc.
Trinity112233 13:35, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If unblocked, I commit to not create articles that violates WP:LIVE and WP:BLP.

Thank you!.
Trinity112233 13:41, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Request unblocking

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Trinity112233 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I regret doing things that doesn't suit my identity and personality, I am not a kind of editor as people know me. What I have expressed above was indirect apology towards wrongdoing, it also means I will not create articles like Petar Tsankov. I expressed about things to keep in mind which I have mentioned above (line 10-13) (which is causing you to have WP:CIR

Decline reason:

This unblock request is almost unreadable, I have to echo the WP:CIR concerns above and decline this request due to those concerns. Aoidh (talk) 00:25, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thank you 😊 Trinity112233 20:37, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Request Unblocking (WP:CIR)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Trinity112233 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I agree to avoid editing or creating articles about Petar Tsankov. There is no need of confusin, I know and follow the Wiki policy. In summary, I avoid creating articles with conflict of interest.

Decline reason:

I, am good at editing in English, not the one who only creates article in English, only make edits to the topics. I get template ideas and for writing, I now use grammar tools to check any kinds of error. This response does not inspire confidence in your ability to evaluate your own skills or your competence to contribute to the English Wikipedia. If you want to continue editing Wikipedia, I'd recommend contributing to the project in your native language(s). Spicy (talk) 10:27, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thank you! Trinity112233 09:22, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK ... so if we unblock, what or who will you focus on editing articles about? Daniel Case (talk) 07:11, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am very happy that you replied.

If I am unblocked, I will contribute to the following topics.

1. Government.

2. Science & Technology.

3. Trending topics (Sam Altman, AI, Crisis, etc).

4. Improvement of articles that come under my knowledge such as Programming, Software, Computer Science.

And many more.

Thank you 🙏🏼 Trinity112233 08:47, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel Case and Rosguill: OK to unblock? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:21, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm concerned by the persistently weak English skills and am doubtful that they can become a net positive in the areas that they are proposing to contribute to, even if we treat the COI issues as water under the bridge. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:14, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I, am good at editing in English, not the one who only creates article in English, only make edits to the topics. I get template ideas and for writing, I now use grammar tools to check any kinds of error.

~ Trinity112233 06:54, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking request - December 2023

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Trinity112233 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand the importance of maintaining high standards on Wikipedia and am committed to upholding those standards through well-researched and well-written content.I would appreciate any feedback or guidance you could provide on my contributions. I am eager to contribute more to Wikipedia and believe that my skills align with the platform's goals. We should not conclude on the basis of past experience everytime.

Decline reason:

At this point you're just wasting our time. You are blocked for writing promotional articles while having a conflict of interest, something you have failed to address in your nine(!) previous unblock requests. There are additional concerns about your level of understanding of English; while that's not your fault, it may explain why you are not able to write a coherent unblock request or understand the policies you're being pointed to. I am revoking your talk page access again because you have yet to address the reason for your block and further appeals would not be a good use of administrators' time. You ma have more success contributing to the Hindi Wikipedia. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:58, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request help

I need help to get unblocked, because everyone is repeating the same process multiple times without any fruitful evaluation. There are thousands of ineligible editors free to break the rules, I am not one of them, just for a false narrative I was blocked, I can write in bith Hindi and English. If I am not unblocked, I would request help from the Wikipedia founder.

Trinity112233 Trinity112233 13:21, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The admin help template is not for appealing blocks and you do not have a right to appeal to the founder, whether blocked or unblocked. I suggest you read the guidance in the templates above and the remarks from the multiple administrators who have taken the time to review your unblock requests. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:48, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #87793

is declined. We don't want AI chatbots editing Wikipedia. --Yamla (talk) 18:23, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #92696

Closed. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 05:14, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]