Jump to content

User talk:KHR FolkMyth

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, KHR FolkMyth!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.


The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.


The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips
  • Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
  • It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
  • If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~), be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
  • When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
  • If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
  • Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Two Pieces of Nuts (April 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Numberguy6 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Numberguy6 (talk) 22:55, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, KHR FolkMyth! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Numberguy6 (talk) 22:55, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Two Pieces of Nuts (Hungarian folktale), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 23:28, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The Children with the Golden Locks (Georgian folktale), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 13:42, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Rich Khan Badma has been accepted

[edit]
The Rich Khan Badma, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 14:49, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome KHR FolkMyth!

Hello KHR FolkMyth. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions!

I'm Sm8900, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

Some pages of helpful information to get you started:
  Introduction to Wikipedia
  The five pillars of Wikipedia
  Editing tutorial
  How to edit a page
  Simplified Manual of Style
  The basics of Wikicode
  How to develop an article
  How to create an article
  Help pages
  What Wikipedia is not
Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:
  Do be bold
  Do assume good faith
  Do be civil
  Do keep cool!
  Do maintain a neutral point of view
  Don't spam
  Don't infringe copyright
  Don't edit where you have a conflict of interest
  Don't commit vandalism
  Don't get blocked
If you need further help, you can:
  Ask a question
or you can:
  Get help at the Teahouse
or even:
  Ask an experienced editor to "adopt" you

Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.

There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
  Fight vandalism
  Be a WikiFairy or a WikiGnome
  Help contribute to articles
  Perform maintenance tasks
           
  Become a member of a project that interests you
  Help design new templates
  Subscribe and contribute to The Signpost
  Translate articles from Wikipedias in other languages

To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.

Please remember to:

  • Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp.
  • Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.
The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!

Sincerely, Sm8900 (talk) 19:11, 20 April 2022 (UTC)   (Leave me a message)[reply]

Sm8900 (talk) 19:11, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Story of Arab-Zandiq has been accepted

[edit]
The Story of Arab-Zandiq, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 21:59, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The Bird that Spoke the Truth (New Mexican folktale), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 12:24, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The Story of The Farmer's Three Daughters (Icelandic fairy tale), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 21:34, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Three Golden Children (folklore) has been accepted

[edit]
The Three Golden Children (folklore), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 03:59, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The Tale of the Woodcutter and his Daughters (Egyptian folktale), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 12:48, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Ruby Prince (Punjabi folktale) has been accepted

[edit]
The Ruby Prince (Punjabi folktale), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 18:52, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The Story of Princess Zeineb and King Leopard, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 11:00, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome KHR FolkMyth!

Hello KHR FolkMyth. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions!

I'm Sm8900, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

Some pages of helpful information to get you started:
  Introduction to Wikipedia
  The five pillars of Wikipedia
  Editing tutorial
  How to edit a page
  Simplified Manual of Style
  The basics of Wikicode
  How to develop an article
  How to create an article
  Help pages
  What Wikipedia is not
Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:
  Do be bold
  Do assume good faith
  Do be civil
  Do keep cool!
  Do maintain a neutral point of view
  Don't spam
  Don't infringe copyright
  Don't edit where you have a conflict of interest
  Don't commit vandalism
  Don't get blocked
If you need further help, you can:
  Ask a question
or you can:
  Get help at the Teahouse
or even:
  Ask an experienced editor to "adopt" you

Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.

There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
  Fight vandalism
  Be a WikiFairy or a WikiGnome
  Help contribute to articles
  Perform maintenance tasks
           
  Become a member of a project that interests you
  Help design new templates
  Subscribe and contribute to The Signpost
  Translate articles from Wikipedias in other languages

To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.

Please remember to:

  • Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp.
  • Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.
The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!

Sm8900 (talk) 20:02, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Two Pieces of Nuts

[edit]

On 10 May 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Two Pieces of Nuts, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that István Banó collected Two Pieces of Nuts in Baranya? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Two Pieces of Nuts. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Two Pieces of Nuts), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Champavati has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Champavati. Thanks! asilvering (talk) 03:34, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Champavati has been accepted

[edit]
Champavati, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 15:52, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Goose Wife (Inuit) has been accepted

[edit]
The Goose Wife (Inuit), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 13:58, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The Golden Fish, The Wonder-working Tree and the Golden Bird, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Artem.G (talk) 08:37, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The King of the Snakes (Chinese folktale), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 07:39, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: King Ravohimena and the Magic Grains has been accepted

[edit]
King Ravohimena and the Magic Grains, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 12:28, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zarlik and Munglik (Uzbek folktale) has been accepted

[edit]
Zarlik and Munglik (Uzbek folktale), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 14:46, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The Golden Eggplant (Japanese folktale), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 22:16, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Black Colt (Iranian folktale) has been accepted

[edit]
The Black Colt (Iranian folktale), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 13:17, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yasmin and the Serpent Prince (Iranian folktale), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 13:17, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Horse Lurja has been accepted

[edit]
The Horse Lurja, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

HenryTemplo (talk) 10:53, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome KHR FolkMyth!

Hello KHR FolkMyth. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions!

I'm Sm8900, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

Some pages of helpful information to get you started:
  Introduction to Wikipedia
  The five pillars of Wikipedia
  Editing tutorial
  How to edit a page
  Simplified Manual of Style
  The basics of Wikicode
  How to develop an article
  How to create an article
  Help pages
  What Wikipedia is not
Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:
  Do be bold
  Do assume good faith
  Do be civil
  Do keep cool!
  Do maintain a neutral point of view
  Don't spam
  Don't infringe copyright
  Don't edit where you have a conflict of interest
  Don't commit vandalism
  Don't get blocked
If you need further help, you can:
  Ask a question
or you can:
  Get help at the Teahouse
or even:
  Ask an experienced editor to "adopt" you

Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.

There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
  Fight vandalism
  Be a WikiFairy or a WikiGnome
  Help contribute to articles
  Perform maintenance tasks
           
  Become a member of a project that interests you
  Help design new templates
  Subscribe and contribute to The Signpost
  Translate articles from Wikipedias in other languages

To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.

Please remember to:

  • Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp.
  • Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.
The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!

Sm8900 (talk) 23:33, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Child with a Moon on his Chest (Sotho), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman (talk) 10:43, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ATU numbers into sandbox

[edit]

Hi KHR FolkMyth. Thanks for adding the ATU numbers to the entries in my sandbox. I’ve been wondering what, if anything, to do about the individual numbers. They could go into a “list of...” article, and the database I’m gradually building up (helped by the numbers you’ve provided) would allow me to create that, but it would then be quite a bit of work to find references for the ones that Aarne et al don’t mention themselves, and it would need to somehow note any reclassification that has taken place in the past. Multiple numbers would be needed to deal with different sources using different numbers for that reason. For the groups, I’ve simply categorised articles into several groups if they have several ATU numbers for any reason (multiple themes, debatable classification, re-classification etc.) Maybe any use of specific numbers belongs in the articles themselves and not in categories or lists? --Northernhenge (talk) 21:45, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Horse-Devil and the Witch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saz. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Son of Seven Mothers (Indian folktale), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 20:03, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The Tale about Baba-Yaga (Russian fairy tale), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

RB Talk to the Beans? 08:11, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Champa Si Ton has been accepted

[edit]
Champa Si Ton, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Artem.G (talk) 11:21, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sivko-Burko has been accepted

[edit]
Sivko-Burko, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Artem.G (talk) 18:21, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sigurd, the King's Son (Icelandic fairy tale), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Artem.G (talk) 19:24, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fragolette

[edit]

I've got some time and uploaded images from Fragolette for you.

Artem.G (talk) 09:52, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the help. KHR FolkMyth (talk) 01:28, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The Swan Queen (Lithuanian fairy tale), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Artem.G (talk) 18:10, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Dog, and His Human Speech (West African folktale), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Artem.G (talk) 12:42, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Moving discussion:

Fixing the problems with Two Pieces of Nuts

[edit]

Hello, GenQuest. I saw the warning atop the article page and was wondering: barring the "LEDE" section, what does it mean to be an "indiscrimate list"? The extensive "See also" section? The tales listed at "See also" are other tales from the same tale type, collected and published from all over the world and separated according to geography and common motifs - of course, based on the appropriate scholarship. That said, I have replaced the "See also" for a template that lists the tale type and other variants.KHR FolkMyth (talk) 04:32, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KHR FolkMyth. Yes. The SA lists are waaaay too long. Please review LINKFARM. They seem to be present throughout the folklore articles you've authored, so I only marked two. Same with the LEDEs. 05:22, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello again, GenQuest. Following your advice, I've edited the articles to remove the extensive "See also" for a template. As for the LEDE, any tip on how to improve them?KHR FolkMyth (talk) 00:07, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, KHR FolkMyth. That's a start. However, you needn't remove the See also sections entirely. Focused lists of 1–5 entries are optimal, as long as they can add to the understanding of the article. I went ahead and did the LEDE re-write for you, and some other minor edits for clarity, on the article. All in all, good job. GenQuest "scribble" 14:34, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The Green Man of Knowledge (Scottish folktale), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 14:09, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Wife from the Dragon Palace has been accepted

[edit]
The Wife from the Dragon Palace, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

R E A D I N G Talk to the Beans? 11:22, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:The Green Man of Knowledge (Scottish foltkale), was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:02, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The White Wolf (Waloon fairy tale) has been accepted

[edit]
The White Wolf (Waloon fairy tale), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

R E A D I N G Talk to the Beans? 07:25, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The Beautiful Palace East of the Sun and North of the Earth, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 08:03, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trandafiru (Romanian fairy tale) has been accepted

[edit]
Trandafiru (Romanian fairy tale), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Artem.G (talk) 06:36, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm CorbieVreccan. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Bear worship have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Read up on how to properly format citations, and use them to cite actual content; just adding lists of articles to a "Further Reading" section, on multiple articles, especially without any edit summaries can be perceived as WP:CITESPAM. - CorbieVreccan 22:09, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Man and the Girl at the Underground Mansion, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Reading Beans (talk) 09:49, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Again, The Snake Bridegroom has been accepted

[edit]
Again, The Snake Bridegroom, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 17:05, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

El Lissitzky's folktales

[edit]

Hey, thought that it can be interesting for you: commons:Category:Ukraynishe Folkmayses by El Lissitzky and commons:Category:Vaysrusishe Folkmayses by El Lissitzky. These are illustrations made by El Lissitzky to Leib Kvitko's Yiddish books of Ukrainian and Belarusian folktales. Artem.G (talk) 15:25, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why, thank you! KHR FolkMyth (talk) 15:27, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The Youth and the Maiden with Stars on their Foreheads and Crescents on their Breasts, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 23:40, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Princess Aubergine has been accepted

[edit]
Princess Aubergine, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Artem.G (talk) 11:59, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Little Nightingale the Crier has been accepted

[edit]
Little Nightingale the Crier, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Reading Beans (talk) 12:56, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The Son of a Horse (Chinese folktale), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 17:16, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Two Pieces of Nuts

[edit]

Information icon Hello, KHR FolkMyth. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Two Pieces of Nuts, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vellaunus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cadwallon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Two Pieces of Nuts

[edit]

Hello, KHR FolkMyth. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Two Pieces of Nuts".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:56, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Horse Lurja, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Basque Country.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ataegina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pliny.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Trebaruna, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coria.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bandua, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Stem, Beira Alta and Beira Baixa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Black Colt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bismillah.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Donotknow (Russian fairy tale) has been accepted

[edit]
Donotknow (Russian fairy tale), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 19:13, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hassan of Basra (January 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 06:18, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

[edit]

Hello, I'm Ppt91. I noticed that you made a change to an article, The Enchanted Pig, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ppt91 (talk) 01:41, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please ignore, the revert was in error and content has been restored! Ppt91 (talk) 01:45, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Ppt91. Thank you for your consideration. As I am aware of Wikipedia's need to source *anything*, I *always* provide a citation to anything I add. KHR FolkMyth (talk) 01:47, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
You have just been doing a ton of work in an area that needs it, and I thank you for it. Drmies (talk) 01:52, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Why, thank you! KHR FolkMyth (talk) 01:55, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hassan of Basra has been accepted

[edit]
Hassan of Basra, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 05:58, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
The Story of the Abandoned Princess is a very good page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 03:28, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. KHR FolkMyth (talk) 03:29, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
The Tale of Clever Hasan and the Talking Horse is a very good article. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 03:24, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Story of Arab-Zandiq, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tunisian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yasmin and the Serpent Prince, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ablution.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:03, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page The Sprig of Rosemary, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:12, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
Kiranmala (Bengali folktale) is a very good article. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 02:39, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Bindus (Illyrian god) has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bindus (Illyrian god). Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 12:03, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bindus (Illyrian god) has been accepted

[edit]
Bindus (Illyrian god), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 12:28, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Tezin Nan Dlo

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Tezin Nan Dlo, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:32, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

[edit]

Hello KHR FolkMyth!

  • The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
  • We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
  • Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
  • Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
  • If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:50, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dawn, Midnight and Twilight, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baranya.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tsar Saltan

[edit]

All infromation you put in edit summaries must be added to the asticle, otherwise it is unclear what relation this belarusian tale has to Pushkin's tale. - Altenmann >talk 02:18, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Altenmann, done and done! Thank you for bringing it to my attention. KHR FolkMyth (talk) 13:20, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fr. Richter

[edit]

Richter, Fr. "Lithauische Märchen" -- I failed to find any scholarly reference which discuss this person and this collection. Therefore I am afraid this is not a reliable source for folklore. The texts of these fairy tales are not accompanies with information about their sources, i.e., they are of unknown provenance. This is not how ethngraphers publish their work ven in 19th century. I strongly suspect it is a literary hoax. Unless you convince me otherwise with good sources, I am going to remove refs to him from wikipedia. - Altenmann >talk 19:12, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Altenmann: well, some of this "Richter"'s fairy tale collection have been discussed in academy:
  • Bolte/Polívka's 3-tome Anmerkungen of the Grimm's tales list "Das Mädchen und die Schlange" under the discussion of "The Frog Prince" (Vol. 1, p. 7).
  • The tale "Der einäugige Riese", also by this Richter, was at least referenced in Frazer's scholium of Apollodorus's Libraries as a modern version of the Polyphemus's tale.
  • The tale "Der starke Hans und der starke Peter" was also listed under Bolte/Polívka's discussion of Grimm's tale nr. 60, The Two Brothers.
  • Richter's tale "Der Rabe" was also listed by Bolte/Polívka.
  • Tale "Der Bote aus dem Himmel" was listed in Bolte/Polívka's Vol. 2, in the notes to tale nr. 104, "Die klugen Leute".
  • This "Zeitschrift für Volkskunde [de]" is also a source on folklore, according to its article.
KHR FolkMyth (talk) 23:47, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I did see them. I searched google myself. But none of them discussed Rischter and his credentials, with one notable exception: Apolidorus wrote (being a polite person, I guess :-) "From Lithuania is reported a tale, which bears a close, if not a suspicious, resemblance to a Homer's story." He also footnotes it: "The author says nothing as to the source of the tale". Ethnographers know only too well about contamination by literary influences of narrators. This was even a subject of a funny scene in one old Russian film when villagers's choir sung an excerpt from Tale of Tsar Saltan pretending it is a genuine local folk song. We know nothing about a "Fr. Richter", and per sikipedia WP:RS rules he cannot be a reliable source to be cited. Initially I mistakenly thought he was Johann Paul Friedrich Richter, a.k.a. Jean Paul (Fr. Richter), but he died long before this publication and anyway none of bibliographies of this famous poet contain "Lithauische Märchen". - Altenmann >talk 01:14, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm... Okay, do what is right, then. KHR FolkMyth (talk) 01:22, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Parameter for pages

[edit]

Hello KHR FolkMyth; I hope you are doing well. Regarding your partial revert (diff) in Aeolic Greek, it is my understanding that commas are only used for non-sequential pages. For example, per Template:Citation Style documentation § pages, which I linked in my edit summary (diff) as well:

  • pages: A range of pages in the source that supports the content. Use either |page= or |pages=, but not both. Separate using an en dash (–); separate non-sequential pages with a comma (,); do not use to indicate the total number of pages in the source. Displays preceded by |pp. unless |no-pp=yes.

Likewise, per Help:Citation Style 1 § Pages:

  • pages: pages in the cited source containing the information that supports the article text. Separate page ranges with an en dash: – , for example |pages=236–239. Separate non-sequential pages either with commas or semicolons, for example |pages=157, 159. The form |pages=461, 466–467 is used when you are citing both non-contiguous and sequential pages. For page numbers higher than 999, either do not use thousands separators or enclose the page number in accept-this-as-written markup to avoid commas being erroneously interpreted as list separators, e.g. |pages=((1,234{{endash}}1,235)). For multiple hyphenated pages, use the accept-this-as-written markup to avoid the hyphens being converted to dashes, e.g. |pages=((1{{hyphen}}2)), ((3{{hyphen}}4)).

Lastly, see the relevant Template:Harvard citation no brackets § Location in the source text, which also includes an example with sequential pages; similar to the aforementioned in Aeolic Greek.

  • Article text.<ref>{{harvnb|Smith|2020|pp=25–26}}</ref>

I don't think the etymology by Beekes (2010) [2009], being separated into two entries, affects this. Anyway, thanks for your time. Demetrios1993 (talk) 20:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, no problem at all. Thank you for the notice. If you wish to revert, I'm not opposed to it, if it is part of Wikipedia's standards. KHR FolkMyth (talk) 22:28, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi KHR FolkMyth. Thank you for your work on The Belbati Princess. Another editor, TechnoSquirrel69, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating this article! I've added a few cleanup tags to highlight some issues with the prose; primarily, the retellings of the tale are excessively detailed and need to be significantly pruned to be encyclopedic. Let me know if you have any questions!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|TechnoSquirrel69}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 00:44, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • I pruned the main plot summary some, but obviously a lot needs to be done. KHR, I don't know if you care, but each one of these articles on tales you churn out could have been on the front page in the DYK section. Drmies (talk) 21:56, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject

[edit]

Hi, I see you've contributed a lot to The Child with a Moon on his Chest (Sotho), would you be interested in joining a wikiproject on oral tradition? Kowal2701 (talk) 15:36, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kowal2701:, sorry for the late reply. I'm honored for the invitation, but I think I might pass. Wish you good luck on this endeavour! I'm still editing articles about myths, literature, and folktales/fairy tales, though. KHR FolkMyth (talk) 16:58, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm genuinely really impressed with the work you're doing, relentlessly high quality. I understand a lot of editors prefer to work independently, if there's any way we can assist you, please feel free to let us know. You might find the assessment categories useful once they're done? Kowal2701 (talk) 17:10, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Btw the page is at WP:WikiProject Anthropology/Oral tradition taskforce, it's still very new so won't be of much use atm. We hope to make resources like style guides, like WP:WikiProject Climate change/Style guide, and your input would be greatly appreciated, but absolutely no worries if not, sorry for badgering Kowal2701 (talk) 18:08, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No problem at all. KHR FolkMyth (talk) 18:09, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Kowal2701:, I think the people at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Mythology (Wikipedia Project Mythology) can be of help, since there is a great overlap between oral tradition, written literature and mythology, any help from any of the other camps is very useful. KHR FolkMyth (talk) 18:14, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, but I 've already messaged all of them lol. I'm going through various categories and messaging editors who contributed lots to a related article. I've done Category:Oral tradition, Category:Oral literature, doing Category:Folklore now, have Category:Legends and Category:Ethnic groups in Africa by country lined up, are there any others you know of that might be good? Kowal2701 (talk) 18:21, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Mythology would be good like you said Kowal2701 (talk) 18:22, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No one at the moment besides those you mentioned. KHR FolkMyth (talk) 18:22, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Kowal2701:: A good starting point could be the Enzyklopädie des Märchens. Many reputed authors wrote articles dealing with the local and national traditions of many countries. If you have access to De Gruyter, it is available there, in German. KHR FolkMyth (talk) 01:44, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I’ll add that to the bibliography on the page Kowal2701 (talk) 08:57, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Kowal2701:: for Madagascar and Indic Ocean traditions, specially from African populations, search for the works of Lee Haring. KHR FolkMyth (talk) 12:11, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Kowal2701:: The page Cuento, in his further reading, has many sources I added. Perhaps there are valuable references that may add to the study of Spanish/Latin America traditions. KHR FolkMyth (talk) 23:47, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I added something I found elsewhere but it might be worth adding one of the general catalogues. Do they discuss oral tradition specifically? Kowal2701 (talk) 07:23, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Kowal2701: The catalogues may discuss oral tradition in their introductions or in a conclusion-like chapter. In the articles I edit, I use their indexing/classification, which is their "meat", so to speak.
You are free to add anything you may find useful to that page. I do not own the article. I am simply someone deeply fascinated with folklore and comparative mythology. KHR FolkMyth (talk) 11:56, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I'll have a look. Yeah I can see that lol, it's a great way to get to know other cultures. Feel free to add any drafts you're working on that you would be comfortable with other people contributing to to the taskforce page, honestly some drafts I do I have a vision for what I want it to be so don't like people contributing it or having to articulate the vision, so no worries if not Kowal2701 (talk) 12:19, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi KHR FolkMyth. Thank you for your work on Nemtudomka (Hungarian folktale). Another editor, Wasianpower, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for the comprehensive article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Wasianpower}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

🌸wasianpower🌸 (talkcontribs) 20:46, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! KHR FolkMyth (talk) 21:17, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, The Horse of the Cloud and the Wind

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, The Horse of the Cloud and the Wind. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – The Wonderful Sea-Horse. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at The Wonderful Sea-Horse. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 03:40, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey KHR FolkMyth, to say I was surprised when I was reviewing this article would be an understatement. Could you explain why you forked almost all of the content from one article into another? TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 03:45, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@TechnoSquirrel69:: to be frank, I can re-add the tales back into "The Wonderful Sea-Horse", since they refer to a cycle of tales that exist in Iran and adjacent areas (but mostly Iran) wherein the hero finds his equine companion, the magic sea-horse, either in the sea (which is occurs in most of the tales) or rescues the foal from the rim of the well.
However, I separated the tales since, to add "The Horse of the Cloud and the Wind", which is a variant of the cycle, to my mind, would have made the page even larger.
Since I edit mostly about fairy tales, you can see for my history of contributions that larger pages about tales, like The Dancing Water, the Singing Apple, and the Speaking Bird, The Love for Three Oranges (fairy tale), Egle the Queen of Serpents/The Lake Beetle as Groom and Swan Maiden, I've been trying to break off their contents to shorter and more manageable pages with scholarly sources focused on them. KHR FolkMyth (talk) 10:34, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

[edit]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

[edit]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:41, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]