Jump to content

User talk:K6ka/Archive 13

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12Archive 13Archive 14Archive 15Archive 20

19:39, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Edits

Hello, I would like to apologize for the edits on "Casa de los Azulejos: Difference between revisions"

This is a shared IP at a public school so there are many people here.

64.30.37.124 (talk) 16:18, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

How much work

how much work do you do on Wikipedia? 204.84.165.5 (talk) 21:39, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

What's going on here?? This wasn't me...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:2600:1010:B05A:1601:AC66:BA5A:F055:A3E6

For some reason, I got 2 revert notices from you for vandalism that not only were NOT made by me, but weren't shown as being part of my account. I've been editing here for years, and obviously have never vandalized once (why would I). Can you please look into this when you have a chance, and let me know if my account has somehow been compromised? I don't think it has, however - I have certainly never given anybody my password...online or offline. Thanks.

Bomb319 (talk) 17:10, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

@Bomb319: You were "pinged" because my warning message contained a link to your userpage. Wikipedia has a system called Echo (notifications) that pings people if someone makes an edit on a discussion page that contains a link to their userpage (Like this message; I used the {{Ping}} template, which really just links to your userpage, so you get pinged). You were pinged because my warning message contained a link to your userpage, not because I sent you a message or that you did anything wrong. The message was intended for the IP user, not you. I hope this clarifies the situation. --I am k6ka Talk to me! See what I have done 17:31, 19 November 2015 (UTC)


Ah, OK. Thank you for replying and taking the time to explain what happened :)

Bomb319 (talk) 00:14, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 November 2015

Bot automation at Wikipedia:Today's articles for improvement

Greetings WikiProject TAFI members!

Over the past two weeks, there has been extensive discussion on introducing bot automation to assist with maintenance of the Today's Articles for Improvement project. A bot has now been approved for trial and will carry out the weekly duties. The bots first run will occur around 00:00, 22 November 2015 (UTC) (midnight on Sunday).

If you have been assisting any of the weekly maintenance tasks, please refrain from doing so this week. The bot needs to be tested and proven it can do the job, and it only gets one chance per week. The tasks will include:

Updating the accomplishments and archiving selections is still done manually, along with daily tasks such as adding approved entries to the articles for improvement page. These will become automated in the near future.

We hope the bot proves to serve well, and by carrying out the routine housekeeping tasks we can boost the overall efficiency and effectiveness of the project. MusikBot thanks you for your service in helping with the weekly tasks in the past, and for your cooperation during this trial period :)

Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:48, 21 November 2015 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions for all project notifications

Diwali

Hello, I originally made that request but my IP address changed, it was never answered properly as you will be able to see that the user who initially answered never replied after I suggested a compromise instead they changed it so it appeared to be answered, but it never was. (120.144.35.113 (talk) 09:10, 21 November 2015 (UTC))

So you knew about this request, but you ignored it after it was changed back. You shouldn't have changed it to answered because it never was. (124.180.201.95 (talk) 23:21, 22 November 2015 (UTC))

This week's article for improvement (week 48, 2015)

Hello, K6ka.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Coffee production in Cuba

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Goods and services • Marie Serneholt


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

How do I make a new Wikipedia page/person

Can you please tell me how to make a new person on wikepedia James is secretly your mum (talk) 18:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Edit

I am new to this, where does the source go exactly? I know stupid question...help? Primadonalounge (talk) 18:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

@Primadonalounge: See the Help:Footnotes page. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 18:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

20:26, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:14, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Gamer's Guide to Pretty Much Everything

Hey, thank you for contacting me! I dissagre with that title of the the first episode because it cant be the same name with the title of the series. In addition the Greek Episode says the title in greek after the intro... Gazakias1970 (talk) 18:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)gazakias1970

@Gazakias1970: Where does it say that the first episode of the series can't be named the same as the title of the series? —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 18:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

This wasn't me, either...

I received a revert notice from you that was apparently directed to me because of my current IP address. I'm staying at an airbnb and using its wifi; anyone who has stayed at this house might have used the same IP address if it's static, which I don't know. I have never edited the Hydrology page, and I am logged in with my user name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geneal~enwiki (talkcontribs) 01:55, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

@Geneal~enwiki: I believe you're barking up the wrong tree, because 1) Your user talk page doesn't have any warnings, and 2) I actually have never edited the Hydrology page before. You got the notification because you probably accessed Wikipedia before you logged in; when not logged in, any messages sent to that IP address will be visible to anyone using that IP address. You can safely ignore those messages and log in, where those warnings should not appear again for the duration of your login session. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 02:03, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 November 2015

This week's article for improvement (week 49, 2015)

The First Geneva Convention (1864) is one of the earliest formulations of international law.
Hello, K6ka.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

International law

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Coffee production in Cuba • Goods and services


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

16:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Tools

Hey there. Just wondering what tools you use while doing your Recent Changes Patrol. I see that you almost instantly leave messages on talk pages after reverting something. Just curious. --allthefoxes (Talk) 17:55, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi Allthefoxes. I use a wide variety of tools to assist me with recent changes patrolling. The one you probably saw me use is called Huggle, a standalone application written in C++. I also use STiki, another standalone application written in Java, and Twinkle, a browser gadget, written in Javascript. I also use popups, which can make viewing diffs in recent changes faster. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 18:07, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Brady Haran "Professional Flag Critic"

I would like to push through the update to for "Professional Flag Critic" on Brady Haran's page based on information from the following source: Hello Internet #52 [1]

Haran and his co-host, CGP Grey, make the case for which why they should be considered "Flag Critics" at 14:30 of the podcast. Thank you for your consideration!

--50.206.99.186 (talk) 18:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but this does not belong in the "Associated acts" section, and I'm afraid it may not have much of a place in the article either; not everything that someone says or does is worth including on Wikipedia. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 18:20, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ Grey, CGP. "20,000 Years of Torment". Hello Internet. CGP Grey. Retrieved 30 November 2015.

Faderman

YOU'VE GOT MAIL.

WitchyWordy (talk) 19:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello K6ka

Sorry,

This is my material, its not a copyrighted material (or you mean the photo?? its Creative Commons photo)! In the old section (the text) there were some incorrect!!! information on Georg Kolbe. Best GKM Berlin — Preceding unsigned comment added by GKM Berlin (talkcontribs) 12:05, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

@GKM Berlin: No, I am not referring to the image. I am referring to the fact that the text you inserted into the article was simply copied and pasted from another source. Even if it belongs to you, if it does not have a license compatible with Wikipedia, we cannot accept it. See Wikipedia:Copyright violations. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 12:11, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 December 2015

This week's article for improvement (week 50, 2015)

Princess Leia with characteristic hairstyle cosplayed.
Hello, K6ka.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Princess Leia

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: International law • Coffee production in Cuba


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

17:52, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Can you fix the Lianne la Havas page for me at the end? i wanted to add her new nomination and did so, but the rest of the page is running into the awards section and i do not know how to fix it! please and thanks Jbuddy101 (talk) 18:03, 7 December 2015 (UTC) buddy

i wanted to add her new nomination and did so, but the rest of the page is running into the awards section and i do not know how to fix it! please and thanks I'm new to editing wiki, so i thought i could handle a simple add, but it didn't work, and i assume I've messed up her page, please help!!!!! [1] ~ ~ ~ ~jbuddy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jbuddy101 (talkcontribs) 18:03, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

@Jbuddy101: Fixed. The table wasn't closed, which is why it "ate" the rest of the page. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 18:07, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
@K6ka: i did that several times, and it didn't work >.< thanks for the fix i greatly appreciate it


~jbuddy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jbuddy101 (talkcontribs) 18:03, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Revert: Sadhu Miranda

@K6ka: The article is about this movie, and not about this movie. Besides the original Wikidata link was not correct - linking the wrong movie, hence i made the change. Thanks for understanding that mirandaa and mirandal or mirandaal are used interchangeably in tamil, though the former is used colloquially while the latter is used literally. - ʋɐɾɯnTalk 09:26, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

I am a primary source

You have deleted a few sentences that I wrote because I did not tell from where the sources are. I am a primary source. I am a student of the person that that is featured in the wiki page. 178.190.55.249 (talk) 18:10, 10 December 2015 (UTC) Evgeny Stoylarov

Hey there. Even if you heard it with your own ears, wikipedia has a few guidelines about this type of thing. Feel free to read WP:V, it may be relevant. But, basically, just saying "I heard it" is not verifiable or reliable. --allthefoxes (Talk) 18:12, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
^^ What Allthefoxes said. "I am the primary source" isn't something that rolls on Wikipedia; we don't consider it a reliable source, because anybody can lie and claim to be the source. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 18:13, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Commonwealth Fund edit

I am reluctantly responding to your comment regarding a revert on the Commonwealth Fund page. The edit I made was someone's last name that is incorrectly spelled. It is Samuel O. Thier and NOT Samuel O. Their. If you continue to think I am wrong, I suggest you look at the "select past board members" section on the same page or conduct a Google Search on the individual in question. I now would like to ask you, why would you consider my edit incorrect without doing any research on your end? It makes me want to not participate in the improvement of wiki. 96.58.206.230 (talk) 22:33, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 December 2015

Ellipticcoin → Gatland One Name Study

Gatland One Name Study renamed from Ellipticcoin is simply using an old account to begin a serious genealogical study of the surname of Gatland. I am a Guild member of www.one-name.org. My study is not as an employee but as a genealogy researcher in my home who has a subscription to the site and holds the ownership of the study. When other genealogy researchers use the keyword Gatland or any place or other surname in the articles, they will find my study page easier. I also have a website that is in its early stages www.gatlandonenamestudy.com and a facebook page as well. The Wiki page as the others will be developed over time as the study progresses. Wiki is the perfect place to tie the three together world-wide.

Thank you for your consideration. --Ellipticcoin (talk) 13:59, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

@Ellipticcoin: Sorry, that doesn't address my concerns in that the username you are requesting may be seen as unacceptable by some editors, especially considering that it is the name of a website and that it is related to the topics you wish to write about. Please pick a new name. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 17:22, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Please leave my user name to Ellipticcoin. I will seek a different path. --Ellipticcoin (talk) 19:05, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 51, 2015)

The word scandal is used a few times in several bibles like Douay–Rheims Bible.
Hello, K6ka.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Scandal

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Princess Leia • International law


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 01:25, 14 December 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

17:42, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 December 2015

This week's article for improvement (week 52, 2015)

Hors d'oeuvre, also known as an appetizer or starter, is a food item served before the main courses of a meal.
Hello, K6ka.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Hors d'oeuvre

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Scandal • Princess Leia


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:08, 21 December 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

Yes i am sure

Yes i am sure to change username — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akash Deep Pannu (talkcontribs) 15:15, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

18:29, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

VisualEditor News #6—2015

Read this in another languageSubscription list

Did you know?

A new, simpler system for editing will offer a single Edit button. Once the page has opened, you can switch back and forth between visual and wikitext editing.

Screenshot showing a pop-up dialog for switching from the wikitext editor to VisualEditor
If you prefer having separate edit buttons, then you can set that option in your preferences, either in a pop-up dialog the next time you open the visual editor, or by going to Special:Preferences and choosing the setting that you want:
Screenshot showing a drop-down menu in Special:Preferences

The current plan is for the default setting to have the Edit button open the editing environment you used most recently.

You can read and help translate the user guide, which has more information about how to use the visual editor.

Since the last newsletter, the VisualEditor Team has fixed many bugs and expanded the mathematics formula tool. Their workboard is available in Phabricator. Their current priorities are improving support for languages such as Japanese and Arabic, and providing rich-media tools for formulæ, charts, galleries and uploading.

Recent improvements

You can switch from the wikitext editor to the visual editor after you start editing.

The LaTeX mathematics formula editor has been significantly expanded. (T118616) You can see the formula as you change the LaTeX code. You can click buttons to insert the correct LaTeX code for many symbols.

Future changes

The single edit tab project will combine the "Edit" and "Edit source" tabs into a single "Edit" tab, like the system already used on the mobile website. (T102398) Initially, the "Edit" tab will open whichever editing environment you used last time. Your last editing choice will be stored as a cookie for logged-out users and as an account preference for logged-in editors. Logged-in editors will be able to set a default editor in the Editing tab of Special:Preferences in the drop-down menu about "Editing mode:".

The visual editor will be offered to all editors at the following Wikipedias in early 2016: Amharic, Buginese, Min Dong, Cree, Manx, Hakka, Armenian, Georgian, Pontic, Serbo-Croatian, Tigrinya, Mingrelian, Zhuang, and Min Nan. (T116523) Please post your comments and the language(s) that you tested at the feedback thread on mediawiki.org. The developers would like to know how well it works. Please tell them what kind of computer, web browser, and keyboard you are using.

In 2016, the feedback pages for the visual editor on many Wikipedias will be redirected to mediawiki.org. (T92661)

Testing opportunities

  • Please try the new system for the single edit tab on test2.wikipedia.org. You can edit while logged out to see how it works for logged-out editors, or you can create a separate account to be able to set your account's preferences. Please share your thoughts about the single edit tab system at the feedback topic on mediawiki.org or sign up for formal user research (type "single edit tab" in the question about other areas you're interested in). The new system has not been finalized, and your feedback can affect the outcome. The team particularly wants your thoughts about the options in Special:Preferences. The current choices in Special:Preferences are:
    • Remember my last editor,
    • Always give me the visual editor if possible, 
    • Always give me the source editor, and 
    • Show me both editor tabs.  (This is the current state for people using the visual editor. None of these options will be visible if you have disabled the visual editor in your preferences at that wiki.)
  • Can you read and type in Korean or Japanese? Language engineer David Chan needs people who know which tools people use to type in some languages. If you speak Japanese or Korean, you can help him test support for these languages. Please see the instructions at mw:VisualEditor/IME Testing#What to test if you can help, and report it on Phabricator (Korean - Japanese) or on Wikipedia (Korean - Japanese).

If you aren't reading this in your favorite language, then please help us with translations! Subscribe to the Translators mailing list or contact us directly, so that we can notify you when the next issue is ready. Thank you!

Whatamidoing (WMF), 00:54, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

i am aware of your polisies please change my user name hussainacha1122 to hussainacha11

i am aware of your polisies please change my user name hussainacha1122 to hussainacha11 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hussainacha1122 (talkcontribs) 16:20, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Usurp request in Meta

You are active in meta. Ruslik put my request on hold till 22nd December. The request made after me was done by Steinsplitter (Kostazyranov@global). Why my request is pending? --Eden's Apple (talk) 05:57, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

@Eden's Apple: Perhaps because Action Hero has too many edits for usurpation? 900 edits is a lot, and since they weren't reverted straight away, it may be a barrier to usurpation. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 14:47, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
But Action Hero is indefinitely blocked as a sockpuppet of undertrial. Ruslik gave me hope. I waited for one month. Please ask Steinsplitter. Do I have to cross his 900+ edits?. Eden's Apple (talk) 16:55, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
@Eden's Apple: The issue is not whether they are blocked or not. The issue is that they have lots of edits that were not immediately reverted as vandalism, were all deleted, or were only insignificant edits to their own userspace. The drafted usurpation policy, while not yet finalized, is still a good guideline to refer to. According to that policy, we may not be able to usurp this account because they meet none of the criteria in point #3. Also, "lapping" a user's edit count to try to usurp their username is not a good idea, because that will put even more strain on the servers when the rename jobs are running (We already have to rename the account you want to usurp. Users with high edit counts are difficult to rename because the server needs to reassign each and every one of their edits to the new username). —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 17:12, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
@Eden's Apple: In response to your email (because this isn't a "private" matter that I would consider using email as a means of communication), please wait for a response. I'll give them a poke, but I can't guarantee that the request will be processed. There are lots of usurpation requests that get turned down for reasons similar to yours. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 17:28, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
I emailed for not increasing my edit count. Okay, then why was it put on hold for one month?. Even one month ago Ruslik knew about Action Hero's edit count. Someone must take a final decision on that request. As you said increasing my edit count is not good idea, I can't stop editing for an uncertain period. They are not giving me any reply. Either "done" or "not done". Eden's Apple (talk) 17:34, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Perhaps you misunderstood what I meant about "increasing edit count". As of this writing you only have 69 global edits; a few edits to my talk page isn't going to blow a server up. What I meant is that intentionally trying to get over the 900+ edit count in order to usurp the username you want to have is not a good idea, because that won't give you any more influence over whether you can usurp the username or not. It doesn't matter if I have a billion edits and I wanted to usurp your user account — I cannot do it. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 17:41, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
I have made a new request at meta. This user has only 77 edits and inactive since 2011. Would it work this time? Eden's Apple (talk) 19:07, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
@Eden's Apple: I don't think you're understanding why we're not processing your usurpation requests. The usernames you wish to usurp all have valid edits that were not immediately undone, not insignificant userspace edits, and not deleted. It doesn't matter whether the username you want to usurp has 300 edits or 30 — if they have valid edits, don't bother trying to usurp them. Stay with your current username or pick a username that's entirely unused. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 22:03, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 53, 2015)

Hello, K6ka.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Person of the Year

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Hors d'oeuvre • Scandal


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:10, 28 December 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

RfA reform

Hi. Re:this edit. Not that I'm splitting hairs, but while WP:RFA2011 was indeed a community affair with a task force of over 40 users, WP:2015 is generally the work of a single user. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:30, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

@Kudpung: I changed the link because RFA2011 is largely inactive, which made the wording "the community is working on" somewhat misleading (How can the community be working on something if the project is inactive?), so I thought I'd change it to RFA2015, since it is an active project. While it seems to be largely organized by one user, the RFCs it is going through is a community process, and there are users who are supportive of it, so I would believe that keeping the wording and simply changing the link is justified. Of course, I could have also kept the link and changed the wording to "the community was working on", but that seems discouraging and incorrect to me. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 05:02, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
With the greatest respect for all the effort that was put into RFA2011, it might be good to honestly consider which of the two projects actually proposed things and got at least some changes made. Even RFA2011's page admits straightforwardly that nothing was even proposed at all. (Don't shoot the messenger; I'm just saying what the source itself says.) On the other hand, that was simply not an option with RFA2015. The whole point of the project was to propose things, and without proposals there would have been no point to the project. RFA2011 has many potential proposals lying around in its project space, but what's the point if someone doesn't use them. Why hasn't anyone actually proposed the rather sensible clerking draft there? With some very light edits to bring it up to date a little bit, it looks ready to go. Biblioworm 06:50, 29 December 2015 (UTC) After making some comparisons, the clerking system that was proposed in 2013 was quite similar to the RFA2011 draft, and the proposal failed by quite a wide margin. Never mind. Biblioworm 07:23, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
Anyone who is really concerned about bringing about change would have done their research and recognised WP:RFA2011 for the immense objective and systematic research that it provided. All that information is still relevant and could have been used effectively instead of launching RfCs that need RfCs to determine if the need for an RfC exists. A full examination of WP2011 would also have revealed that the reason for its failure to launch any proposals was due to the trolling on the project by the very users who will attempt even today to reduce the possibilities of success of any subsequent attempts at reform. - sooner or later people get bored, and one ends up with only the newbies or the peanut gallery commenting. I'll say again for what seems to be the 10,000th time: Fix the voters,and RfA will fix itself, but half-baked RfCs are no better than the none at all that were proposed by RFA2011.Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:19, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Speedy

Hey there, I was just wondering why you tagged this page for CSD G2. I was under the asumption that User_Talk space was also not part of the criteria, or am I mistaken? --allthefoxes (Talk) 04:14, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)In my interpretation of G2, user talk pages are not part of the criterion. In this case though you have one IP making a talk page for another IP address that is nothing but a test page. Also, since 0.0.0.1 is not a valid IP address, no one would ever receive any message left there. I would have deleted that as a test page also if I had seen it, IAR. -- GB fan 12:15, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
@Allthefoxes: From what I remember, that page was nothing more than the stuff you get when you click on the bold and italic text buttons on the editing toolbar, and since nobody edits from that IP address anyways, I think G2 was fine. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 15:39, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 December 2015

mei-teru to Ekomaks username change reason

The reason is that I allready don't really use "mei-teru" nickname anywhere. "Ekomaks" fits better for my present activity (as environmental activist). I am planning to post only environmental topics in wikipedia and I am ashamed that I was not doing it before. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mei-teru (talkcontribs) 01:39, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for your response. I have processed your rename request. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 02:30, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 1, 2016)

King Mswati III, the monarch of Swaziland, one of the Monarchies in Africa.
Hello, K6ka.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Monarchies in Africa

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Person of the Year • Hors d'oeuvre


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 04:38, 4 January 2016 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

Question about changing usernames

I was hoping you could answer a quick question I had before I waste anyone's time at the request pages. Would it be impossible to take the username Modulus if someone made 291 edits under it on the Swedish Wikipedia (last edited in 2008)? StressOverStrain (talk) 04:00, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

@StressOverStrain: Yes: with 291 edits, it's almost a guarantee that a request to usurp it will be declined. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 11:12, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Ah thanks, that's what I figured. Guess I'll have to append a number. StressOverStrain (talk) 12:05, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors 2015 End of Year Report

Guild of Copy Editors 2015 End of Year Report

Our 2015 End of Year Report is now ready for review.

Highlights:

  • Summary of Drives, Blitzes, and the Requests page;
  • New record lows in the article backlog and on the Requests page;
  • Coordinator election results;
  • Membership news;
  • Changes around the Guild's pages;
  • Plans for 2016.
– Your project coordinators: Jonesey95, Miniapolis and Baffle gab1978.
To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by Jonesey95 via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:42, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 January 2016

WikiCup 2016: Game On!

We are about to enter the second week of the 2016 WikiCup. The most recent player to sign up brings the current total to 101 contestants. Signups close on 5 February. If you’re interested, you can join this year's WikiCup here.

We are aware that in some areas the scoring bot’s numbers are a little bit off (i.e., overly generous) and are working to have that corrected as soon as possible.--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:04, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

WikiCup 2016: Game On!

We are about to enter the second week of the 2016 WikiCup. The most recent player to sign up brings the current total to 101 contestants. Signups close on 5 February. If you’re interested, you can join this year's WikiCup here.

We are aware that in some areas the scoring bot’s numbers are a little bit off (i.e., overly generous) and are working to have that corrected as soon as possible.--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:08, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2015

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 8, No. 4 — 4th Quarter, 2015
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q4 2015, the project has:


Content


Project Navigation
To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:35, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 2, 2016)

Depictions of various deities on the entrance tower of Sri Mariamman Temple, Singapore, dedicated to the Hindu goddess of rain; Mariamman.
Hello, K6ka.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Deity

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Monarchies in Africa • Person of the Year


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:07, 11 January 2016 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

16:59, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

I would like a teacher to get started with the user group

Given the potential to screw things up with the global renamed right, I want to start slow, preferably with a teacher, like you. Also thank you for supporting my request. :-)—cyberpowerChat:Offline 05:18, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

@Cyberpower678: Hehe, well, the actual renaming process isn't too difficult; if you know how to make a peanut butter and jelly sandwich sandwich then you know how to rename people. The thing that confuses people the most, however, is likely to be the global account system.
In the past, accounts on other Wikimedia projects used to be different from one another. For example, if I had the username "John Doe" on the English Wikipedia, if I wanted an account on Commons I'd have to manually register an account there. And if I didn't, someone else could register the username "John Doe" on Commons...
...but not anymore; the global account system, or the "Single User Login" (SUL), fixes that by making usernames global. Now, if I registered "Jane Doe" on the English Wikipedia, no one else on any other Wikimedia project can register that username, even if the username hasn't been created on Commons. This works by creating a "global account", which contains the username and email. Accounts on individual Wikimedia projects are called "local accounts", and they are attached to a global account. A local account that is attached to a global account is automatically logged into when the username and password for the global account is specified. When you visit a wiki that you've never visited before, a local account on that wiki is automatically created and attached to your global account, allowing you to edit that wiki and set your personal preferences (which are still mostly local).
The introduction of the global account system has also allowed users to be renamed globally, across all of Wikimedia. In the past, renames were done locally, and if you wanted to rename your English Wikipedia and your Commons accounts, you had to make two separate requests on two separate wikis. The more accounts you had, the more annoying it got. The global account system solves this problem by allowing global renames; with only one request, all attached local accounts, plus the global account, will be moved to the new username. No more Google Translating your request in French!
Accounts with clashing usernames on other wikis could not make the transition to global accounts peacefully. They had to visit Special:MergeAccount to unify the local accounts. The accounts that didn't do this were forcefully renamed in order to allow a "dominant user" to get the full claim on the global account, and to give those unattached local accounts a global account of their own. More details on this change at m:Single User Login finalisation announcement and mw:SUL finalisation.
So, that's a brief technical introduction to SUL and why it matters to global renaming. Like I said, the interface for global renaming is very simple, although there are some things you should be aware of...
  • Before renaming, always check Special:CentralAuth! Special:CentralAuth looks up the specified username across all of Wikimedia, and will return results if it finds something. It is used to locate global accounts and any local accounts (plus their edit count and user groups) attached to it. For example, Special:CentralAuth/K6ka reveals all of my local accounts, plus my global account status. Use Special:CentralAuth both on the requesting user's username and the target username. The first should be done to check for any active blocks, or for potential issues that could preclude renaming. The policy around renaming users that are blocked on another Wikimedia project is a bit vague, but at least for the English Wikipedia, it's common practice for users to be unblocked before being renamed. The latter should be done to see if the target username is already taken; if it appears to be used, even on another Wikimedia project, the rename request can't be processed (unless it's a usurpation request).
  • Be sure to use m:Special:GlobalRenameProgress on the requesting user's username. GlobalRenameProgress displays the progress of any renames in progress around Wikimedia when given a username. For example, if I renamed myself "K6ka", m:Special:GlobalRenameProgress/K6ka will show all my local accounts and whether or not they got renamed. The thing you want to look for here is the rename log; if the requesting user has been renamed in the past, a log entry will be made visible in GlobalRenameProgress. Generally, if a user has been renamed already, tell them that renaming user accounts take up valuable server resources, and that frivolous or repeated requests will not be processed. If they agree and understand, you can proceed with the rename. Also, if a user has made too many rename requests, or has been renamed too many times, you can decline the request or discuss it with other global renamers.
  • What about similar usernames? Oh, right. When processing a request you may run into messages that say something like "The target username is similar to an existing username: <blah blah blah>". That's the Antispoof filter, intended to prevent users from picking usernames too similar to existing ones. However, Antispoof does occasionally block names that bear no similarity to the conflicting name. Unfortunately, while WP:ACC has a process for handling this, global renaming does not. You can see m:Talk:Steward_requests/Username_changes#Accounts_with_similar_usernames for a proposal, and for now you can follow the suggestions there.
  • And usurpations? Again, there is no official global usurpation policy, although a draft has been written here. For now, leave requests made on WP:CHU/U be, as only stewards and English Wikipedia bureaucrats who are also global renamers can handle requests there. I've seen some non-steward global renamers process usurpations on m:SRUC, but don't worry: I've never usurped an account in my life, so if you don't feel comfortable doing it, that's totally fine.
That's a lot to take in, but it will come naturally to you! Feel free to poke me again if you have any questions, and you can always ask another member of the global renamer team. Good luck! —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 12:00, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
One more thing... remember what I said about global accounts and local accounts being attached when you visit another wiki? You can use m:User:Krinkle/Tools/Global SUL to create your local accounts across all of Wikimedia. I don't think it's strictly required for global renaming, but it doesn't hurt to do it. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 12:05, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for the thorough explanation. Being an ACC user SUL is something we must be familiar with and we run intense checks on the requesting user including SUL checks and deal with AntiSpoof scenarios. I will read the proposals but I don't find it unreasonable to also implement ACC guidelines for the time being correct? I think I will handle a few straightforward requests at CU/S to get into the swing of things.—cyberpowerChat:Online 12:43, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
I see the proposal regarding anti spoof adopts ACC procedure, yay. That makes it easy for me.—cyberpowerChat:Online 13:06, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
@Cyberpower678 and MusikAnimal: Before I forget, and this is important: Users with over 20,000 edits should be renamed with supervision from a developer. Users with over 50,000 edits should only be done with supervision from a sysadmin. You can ask for assistance at #wikimedia-rename connect. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 13:22, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Got it.—cyberpowerChat:Online 13:24, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Editing

Please explain my rough treatment from you regarding Andrew Pilley edit?Opps123 (talk) 18:04, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

@Opps123: Same reason as all the previous messages left by other users on your talk page. Everything added to articles about a living person must be reliably sourced by a citation. "Go find the sources yourself" isn't an excuse; the source needs to be there now. Contentious material about living persons (or, in some cases, recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced – whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable – should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion.k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 18:08, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Ok fair enough I shall obtain the relevant references and apply them Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Opps123 (talkcontribs) 19:05, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 January 2016

Nickname for 1969 KCChiefs

Advice requested, I added the Nickname on Jan 11, 2016 - However, should I make a Footnote for it, in your opinion ? Page - "Kansas City Chiefs" Thank you for any feedback. Behold Eck (talk) 06:21, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

@Behold Eck: When in doubt... just cite it. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 11:13, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 3, 2016)

Hello, K6ka.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Chowder

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Deity • Monarchies in Africa


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:08, 18 January 2016 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

17:56, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi k6ka, this is ArrivalR8 formerly QueueNut. Unable to login to ArrivalR8, says this name does not exist (you made my account change last night, per your message).

Seems I am locked out in a no-man's land... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:281:C300:5542:D954:CAA2:CCB6:8F7E (talk) 05:19, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

I did not rename you - Cyberpower678 renamed you. You were renamed to "ArrivalR8" (note the quotation marks), because your request had quotation marks surrounding your desired username, and since quotation marks are permitted in usernames, that was given to you. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 11:12, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 January 2016

This week's article for improvement (week 4, 2016)

Hello, K6ka.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Izakaya

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Chowder • Deity


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:07, 25 January 2016 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

16:39, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

FirstResponseTeamofAmerica

Thanks - I see we hit exactly the same buttons at about the same time! The other issue with them is that their photos were taken by an outside agency who claims to hold copyright in the metadata. Dithering about what to do about that now, but have put an explanation on their talk page... Blythwood (talk) 22:49, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

@Blythwood: Indeed we have — according to popups, your edit was made one second after mine! I've only seen that with ClueBot NG so far. Congratulations for this amazing feat of good timing! —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 23:48, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Yeah. Since I'm not an expert on Wikimedia copyright problems, have tagged them there so someone can figure out what to do with them. Blythwood (talk) 00:09, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 January 2016

This week's article for improvement (week 5, 2016)

The slaughtered swine (1652) by Barent Fabricius, a depiction of a killed animal
Hello, K6ka.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Killing of animals

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Izakaya • Chowder


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:07, 1 February 2016 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

21:02, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Invitation to the Google Doodle task force

Hello, K6ka. You're invited to join the Google Doodle task force of the Today's articles for improvement project. We aim to improve articles on current and previous Google Doodles to turn them into a valuable and inspiring resource for interested readers.

If interested in joining, please add your name to the list of members. Thank you for your consideration.

– Sent using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:54, 2 February 2016 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject Today's articles for improvement

Thank you

Thank you for ending the vandalism to the New Glarus, Wisconsin article.RFD (talk) 13:55, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 6, 2016)

Delivery trucks in San Salvador, El Salvador
Hello, K6ka.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Delivery (commerce)

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Killing of animals • Izakaya


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 02:00, 8 February 2016 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

18:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 February 2016

This week's article for improvement (week 7, 2016)

An iceberg, which is relatively cold.
Hello, K6ka.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Cold

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Delivery (commerce) • Killing of animals


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:07, 15 February 2016 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

The Signpost: 10 February 2016

16:16, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 February 2016

This week's article for improvement (week 8, 2016)

Several of the commonly known molecules.
Hello, K6ka.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Molecule

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Cold • Delivery (commerce)


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:08, 22 February 2016 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

Rename question

Hi. I hope you don't mind my asking a question about global renaming. I saw the Kingibk → True_N request, tried it and got a warning that there's a similar username already there called Truen. Truen has made no edits since registering in 2009, so I thought it was probably not a real problem, but I decided to leave it and see how an expert would handle it. I see you did the rename, so am I along the right lines in assuming it was OK because Truen was old and had no edits? Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:05, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi Boing! said Zebedee. Unfortunately, the policy around similar usernames (AntiSpoof) for global renamers is quite vague. I renamed because I felt that "Truen" couldn't possibly be confused for "True N" as the differences between them are quite distinct. If the username were slightly more similar, say, "True N" versus "Truε n" (or "k6ka" versus "k5ka"), then AntiSpoof would definitely come in handy; notifying the requesting user about the conflict is advised. However, if the account with the conflicting username is inactive, then it may be acceptable to proceed with the renaming and notify the user who got renamed about the conflict, and advise them to be prepared to change their username again should there be confusion. I proposed a policy for this at m:Talk:Steward requests/Username changes but discussion has largely dried up. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 15:20, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for your thoughts - that makes a lot of sense. My own thinking was that confusion between the two would be unlikely, especially as one is inactive, so I would certainly agree with a rename in this case. Interesting discussion at m:Talk:Steward requests/Username changes too, and it's a shame it dried up - what you suggest, if used as policy-based guidelines with some discretion allowed, makes sense, and I guess that's the way such things are de facto treated anyway. I guess it's a bit late now, but I might add a comment to it myself. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:03, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

18:22, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

webex

I request you review the text that I had deleted. It is composed entirely of a long screed by apparently a litigant against the company and/or its founders. It makes allegations of child rape against one of the founders among other allegations. I can not believe text like that could be left on a wikipedia page or from a purely legal perspective allowed to be published on the site. Can you explain why it should not be deleted? Wba1990 (talk) 18:01, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 February 2016

VisualEditor News #1—2016

Read this in another languageSubscription list for this multilingual newsletter

Did you know?
Among experienced editors, the visual editor's table editing is one of the most popular features.
Screenshot showing a pop-up menu for column operations in a table
If you select the top of a column or the end of a row, you can quickly insert and remove columns and rows.

Now, you can also rearrange columns and rows. Click "Move before" or "Move after" to swap the column or row with its neighbor.

You can read and help translate the user guide, which has more information about how to use the visual editor.

Since the last newsletter, the VisualEditor Team has fixed many bugs. Their workboard is available in Phabricator. Their current priorities are improving support for Japanese, Korean, Arabic, Indic, and Han scripts, and improving the single edit tab interface.

Recent changes

You can switch from the wikitext editor to the visual editor after you start editing. This function is available to nearly all editors at most wikis except the Wiktionaries and Wikisources.

Many local feedback pages for the visual editor have been redirected to mw:VisualEditor/Feedback.

You can now re-arrange columns and rows in tables, as well as copying a row, column or any other selection of cells and pasting it in a new location.

The formula editor has two options: you can choose "Quick edit" to see and change only the LaTeX code, or "Edit" to use the full tool. The full tool offers immediate preview and an extensive list of symbols.

Future changes

The single edit tab project will combine the "Edit" and "Edit source" tabs into a single "Edit" tab. This is similar to the system already used on the mobile website. (T102398) Initially, the "Edit" tab will open whichever editing environment you used last time. Your last editing choice will be stored as an account preference for logged-in editors, and as a cookie for logged-out users. Logged-in editors will have these options in the Editing tab of Special:Preferences:

  • Remember my last editor,
  • Always give me the visual editor if possible,
  • Always give me the source editor, and
  • Show me both editor tabs.  (This is the state for people using the visual editor now.)

The visual editor uses the same search engine as Special:Search to find links and files. This search will get better at detecting typos and spelling mistakes soon. These improvements to search will appear in the visual editor as well.

The visual editor will be offered to all editors at most "Phase 6" Wikipedias during the next few months. The developers would like to know how well the visual editor works in your language. They particularly want to know whether typing in your language feels natural in the visual editor. Please post your comments and the language(s) that you tested at the feedback thread on mediawiki.org. This will affect the following languages: Japanese, Korean, Urdu, Persian, Arabic, Tamil, Marathi, Malayalam, Hindi, Bengali, Assamese, Thai, Aramaic and others.

Let's work together

If you aren't reading this in your favorite language, then please help us with translations! Subscribe to the Translators mailing list or contact us directly, so that we can notify you when the next issue is ready. Thanks!

Whatamidoing (WMF) 17:47, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 9, 2016)

Hello, K6ka.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Music of Africa

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Molecule • Cold


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:07, 29 February 2016 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

20:12, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

WikiCup 2015 March newsletter

One of Adam Cuerden’s several quality restorations during round 1

That's it, the first round is done, sign-ups are closed and we're into round 2. Forty-seven competitors move into this round (a bit shy of the expected 64), and we are roughly broken into eight groups of six. The top two of each group will go through to round 3, and then the top scoring 16 "wildcards" across all groups.

Twenty-two Good Articles were submitted, including three by Connecticut Cyclonebiskit (submissions), and two each by Denmark MPJ-DK (submissions), Zanzibar Hurricanehink (submissions), Florida 12george1 (submissions), and New South Wales Cas Liber (submissions). Twenty-one Featured Pictures were claimed, including 17 by There's always time for skeletons Adam Cuerden (submissions) (the Round 1 high scorer). Thirty-one contestants saw their DYKs appear on the main page, with a commanding lead (28) by Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions). Twenty-nine participants conducted GA reviews with Lancashire J Milburn (submissions) completing nine.

If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Thanks to everyone for participating, and good luck to those moving into round 2. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), and Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:39, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

WikiCup 2016 March newsletter (update)

Along with getting the year wrong in the newsletter that went out earlier this week, we did not mention (as the bot did not report) that New South Wales Cas Liber (submissions) claimed the first Featured Article Persoonia terminalis of the 2016 Wikicup. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), and Godot13 (talk · contribs · email).--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:06, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

I sorry for deleting the page

i did not mean to delete the page and could not restore it 184.105.79.45 (talk) 22:24, 3 March 2016 (UTC)jon184.105.79.45 (talk) 22:24, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 10, 2016)

Eugene Delacroix - Liberty Leading the People
Hello, K6ka.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

People

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Music of Africa • Molecule


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:08, 7 March 2016 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions