User talk:Opps123

November 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to BES Utilities has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: BES Utilities was changed by Opps123 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.914891 on 2015-11-25T20:28:23+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:28, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Laoris. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to BES Utilities seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Laoris (talk) 20:28, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Andrew Pilley

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Andrew Pilley, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Caballero//Historiador ^☊ 13:07, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Andrew Pilley. Thank you. —Laoris (talk) 19:25, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Andrew Pilley. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Laoris (talk) 22:31, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you harm Wikipedia, as you did at Andrew Pilley with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 17:52, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Pilley

Wikipedia has a policy of wp:verifiability. Significant content must wp:cite wp:reliable sources. This is especially true of potentially libelous material that you added to Andrew Pilley. Sources need to be reliable news sources, not blogs nor forums. Please read what constitutes a wp:reliable source. Jim1138 (talk) 09:35, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Fleetwood Town F.C., you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Unsourced and irrelevant content. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:58, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Fenix down (talk) 20:14, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Andrew Pilley has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Do not use misleading statements such as officially confirmed by Wikipedia administration. -- Rsrikanth05 (talk) 12:08, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:10, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]