User talk:Judy Vorfeld
Welcome!
[edit]
|
 | You used the {{Help me}} tag but did not ask a question. Please write out your question and replace the {{Help me}} tag when you are done, and someone will be along to help. Alternatively, you can ask your question at the new contributors help desk, the help desk, or join the #wikipedia-en-help IRC help channel to get real-time assistance. Click here for instant access. |
Judy Vorfeld (talk) 21:32, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
Sorry about that. I am so new. Clearly. The removal of the Facebook link may be a bit of a problem. The entire nonprofit/foundation is based on getting started by a FB posting and the subsequent use by many people over the Philippines to ask for help, provide help, and bring communities together. [1] I would like to revert if it's possible but am not sure how to do it and don't want to break anything, including faith. Can you advise? Thanks.
May 2012
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Jay Jaboneta has been reverted.
Your edit here to Jay Jaboneta was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100002826116347) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 04:43, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Yellow Boat of Hope Foundation
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Yellow Boat of Hope Foundation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Best regards, Cindy(talk to me) 01:10, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Ofelia M. Samar-Sy
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Ofelia M. Samar-Sy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. LegoKontribsTalkM 04:29, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 7
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ofelia M. Samar-Sy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Filipino (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:07, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Ofelia M. Samar-Sy
[edit]You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.
A tag has been placed on Ofelia M. Samar-Sy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising, 
. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Judy Vorfeld (talk) 17:34, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Josh Mahinay (February 1)
[edit]
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Josh Mahinay.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .
contributions to Wikipedia!
- Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Josh Mahinay
[edit]Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .
contributions to Wikipedia!
- Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Thank you so much for catching my errors and omission. I added a citation for a quotation by Dr. Lim, and reformatted all citations using the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:REFB#Good_references page, templates. I appreciate the links on the submission page.
If there is anything else I need to do, I stand ready to do so. Again, thank you for your contribution.
Judy Vorfeld
Judy Vorfeld 02:33, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Josh Mahinay (March 20)
[edit]Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Josh Mahinay.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .
contributions to Wikipedia!
- Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Josh Mahinay
[edit]Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .
contributions to Wikipedia!
- Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
I have redone this page: [2] to ensure that it doesn't sound like an advertisement, and that additional references verify that the subject is authentic and committed to helping disadvantaged school kids in his country.
I respectfully request that you review and approve this article for publication.
Thank you for your time. Judy Vorfeld 20:39, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Josh Mahinay (May 2)
[edit]Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Josh Mahinay.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .
contributions to Wikipedia!
- Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Josh Mahinay
[edit]Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .
contributions to Wikipedia!
- Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Thank you for reminding me to use solid writing tools. I have made a number of changes and eliminated many words and phrases that were not necessary. Thank you for reconsidering. Judy Vorfeld 17:54, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Judy. I received your e-mail, but I prefer to discuss Wikipedia article improvements here on the Wiki so as not to fragment discussions. Sure, you can submit the article as many times as necessary as long as it's a little better each time. Actually, it's a good way to learn about Wikipedia policies improve your editing skills, while getting to know some other editors that you later may want to work with to improve articles.
I did fix a few of the formatting errors; I was kind of hoping that you would take the hint and do the rest of the list yourself. It's fine to keep working on it while it's waiting for review.
I would like to give you some advice:
- You have figured out that Wikipedia requires references to sources to verify the information, and that's great. However, the preferred sources are the independent ones, such as news reports, magazine articles, reviews, etc., by journalists and authors not connected with Mr. Mahinay and his organizations. You have some of these, but you've put them in the "Further Reading" section, and are depending instead on the closely connected sources, such as organization web sites, to verify your facts. The more acceptable way is to reference as much material as possible from the independent sources, and to add the web sites of Mr. Mahinay's organizations to the External links section.
- Your use of the table with the further reading is an unnecessary complication, since it leaves some of the info about a particular document in the reference section and some in the Further reading. It's simpler just to use bullet points, and also less susceptible to formatting errors. However, drafts are not turned down for unusual formatting; they are just changed later.
I hope this helps. I know that Wikipedia's article development process can be frustrating at times, but the result will be a much more encyclopedic article, and you'll have much less trouble if you decide to write another. —Anne Delong (talk) 03:45, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello Anne, and I am so grateful for your advice. Now that I've heard from you, I will go in and make changes accordingly, including completing what you started. Examples help me so much. Once I have completed everything, I will submit the article again. Judy Vorfeld 04:47, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Josh Mahinay (June 9)
[edit]Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Josh Mahinay.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .
contributions to Wikipedia!
- Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello! Judy Vorfeld,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hasteur (talk) 12:42, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Josh Mahinay (July 14)
[edit]Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Josh Mahinay.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
contributions to Wikipedia!
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Re https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Josh_Mahinay Hi, Tim. Thank you for taking time to review this entry. I did use some of the further reading sources as references within the body text. But there are two specific, important reasons I have a number of further reading excerpts. The values of Josh Mahinay, the subject of the article, are reflected in his generosity and business ethics and cannot be easily separated. They define his business life. Many large companies practice philanthropy, but perhaps not so many small companies. So what he does is still evolving. He has a Facebook page for himself and another page for his business. His personal page is almost nothing but photo stories of ways that he, along with NGOs, gives his manufactured product to various (often disadvantaged) schoolchildren.
As he partners with NGOs, he is always on hand to ensure that these children feel important. He constantly makes presentations to small and large audiences to raise awareness of the needs of thousands of children who need reinforcement and encouragement to continue going to school despite many difficulties:.[1]
A little San Francisco girl, Cassie Eng, raised money for Josh's product on GoFundMe so they could give bags to [2] and subsequently she and her mother flew to the Philippines to help present full BAG943s to 300 kids, mostly of the Badjao tribe. This was just covered in the Philippine Star, July 14:.[3]
The second reason is that while on many levels the use of social media may be questionable, there is a growing place for it in countries like the Philippines, particularly with the NGOs. Its proper use is making it possible to help hundreds of thousands of children and adults, often (but not always) following a disaster. The Philippines has over 7,000 islands, and a powerful need exists because of the inability of children to get to school or get other needs met. Josh was in the thick helping survivors or Typhoon Yolanda, but at the same time, he is working to help children from all around the Philippines (as identified by partner NGOs). Again, rather than intending this as an advert or pseudo-reference, I consider my article's further reading links as important relative to his credibility so people from around the globe, including many OFWs, may see what this young man is doing for his country.
What other vehicle than Wikipedia to show a businessperson's support of the educational system by giving away needed, useful products to disadvantaged school children? Social entrepreneurship. If you can help me find a way to re-write and/or change the slant of this article, I would be grateful. Judy Vorfeld 22:06, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
References
MfD nomination of Draft:Josh Mahinay
[edit]Draft:Josh Mahinay, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Josh Mahinay and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Josh Mahinay during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. DGG ( talk ) 05:19, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Josh Mahinay
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Josh Mahinay requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.cfo.gov.ph/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2032:leaving-los-angeles-to-pursue-greener-pastures&catid=109:overseas-filipino-new&Itemid=840. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~KvnG 16:34, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Reply
[edit]Hi, thanks for message. You can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~~~~. It's getting late here now, so I'll reply in detail in the morning. Meanwhile, I'd be interested to see your reply to the message above
Thanks, and I look forward to hearing from you. On the topic of copyright violation, the original article was published by [1] on August 9, 2013, and Rappler apparently gave permission to republish to others. One example is the Philippine Government, who republished the article on August 12, 2013.[2] You will note that at the end of the article, the government gives credit to Rappler and a link to its site.
And many other people on blogs and websites have used his article as the basis for encouraging grit and education.
Thanks, and I look forward to hearing from you as time permits. Judy Vorfeld 20:37, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- I've read the Government page, which claims copyright on its content. That claim is only invalid if the attributed Rappler text is itself public domain. The Rappler terms and conditions do not state that the text is public domain, and require permission for reuse. They also claim the right to withdraw permission, so that does not establish that the text used by you and the government has been released as public domain, and there is nothing on the Mahinay page in question to indicate that it has been so released. The fact that it has been widely copied doesn't change that
- In any case, a page that is effectively written by Mahinay, or a copy of it, is not a independent verifiable sources
Jim, I sent a message the other day . . . probably to the wrong place (it's a gift I'm trying to overcome). But I wanted to thank you for your amazing help and pointing me in a better direction. I hope my next article will absolutely shine in terms of writing and reliable sources. Judy Vorfeld 17:04, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
References
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Judy Vorfeld. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Judy Vorfeld. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Judy Vorfeld. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Libel
[edit]Anonymous contributor continues to change initial page description for Ofelia M. Samar-Sy, MD to mention that she took bribes. Here is the text :Medical Director of Ibalong Medical Center in Legazpi City, Albay, in May 2014 she was additionally appointed Dean, College of Medicine of Bicol Christian College, also in Legazpi City. She was later dismissed from her position as Dean from Bicol Christian College as she was rumored to be taking bribes from students to graduate them. Currently, she is the Dean of the Bicol University College of Medicine, Legazpi City. This anonymous person has repeatedly used "undo" to change my text, much to the distress and dismay of Dr. Samar-Sy. The latest revision leaves out the "bribe" issue and removes a good portion of her initial biography. Judy Vorfeld 23:39, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
We cannot identify the person making the changes, but since the statement has no reference, we can infer that there is an issue that the person may want to address personally to Dr Samar-Sy----
November 21, 2002. There appears to be two Wikipedia pages for Dr Samar-Sy, and both are identical except for a libelous statement. One page is the current page that is pulled up on Wikipedia, one can pull up the second page (Otherwise the libelous page is identical to the one we can pull up on Google. Here are the Urls I took from each one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ofelia_M._Samar-Sy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ofelia_M._Samar-Sy
I found the libelous page after a deep search on Bing, and have had both pages in my browser at the same time to verify I wasn’t losing my marbles. The statement in the second page: ” She was dismissed from her position at Bicol Christian College for solicited corruption. Currently she is the Interim Dean of Bicol University College of Medicine.” This is the second time someone has inserted similar material; Wikipedia took care of it in January.
Unless this can be investigated and dealt with, Dr Samar-Sy has directed me to delete her Wikipedia page. Thank you.
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 19)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Judy Vorfeld/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
February 2023
[edit]Hello, if you have issues with an article the place to begin a discussion is at the article talk page. As you appear to have a conflict of interest you should not edit the article directly; you can use Template:Request edit to suggest changes. Please note changes must be specific per the template instructions. Wikipedia reports on what has been written about a subject in reliable sources and any such sourced information will not be deleted at the subject's request. The article is not 'their page' but Wikipedia's article about them. The community as a whole will decide on what the article contains based upon the sources.
However, before editing further please read WP:COI and WP:PAID and make any necessary declarations. (The latter is mandatory, if applicable, under the terms of use). Eagleash (talk) 03:36, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
NB: you can also use Template:Help me to attract the attention of editors available to help out. Eagleash (talk) 03:43, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Help me!
[edit] | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Please help me with... My pro bono client/friend, Ofelia M. Samar-Sy, has directed me to delete her Wikipedia page because of the tenacious activities of an unknown party who cannot be traced. The slander has been all over the internet, quiets down temporarily, then starts up again. This is all we want to accomplish: page deletion. Very simple. Judy Vorfeld 02:06, 25 February 2023 (UTC) Judy Vorfeld 02:06, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- We don't delete articles merely because a subject demands it unless that subject is of marginal notability to the point where the privacy concerns would outweigh the benefits of any article. And even if the page were deleted, as long as the sourcing exists nothing prevents someone from writing a new article with good sourcing. That being said, the article as it presently sits is woefully undersourced, and I am tempted to go through with a pair of shears and remove everything that has no source what-so-ever. —Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 04:01, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- On top of what Jéské Couriano just said, if the harassment flairs up again, a request for page protection from newer editors is more likely to be successful than a request for deletion. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 04:04, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you. Judy Vorfeld 03:51, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anton Lim until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 10:02, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- Dr. Lim's article has been deleted without any notification. His humanitarian work is legion, and he continues to receive awards for highlighting the need for more and better education in the Philippines. His coordination with many institutions within and without the Philippines continues to the benefit of many isolated areas of the Philippines...places that do not have publishing houses or PR people on hand to publicize.
- Somehow this action by Wikipedia doesn't reflect the magnificent work it does to highlight and encourage many small communities to learn independence so their children may receive an education.
- What must we do to get this action reversed, and to ensure that I receive notifications? And be assured that I will get other references for him and clean up the article. Thank you so much. Judy Vorfeld 18:26, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
ON RECONSIDERING DELETION FOR ANTON MARI H LIM. I take responsibility for not asking Dr Lim to keep me informed of his PR notability. The editors rightly said, “…find that this article is verifiably about a veterinarian from The Philippines who is active in philanthropic work, particularly as a Rotarian…” Well, he is so much more than a modest Mindanao veterinarian who also kindly adopted Kabang.
Dr Lim just finished a course designed for leaders at the London School of Economics, and had in the recent past completed another leadership course at Harvard, but I did not know of his talk at TEDx (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GUema95G5ZA), or that he was featured in a Washington Post article, or that he was recently the campaign manager for Leni Robredo for President of the Philippines. I also knew of his powerful support where he is coordinator for the Tzu Chi Foundation Philippines, and that in 2016 he was awarded “Heroes of Philanthropy” by Forbes.
I did know that he builds yellow boats, educational opportunities, and civic pride wherever he goes, but many such feats are accomplished in outlying areas, and these are difficult to express if required to provide references. One of his slogans is: “Where no children have to swim in order to get to school.”
I am now verifying all the sources he sent me, and hope that my lack of initiative might not penalize a Filipino who is an enthusiastic leader and determined to help build the quality of his country. Where no children have to swim in order to get to school.
May I be allowed to edit his page, update it, and follow every Wikipedia guideline before presenting it?
Judy Vorfeld 00:10, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding User:Judy Vorfeld/sandbox
[edit]
Hello, Judy Vorfeld. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Judy Vorfeld/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:03, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
Your draft article, User:Judy Vorfeld/sandbox
[edit]
Hello, Judy Vorfeld. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:55, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)