User talk:Jsnueva1022

September 2019

Hello, Julan, and welcome to editing Wikipedia. I hope you will have a successful time contributing to the encyclopaedia, but there are a few points you should know, relating to the editing you have done on your user page.

A Wikipedia user page is for someone who is active in working for the project to give a little information about himself or herself in connection with his or her work for the encyclopaedia: it is not a place to post a personal web page, unrelated to work for Wikipedia.
Editing to promote, publicise, or advertise anything is not permitted by Wikipedia policy. That includes promotion of yourself, your work, and any FaceBook and Twitter accounts.
This is the English language Wikipedia, and all contributions should be in English. To my surprise, it seems from the list of all Wikipedias that there is no Filipino Wikipedia, unfortunately. I am sure there should be.

As I said, I hope you will have a successful time contributing to the encyclopaedia, but I'm afraid your user page is unsuitable, and will have to be deleted. JamesBWatson (talk) 17:26, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is a Cebuano language Wikipedia, which is second only to the English wiki in terms of article numbers. There is also a Tagalog language Wikipedia, and a Waray language one, Ilocano language, and so forth. So I'd say that the Philippines are well-represented! Elizium23 (talk) 07:04, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Elizium23: OK, thanks. Evidently I am pretty ignorant about the linguistic situation in the Philippines. JBW (talk) Formerly known as JamesBWatson 19:42, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jsnueva1022, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Jsnueva1022! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Masumrezarock100 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Flyer22 Reborn. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to SOGIE Equality Bill— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 03:16, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging other editors

Above, I said "It is usually best to answer messages on the page where they were originally posted". Obviously, if you answer another editor's message here, you will want to make sure that editor sees your answer, and there is a way of doing that. Suppose, for example, you want me to see a message that you write. In that message include {{Ping|JBW}}, and also make sure that you sign your message by typing ~~~~ at the end of it. I will then be automatically notified of your message. It's easy, but there are just a couple of things you need to know to make sure it works. (1) The "ping" and the ~~~~ must both be in the same post. It will not work if, for example, you do the ping then realise you forgot the ~~~~ and do that in a separate edit. (2) For some reason it works only if your message adds a new line: it won't work if you just add a new sentence onto an existing line. JBW (talk) Formerly known as JamesBWatson 15:37, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Hello, I'm Mcmatter. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Ferdinand Marcos seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 03:20, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am so sorry if the added contents are seemed to be biased to somebody but they are verifiable. Please protect the said page of article for the reason that it has been vandalized already by Anti-Marcoses. Such as using “kleptocrat” and the like to the description reflects how some other users of the Wiki community abused their previlege given to them. I am suggesting that the said article be protected and closed to everyone. Let the legit users and know-it-all individuals take the responsibility of editing. Thank you and God bless! Jsnueva1022 (talk) 03:29, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The issue is with your overtly positive opinion replacing well cited content as well as removing references. You provided no references for your opinion. Page protection is not required at this point as there has been no ongoing vandalism. If you have issues with the content please take it to the article talk page and provide references to support your claims. Wikipedia is not about what we believe but what has been published by reliable sources. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 03:43, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Sir. I will provide some citations and prove the authenticity of the contents. Thank you and God bless! Jsnueva1022 (talk) 03:52, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please reply here not somewhere else, like my talk page, as mentioned above we like to keep the conversation in one place. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 03:58, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Continuing problems with neutral point of view (Reply)

Sir/Madam, there is a user in Wikipedia that warned me already in editing the Ferdinand Marcos article and I abstained visiting and editing the said page anymore. I am taking care of my actions now. I am contributing contents as well as photos with neutral point of view. I was enough on that article and I will let other people make contributions to that. I am very careful now knowing that I did unfavorable actions. Jsnueva1022 (talk) 12:17, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal: Changing “Tagalog Wikipedia” to “Filipino Wikipedia”

Hello Jsnueva1022, I left a reply to your post Changing “Tagalog Wikipedia” to “Filipino Wikipedia”. Please check. Thanks! Allenjambalaya (talk) 00:47, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pelodiscus sinensis naming.

Do you have a reliable source for this name change? Regards, Sun Creator^(talk) 18:10, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unless there are very specific reasons for doing otherwise, Wikipedia stye is to use the name most commonly used in English, not the name which you, I, or any other Wikipedia editor think should be used. JBW (talk) Formerly known as JamesBWatson 19:04, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Seems the reason is to insert the uploaded image provided on the right. Reading the text in the image careful, shows it to be a Asian giant softshell turtle, Pelochelys cantorii, the appropriate article for the image is Cantor's giant softshell turtle. So I've added it on that article. Regards, Sun Creator^(talk) 20:13, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@JBW: Thank you Sir/Madam for the correction. I thought they were on the same specie provided that they were the same look. I will revert the said article. My apology. Thanks.

Jsnueva1022 (talk) 20:23, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Sun Creator:

Sir/Madam, thank you also for informing Sir/Madam @JBW: about that. I truly understand now the distinction of both species. My apology.

Jsnueva1022 (talk) 20:27, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

All resolved nicely. Thanks. Regards, Sun Creator^(talk) 20:35, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Have you heard about PhilWiki Community?

Did you know that there is a small community of editors in the Philippines who meet up and conduct activities online and offline to promote Wikimedia projects? Please take a look at our profile here. You might be interested to join. Thanks. --Filipinayzd 12:56, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

I am interested!😊 Jsnueva1022 (talk) 06:05, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for signifying your interest in joining PhilWiki Community. Please Like our Facebook page and pages of our different projects: Wiki Loves Earth Philippines and Wiki Loves Monuments Philippines. --Filipinayzd 11:55, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edits on Koko Pimentel

Hello! I see you've changed my edits on the Koko Pimentel page without adequate reason, removing my changes. May I ask why you did that? I reworded your edit to make it sound more encyclopedic, omitting unnecessary details and even added a reference. I removed the mention of Felimon Santos Jr., since he is not related to the senator, being a part of the Executive branch, and not the Legislative.

Moreover, the use of "highest ranking" is baseless since it does not mention any ranking system, or describe a system of power that can determine the "highness" of a person within the Philippine government. Additionally, the Philippine legislature does not put any senator higher than the other, nor does it give more power to one or the other chamber of Congress.

Since my edits seem more beneficial to the quality of the article, I'll be reverting my change back soon. If you have any questions, feel free to reply. Chlod (say hi!) 03:38, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Sir/Madam! I thought it was vandalized by other users. Thanks for clarification. God bless and keep up the good work! Jsnueva1022 (talk) 15:07, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gandara, Samar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gandara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ericka “Miss Everything” Camata moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ericka “Miss Everything” Camata, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hughesdarren (talk) 09:50, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article about yourself, at Draft:Julan Shirwod Nueva. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. GPL93 (talk) 15:14, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Herminigildo “Hermie” Sanchez moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Herminigildo “Hermie” Sanchez, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 15:14, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Your addition to Karabaw Festival has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 13:25, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for clarifying things. I will provide the necessary information including the permission from the said author. Jsnueva1022 (talk) 13:33, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will modify the said article. My apology for the copyrighted content even it was sourced. I will be careful next time. Thank you and God bless! Jsnueva1022 (talk) 13:38, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ramon T. Diaz National High School moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ramon T. Diaz National High School, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. Please see the school article guidelines which describes how the content of school articles should be organized, with the aim of providing general guidance to editors. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Steven (Editor) (talk) 03:08, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Saint Mary’s College of Catbalogan

Hello, Jsnueva1022. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Saint Mary’s College of Catbalogan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 10:24, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Larry Gadon

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Larry Gadon, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 09:51, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good day! The article does not advertise nor promote specific person. It is well cited by outside sources. Please check again. Regards! Jsnueva1022 (talk) 09:54, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The content also is neutral in nature; free from bias. The said article is cited by 20 citations. The person is a well-known personality or said to be a public figure already in the country of Philippines. The content and information are from various media platforms. Please review. Thank you. Jsnueva1022 (talk) 10:00, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of AFPSLAI

Hello Jsnueva1022,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged AFPSLAI for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bensci54 (talk) 17:00, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! The article is not promotional. I am not affliated nor connected to AFPSLAI. If there is need of improvement, I will do. Do not delete it quickly to give justice to my effort and time spent in order to contribute in the Wikipedia. Please review again. Thank you! Jsnueva1022 (talk) 23:14, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because the article is neutral and free from bias. I am not affiliated nor connected to AFPSLAI. If there is need of improvement, I will do. Cite the part which needed to rewrite or revise. Do not delete it quickly to give justice to my effort and time spent in order to contribute in the Wikipedia. Please review again. Thank you! Jsnueva1022 (talk) 23:34, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Exchange of work

I am wondering if you would be willing to produce a translation of Door County, Wisconsin on tl.wikipedia.org. It would not need to be the whole article, and you could translate from the English one that I linked to or the Japanese version if you prefer (they are rather different versions). There are two main audiences: 1. Immigrants residing in the U.S. who come as tourists 2. Students seeking J-1 visas for summer work. In return I can work on AFPSLAI. Because I am not paid to edit anything on Wikipedia, I think I will have more success in preventing it from being deleted. (But of course nothing is certain.) Would you like to exchange Wikipedia editing with me? I have already left an edit on the article and its talk page.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 06:39, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I am accepting your offer. Good to hear that.🙂 I will translate your article to Tagalog/Filipino in tl.wikipedia.org Jsnueva1022 (talk) 07:18, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article was just deleted; for now I am confident I can rewrite a stub article. One shame was the loss of the photos. Do you have any connections that could fill out the form to the WMF for Wikipedia:Declaration_of_consent_for_all_enquiries? If so it could save a lot of work and allow the photos to be used on Draft:AFPSLAI.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 15:41, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I saw your work awhile ago. Thank you for editing the said article. I am working now translating the Door County article from English to Tagalog. 🙂 Jsnueva1022 (talk) 04:56, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Great! I only noticed your work today. I can do some minor syntax editing on tl.wikipedia; but for now will work more at AFPSLAI.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 18:09, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am now working at Draft_talk:AFPSLAI/Temp.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 18:24, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I started a draft page at tl:Tagagamit:Epiphyllumlover/burador Like a scrapyard of old cars, it is good for picking parts from to use in the real article you started. The machine translator is good for translating Wikipedia syntax and also quickly finding blue links in Filipino. I'm not sure if you prefer to translate straight from the English or instead prefer to smooth out a machine translation. I think you prefer to work straight from the English first, but I am not sure. If so, you can feel free to copy and paste references from the burador page into the article as you translate.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 19:13, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 12:29, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good day!😊 Thank you for notifying me about that issue. I will resolve it as soon as possible. I will rewrite and paraphrase it. I am very grateful that my willingness to contribute here in Wikipedia is treasured. Regards! Jsnueva1022 (talk) 14:00, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: AFPSLAI

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as AFPSLAI, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.afpslai.com.ph/About/csr/outreach, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:AFPSLAI and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, AFPSLAI, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:AFPSLAI. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:AFPSLAI with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:AFPSLAI saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! MrOllie (talk) 12:39, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good day!😊 Thank you for notifying me about that issue. I will resolve it as soon as possible. I will rewrite and paraphrase it. I am very grateful that my willingness to contribute here in Wikipedia is treasured. Regards! Jsnueva1022 (talk) 13:57, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See User_talk:MrOllie#AFPSLAI--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 04:32, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pinoy hip hop, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dello (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Samar College moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Samar College, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:16, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good day! The article was made awhile ago. I am putting the sources when you suddenly move it to the draftspace. That is why the edits were unsaved and the article remained unsourced. Jsnueva1022 (talk) 09:21, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Kilometro Kupong

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Kilometro Kupong. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Kilometre zero. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Kilometre zero. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. PamD 05:52, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! The article I recently made is all about the kilometre zero of Philippines. I made a separate article to expand the certain topic. If you believe that it is a redundancy only of the “Kilometre zero” article, it is okay to be deleted. Thank you! Jsnueva1022 (talk) 06:03, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nemesio Baldesco moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Nemesio Baldesco, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 07:36, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Hello, I'm JSH-alive. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to ABS-CBN franchise renewal controversy seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. JSH-alive/^{talk/cont/mail} 13:33, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! You can verify the certain grounds for cancellation of franchise of the said network in the following websites:

https://businessmirror.com.ph/2020/07/10/house-panel-votes-70-11-to-reject-abs-cbn-franchise-renewal/

https://mb.com.ph/2020/07/10/palace-respects-house-decision-to-deny-abs-cbn-franchise-renewal/

https://cpj.org/2020/07/philippine-congress-denies-abs-cbn-news-broadcasters-franchise-renewal/

Violations such as tax evasion, unsuitable program content, foreign ownership of the media corporation etc. are included here in the final decision of the 18th Congress of the Philippines. Must read: http://www.congress.gov.ph/legisdocs/basic_17/HB04349.pdf Jsnueva1022 (talk) 07:52, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ABS-CBN franchise renewal controversy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bureau of Internal Revenue (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I fixed it already. Jsnueva1022 (talk) 07:51, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Maria Diana's chapel

Thanks for your "thank you". Can you find some additional "internet" sources for this article?

If you would post them on the Talk Page for the article, I will write the information and put it into the Maria Diana's chapel article. The sources do not need to be in English. I can use Google Translate, so that I can read them in English, and ask questions if needed.

It is permitted to use references that are written in a foreign language. But the article must be written in English, and I can help with this. Please post a note on my talk page, if you find some sources. Sincerely,Tribe of Tiger ^{Let's Purrfect!} 03:21, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I have just glanced through your talk page, and see that you are very fluent in English. But the offer still remains and I hope I have not offended you. Tribe of Tiger ^{Let's Purrfect!} 03:27, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Carmelita Abdurahman moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Carmelita Abdurahman, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Wiki Macaroons^Cinnamon? 10:13, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I am just working it now when suddenly you moved it to draft. Jsnueva1022 (talk) 10:15, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carmelita Abdurahman has been accepted

Carmelita Abdurahman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MurielMary (talk) 11:33, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thank you for publishing the said article. I am overwhelmed to hear that. You’re welcome also! Let’s expand the wiki community! Regards. Jsnueva1022 (talk) 15:17, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Herminigildo “Hermie” Sanchez (July 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Herminigildo “Hermie” Sanchez and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Herminigildo “Hermie” Sanchez, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 22:27, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gilbert Gapay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Filipino.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ericka “Miss Everything” Camata (July 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs more detail on how this person became famous. What year started, coverage on national media, etc.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ericka “Miss Everything” Camata and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ericka “Miss Everything” Camata, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:48, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Saint Michael's High School moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Saint Michael's High School, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 20:36, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nemesio Baldesco has been accepted

Nemesio Baldesco, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SL93 (talk) 01:18, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you as well! I am always grateful every time my contributions are accepted and published. Jsnueva1022 (talk) 02:43, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ramon T. Diaz National High School has been accepted

Ramon T. Diaz National High School, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SL93 (talk) 00:31, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thanks for accepting and publishing my article. Jsnueva1022 (talk) 04:00, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Samar College has been accepted

Samar College, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Primefac (talk) 16:15, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for publishing my created article! Jsnueva1022 (talk) 04:37, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Pia Ranada

Hello, Jsnueva1022,

Thank you for creating Pia Ranada.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for this new article, but I recommend finding more material about the journalist's career and influence, because currently the article only describes her involvement in one controversy. See also WP:BLP1E.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

☆ DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) ☆ 15:01, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ed Caluag, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ghosthunter.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Herminigildo “Hermie” Sanchez

Hello, Jsnueva1022. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Herminigildo “Hermie” Sanchez".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:59, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Saint Michael's High School

Hello, Jsnueva1022. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Saint Michael's High School".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:59, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ericka “Miss Everything” Camata

Hello, Jsnueva1022. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ericka “Miss Everything” Camata, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:01, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of General rank in the Philippines for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article General rank in the Philippines is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/General rank in the Philippines until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Hariboneagle927 (talk) 09:56, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Brigadier General rank in the Philippines for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brigadier General rank in the Philippines, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brigadier General rank in the Philippines until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Maria Diana Chapel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maria Diana Chapel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Diana Chapel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 11:01, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]