User talk:Jpswade

Welcome!

Hello, Jpswade, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Fiddle Faddle 10:00, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Randles (company) (May 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Randles (company).
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 09:59, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Jpswade, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Prodding articles

Hi, you have nominated several articles for deletion via WP:PROD. Unfortunately if it has been nominated for deletion via WP:AfD it is no longer eligible for deletion via PROD. Jarkeld (talk) 14:59, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect prod at Belron

You recently prodded Belron with the reason "A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:".

I wonder where and how you did this search, as a book search for Belron immediately gives multiple very good sources, e.g. this book spends a whole chapter on Belron (chapter 14), while many other books give it shorter but still significant attention, like here. Google News also has plenty information about Belron, e.g. about the Best of Belron meeting.

Please be more careful before prodding articles. If you disagree with my assessment, feel free to take the article to WP:AFD, but I expect that it will get a snow keep there as it is an obviously notable company. Fram (talk) 11:36, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please improve the article. Telling me is futile. Thanks. --Jpswade (talk) 11:37, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You wanted it deleted because no significant sources existed. Telling you isn't futile if it prevents further such blatantly incorrect proposals in the future. Whether an article stays or not is not dependent on the current state of the article, but on the potential. Fram (talk) 11:47, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, put your efforts into improving Wikipedia. Telling me is futile. Thanks. --Jpswade (talk) 11:57, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

But you don't improve Wikipedia by incorrectly tagging articles for ProD, like you did here and at STOPzilla and FRISK Software International and so on. Apart from the technical reason why Advanced SystemCare could not be ProD'ded, it is also abundantly clear that your reason in the ProD is not correct at all, simply looking at the sourcing already in the article. So why did you prod it, what do you try to achieve? Fram (talk) 12:14, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Looking further down in your history, I notice many other contested prod, some of them for clearly notable companies as well. For someone with less than 300 edits here, this is not looking good. When one takes into account that you are trying to make an article for Randles, which is a much smaller copany than many of its competitors you have tried to delete, one can't help but wonder whether you are actually here to improve Wikipedia, or whether you are here to promote one dealer and remove mention of its competitors. You definitely are heading the wrong way with your current editing if you want to remain on Wikipedia though. Fram (talk) 12:43, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your concern, however I am within the Wikipedia guidelines and I suggest you do the same. It is tempting to justify my actions however, I feel it would be futile for us to engaging in this discussion any further so I wish you good luck with your future contributions and will look forward to seeing your improvements to the articles in question. If you have an issue with one of my edits, please revert and discuss on the talk page of the article. Thanks. --Jpswade (talk) 13:14, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No, constantly prodding articles which don't need deletion at all, with clearly incorrect reasons (you obviously had not tried to find any sources for Belron), is disruptive editing, and may be cause for blocks. If you continue to edit like you are doing now, you'll probably get blocked rather soon. BRD is allright when a problem is restricted to one or two articles, but when a problem is with the actions someone takes across many articles, we don't do BRD but we discuss this on the talk page of the editor involved. I agree that it seems to be futile to try to engage you in a meaningful discussion about these prods. So instead of discussing this any further, let this be a final warning: further blatantly incorrect prods will get you blocked. Fram (talk) 14:44, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On the contrary. Your uncivil behaviour will get you blocked. --Jpswade (talk) 16:53, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Comodo Antivirus for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Comodo Antivirus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comodo Antivirus until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Codename Lisa (talk) 19:57, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Randles (company) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Randles (company), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Automotive industry in the United Kingdom

Your list of dealer groups in Automotive industry in the United Kingdom was getting into less notable companies with red links, so I have taken the opportunity to trim the list down, and to add a little context to your section, and a reference. If you want a long extensive list, why not start a new List Article, perhaps using the Top 200 as a starting point?! Warren (talk) 16:09, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Warren. Thanks for your message. Each entry is notable enough to warrant their own article, references can be provided. Please do not delete red links as per WP:REDYES. Once the list has matured, it can be split into a new article, you may use the Split section tag template to make this suggestion in the article. Please use the article talk page to discuss any further concerns. Thanks. --Jpswade (talk) 16:16, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Randles (company) (January 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Samuell1616 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Randles (company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

One life to live (talk) 19:32, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Randles (company) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Randles (company), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Randles (company) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Randles (company), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Randles (company)

Hello, Jpswade. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Randles".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 12:45, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Jpswade/Randles (company)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Jpswade/Randles (company), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Legacypac (talk) 06:13, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jpswade. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jpswade. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jpswade. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Easyfundraising.org.uk (January 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Advertising tone

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Easyfundraising.org.uk and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Easyfundraising.org.uk, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:36, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Easyfundraising.org.uk has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Easyfundraising.org.uk. Thanks! Otr500 (talk) 16:24, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Easyfundraising.org.uk (March 10)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Otr500 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: My entire previous comments were because I "thought" this was a charity. When attempting to find a charity tax exemption I saw where "for-profit business" was added to the article. It is a business (website) that give cash back to some charities. This also changes my outlook in that this does appear to be an advertisement type promotional article. The first comments about the tone were correct. I offered a reference assessment on the talk page. Add to this the fact that the title is actually the website without "www". On a more in depth examination I do not see "Significant coverage" to advance notability Otr500 (talk) 14:15, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Otr500 (talk) 14:15, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Easyfundraising.org.uk concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Easyfundraising.org.uk, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:37, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Easyfundraising.org.uk

Hello, Jpswade. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Easyfundraising.org.uk".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:51, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Red Industries

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Red Industries, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:34, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Since this article didn't meet the criteria for inclusion, I've moved it to draft space, where you can work on it and then submit for review. Deb (talk) 12:35, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Red Industries

Hello, Jpswade. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Red Industries, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Red Industries

Hello, Jpswade. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Red Industries".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:42, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]