User talk:JorgeLaArdilla

In 1900 Muslims only numbered 200 million followers or 12% of the world population. This percentage drastically increased over the last 100 years due to higher birth rate in Muslim majority countries. Pew Research have estimated the number will be around 2.2 billion in 2030 and 2.8 billion, or 30 percent of world population, in 2050.

In Muslim world article user Manticore had deleted this sentences with different reason. First he claimed it was out of topic, poor written (it could targetted non English contributors), and wikipedia not a Crystal Glass (but in Religion Growth Population had cited Pew Research estimated). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.140.166.31 (talk) 12:46, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

April 2019

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Hadith. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 12:31, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

You were warned about this just last month. General Ization ^Talk 12:32, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, as you did at Al-Zamakhshari, you may be blocked from editing. General Ization ^Talk 12:34, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Unsourced changes to lead

Please stop introducing unsourced material to the lead at Dhul-Qarnayn, as you did here and here. Your changes have been undone. Please see WP:CITE and Help:Footnotes for how to create footnotes to reliable sources. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 09:58, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

It also looks like you've been making other changes to Dhul-Qarnayn contrary to WP:MOSAR that you've already been warned about previously a couple of times at least. Please stop. Mathglot (talk) 10:21, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

14 Ibrāhım̄ listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 14 Ibrāhım̄. Since you had some involvement with the 14 Ibrāhım̄ redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Wugapodes [t^hɑk] [ˈkan.ˌʧɹɪbz] 03:42, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Category:Modern Languages has been nominated for discussion

Category:Modern Languages, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. power~enwiki (π, ν) 20:26, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Medr moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Medr, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Additionally, the article claims to be about a regional god, yet the content of the article talks about a king and Christianity without first contributing much if anything related to the deity. As such, the article lacks a focus. Please revise, restructure, and expand this prior to bringing this back into a published article. Happy to review it again if that will help. FULBERT (talk) 01:38, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Thanks for creating Issam Abuanza.

User:Rosguill while reviewing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

It's not clear to me that Abuanza's quote vis-a-vis Al-Kasasbeh is WP:DUE.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:33, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Natural History Society of Northumbria

Thanks for adding William Loftus into the notable members list of Natural History Society of Northumbria. The citation you gave is hidden by a paywall. Can you confirm that the reference does show that Loftus was a member, and preferably include the relevant quote in the citation against your entry in the list, please? CitizenEd (talk) 17:42, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

December 2019

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Sam Tarry; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:27, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of "cognitive" revolution

A tag has been placed on "cognitive" revolution requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:49, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Standard ArbCom notice about editing gender-related articles

JorgeLaArdilla, you have recently edited the article TERF. Below is a standard notice from ArbCom directed to all editors editing this, or any article related to gender. Please read it and understand it; thanks.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Mathglot (talk) 07:16, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

""Abu Muhammad"" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect "Abu Muhammad". Since you had some involvement with the "Abu Muhammad" redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. PamD 12:42, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

"Chapter named after Mary" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Chapter named after Mary. Since you had some involvement with the Chapter named after Mary redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:16, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Medr concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Medr, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:28, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

"His Prophet" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect His Prophet. Since you had some involvement with the His Prophet redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:44, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Medr

Hello, JorgeLaArdilla. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Medr".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 15:30, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

May 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Event of Ghadir Khumm. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Alivardi (talk) 14:12, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

"Holy Quran ( twelver tafsir)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Holy Quran ( twelver tafsir). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 7#Holy Quran ( twelver tafsir) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 21:05, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Avian phenomena and incidents

The article Avian phenomena and incidents has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Delete Wikipedia is not a random collection of things; there are no sources to indicate this is a complete or notable collections of items requiring disambiguation.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:41, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Aš-šūsi

A tag has been placed on Aš-šūsi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TheseusHeLl (talk) 13:32, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of الشُّوسِ

A tag has been placed on الشُّوسِ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TheseusHeLl (talk) 13:36, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Birmingham Quran manuscript into Maryam (surah). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 10:43, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

July 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Ṣād (surah), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. –User456541 13:18, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ṣād (surah). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. –User456541 13:20, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:53, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Muhammad's first revelation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Islamic tradition (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Avian phenomena and incidents for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Avian phenomena and incidents is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avian phenomena and incidents until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. happy days, Lindsay^Hello 16:38, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 16

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

History of the Quran (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Brill

Ibn Abbas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Brill

Ibn Taymiyyah (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Hisba

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

"Traditional scholars" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Traditional scholars. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 17#Traditional scholars until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:43, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

"The World's Oldest Library" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect The World's Oldest Library. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 19#The World's Oldest Library until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:47, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

"21st-century Quran" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 21st-century Quran. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 22#21st-century Quran until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:54, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ʿĀd, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Islamic tradition.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

George Sale material

Hello, regarding your addition of George Sale material, I think to avoid the WP:UNDUE problem it's better to not indiscriminately add his opinion/analysis to every Quran article. When appropriate, e.g. if it covered significantly by more recent scolarship, we can add it for example to George Sale's own article, but IMO we should avoid it adding George Sale as a reference on its own right, because according to WP:RS AGE works such as his should not be treated as RS. HaEr48 (talk) 23:26, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

@HaEr48: In a nutshell: It is a significant viewpoint in needed of being fairly represented within the exegisis. His work is basesd on Arabic Quranic texts that are extant and in reputable archives.

OK I have read the policy. WP:Undue: Neutrality requires that each article or other page in the mainspace fairly represent all significant viewpoints that have been published by reliable sources, in proportion to the prominence of each viewpoint in the published, reliable sources.

I get that I may seem to be plastering the surahs with George Sale material, but I feel I have not been indiscriminately add his opinion/analysis to every Quran article. George Sale was a protestant using the Vatican Quran in a time when Islam might be classified a political superpower, before inferiority complexes, before the time of the "arrogant" orientalist, the Fall of the Caliphate, the "new" traditional Islam or the Revisionist School of Islamic Studies. The problem is that the other perspectives have so far not been able to add much quality content themselves. My LT plan would be to do this too if no one else comes along.

The premise of the content guideline, WP:Age matters concerns scientific and academic fields, where older sources may be inaccurate. In Religious studies older sources are often more accurate, provide a vivid context, and provenace to what might otherwise seem a recent idea.

JorgeLaArdilla (talk) 16:45, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

I agree that older sources might in certain cases provide more vivid context, as you put it, but IMO they shouldn't be taken as source of their own. We should include it only if it is influential or covered significantly by more recent scholarship that meets WP:RS. Otherwise it will be a free-for-all, everyone will find their favourite historical author and put that as the voice of the Wikipedia article on the topic. HaEr48 (talk) 18:43, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

...Continued at Talk:Al-Insān

July 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at User talk:CommanderWaterford, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please see WP:BLANKING for precisely why editors are allowed to remove most messages and threads from their user talk pages. ——Serial 11:55, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

That's the second time you've refactored that editor's talk page, and that—combined with leaving me a copy/ paste of the above message (which still contains a portion of my signature!)—looks like little more than trolling, whatever the merits of your original complaint.

If you carry on, I'll have to file at a noticeboard. ——Serial 12:13, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at User talk:CommanderWaterford shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Edit warring on a user talk page is not a hill you want to die on. Praxidicae (talk) 12:38, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ——Serial 12:43, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Nafil salah moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Nafil salah, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 10:26, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Salaat al-Layl moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Salaat al-Layl, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Zoodino (talk) 11:41, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Al Hejr, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Formal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Islamic archaeology moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Islamic archaeology, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:02, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1998–99 Aston Villa F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Gregory.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

1975–76 Aston Villa F.C. season moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 1975–76 Aston Villa F.C. season, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 15:23, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

"Villa record" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Villa record. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 1#Villa record until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:15, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Haman (Islam), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Q40.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Al-A'raf. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 11:59, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on As-Sajda; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. You appear to be edit warring to insert disputed content; you must per WP:ONUS gain consensus. Please do not revert again. Instead go to the talk page and discuss until the other editors there agree with you. —valereee (talk) 17:02, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. HaEr48 (talk) 17:18, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

About titles, honorifics and appeal to popularity

Hello and greetings,

This is just for your kind info. Since previously you have participated in an inconclusive RfC discussion at this RfC in year going by, and since some related aspects are under discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Titles, honorifics and appeal to popularity may be you want to join in to share your inputs or opinions.

Thanks and regards

Bookku (talk) 05:49, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Ahmidiya

Ahmidiya is a different faith and not at all an extention of Islam. As two primary sources of Islam, that is Quran and authentic Hadith of Prophet peace be upon him, clearly reiterates that belief in finality of Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him is integral to Muslim faith. Hence any one who claims to be prophet or messenger, in any form or status or authority,is denying belief in finality of Prophet Muhammad pbuh. Therefore all major sects of Islams clearly declare Ahmadiya to be non Muslims. This community has conflict in their claim and actions. They have challenged the basic belief of finality of Prophet Muhammad pbuh by declaring their caliphs as equal to messengers. God forbid this is disrespectful towards the final Prophet of Islam when he himseld clarified that he has perfected Islam as our religion and there is no room for any changes, additions or messengers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2400:ADC5:135:DF00:800:CC6B:3E46:5D1A (talk) 18:58, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

page move

What were you trying to do here: Special:Diff/997173544 —valereee (talk) 19:01, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

@Valereee: My Arabic has improved since my first edit but then was non-existent so effectively the article title was gibberish and the Arabic script was gibberish in gibberish. The chapters were not numbered as in Western tradition but were simply given titles as in the Eastern tradition and Arabic titles at that - This is English Wikipedia. We are here to impart knowledge to English speakers. However the problem with simply using the English titles is creating too many ugly (disambiguation) (surah) identifier requirements. Chapter number and English title would solve this... The Study Quran, a publication HaEr48 seems to prefer, entitles the chapter 32, Prostration, al-Sajdah - It just seems the best of all worlds solution. JorgeLaArdilla (talk) 22:23, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

What I would very strongly recommend is that before you make such major changes you bring it up on the talk page. —valereee (talk) 22:54, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

@Valereee: I see it as fixing a problem. I am struggling to reconcile your comment above with the editing guideline Go for it!. JorgeLaArdilla (talk) 23:11, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Be Bold, until someone objects. Then discuss. That's how we do it around here. —valereee (talk) 23:13, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

@Valereee: Agreed. How have I deviated from that? JorgeLaArdilla (talk) 23:17, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

You've had fairly major pushback on that page, I believe? It's time to talk first, then make changes. —valereee (talk) 23:42, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

@Valereee: Agreed and not unexpected. Wikis develop faster when everybody helps to fix problems. I made an edit to fix problem & it was reverted...er...thats it. Why do you find that sufficiently problematic to give me strong advice? Following this contribution Special:Diff/995715269 I worked to amend the summary in accordance with HaEr48's objections. Despite my many contributions to the talk page, my edit was reverted in its entirety, and yet you choose to template me before HaEr48. How is that impartial? JorgeLaArdilla (talk) 00:40, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Cut and Paste

What you have to do is Move the page. That keeps all the attribution. What you did is okay for when you split articles, but not for changing the name of an article. If you can't move the article, you can ask it to be done for you at WP:REQMOVE. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:05, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

@Onel5969: I noted your comments and followed the process at WP:Merge and yet you are still reverting? JorgeLaArdilla (talk) 14:46, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

JorgeLaArdilla, No, you didn't. Merge is not Move. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:47, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

PDF Quran

Hi, there was a PDF version of Arabic text of Quran you were using it on articles about various surahs. Where can I download it? Thanks --Ali00ABC (talk) 05:15, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

@Ali00ABC: I'm guessing you mean the one that was at the top of the page for a short period? It actually was not me who added it. It was introduced, not using Wiki markup, but via some sort of page coding - well outside my knowledge level. Likewise I was not responsible for its disappearance and I don't know who was because they circumvented the Wiki history. I have done a quick google but cannot find it online. But I did download it (it was named: Arabic Holy Quran القرآن الكريم Священный Коран Kuran). I have never used the mediawiki email system so not sure if I can get it to you.JorgeLaArdilla (talk) 05:51, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

http://tanzil.net/#2:183 This is an Arabic Quran although not a pdf JorgeLaArdilla (talk) 05:53, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Ping on As-Sajdah

I saw the ping you made on As-Sajdah where you said I am hoping to convince you that I am genuinely trying to improve the article. I think you're a very hard working user, but you just need to get some consensus for your edits. I never doubted your genuineness. But I don't agree with a lot of your edits. For example, I see recently you've been going around making redirects for Quranic verses (e.g.Q37:35). Instead of that I think it is better to externally link verses using Template:Cite Quran where the reader can see multiple translations. Giving multiple translations for every Quranic verse is beyond the scope of wikipedia.VR _talk 15:34, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

@Vice regent: Thank you for your coming back to me. You raise several issues which I will need to answer over several pages. I am asking for a little patience as some issues may be addressed a little bluntly and I do want to alienate myself before I address the issues where I am sure we will see eye to eye more easily. JorgeLaArdilla (talk) 21:22, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

I appreciate your cooperation. I think there are other things we can also discuss on user talk page and clarify misunderstandings between us.VR _talk 21:25, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

We are talking about single pattern of edits, but you keep pinging me from talk pages ([1][2]). Can we pick a single place to discuss this? I'd rather go back to the original place we were talking about this.VR _talk 18:39, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

I really didnt mean to irritate you. Talk:As-Sajda was the page where I pinged you first, so there, not here, was where I was expecting your reply.JorgeLaArdilla (talk) 18:49, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

I'm not irritated. I'm sorry if I came across that way. I have seen your edits for a long time and while I disagree with many, I'm hoping we can find solutions. You've done a lot of hard work on articles I watch, so thanks for that.VR _talk 19:12, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

edit warring

You appear to be repeatedly reverting other editors to add thirty external links to the Summary section at As-Sajdah. Please explain. —valereee (talk) 20:18, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Islamic archaeology

Hello, JorgeLaArdilla. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Islamic archaeology".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:40, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (2nd request)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Judge into Referee. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 00:15, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

"The Home of Football Stadium" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect The Home of Football Stadium. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 27#The Home of Football Stadium until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:25, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Cross-Project Assistance Requested

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Hello, I'm an user from English Wikisource currently dealing with s:Index:Syariah Penal Code Order, 2013.pdf, and the OCR plugin provided on English Wikisource struggles to identify some Arabic characters (and may have misidentified some others), which affects the following pages:

• s:Page:Syariah Penal Code Order, 2013.pdf/108
• s:Page:Syariah Penal Code Order, 2013.pdf/109
• s:Page:Syariah Penal Code Order, 2013.pdf/110
• s:Page:Syariah Penal Code Order, 2013.pdf/111
• s:Page:Syariah Penal Code Order, 2013.pdf/112
• s:Page:Syariah Penal Code Order, 2013.pdf/113

As an active user on WikiProject Islam, I hope you can help with the transcription of these two pages by inserting missing Arabic characters. Missing characters are marked properly by "Arabic characters" templates, and can be done by replacing them with the corresponding Arabic characters.

I'll appreciate your useful assistance, thanks!廣九直通車 (talk) 11:06, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timba, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page El Gallo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Thomas Milo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thomas Milo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Milo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:26, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Need your attention

Hello dear, can you please take a look here and let me know what you think? Thanks in advance.--TheEagle107 (talk) 14:33, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi TE107, In my opinion the problem is overuse of template in WikiProject Islam main space articles. The user is taken to a clunky site off Wikipedia. It would be great if we could tweak it to provide better translations but alas we cant. Just gotta work with the tools we are given. @Mccapra: explained techieStuff which I did not see while articulating the bits I did understand better than I could. JorgeLaArdilla (talk) 18:52, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Al-Baqara, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alif.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Talk page modifications

JorgeLaArdilla, please don't modify another editor's post in a talk page discussion; correcting typos is not an exception to WP:TPO.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:25, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

@Ponyo: The guy is a new user unfamiliar to Wiki formatting, it would seem with English language as a second Language. I have previously wikified his work and am seeking to educate. If he has a problem he can speak for himself.JorgeLaArdilla (talk) 18:34, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

While indenting and such to allow readers to understand the flow of a conversation is acceptable if necessary, you should never modify any of the wording in another editor's talk page post (outside of removing blatant personal attacks and similar situations). We have editors from all around the world with varying degrees of English-language comprehension who include typos and grammar errors in their posts; we don't modify or correct their typos. If you've been doing so, please stop as there is strong consensus that posts should not be modified in such a manner.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:45, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

"Florida building collapse" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Florida building collapse. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 8#Florida building collapse until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 09:58, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

3rr

Your recent editing history at British Isles shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Canterbury Tail talk 20:34, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

You are past 3 reversions in the last 24 hours, I'd recommend undoing your last one. Canterbury Tail talk 20:34, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

If I have misunderstood WP:3RR, I'll take the consequences JorgeLaArdilla (talk) 20:36, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Came to leave a 3RR warning, but I see you've already been warned and blocked. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 23:35, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Canterbury Tail talk 20:57, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

July 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at British Isles. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 23:15, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Redirects

2004–05 season in association football listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 2004–05 season in association football. Since you had some involvement with the 2004–05 season in association football redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:46, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

"Counter-terrorism policing in the UK" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Counter-terrorism policing in the UK. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 3#Counter-terrorism policing in the UK until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 19:11, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Emett, (Frederick) Rowland listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Emett, (Frederick) Rowland. Since you had some involvement with the Emett, (Frederick) Rowland redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 04:31, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Somatometry listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Somatometry. Since you had some involvement with the Somatometry redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:59, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Great mosque, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Great Mosque of Algiers.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:10, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

"(Milch) camels" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect (Milch) camels. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 21#(Milch) camels until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:35, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Early Quranic manuscripts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vat. Ar..

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, JorgeLaArdilla

Thank you for creating AlKoran.

User:Rosguill, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Seems like this could equally be used as an alternative spelling of Quran, but I'll defer to you on which is a more appropriate target.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 14:52, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

"Hangover 2 Now in Thailand! (2011)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hangover 2 Now in Thailand! (2011). Since you had some involvement with the Hangover 2 Now in Thailand! (2011) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:08, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Religion

"Vatican summit" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Vatican summit. Since you had some involvement with the Vatican summit redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:49, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Islam

Your move of Al-Kahf has been undone

I moved page Al kahf back to Al-Kahf again, undoing your recent unilateral move. Please seek consensus for page moves of this nature on the article's Talk page first. Please see Wikipedia:Moving a page, and especially section #Before moving a page. Normally, when you want to move a page, you should follow the procedures given at WP:RM#CM. See sections #Changing capitalization of sura article, and #April 2019 above. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 23:36, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Clarification: user’s page move happened before the block above and does not represent recidivism. Mathglot (talk) 02:27, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

You have moved An-Nas again, and Al-Ahzab. At least you gave a rationale on the talk page for the first one. That is now open for discussion. Please await consensus on that page before moving any others. – Fayenatic London 09:44, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Changing capitalization of sura article

I'm sure you have a reason for changing the capitalization of sura name articles e.g. Al-Ahqaf → Al aḥqāf and a lot of others, but the previous naming is a longstanding practice and I'd suggest not changing it without some discussions to see if other editors agree with your reasoning. For a start, you can begin a discussion in WT:ISLAM. HaEr48 (talk) 00:39, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Please do not move any more such articles without discussion. You moved Surah to Sūrah referring to WP:MOSAR, but WP:MOSAR#Common transcription means that we should use "Surah".

Please revert any other surah pages that you have moved to versions with diacritics, where that version is not in accordance with WP:MOSAR. – Fayenatic London 22:34, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

@Fayenatic london:, would you mind checking if that applies as well to recent non-title transcription changes of a similar nature to Dhul-Qarnayn such as here, here, here, or here? Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 10:17, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

WP:MOSAR#Common transcription may not specifically cover those, but it certainly covers Special:diff/899030559, moving Al-Ahzab to Al aḥzāb.

JorgeLaArdilla, you are now blocked for 24 hours. Please consider your future conduct carefully. Do not move pages again from longstanding names without discussion. If you wish to gain the confidence of other editors, you should also start to respond to discussions and requests on this page and other relevant talk pages. – Fayenatic London 18:53, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  – Fayenatic London 18:53, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Article for The Clear Qurʻan: Thematic English Translation

Hi Jorge LaArdilla,

I would like your advice. I see you created a page on the Quran translation Saheeh International.

I wish to create a Wikipedia article on another Quran translation, The Clear Quran by Dr. Mustafa Khattab.

The Wikipedia article title could be "The Clear Qurʻan: Thematic English Translation."

This specific translation was completed after three years of collaboration with a team of scholars, editors, and proof-readers. This specific translation is clear, accurate, and easy to understand. The Clear Quran by Mustafa Khattab is a translation of the Quran. It is now the default translation available on https://quran.com/1/1

Independent sources

• Niagara Falls Review, Holy book project took 4,000 hours
• Mustafa Khattab, Centre for Islamic Knowledge, Canada
• IQRA' International Educational Foundation
• Muslim Link, Canada

Other sources

• The Clear Quran – A Review, MY Voice is a non-profit Muslim Youth project
• The Clear Quran Paperback $7.67
• The Clear Quran at GoodReads

If you think this Wikipedia article should be created, can you help start the Wikipedia article? spartymantz (talk) 14:10, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

I like your advice to start a Mustafa Khattab article. How do I get started? Can you please reply by email instead of messaging me on my talk page :-). Sorry this is so difficult for me to do. You can use the "Send this user an email" feature on my profile page. Thanks

spartymantz (talk) 03:27, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Sujud Tilawa

Hello JorgeLaArdilla.

I kindly ask you to take a look at the draft Sujud Tilawa and make the necessary improvements and corrections. Cordially.

--Kalimoun (talk) 11:02, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

I look at it after checking your main space articles. My English is better but I do not have your expertise! JorgeLaArdilla (talk) 11:12, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Covid 19 Information

Your submission at Articles for creation: Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (May 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 11:48, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Hello, JorgeLaArdilla! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 11:48, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (May 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 15:57, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

My bad

Mohamed Salah

What are you playing at? Restore his full name. Barton Dave (talk) 23:33, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Al-An'am

The "summary" is excessive and your interpretations are based off one website, https://www.islamawakened.com/. You were WP:BOLD, I reverted, now the WP:ONUS is on you to gain consensus. Kleuske (talk) 11:21, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:JorgeLaArdilla reported by User:TrangaBellam (Result: ). Thank you. TrangaBellam (talk) 15:47, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

September 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  RegentsPark (comment) 20:24, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Requesting some article expansion help

Greetings,

Requesting your visit to Draft:Intellectual discourse over re-mosqueing of Hagia Sophia and article expansion help if you find you interest in the topic.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 12:06, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Islamic archaeology has been accepted

Islamic archaeology, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 10:09, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Firmament

Hi, you contributed to the article Firmament. You may wish to weigh in on the controversy about recent deletions that I have just highlighted on that articles talk page. --Doric Loon (talk) 13:46, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

"Shabji" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Shabji and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 20#Shabji until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 13:17, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

"Quran.com" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Quran.com and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 26#Quran.com until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. --37.56.21.106 (talk) 02:54, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

"Jesus, considered as a Muslim" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Jesus, considered as a Muslim has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 25 § Jesus, considered as a Muslim until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 12:55, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

"Pharaoh in Islam" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Pharaoh in Islam has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 28 § Pharaoh in Islam until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 21:29, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Thomas Milo

Hello, JorgeLaArdilla. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Thomas Milo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

"1834 edition" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect 1834 edition has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 28 § 1834 edition until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 02:56, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

"Adoption in China" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Adoption in China has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 28 § Adoption in China until a consensus is reached. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:26, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

"Adoption in China" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Adoption in China has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 11 § Adoption in China until a consensus is reached. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:04, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Thomas Milo

Hello, JorgeLaArdilla. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Thomas Milo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:37, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

"Napoleon's army in 1808" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Napoleon's army in 1808 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 8 § Napoleon's army in 1808 until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 08:05, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

"Holy Quran ( twelver tafsir)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Holy Quran ( twelver tafsir) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 15 § Holy Quran ( twelver tafsir) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 06:20, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

"Fire must never be extinguished" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Fire must never be extinguished has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 3 § Fire must never be extinguished until a consensus is reached. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 20:29, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

Added to Missing Wikipedians

Howdy! I noticed you fit the criteria to be added to the list of Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians with over 18,000 edits. I went ahead and added you because you haven't made an edit since September 2, 2021 after your one week block from editing. If you ever decide to come back or don't want to be on the list, feel free to remove your entry. Thanks for contributing!

Defunct But Not Forgotten (talk) 22:09, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

"Sayyid Muhammad" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Sayyid Muhammad has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 7 § Sayyid Muhammad until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:33, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

Please help Muslim World Article — Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.140.166.97 (talk) 13:26, 31 March 2024 (UTC)