User talk:Johnathan Osorio

Welcome!

Hello, Johnathan Osorio, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as CFC – Youth for Christ, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Bennv3771 (talk) 05:57, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of CFC – Youth for Christ

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on CFC – Youth for Christ, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://yfccentralb.weebly.com/cfc-youth-for-christ.html. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bennv3771 (talk) 05:57, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Johnathan Osorio/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:02, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Johnathan Osorio, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:02, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of CFC Youth for Christ

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on CFC Youth for Christ, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://cfcyouthforchrist.net/. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Valenciano (talk) 13:33, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Roman Catholic Diocese of Imus. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 13:35, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from CFC Youth for Christ, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:46, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What are you trying to do

In this edit, you added {{db-Jonathan Osorio}} to your user page. Are you attempting to delete your user account? User accounts at Wikipedia are rarely deleted, but you do have the right to vanish. Follow the directions at that link if this is what you are trying to do. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:32, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Liveloud

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Liveloud requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Eman 235/talk 18:59, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as CFC - Youth for Christ, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Please do not create redirects to pages that do not exist (nor have they ever existed). —C.Fred (talk) 20:38, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Johnathan Osorio. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 08:39, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of CFC-Youth for Christ

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on CFC-Youth for Christ, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. bonadea contributions talk 22:47, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Johnathan Osorio. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 20:35, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Unblock Requests

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Johnathan Osorio (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm very very sorry and i won't do it again

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Just Chilling (talk) 18:33, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Johnathan Osorio (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I would like to apologize for creating articles about an organization which i don't really know,-leading to creating a multiple accounts. I would like to say sorry for that, and i promise it won't happen again. further more i would like to request for help to know further about Wikipedia. Thank you :)

Decline reason:

See below. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:34, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello. Can you explain me how does creating articles about an organization [you] don't really know lead to creating a multiple accounts? It's an interesting phenomenon. Also, can you explain how is it possible to write a 8,415 bytes long article about an organization you don't really know? Vanjagenije (talk) 21:42, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi... Vanjagenije here it is, first, the organization itself (the physical Organization) like CFC-Youth for Christ, is i don't know its structure, and i only know is how it does in their works of evangelization. i see how huge their formation is, and i have witnessed some. i believe it was in wikipedia before and it is deleted for unknown reason then i created one. the "Liveloud event too. i see everything about them in many news report in the local channel and i believe it is remarkable and has encyclopedic evidence.i only thought the article i created it was just a body of what i have witnessed from the organization, while i don't know how to use the wikipedia. I accidentally created an account like "livelouder" because i thaught that one article is equivalent only to one account. because i don't know how to use everything in here, i have made many edits including recreating those deleted articles because i have my draft in the wordpad. I believe it was my fault because i have blured eye sight in white pages like wikipedia that i need to invert colors and calibrate my monitors before before i read everything. i didn't see hidden button in moblie view and i don't see a quick access button in desktop because its tiny.
Also, I'm trying to delete my account but i failed so creating another accounts was my choice and forget the others. unfortunately, we're sharing the same IP Address in my phone, in desktop and in laptop. were having fellowship in the house and my friends use everything in the house and i forgot to log out in my things. they are interested to do editing in wikipedia like what i did without knowing the circumstances, i'm being blocked by Bbb23 for using multiple accounts. I only trying to share what happens in the organization where i belong but i admit it was my fault for not reading carefully. regardless of my poor eyesight. I hope you may understand. Thank You :)
- I still don't understand. Did you, as an individual, register multiple accounts, or were those your friends? Or both? Or have you let your friends operate your accoun(s)? Also, first you said that CFC is an organization you don't really know, and now you say that it's an organization you belong to. Which of those is true? Vanjagenije (talk) 08:52, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

- Hello, I only created 2 Accounts, the "Johnathan Osorio" and "Livelouder", the rest are its either one of my friends, or my friend's friend. because they are connected to my wifi, furthermore, they maybe created an account under the same IP address leading to block :( and the CFC-Youth for Christ is an organization that anyone can contribute for "enthusiasm", I am only a member of the said organization but i don't know exactly its structure, i only know its activities but i don't know the other aspects as generally speaking.
  - The problem is that LiamAiken created CFC-Youth for Christ article as many as 3 times. Even if that's not you but your friend, you were working together to create an account about non-notable organization. This kind of multiple accounts manipulation is not allowed. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:21, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - Ah... I see, Thanks for that information :)
  - Please help me remove those unnecessary accounts, i admit that its a lack of knowledge brought me in this situation.
    - It seams that your only intention here is to promote an organization you belong to. Promoting is not allowed in Wikipedia, and WP:conflict of interest editing is also discouraged. Not just that you were promoting the organization, but you also organized your friends to help you, which is especially disruptive. Therefore, I can't unblock you. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:34, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Requests

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Johnathan Osorio (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I have been blocked by an admin for the following reason: * I have created a multiple accounts. Liveloud, Livelouder, YoungChristian1995 and LiamAiken. those accounts are belong to Johnathan Osorio, that leads to blocks (Blocked by Sockpuppetry). I would like to request unblock because I love to create an article based on importance and not for advertising or campaigns. I admit multiple mistakes I've done, including creating a not notable article sounds like promoting an event or advertising point of view which is not allowed on wikipedia policies and guidelines. * I would like also to request for the deletion of those accounts:, Liveloud, Livelouder, and LiamAiken, and YoungChristian1995, because those are puppets. * I would like to say sorry for everything, and i promise It will not happen and i will not do it again. Thank you and God bless!

Decline reason:

You state in the appeal, below, that your friends may have accessed your account. We cannot unblock compromised accounts because an account must only be used by one person and we do not know who is using a compromised account. Just Chilling (talk) 15:35, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{how can I able to delete those sockpuppet accounts?}} CFC-Youth for Christ 16:47, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

It is not possible to deleted an account. Wikipedia's term of use do not allow deleting accounts. Vanjagenije (talk) 16:51, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

*What can i do to those accounts or just leave those? 
*what does it mean "vanishing" accounts?
* please help me vanish those accounts instead... 😀
*I am only 16-days old as Wikipedian and I don't know many aspects as of now, please help me. thank you 🙂

- As explained at WP:VANISH, courtesy vanishing is only possible for "a user in good standing". Sockpuppet account are certainly not in good standing. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:39, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to clarify that is it possible that accounts with forgotten password or username may lead to sockpuppetry if i create a new one?
What will be your advice for me for now?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Johnathan Osorio (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't know what am I doing.... I allow my friends to use my phone but I don't know if they accessed my wikipedia account intentionally or accidentally 😭😭😭 please get me out of here... it is not my intention to advertise the organization... the problem is the way how i constructed the article that might be sounds like an advertising... help me instead... Also, I don't know (in that time) totally Wikipedia aspects, that may leads to creation of new accounts, in some case i have account with forgotten passwords (before i reset my phone, while my another phone snatched 5 days ago) including non-intentional re-creactions of deleted articles... please advise me what am I going to do... what if I'm being hacked...

Decline reason:

We get a lot of the "My little brother did it" variety of unblock requests on a daily basis. Sometimes it's a brother, sometimes it's a cousin, sometimes it's a best friend, you get the general idea. Unfortunately, that itself is a reason for a block.

Even if your little brother did it, you're admitting to leaving your account insecure. We do not allow account sharing on Wikipedia and it is your responsibility to keep your account secure and prevent abuse by others. If it indeed is the case of your little brother, we still cannot unblock you.

You have not addressed the reason for your block. According to the guide to appealing blocks, you should explain to the reviewing administrator what you did, why it was wrong, and how you'll avoid it in the future. As you've not done that here, your request for an unblock has been denied. Just Chilling (talk) 15:28, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Johnathan Osorio (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #18868 was submitted on Jul 30, 2017 19:09:24. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 19:09, 30 July 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Johnathan Osorio (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #18878 was submitted on Jul 31, 2017 13:34:08. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 13:34, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Johnathan Osorio (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, please unblock me for I need to fix my account here, I Herby admit what I did. the mistakes is I have created 4 accounts. Let me tell you the story. "Johnathan Osorio" Account (me), has only purpose is to create an article about CFC-Youth for Christ, a religious youth organization based in the Philippines. Since I am new at Wikipedia, I'm not familiar with the Policies and Guidelines. I created a CFC-Youth for Christ Article but it is deleted for an Advertising reason. I tried to edit it many times, but I forgot my password cause In July 22, 2017, I've lost my phone. and in that phone is where my password notes is. I created a new account. "LiamAiken" to re-create the Article. Someone (A user with a username starts with letter "B" i don't know who she/he/they is/are) who contribute to it and I don't know why the article has many issues again. In July 21, before I've lost my phone, I did many edits to the article and even linked it to another categories. I created an Account "Liveloud/Livelouder" to contribute to the Article or even create a new article about the "Liveloud Band". My cousin celebrate her birthday in house, my friends use my phone, laptop and desktop computer. (Knowing the fact that I'm still logged In at Wikipedia). Then I don't know what happened, I've lost my iPhone (I don't know if it is horde by someone or stole it) with my password note is in it. Then I retrieved my password through icloud, where my iPhone notes are synced. Unfortunately, I'm already blocked by Sock Puppetry. Even if it is my friend, my little brother, or anyone who did these mistakes, or even Myself, It is still my responsibility to secure my account. I'm sorry if I did anything like (e.g. vandalism, or anything against Wikipedia Policies and Guidelines), I promise that I will avoid making this happen again, for it is IN MY accountability, with MY NAME on it. Thank you for your kind consideration.

Decline reason:

Sorry, but you admit that your account was compromised. Since we have no way to determine that you have truly regained control of your account, we cannot unblock your account. —C.Fred (talk) 21:11, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Johnathan Osorio (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, now I regained the full control of my account by Disabling features in my iPhone Via iCloud, change email linked to this account, also, by changing password. Therefore no one can access this account other than me and Wikipedia Administrators. Thank you, I promise, it won't happen again.

Decline reason:

Unfortunately, we have no way to prove this at all. Even if you took these steps, there's no way to actually prove you did all this, and WP:COMPROMISED says we will not unblock accounts that have been admittedly compromised. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:12, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Change Username

Johnathan Osorio → Share-XR

Status: In progress

Current username: Johnathan Osorio (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · target logs · block log · list user · global contribs · central auth · Google) (ping user)
Target username: Share-XR (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · target logs · block log · list user · global contribs · central auth · Google) (advise user)
Previous renames: current user, target user, Queue: open req, closed req
For renamer use: Email target username, usurp user, rename user
Datestamp: 14:09, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Reason: The Username is too long

Johnathan Osorio (talk) 14:09, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request to Move All Suspected and Confirmed Sock Accounts

Are you able to move all suspected and confirmed sockpuppet accounts to this account? ~~ Johnathan Osorio (talk) 21:11, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Those accounts claimed as probable mistakes-resulting to block and its admitted. Johnathan Osorio (talk) 21:15, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Johnathan Osorio (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sincerely requesting for unblock and claiming those accounts are made by mistakes. We (my friends) gathered in the house. In what we called "fellowship" And as newbie, I was unaware of the rules. My friends created those accounts to provide and gather information about that organization. But unintentionally, we created and edited the same topic which probably seems like a spam and advertising, using the same computer and IP. Sorry for being rude and dishonest. I was recently unable to access this account, that is why I created another and yet it leads to another series of blocks in addition to my sockpuppet investigation but I don't intent to evade block. Which sometimes, I just forgot... In line with this, I am willing to contribute a fact-based content to wikipedia and not adding spam advertising or anything that appears like vandalism to any articles. I may need some advise. Thank you for considering.

Decline reason:

No. Talk page access revoked to stop you wasting more of our time. Yamla (talk) 10:01, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.