User talk:Jnorman34

Welcome!

Hi Jnorman34! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! ZombiUwU ^{(💬 ~♥~ 📝)} 01:48, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apparent COI with Henry Duffy

Greetings! I notice you claim to be the photographer for the image in Henry Duffy. This would indicate you have (had) a professional relationship with Duffy, which is a conflict of interest. Can you provide more information on how you obtained the image? —C.Fred (talk) 03:00, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I got the image from the ALPA website, and did not know how to attribute it. I do not have a professional relationship with Mr Duffy. I do know him, however, if that matters. Please advise on how I can correct the attribution for the photo. Thanks. Jnorman34 (talk) 03:55, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for clarifying. I have requested deletion of the image, because it is copyrighted and under an all-rights-reserved license. —C.Fred (talk) 04:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can I just use a link to the photo from the ALPA website. If not, how can I legally obtain a photo of Mr Duffy? I found one on Alamy, but it says it is not available for licensing in my area. Jnorman34 (talk) 04:45, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia does not allow hotlinking to outside images. To use an image of Duffy on Wikipedia, it will likely need to be a free image. This is one where the copyright holder is released their copyright claims on the image (or made it available under a free license like a Creative Commons license), so the image can be used for any derivative purpose, inclusind commercial reuse. As a general rule, a non-free image of a living person can't be used in the infobox of their article. —C.Fred (talk) 04:49, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could I request a photo directly from Mr Duffy or one of his family members? I believe his daughter could provide one of her personal photos of him. If so, how do I attribute the image? Again, thank you for your assistance with this. Jnorman34 (talk) 04:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Henry Duffy

Hello Jnorman34! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Henry Duffy, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.alpa.org/about-alpa/our-leadership/past-presidents, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (CC BY-SA 4.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Henry Duffy and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-enwikimedia.org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Henry Duffy, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Henry Duffy. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA), version 4.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Henry Duffy with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Henry Duffy saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! RudolfRed (talk) 05:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Henry Duffy moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Henry Duffy. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and more citations to better support the information. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:13, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Henry Duffy has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Henry Duffy. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:15, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to you all for your assistance. I will continue to add more references and citations to fill out the page. Sorry for prematurely publishing the page.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Henry Duffy (February 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Henry Duffy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 20:43, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jnorman34! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 20:43, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Henry Duffy (February 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by The Herald were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

SIGCOV not met.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Henry Duffy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 12:07, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Henry Duffy has been accepted

Henry Duffy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Clear friend a ^💬 14:26, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Jnorman34. Thank you for your work on Henry Duffy. Another editor, Clearfrienda, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Please make sure to disclose your conflict of interest before continuing to edit.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Clearfrienda}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Clear friend a ^💬 14:28, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]