User talk:Jimmio78

Hey jimmio78, can u also tell the genre of each and every tracks seperate in the form of list in the track listing of 'folklore' by Taylor Swift? It will be really helpful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4055:2E1C:FDA5:CC49:102:78D7:18BE (talk) 05:26, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Jimmio78. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! DThomsen8 (talk) 01:01, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to 808s & Heartbreak, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 02:00, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 01:57, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Late Registration

Don't restore your edit to this article. Commas are an acceptable (and easily understood) way to delineate items in a list, and this is further shown at the WP:ALBUM article style guide (scroll down to the examples). Other items at Late Registration are separated by commas, and articles should be consistency in style internally. Don't change it. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 08:17, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your bold edits at Channel Orange were reverted twice...

... please direct your efforts at discussing your changes at the article's talk page rather than reinstating them (WP:BRD). Dan56 (talk) 00:50, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 11 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Unapologetic page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:31, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Colour in Anything, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Blake. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:39, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:22, A Million cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:22, A Million cover.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:06, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at 808s & Heartbreak, you may be blocked from editing. SummerPhD^v2.0 01:30, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Starboy

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that one of your recent edits on Starboy has been reverted. Please refrain from adding songwriters and/or producers without a citation. Thank you! GagaStan (talk) 03:24, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jimmio78. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Blonde (Frank Ocean album), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 05:44, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TiimmyTurnerDesiignerRemix.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TiimmyTurnerDesiignerRemix.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:20, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive edits at xx articles

Please do not restore your changes to xx (album) and Coexist (album). Items are ordered alphabetically, and there's no underlying principle behind the way you reordered the personnel and track listing credits. If you would like to argue in favor of your changes, please do so at the article's talk page. Dan56 (talk) 22:29, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of All-American Trash

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on All-American Trash requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DrStrauss talk 18:04, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kanye West - Champions Cover.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kanye West - Champions Cover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 01:03, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your bold edits at Blonde (Frank Ocean album)

Please direct your efforts at discussing your changes at the article's talk page rather than reinstating them (WP:BRD). TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 23:44, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Channel Orange, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 03:05, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Funk Wav Bounces Vol. 1, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kellymoat (talk) 12:38, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Funk Wav Bounces 1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Funk Wav Bounces 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Album credits

I wanna ask you about your editing, where do you get your information from these album credits, do you own these albums personally or get it from the album's booklet? TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 17:03, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@TheAmazingPeanuts: Usually from albums I own, although often automatically uploaded songs on YouTube "topic" pages contain accurate credits provided by the record label.

That would make sense as to why you add these credits in album pages, while YouTube isn't classified as an reliable source in Wikipedia standards, we usually add the album's booklet if it available online. It nice to get a response from you about your editing, try to be more responsive to other editors if you get in a edit conflict in the future. Thanks. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 06:14, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Saturation Brockhampton.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Saturation Brockhampton.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:30, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Album article formatting

Please see WP:MOSALBUM for guidelines on how to format album articles. Thank you. --Jennica✿ / ^talk 04:11, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Saturation (Brockhampton album)

Hello Jimmio78,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Saturation (Brockhampton album) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is significant enough to be included in an encyclopedia, and the artist doesn't have an article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Domdeparis (talk) 13:09, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Saturation (Brockhampton album)

Hi, I'm Domdeparis. Jimmio78, thanks for creating Saturation (Brockhampton album)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. At the moment this article does not provide sufficient sources to pass WP:NALBUM. there are no reviews of the album on the page. There is 1 page that streams it but has no review and 1 page that simply annonces the release of the album, and the group's own page.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Domdeparis (talk) 08:54, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ctrl (SZA album), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 09:41, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Personnel formatting

Please see the difference between your edit and mine. This is generally how it's supposed to be formatted. Div col on the whole thing looks wonky. It's better if you do it by section. Thanks. --Jennica✿ / ^talk 02:14, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Questionable edits

Don't make edits like this to articles, I don't know why the hell you remove the producer list and place the producers in the notes. That's why we have a producer list in the first place, there's no reason to remove that. Jennica have get on you about your edits before and gave you the link to the guidelines here, maybe it's time you should follow them. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 06:47, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Cherry Bomb (album), have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 07:29, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@TheAmazingPeanuts: The genres I added were actually all sourced directly from the Complex article currently used to source the genres.

Okay, but do the source explicitly says these are the genres for the album? It's important to adding genres based on sources that explicitly says what genre it is. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 22:50, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Lacy Article

Hi,
I saw that you made a major edit to this article and while I appreciate the changes, I had to undo it because it did not have any references. I will add the references and put that same table format you had once I have finished that. I also want to put Steve's writing credits in his article, so please do not change that.

Thank you,

-Bmegrl9113 (talk) 14:42, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Miami Garden Club Kitty.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Miami Garden Club Kitty.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Track listing formatting

I already tell you before, do not add the producers in the note field like you did here in Kiss Land. I have restore most of your changes, but corrected to how it's supposed to be formatted, you can see it here. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 05:17, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MarkSewath (talk) 06:34, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Jimmio78 reported by User:MarkSewath (Result: ). Thank you. MarkSewath (talk) 06:36, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hi. Please leave edit summaries for your edits, especially when making significant changes to a page. It is helpful to other editors when scanning a page's history. Thanks. Ss112 04:23, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jimmio78. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Saturation III cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Saturation III cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:33, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Night Time, My Time.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. You were reverted over this two months ago. Discuss your changes per WP:BRD. Do not edit war or you will be reported. Thank you. Ss112 06:54, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joanne (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kevin Parker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Apricot Princess.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Apricot Princess.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:30, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to My My My! (Troye Sivan song), have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Hayman30 (talk) 02:52, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Xx (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page West London (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Melodrama (Lorde album)

You made the same edit 10 days ago. It was reverted. Even before this, other editors did this and were reverted (not always by me, by the way—others too). Stop restoring changes that other users have reverted you for. Ss112 10:14, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Black Panther (soundtrack), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:38, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Saturation Brockhampton.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Saturation Brockhampton.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:49, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Saturation II Brockhampton.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Saturation II Brockhampton.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:52, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Brckhmptn.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Brckhmptn.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Please provide edit summaries for the changes you make to articles, particularly those involving your changes to credits. I've seen you reverted at least three times today, and each time you did not provide an edit summary for why you changed what you did. It would be helpful for everybody to know. You also seem not to be aware that credits are often ordered alphabetically and do not have to be in the order the booklet or liner notes place them in. Those can often be arbitrary. Please bear this in mind. Thanks. Ss112 05:21, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Little Dark Age. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ss112 00:32, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Per your edits to Everything Now, if you wish to remove the members of Arcade Fire's roles, take it to the talk page. Please don't remove them again. We also don't credit the band as "The Arcade Fire". It isn't the Funeral era anymore, and regardless of what their booklet says, we know what the band's name is. Also, please start providing edit summaries with every one of your edits. Considering basically all of your edits are changes to credits, it would be best if you explained your reasoning. Ss112 07:45, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Strange Mercy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Keyboard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Love This Giant

I wanted to give a personal note about reverting your edit so you didn't think that I was dismissive. The only things I immediately objected to was replacing the track listing with the template and adding {{small}}, which only makes things harder to read. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:51, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sex & Food

We don't use the AllMusic sidebar for genres—it is automatically generated with little oversight; see WP:ALBUMAVOID. AllMusic reviews are fine, the sidebars are not. Ss112 17:27, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Isolation (Kali Uchis album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moog (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Channel Orange personnel section

There is no mention of a "technical" personnel (whatever that means in the context of album credits), and "additional vocals" are musicians too, yet they are distinguished in your revision as two separate groups; this does not make sense. It does not matter that the booklet does this; common sense should say to do otherwise. Furthermore, a number of the participants hold dual roles, as musicians and--err--as "technical" personnel, the additional programming credit in particular, which you and the booklet list as a "musician" role, when this has more to do with "production". Dan56 (talk) 00:14, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you believe it serves the article better to slavishly follow the presentation of the booklet, then do so completely. Dan56 (talk) 00:16, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I See You (The xx album)

Please propose this change on the talk page. It's been the way it is for a while, so I think any upheaval in which cover is preferred is bound to be controversial. I believe your unnecessary "last time I checked" line was posed as if you knew the change was bound to be controversial anyway (and I say "unnecessary" because you weren't in an active dispute with anybody and it was written as if you were). I also find it a pretty weak reason, to be honest. Wikipedia does necessarily preference digital covers just because it itself is hosted online, and I haven't seen this raised anywhere else. Ss112 05:43, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:God's Favorite Customer.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:God's Favorite Customer.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:30, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Your recent editing history at Favourite Worst Nightmare shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ss112 04:45, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Glam rock

Why is it you often do things like this, where only hours before I reverted a user for adding glam rock, which was unsourced, then it seems you intentionally go and find a source? Considering how much information you've added to this article, surely you came across a source that's already mentioned "glam rock", or had heard the term used in regard to the album's sound, but only now you add it? It seems you've pored over much information in regard to the album, but all of a sudden you agree with a user's assertion and find a source to suit it? It seems very deliberate, as if you're going out of your way to contradict what I've said or reverted. You also did this not too long ago at Tell Me How You Really Feel. Two promotional songs were continuously added to the infobox, I removed them (one of the many times I did), then it seem you deliberately go out and find sources using the term "single". Honestly. Ss112 12:56, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

While we've certainly had our disagreements, I respect your contributions to Wikipedia, and have never intentionally tried to undermine you personally. In this case, I saw another user add the glam rock genre, and considered reverting it, but realised that I had seen various sources refer to multiple sections of the album as glam rock, and decided to instead find a better source. By the time I had done so you had reverted the genre (as you should have; it was not yet sourced). This was simply bad timing. With Tell Me How You Really Feel I had seen the hidden text in the singles section, but had no idea what user added it. I had seen sources refer to all four songs as singles, and thus corrected the article. I can assure you that I have no personal vendetta against you as an editor; we simply happen to sometimes have differing perspectives. Jimmio78 (talk) 22:09, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:AlexTurnerTBHC.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 18:26, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kanye West

Why are you moving a piece of information about May 2018 to before April 2018 in Kanye West, this is non-chronological and a seemingly illogical way of setting this out. Just wanted to know your reasoning. Thanks. Alduin2000 (talk) 05:11, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oops I misread that Sorry! Also I skipped over reading the edit summary which might have helped. Alduin2000 (talk) 05:21, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. It was an honest mistake to make! Jimmio78 (talk) 05:30, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Nasir (album). Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 23:55, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. It looked like the discussion had been resolved.Jimmio78 (talk) 23:57, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Jimmio78, No problem. Just note all AfD (article for deletion) and CSD (criteria for speedy deletion) can NOT be removed until decision of the discussion is closed (AfD) and CSD tags are removed by Admin (if Admin deems the CSD does not apply). Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 00:34, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You blatantly re-added this source to Everything is Love even though Beyonce's official website still has no credits listed. Refrain from such falsification the next time. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 04:11, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This source shows the albums and the tracks till Lemonade, where is the new album here? At least its not visible to the naked eye. If there is some other button to be clicked, please tell me? —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 04:40, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You blatantly removed additional lyricist credit and incorrectly edited samples, then attacked the credibility of such in the comments, despite your lack of knowledge for the creative process and input that went into the WY sessions. Not only was I involved in a creative capacity, but I was invited to the listening parties as well. Use less bias and more reasoning when doing your research.AdamWolpert1 (talk) 10:23, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, of course I removed the credit! You are repeatedly adding YOUR OWN name with NO reliable source. How am I the biased one here? If your claims were credible, you'd include the countless sources you keep mentioning in your edit summaries. This is getting to the point where I don't even know what you're trying to achieve. Jimmio78 (talk) 23:28, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jimmio78: I am independent singer/songwriter Adam Wolpert’s representative and manager. My client was recently made aware that an account had been created under his name mimicking his personal profile and likeness. The claims above are false and not a representation of my client’s wishes, but he is currently associated with the G.O.O.D. Music team and was in fact involved with three of the albums which were worked on in Wyoming. While he assisted in sound engineering and writing, both of which have been confirmed, he is not currently published hence the absence of accreditation from the label. Myself nor my client wish for his name to be wrongfully associated with the page of subject and regret that someone has taken it upon themselves to do so. My client offered up additional information for myself to edit the release page of KTSE to reflect missing samples and correct any wrongful accreditation which may have occurred, though it appears a majority of this was settled by yourself and we thank you for this. If such an issue arises again or my client’s name is used by the account above, please email me at adamwolpert1music@gmail.com (and my client at a2wolpert@gmail.com). I have gone over the Plain and simple conflict of interest guide with my client as well. Thank you for your assistance and continued monitoring of these pages. Cheers. Adamwolpert1music (talk) 02:18, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited KTSE (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Good Music (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Everything Is Love

Would you like to weigh in this discussion regarding Metacritic's indication of "universal acclaim" be used to verify that this album "was met with widespread critical acclaim"? Editor SummerPhDv2.0 has objected to this, reasons detailed here above the discussion. Only if you interested. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 19:32, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited High as Hope, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Jonathan Wilson and Thomas Bartlett (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Four Out of Five

On 1 July 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Four Out of Five, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Arctic Monkeys song "Four Out of Five" jokes about critics who rarely give perfect scores in their reviews? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Four Out of Five. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Four Out of Five), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Brockhampton All-American Trash.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Brockhampton All-American Trash.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kids See Ghosts (album)

Hi there, I can't tell if your edit summary comments at Kids See Ghosts (album) were directed at me, but I wanted to clarify my edits there. I don't care whether that paragraph goes or stays, and I agree, it's totally vague, subjective language. My repeatedly restoring that content was based on the fact that it was being removed by IPs who provided incorrect edit summaries, saying that the content was unsourced (maybe the sources suck, but they're there), and that they were restoring content, when they'd actually removed it. That, plus the IPs' actions resulting in broken formatting at least once, made me assume what was going on was vandalism, which is why I undid it repeatedly. Your edit summary is the first I'd seen that made it seem as if that paragraph did actually need removing. Anyway, as I say, I don't care one way or the other, just wanted to make it clear I wasn't edit warring, at least not intentionally. Thanks! Jessicapierce (talk) 19:32, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you remove the charts from Hive Mind (The Internet album)?

I presume this was a mistake because I see no other reason for their removal. Please be more careful next time. Also, for about the 50th time, please start providing edit summaries with all or definitely most of your edits, especially contentious ones like this. Ss112 03:42, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. No idea what happened. I was just trying to add a "citation needed" tag to one of the genres and somehow I must have reverted the rest of the article to an earlier version without noticing. Jimmio78 (talk) 11:49, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Personnel

Hey. You once said that composition/songwriting credits do not belong to the personnel section per MOS:ALBUM. Could you show me which part does it say that because I couldn't find it. Thanks. Hayman30 (talk) 12:37, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Here you go: "If citing from AllMusic, do not include "composer" credits. The "composer" field on AllMusic is merely a reiteration of the songwriters included on the album, so including it is redundant to the songwriter credits in the track listing." While this is specifically referring to information copied from AllMusic, it holds true that the songwriters are listed above regardless. Jimmio78 (talk) 12:48, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yea I was wondering because that part specifically talks about AllMusic, thanks for clearing it up. Hayman30 (talk) 18:01, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Tranquility Base Hotel & Casino

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tranquility Base Hotel & Casino you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MrLinkinPark333 -- MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 00:21, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Tranquility Base Hotel & Casino

The article Tranquility Base Hotel & Casino you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Tranquility Base Hotel & Casino for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MrLinkinPark333 -- MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 23:21, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Iridescence (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brockhampton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

About the 10th time somebody's pointed out WP:BRD to you

The amount of times I've seen you be reverted by either myself or another user on an article and then because you believe you're right or your changes to be correct, you go back and restore your changes...please stop doing this. Again, it's WP:BRD. If you disagree with your change being reverted, you discuss it. On the article talk page. If you think it would be silly to start a discussion over such a small difference, then perhaps it's not worth restoring to the article either. Besides, there is nothing explicitly forbidding linking fragments of song titles to things other than the song itself, especially if it's a term some readers may not be familiar with. Also, the fact that you even suggested the song may be referencing Goya Foods tropical soda is so ridiculous I actually laughed out loud when I read it. It's like you think Letissier is the type of artist to come out with a song named after an unimportant drink in a country she's not even from and/or didn't even listen to the album whose article you're extensively editing. I wouldn't expect any editor to have read every interview or piece of writing about an album, but Letissier explicitly explained what the song was about. In future, if you're reverted, leave it or discuss it. Pretty simple. You can respond if you like but there's need to tag me in it, I'm not interested in an argument. You may be aware of it, but you should start following it. Thanks. Ss112 13:17, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't disputing that the track was in reference to the painter. I just didn't think it was ridiculous to suggest that the "soda" in the title might also be alluding to that. It's not a brand I'm familiar with (I just googled "Goya Soda" to see if I could find any more info on the song) so I didn't know if it was American or European or where it was from. And honestly I think Letissier is a type of artist that would really write about anything, from tacky American sodas to Spanish romantic painters. Glad I could give you a laugh though. And sorry about the WP:BRD Jimmio78 (talk) 23:58, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you've put on Chris (album) that the English titles are in sentence case...but they're not. Sentence case is what I'm writing in right now. They're in title case. Ss112 04:51, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
But on streaming services and album packaging they’re stylised in this case? Jimmio78 (talk) 05:35, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Tranquility Base Hotel & Casino

The article Tranquility Base Hotel & Casino you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tranquility Base Hotel & Casino for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MrLinkinPark333 -- MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 21:21, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You've been awarded!

		The WikiProject Albums Barnstar
		Congratulations on your first good article, I see your editing has improved a lot and have responded to your follow editors more. Keep up the good work. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 22:21, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on B. J. Novak. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:10, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CqR2HkbVYAEm1lV.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CqR2HkbVYAEm1lV.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Music to My Eyes. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 08:24, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SR3MM album cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SR3MM album cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:58, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jimmio78. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please Like Me cast table

Thank you for sorting out the cast table in the main Please Like Me article. It was inaccurate listing most of the second season regular cast as recurring. You did a great job there.Rain the 1 17:57, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Brockhampton Iridescence.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Brockhampton Iridescence.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Patience (Tame Impala song)

It looks like Y2kcrazyjoker4 is disputing some of the genres you've been adding to Patience (Tame Impala song). Perhaps you need to have a discussion with them on the article talk page before it becomes more of a slow-motion edit war, and it appears I'm noticing before you do. Ss112 19:46, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Please stop adding duplicate information, as you did on The Newsroom (U.S. TV series), it is unnecessary and has been reverted back to original wording. Thank you, David J Johnson (talk) 10:42, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Your recent editing history at Bond 25 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

The purpose of the talk page is to discuss issues relating to content and resolve debates by forming a consensus. While I understand your comments about the sources, I feel that updating the infobox to reflect them risks contradicting the rest of the article as the body article details the production process at length. Given the number of rewrites the film has gone through and its somewhat chaotic pre-production process, the claim that Purvis and Wade wrote the script needs more evidence. All we can say for certain is that Burns and Waller-Bridge wrote the most-recent versions of the script because this is what the majority of third-party sources say. There is no evidence that anything Purvis and Wade wrote is in the final script beyond what a self-published source says. Mclarenfan17 (talk) 04:48, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Mclarenfan17: I discussed the issue on the talk page to attempt to reach a consensus, with only one editor joining the discussion (supporting me). While I agree this is not a consensus, so far there hasn't been a single editor who has agreed with your perspective on this matter, and yet you insist on reverting back to your preferred version of the article. Jimmio78 (talk) 04:53, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is not "my preferred version". It is the version supported by the majority of third-party sources. Your reliance on the official press release amounts to a self-published source. Mclarenfan17 (talk) 05:04, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

But your whole "SGA" argument relies on what is going to be the "official" guild-approved credit, something that will be sourced from a first-party-source. Once again you're contradicting yourself. Would a billing block be a self-published source? Are you saying that a billing block is unreliable? The article is meant to present the OFFICIAL credits, and just for the credits, first-party sources are totally acceptable. If not, here are some third-party sources that include the same information.^[1]^[2] Not to mention that your third-party sources don't even support your argument, and if so it is in a way so implicit that it is not useable as a source. How do multiple sources explicitly saying the film was written by Purvis, Wade, Burns, Fukunaga & Waller-Bridge get trumped by your vaguely inferred esoteric idea that Purvis & Wade might not be credited? Jimmio78 (talk) 05:19, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Both of those sources are clearly derived from the press release, since the wider media were not invited the announcement event. Neither source satisfies my request either. If P&W are to indeed be credited as screenwriters, then something that they wrote must be in the final version of the script. Can you demonstrate this? Mclarenfan17 (talk) 05:26, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Igor liner notes

I saw that you updated the article for Igor with the liner notes on Tyler's Instagram. I was wondering if by chance you kept a screenshot or know where to find these liner notes again? Tyler has listed Jack White as a collaborator on the project and he seems to be the only person in the personnel with out a specific credit for their work. Thank you. Nice4What (talk) 17:11, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Nice4What: Hi. I have got a screenshot of his story with the liner notes and Jack White doesn't appear to be credited. I would suggest that White contributed to recording but his contributions weren't included in the final album, similar to Frank Ocean's early list of Blonde collaborators. https://imgur.com/a/zC8oa4s

@Jimmio78: Just saw this, thanks! Nice4What (talk) 00:46, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No.6 Collaborations Project

Hi. Please take a look when you have a chance. 2402:1980:8249:85CB:E267:CB67:E9A9:1B81 (talk) 09:03, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I, I genres

Hi, I saw you deleted the genres on the I, I article and wrote "do not add unsourced genres". So I ask you; where do we find a source to confirm that the album belongs to the Folktronica genre? Apart from being obviously a folktronica album following the path of their previous record Pinnkerton (talk) 08:42, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Father of the Bride (album)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Father of the Bride (album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DannyMusicEditor -- DannyMusicEditor (talk) 17:01, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Father of the Bride (album)

The article Father of the Bride (album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Father of the Bride (album) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DannyMusicEditor -- DannyMusicEditor (talk) 09:21, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Father of the Bride (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vanity Fair (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:29, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Father of the Bride (album)

The article Father of the Bride (album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Father of the Bride (album) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DannyMusicEditor -- DannyMusicEditor (talk) 14:21, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Father of the Bride (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Album of the Year (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:31, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RfC on producer entries in infobox album

A discussion has begun at WT:ALBUMS#RfC on producer entries in infobox album regarding the |producer= parameter used in this infobox. Please add your comments there. – TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 13:45, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kids See Ghosts Full Artwork.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kids See Ghosts Full Artwork.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How kind

Thanks for the thanks. I'm glad I'm not the only person interested in writing an encyclopedia: that would be a lot of work for just me. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 11:08, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited High Life (2018 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A24 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:03, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Punisher (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Celeste (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Michael Chabon

Just wanted to express my thanks for your great work on Works of Michael Chabon. I'm mostly interested in his books, but I'm glad the other credits were gathered and included on the page. Very nice job—genuinely appreciated!—ShelfSkewed Talk 01:10, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kids See Ghost Cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kids See Ghost Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Fetch the Bolt Cutters

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fetch the Bolt Cutters you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 100cellsman -- 100cellsman (talk) 05:47, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Folklore (Taylor Swift album)

On 20 September 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Folklore (Taylor Swift album), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that William Bowery, who co-wrote two songs on Taylor Swift's album Folklore, appeared to have no online presence, and is possibly a pseudonym? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Folklore (Taylor Swift album). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Folklore (Taylor Swift album)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Fetch the Bolt Cutters

The article Fetch the Bolt Cutters you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Fetch the Bolt Cutters for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 100cellsman -- 100cellsman (talk) 09:22, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Fetch the Bolt Cutters

The article Fetch the Bolt Cutters you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Fetch the Bolt Cutters for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 100cellsman -- 100cellsman (talk) 02:22, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Live in Florida Vampire Weekend.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Live in Florida Vampire Weekend.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kids See Ghosts Full Artwork.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kids See Ghosts Full Artwork.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:58, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

^ Chapman, Matt; Armitage, Hugh (25 April 2019). "James Bond 25 cast, plot, release date and everything you need to know". Digital Spy. Retrieved 5 May 2019.
^ "James Bond 25: Rami Malek joins cast and Phoebe Waller-Bridge to co-write". BBC News. 25 April 2019. Retrieved 5 May 2019.

[1] Chapman, Matt; Armitage, Hugh (25 April 2019). "James Bond 25 cast, plot, release date and everything you need to know". Digital Spy. Retrieved 5 May 2019.

[2] "James Bond 25: Rami Malek joins cast and Phoebe Waller-Bridge to co-write". BBC News. 25 April 2019. Retrieved 5 May 2019.

[1]

[2]