Jump to content

User talk:Jerium/Archive 4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 < Archive 3    Archive 4   
All Pages:  1 -  2 -  3 -  4 -  ... (up to 100)


Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

—Femke 🐦 (talk) 21:08, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – February 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2023).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The Vector 2022 skin has become the default for desktop users of the English Wikipedia.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Voting in the 2023 Steward elections will begin on 05 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
  • Voting in the 2023 Community Wishlist Survey will begin on 10 February 2023 and end on 24 February 2023. You can submit, discuss and revise proposals until 6 February 2023.
  • Tech tip: Syntax highlighting is available in both the 2011 and 2017 Wikitext editors. It can help make editing paragraphs with many references or complicated templates easier.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:38, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Judah Lewis' birthday.

Hello, Jerium. It has been confirmed that Judah Lewis' birthday is May 22nd, 2001. He's 22 years old. Bugsy27 (talk) 03:02, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – March 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2023).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • The 2023 appointees for the Ombuds commission are AGK, Ameisenigel, Bennylin, Daniuu, Emufarmers, Faendalimas, JJMC89, MdsShakil, Minorax and Renvoy as regular members and Zabe as advisory members.
  • Following the 2023 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: Mykola7, Superpes15, and Xaosflux.
  • The Terms of Use update cycle has started, which includes a [p]roposal for better addressing undisclosed paid editing. Feedback is being accepted until 24 April 2023.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:19, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Removed info

Hi Jerium, I received your message about the info we removed on the Native Seeds Search page today. I noticed today that the page listed incorrect info (an old executive director). It looks like it linked to an old blog post on our website. I deleted the person's name, but I didn't really see where to add an explanation or I would have. So, putting the info back on the site, as your message said, would be reinstating outdated information. Sorry for any confusion - I've never updated Wikipedia. 68.14.216.118 (talk) 18:23, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and thanks for messaging, I went ahead an undid my edit, the link is sending a 404 error. When making changes to a page, fill out the edit summary; see Help:Edit summary for instructions, thank you again. Jerium (talk) 18:31, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RM closure review

Hello. Could I request a review of your close at Talk:Carmel (Israeli settlement). The relevant guideline is WP:PLACEDAB, which says human settlements should be disambiguated via a comma. Although most editors were in favour of the proposed move, a guideline-based argument should be given more weight than numbers in favour. There was also an alternative proposal suggested mid-way through the debate, which was compliant with the guideline, and which not all the editors who had already !voted had a chance to reconsider. Cheers, Number 57 20:26, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Number 57 I f*cked up, thought everyone was in favor of the original proposal. Should've been relisted instead. Jerium (talk) 20:40, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, thanks for being open to being asked rather than doubling down! Cheers, Number 57 20:48, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – April 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2023).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seeking Feedback

Hi Jerium, I hope you're well! I'm a wiki newbie and have made contributions to the Fan Activism article, specifically the K-pop section. I'm seeking feedback and tips to ensure the article is up to par. I saw you on the WikiProject Pop music talk page and am hoping you might leave me some feedback on my contribution! Thanks so much. Also, I love your long and impressive work with barnstars! Alise boal (talk) 23:40, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alise boal Hello Alise boal, I've read the article, and it's really well-written (typed) and sourced. I wonder though, were there any oppositional groups or major political ramifications in response to "fan activism". Also adding scholarly negative and positive opinions would create a more wider perspective and would make the reader more knowledgeable on the subject, if there's any scholarly opinion source available though, but good job, keep up the good work. Jerium (talk) 15:57, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Jerium, thank you so much! I am going to look for ramifications and more scholarly opinions. Alise boal (talk) 21:50, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – May 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2023).

Guideline and policy news

  • A request for comment about removing administrative privileges in specified situations is open for feedback.

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:22, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – June 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2023).

Guideline and policy news

  • Following an RfC, editors indefinitely site-banned by community consensus will now have all rights, including sysop, removed.
  • As a part of the Wikimedia Foundation's IP Masking project, a new policy has been created that governs the access to temporary account IP addresses. An associated FAQ has been created and individual communities can increase the requirements to view temporary account IP addresses.

Technical news

  • Bot operators and tool maintainers should schedule time in the coming months to test and update their tools for the effects of IP masking. IP masking will not be deployed to any content wiki until at least October 2023 and is unlikely to be deployed to the English Wikipedia until some time in 2024.

Arbitration

  • The arbitration case World War II and the history of Jews in Poland has been closed. The topic area of Polish history during World War II (1933-1945) and the history of Jews in Poland is subject to a "reliable source consensus-required" contentious topic restriction.

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:33, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – July 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2023).

Administrator changes

added Novem Linguae
removed

Bureaucrat changes

removed MBisanz

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

  • Two arbitration cases are currently open. Proposed decisions are expected 5 July 2023 for the Scottywong case and 9 July 2023 for the AlisonW case.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – August 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2023).

Administrator changes

added Firefangledfeathers
removed

Interface administrator changes

added Novem Linguae

Technical news

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:54, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kamaitachi no Yoru/Banshee's Last Cry move

Hi, thank you for closing the move at Talk:Banshee's Last Cry. Though I've been following the page and actively edited it a month ago, I missed the opening of the move discussion on August 2 and was caught by surprise when the article was suddenly moved last night. I was hoping you would be willing to reopen the discussion and tag the people who were involved in the 2018 move discussion. I can't find any new sources on this game, so I'm unsure what triggered the overturning of the unanimous consensus of five years ago. What are your thoughts on this? ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 07:53, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Maplestrip The RM had already hit elapsed, and with no opposition, it was an easy decision. You can start another RM if it bothers you, though it could be somewhat perceived as disruptive. Jerium (talk) 08:19, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah I hate being disruptive, hence why most I really want to do is ask here. It's a frustrating surprise to wake up to. Maybe I'll see about moving it back again when I actually go hands-on with it someday; it's awkward that I care so much about the article title while the article itself is in such a poor state, I suppose. But figured I'd try here as per WP:MR, I'm sure we've all experienced a surprise decision that we didn't realize was up fo discussion. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat)
Maplestrip Don’t boldly move if you’re suggesting that, that would be disruptive after a successful RM, even if you boldly move it two years later. Just wait two months to start an RM again. That’s the best advice I can give you. Other than that, happy editing and cheers friend. 😉 Jerium (talk) 10:47, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh no, wouldn't dare to boldly revert an action following a closed discussion, haha. But yeah, thanks ^_^; ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 11:26, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – September 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2023).

Guideline and policy news

  • Following an RfC, TFAs will be automatically semi-protected the day before it is on the main page and through the day after.
  • A discussion at WP:VPP about revision deletion and oversight for dead names found that [s]ysops can choose to use revdel if, in their view, it's the right tool for this situation, and they need not default to oversight. But oversight could well be right where there's a particularly high risk to the person. Use your judgment.

Technical news

Arbitration

  • The SmallCat dispute case has closed. As part of the final decision, editors participating in XfD have been reminded to be careful about forming local consensus which may or may not reflect the broader community consensus. Regular closers of XfD forums were also encouraged to note when broader community discussion, or changes to policies and guidelines, would be helpful.

Miscellaneous

  • Tech tip: The "Browse history interactively" banner shown at the top of Special:Diff can be used to easily look through a history, assemble composite diffs, or find out what archive something wound up in.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:22, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This one is for you...

The Outline Barnstar
is hereby awarded to Jerium, for the creation of The Outline Barnstar, which provides the Outlines WikiProject the increased capability of awarding editors who have contributed to the improvement of outlines and outline coverage on Wikipedia. Thank you. Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   02:24, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And you have been added to the Outline WikiProject's Hall of Recognition    — The Transhumanist   09:45, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – November 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2023).

Administrator changes

added 0xDeadbeef
readded Tamzin
removed Dennis Brown

Interface administrator changes

added Pppery
removed

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

  • Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate themselves from 12 November 2023 until 21 November 2023 to stand in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections.
  • Xaosflux, RoySmith and Cyberpower678 have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2023 Arbitration Committee Elections. BusterD is the reserve commissioner.
  • Following a motion, the contentious topic designation of Prem Rawat has been struck. Actions previously taken using this contentious topic designation are still in force.
  • Following several motions, multiple topic areas are no longer designated as a contentious topic. These contentious topic designations were from the Editor conduct in e-cigs articles, Liancourt Rocks, Longevity, Medicine, September 11 conspiracy theories, and Shakespeare authorship question cases.
  • Following a motion, remedies 3.1 (All related articles under 1RR whenever the dispute over naming is concerned), 6 (Stalemate resolution) and 30 (Administrative supervision) of the Macedonia 2 case have been rescinded.
  • Following a motion, remedy 6 (One-revert rule) of the The Troubles case has been amended.
  • An arbitration case named Industrial agriculture has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case close 8 November.

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:23, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OTS

I've been revamping the "Optimal tool set", and it has dawned on me that I've totally forgotten about Wikipedia's graphic artists.

I've got a text-based AI on there, but I'm not familiar with AI image generators, and was wondering if you were familiar with any of these:

AI Image Generators
Name Free/Cost Account Required? Import? Save File? Popularity
Midjourney Cost Yes Yes Yes 1
Starryai Free Yes Yes Yes 2
Mindseye Lite Free Yes Yes Yes 3
Deep Dream Generator Free No Yes Yes 4
MyHeritage's AI Time Machine Free + Fee Yes Yes Yes 5
NightCafe Free No Yes Yes 6
Jasper Art Free No Yes Yes 7
DALL-E 2 Free No Yes Yes 8
Dream by WOMBO Free No Yes Yes 9
Photosonic Free No Yes Yes 10
Stable Diffusion Free No Yes Yes 11
Runway ML Free No Yes Yes 12
Craiyon Free No Yes Yes 13
Bing Image Creator Free Microsoft/Outlook Yes Yes 14

I was thinking of adding advice to import open licensed or public domain pics into it for modification, to avoid copyright derivative work issues.

Comments?

I look forward to your responses. Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   01:13, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Transhumanist No, I've had not heard of these, nor do I know anything about AI. Jerium (talk) 05:51, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A technological revolution is going on involving AI.

Programs that can understand what you tell them to do, as if you were talking or writing to another person, and which can do a growing range of tasks that they weren't preprogrammed to do. Tasks which they perform a lot faster than we can.

AI programs represent the next generation of software applications, and application programs across the spectrum are incorporating AI features at an increasing rate. In the near future, each segment of the software field will likely be dominated by an AI version, with general purpose AI programs likely making many kinds of specialty software obsolete.

Because AIs have taken a leap in what they can do and how well they can do it, businesses in every industry, and governments around the world and their militaries are scrambling to integrate AI into their operations as fast as they can.

The general purpose text generation AIs can do pretty much any kind of writing task, including converse, answer questions, build a profile on someone or something, help you make plans, develop ideas in an interactive conversation, compose essays or just about any other kind of document or written work, build tables, etc., etc., etc. The most powerful thing they can do right now is write and edit software. You tell them what you want your program to do, or what you want them to do to your program, and they write or edit the sourcecode. They can even translate from one computer language to another. Unsurprisingly, they are being used to help design the next version of themselves.

The class of software that is likely to have the highest physical impact upon civilization are robotics control AIs. AIs that can control machinery of all types, including robots. The AIs mentioned above are being used to develop robotics applications, so it won't be long before automated robotics become as widespread as computers.

It is not exaggerating to say that AIs have the potential to change everything, in the not so distant future. See accelerating change.

We are in for quite a ride.    — The Transhumanist   08:49, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sex Work Barnstar

The Sex Work Barnstar
For you development of a new userbox and barnstar to grow the Sex Work task force. Demt1298 (talk) 01:47, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New barnstar award?

Nice design. The nodes are perfect.
How about these colors? Blue for the star, green for the nodes?

I was wondering if you could create an outline barnstar award that has a picture of a topic tree or menu, that is, something hierarchical to represent outlines, superimposed over the star? We settled on the lightbulb for lack of better images at the time. We've been in need of a more representative symbol for a long time.

I look forward to your reply. Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   00:10, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Transhumanist I have actually attempted something like that, didn't go so well. If I do something like that again, and it works, members of WikiProject Genealogy might not be happy that such a diagram would be dedicated to outlines, and I wound't blame them. Jerium (talk) 13:59, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't the barnstar or userbox for categories have something similar? We have something like that on one of the outline userboxes, but it is probably too "meh" to use with a barnstar. Please keep looking, you are likely to find something suitable. Let me know when you do!    — The Transhumanist   10:18, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The Transhumanist I made an alt, and I already added it as the primary and converted the original as the alternative option. Jerium (talk) 20:07, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! I love the shape, and how the nodes propagate the center hole. Would it be any trouble to make the star sky blue and the nodes neon green?    — The Transhumanist   22:26, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The Transhumanist I won't rehash. Just fulfilling a request can upset other editors when I reject them, causing me more trouble. Your reasoning was sound when I made the brown-version to replace the lightbulb barnstar. I'm not going any further with this. Jerium (talk) 23:10, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's nice. And, the colors are growing on me. Thank you.    — The Transhumanist   01:10, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Why?    — The Transhumanist   01:10, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The Transhumanist Honestly, I don't even know. Jerium (talk) 01:15, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I meant, "Why did you move it?" And now you've deleted it. What is going on?    — The Transhumanist   01:31, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I just undid everything back to the way it was. I shouldn't have made a separate template to begin with. Jerium (talk) 01:33, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your help on the WikiProject. Feel free to keep improving things. I like the look of the page and the tree structure you added, etc. Looks very professional.    — The Transhumanist   07:33, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Userscripts?

Based on your graphic arts skill, my guess is you would take to userscripts like a fish to water.

Userscripts are programs you can install in your browser. Many browser add-ons started out as userscripts.

After you get familiar with how to use them, it's not a huge leap to start to make them.

To understand how they are used in general, not just on Wikipedia, it is necessary to install a userscript manager, such as tampermonkey. With tampermonkey, you can install userscripts, edit existing userscripts, and make new userscripts.

Most of the userscripts on Wikipedia can be loaded into tampermonkey. (Rather than the usual method of installing them on your Wikipedia user account).

But, out there on the web, there are userscripts that'll work on pages other than Wikipedia, and you can browse the main collection of those at https://greasyfork.org/en. That site has a very good introduction on how to get started using userscripts, right on its main page.

If you are slightly intrigued, check it out.

Have fun!

Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   08:12, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kathy Hochul

Thank you for reverting the vandalism on Hochul. The vandalism was WP:LTA from a sockpuppeter who waits for their targets to become unprotected, as Hochul's was. With that nature of a BLP violation, I'm surprised nobody reported them to WP:AIV or the page to WP:RFPP. Please keep in mind the next time you see vandalism like that rapidly reinserted over reversions that the page will likely need admin intervention. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:51, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Muboshgu The vandal was reported to AIV, and as for articles in general, I don't really edit them (not anymore). I just watch the filter log for potential vandalism, and I just so happen to see Kathy Hochul getting vandalized. Btw, thanks for blocking Mike Elko. Jerium (talk) 01:01, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ah scratch that. Thought they weren't. Now you know that vandalism is LTA. Thanks again. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:03, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My messages

Do not edit them. See WP:TPO and Help:Talk pages#Indentation. Thank you. GabberFlasted (talk) 13:16, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GabberFlasted How about you don’t mash your comments with the comments of other editors. Jerium (talk) 14:10, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Packaging

Thank you for your work on the Wikiproject Packaging. I hope you continue to be an active member. Pkgx (talk) 14:49, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – December 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2023).

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

  • Following a motion, the Extended Confirmed Restriction has been amended, removing the allowance for non-extended-confirmed editors to post constructive comments on the "Talk:" namespace. Now, non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace solely to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided that their actions are not disruptive.
  • The Arbitration Committee has announced a call for Checkusers and Oversighters, stating that it will currently be accepting applications for CheckUser and/or Oversight permissions at any point in the year.
  • Eligible users are invited to vote on candidates for the Arbitration Committee until 23:59 December 11, 2023 (UTC). Candidate statements can be seen here.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:54, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays!

Hello Jerium: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, ChrisWx 🎄 (Happy holidays!) 16:30, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

To you as well! ChrisWx 🎄 (Happy holidays!) 16:30, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Joyous Season

I wish that you may have a very Happy Holiday! Whether you celebrate Christmas, Hanukkah, Kwanzaa, Hogmanay, Festivus or your hemisphere's Solstice, this is a special time of year for almost everyone! May the New Year provide you joy and fulfillment! Thanks for everything you do here. ★Trekker (talk) 17:37, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Coffee/Holidays}} to your fellow editors' talk pages.


Thank you and merry Christmas friend! ★Trekker (talk) 17:37, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024!

Hello Jerium, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024.
Happy editing,
–Davey2010Talk 17:53, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Season's Greetings


—El Millo (talk) is wishing you Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

—El Millo (talk) 20:13, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays to you too! 😊

ToBeFree is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec19a}} to your friends' talk pages.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:41, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Season's Greetings
Wishing everybody a Happy Holiday Season, and all best wishes for the New Year! The Nativity scene on the Pulpit in the Pisa Baptistery by Nicola Pisano is my Wiki-Christmas card to all for this year. Johnbod (talk) 02:59, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Thank you for your message! Hope you had a wonderful Christmas and a Happy New Year! 🎄

GnocchiFan (talk) 12:27, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Season's greetings


Christmas postcard featuring Santa Claus using a zeppelin to deliver gifts, by Ellen Clapsaddle, 1909
~ ~ ~ Merry Christmas! ~ ~ ~

Hello Jerium: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:47, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Happy New Year!
Hello Jerium:


Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels?

Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters.

CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:19, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message
CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:19, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year to you too! 😃


Happy New Year 2024! 🎆 ✨ This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 1}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:14, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Jerium!

Happy New Year!

Jerium,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
–Davey2010Talk 01:15, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Happy New Year, Jerium!

Happy New Year!

Jerium,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 14:02, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 14:02, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – January 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2023).

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:54, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – February 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2024).

CheckUser changes

removed Wugapodes

Interface administrator changes

removed

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC about increasing the inactivity requirement for Interface administrators is open for feedback.

Technical news

  • Pages that use the JSON contentmodel will now use tabs instead of spaces for auto-indentation. This will significantly reduce the page size. (T326065)

Arbitration

  • Following a motion, the Arbitration Committee adopted a new enforcement restriction on January 4, 2024, wherein the Committee may apply the 'Reliable source consensus-required restriction' to specified topic areas.
  • Community feedback is requested for a draft to replace the "Information for administrators processing requests" section at WP:AE.

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:02, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unaware of what you removed

Hello Jerium, I am unaware of what in particular you removed? The "Eastern Catholic Churches" in the veneration subsection is still there, that is all i added, of which was already sourced before my edit. Λάντεν (talk) 00:19, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Λάντεν You added "Church Father" in the infobox of Gregory Palamas here, yet there is indication that he ever was, unless you can provide a reliable source that states otherwise. Jerium (talk) 00:23, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Forgive me, it seems I overlapped my edit with an older article, thanks for solving that! However, St Gregory Palamas is indeed a Church Father according to Orthodox Christian sources, however amongst other sects (Such Catholicism and Protestantism) it is more nuanced. Should he then be placed as a Church Father since he is the founder of a related article (Palamism) ? Λάντεν (talk) 00:44, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You need a reliable source indicating that he is a Church Father in major denominations, not just the perception of one denomination. Jerium (talk) 00:48, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, thank you. Λάντεν (talk) 00:50, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bhavana

Hi, I don't understand why you've moved the Bhavana (actress) article. She is far more commonly known simply as Bhavana, which is her stage name, than by the weird hybrid name "Bhavana Menon" which is a combination of her stage name and her given surname (her actual name is Karthika Menon). This has been discussed many times over the years at move discussions, and I don't think that should be overturned on the back of a very poorly attended discussion that didn't address the fundamental issues. Cheers  — Amakuru (talk) 21:52, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Amakuru, the RM had hit the elapsed listing, and there was no opposition. It was a simple closure. You can start a new RM, a move review, or have the page moved though a technical request. I am not opposed to those options. Jerium (talk) 22:07, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi again, and thanks for your reply. Firstly, per WP:RMCI your job as the closer of the RM is to assess the validity of the arguments made... It is never a case of it being a "simple closure" just because nobody happened to oppose. With so many move requests in the past affirming the mononym for this actress, I'd have thought some firm common name evidence was definitely required. Anyway, since you've closed it, I can't really use the technical request to reverse your decision, but if possible I wonder if you would consider reopening and relisting the discussion? Thanks  — Amakuru (talk) 22:17, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Amakuru You make a valid point, I'll go ahead and reopen/relist the RM. Jerium (talk) 22:20, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Amakuru The RM is reopened and relisted. Jerium (talk) 22:46, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
thank you!  — Amakuru (talk) 07:06, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – March 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2024).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The mobile site history pages now use the same HTML as the desktop history pages. (T353388)

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:21, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:WikiProject Ant participants

A tag has been placed on Category:WikiProject Ant participants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 22:26, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:WikiProject Packaging participants

A tag has been placed on Category:WikiProject Packaging participants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 22:28, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:WikiProject Elections and Referendums participants

A tag has been placed on Category:WikiProject Elections and Referendums participants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 22:29, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jerium,
I think you must have made changes to a template or userbox that caused these categories to empty out. You should probably consider reverting yourself. Go to the Teahouse if you need help. Liz Read! Talk! 22:30, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Liz Hi Liz, they were already empty since I made them. The user boxes are more recently made, so I expect the cats to be empty for a bit. Jerium (talk) 21:54, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Project Proposal for Forensic Science

Dear @Jerium I hope this finds you well. I am getting in touch as you were on the list of proposers for the Wiki Project Forensic Science. I was wondering if you might be interested in reviving the proposal? I am planning on applying for funding from the Royal Society of Chemistry for an outreach project to plug some of the knowledge gaps around this topic and/or make improvements to articles. We are particularly interested in translating the pages into minority languages such as Scots and Gaelic. This would be building on two previous applications to the same fund for physical resources for schools. It would be brilliant if I could leverage the project to find more editors to support the proposal and provide a sustainable legacy for the project beyond the funding.

What do you think? I'd also understand if your interests have moved on :-)

All the best

drkirstyross (talk) 10:53, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a test...

The Passive Barnstar
This is a test, please eat some dogshit on your way out, thanks for listening.

Jerium (talk) 11:07, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Brazil national football team records and statistics

Hello, the edits on the page Brazil national football team records and statistics are not about removing referenced content, but rather the arrangement of this content that is in the wrong place. Please do not revert the edits anymore, any questions just send a message, good contributions. Svartner (talk) 12:55, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Svartner I actually don't have to revert you, even though I can, you've already violated WP:3RR and are eligible for a 24h block. You're inability to start a discussion at the articles talk page and constantly using the edit summary to justify your behavior only solidates the need of a block. Jerium (talk) 13:02, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Definitely not, the information provided was reversed several times in the article because it was placed in the wrong place. The account User:Raúl Quintana Tarufetti is a WP:SPA that basically edits and changes content of football related articles from Brazil national football team and Argentina national football team, with history and incident reporting. Some other contributors like @User:Koncorde are aware of the situation in case you have any further questions. Svartner (talk) 13:15, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Factually or not, or the behavior history of another contributor is not a valid reason for any editor to be disruptive. Jerium (talk) 13:27, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
...and is restoring the information and standards adopted by the community is a disruptive behavior? Believe me, I'm always open to discussions and I would be happy if more people helped with this problem that has been happening in the articles I mentioned. Svartner (talk) 13:33, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hard to believe you when you haven't even started a discussion at the articles talk page, so please, start a discussion at the articles talk page. I have already requested page protection. Jerium (talk) 13:42, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I will start another session on the talk page. Previous discussions have already started on WP:FOOTBALL and in the article Argentina–Brazil football rivalry. Svartner (talk) 16:16, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Svartner Thank you, a discussion should always start when there's a content dispute. Other editors might not be aware of the other discussions you mentioned above. Please ping/invite parties that are involved in the dispute about it. Jerium (talk) 16:25, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Brazil national football team records and statistics

Hello! I contact you because I saw that you warned the user Svartner because of his behaviour, that he deleted information well referenced in the article Brazil national football team records and statistics here [1], and here in this conversation you had with him. Well, unfortunately he still insists with the reversions... Today he came back with this, and withour discussing it. Please, see here. I fully demonstrated in the article´s talk page that notes with explicative information are also used in many articles of different national football teams where are mentioned the head-to-head and there are differences or disputes or clarifications about different issues or matches in a head-to-head here. But... apparently it's in vain with this issue with this user, because he insists and still reverts, and apparently doesn´t saw your advices or doesn't want to listen to your warn. I ask you to talk with him again, or (if you consider) report or you you think correct, block him. Regards, Raúl Quintana Tarufetti (talk) 02:57, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no point in using dissimulation, as you constantly change content just for WP:POV, in addition to it already being clear that it is a WP:SPA, ignoring any and all discussions previously held in all other talk pages. You even ignored the talk page's warning again (to be clear, even trying for the thousandth time is useless at this point). It's not about reversing, but about keeping the content in line with the project. Svartner (talk) 04:30, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jerium/Archive_4&oldid=1236463743"