User talk:Jax MN

Jax_MN's Talk page -- thank you for your feedback.

A barnstar for you!

		The Fraternity/Sorority Barnstar
		for dedication and endurance building List of fraternities and sororities at Cornell University  Unician ∇  06:17, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

barnstar

		The Fraternity/Sorority Barnstar
		for thankless work creating a number of chapter lists DOCUMENT★ERROR 01:17, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Turning Wikipedia Green Barnstar
		For your tireless contributions to Fraternity/Sorority articles.

––FormalDude talk 22:37, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Buddy! Thanks! Jax MN (talk) 22:37, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Alpha Kappa Rho

I don't believe it either, but 1,000 chapters wouldn't surprise me. Alpha Phi Omega of the Philippines has over 300 chapters and about 300 Alumni Associations. and some of the GLOs in the Philippines operate like the USA NPHC fraternities and sororities and have full non-collegiate chapters outside their home country. (The list of country flags doesn't surprise me, Alpha Kappa Rho is also one of the more numerous in the Philippines. Whenever I curse not being able to get up to date information on Alpha Phi Omega of the Philippines, I have to remind myself that they are one of the better documented. (Glitches in membership records during the Marcos years not withstanding.) Frankly working on active fraternities and sororities in the Philippines can be tougher than working on groups in the USA that have been inactive for 50 years!Naraht (talk) 20:50, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

They claim a chapter in Malta. Good grief, that would be the tiniest of fractions, global travelers, no, ex-pats who reside in Malta, themselves the tiniest fraction of the law school grads who are themselves a fraction of the student bodies of a couple of Philippine universities. If not native Filipinos, why would a native society in Malta of all places adopt Alpha Kappa Rho? The entire national is less than 50 years old. I call it utter shenanigans. If I'm wrong, maybe my holding the line on this will force them to create a website for their 20,000 chapters and 5M members. Methinks the whole thing is absurd. Jax MN (talk) 22:28, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

I think you are confusing Alpha Kappa Rho with a group like Sigma Rho. Alpha Kappa Rho is *not* restricted to law school graduates. And given https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fS-rJ9oIbJI , I'm inclined to believe it exists. Alpha Phi Omega of the Philippines has an Alumni Association in Milan, Italy that has existed since 2006. Filipino expats end up *everywhere*. I also think 20,000 is wrong, but I wouldn't bat an eye at 1,000. The primary question is how to count the equivalent of "Alumni Associations".Naraht (talk) 23:06, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

Iota Phi Theta chapter list

Looks like the list from the UofIll site is a good start for an Iota Phi Theta list *and* unlike every other NPHC group I've seen, the National website has most if not all of the information on where chapters are. (https://iotaphitheta.org/iotaphitheta/chapter-locator) Looks like the UofIll site doesn't understand the chapters ending in Omega are graduate chapters, so some tweeking is needed. I've taken the info from the UofIll side and will build an excel spreadsheet from that and then automate the creation of the FratChapter template lines. The Graduate chapters will need to go into a separate list generated from the national chapter-locator.Naraht (talk) 18:58, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Nu Beta Epsilon

An actual Article which might show notability (as opposed to being mentioned as existing) page 11. https://www.nli.org.il/ar/newspapers/?a=is&oid=cgs19400411-01&type=staticpdf&submitted=1&e=-------ar-20--1--img-txIN%7CtxTI--------------1&g-recaptcha-response=03AGdBq25ScOclKrZAQS4iXqQa72nindEgAhvn0Hh8U89RaJMWD4AtTzFu92XfpLGC7Bnr4gji4NZJ638vaK6EYsOsLD1GVBJiRciX9OaskAujDrFT4j9U9bdQJhNsWUBmckc474ndWJbzflSvVbIKZ_loVvwGbX2iBcmTRG0fSWi_UvSQcjXg7EAkn_y0qmt6CooP8IQ27RvXiWlN4eYWP9y-4rM4LYZEtDST059eE5gW-KHQRd2H86VVEIvlkKgQQ62Tti-cFsYfvTV9mmFb7n2rdSatOBxKQodL-TyqTsjywMY47z87Ods_5XOgEwJD0q7F7JGko3GfcTrfLxY_8eOgq3i31w27nq7gRXXG0jcskCaAjk9ivGGimhREpohRoV_aCdq6B5BUoQU8fKKaDyAVnBVCnaLq8Qzc9qPDHkx3rn3G6s3raydsMAVD9kE66pLltdqpfm3o0tNyeda3raopdyipta6kTg

(yes, that is one obnoxiously long URL). Chapter names seem to be like some of the other legal groups. I have seen both Brandeis (the founding chapter), Judah Benjamin and Cordozo. But from the page at U of Miami, it looks like they changed to greek letters. What I've found has mostly been chapters around Chicago, U of Miami and George Washington.Naraht (talk) 09:45, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. I read the article, finding it on p.11. It will be valuable proof of notability for a Wikipedia article. Papers like the Sentinel are so painful to read. Did you see the ads, requesting funds for "distressed relatives" in Poland, Lithuania, and other places? Already, word was leaking out of German atrocities. Already, writers were noting the propaganda, meant to inflame anti-Semitism. But these poor souls didn't know the horror that would unfold within a year or two.

Naraht, I will be sporadically active here, as I've got a busy season for work fast approaching. With your help I was able to identify and update many articles that needed infoboxes, and some of these need chapter list tables. I'm pleased with the most recent three, Beta Kappa, Phi Kappa (Catholic fraternity), and Theta Kappa Phi. Those chapter list tables will continue to be a focus, with further attention to the to-do list. Where I can, I now add an 80px, tightly cropped member badge to the infobox, color if possible. That size appears to pass review. I've only had a couple of the many graphics I've uploaded turned back because of size. They seem to be acceptable if I keep them under 60KB. As for new pages, I plan to write the Clovia page next. For the Project, I would like to offer further guidance for newer editors, to list for them what other maintenance or development projects they might take on. Your list of missing infoboxes helped me, for example. Jax MN (talk) 18:18, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Yes, Painful. I've read other issues, some even later. I'm glad these three got the care they did. Have fun with Clovia. My two that I intend to complete by the end of January are the IOta Phi Theta chapter list and piecing together everything for Nu Beta Epsilon. Are you in a job is normally busy in the first part of the year? I'm not sure who else does significant work across the Greek Letter Organizations, but we certainly need new blood.Naraht (talk) 20:38, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

I am a consultant, with a normal workload of three, 3-month-duration, focused projects a year. I could pursue more, expanding my team, and am shifting a bit to offer a set of services learned over the past year. It just happened that I had some free time over the past couple of months to research all those missing graphics and to create the infoboxes I did. Normally, this WP work is an evening project, when everyone has gone to sleep, meaning that it's more of a part time thing for me. But it remains a labor of love: I had several great uncles who were Freemasons and fraternity men. I followed in their footsteps, joining several organizations (APO, Phi Sig, the Masons and their related groups, and several honor societies), and from one uncle's treasure trove of books and memorabilia I inherited a love of the 1920s. All that has sparked my continued interest in researching these groups, many of which date to that period.

I agree that we need new blood. I often (now) patrol the edit list, and offer recommendations and thanks. We could still use a couple more strong volunteers. Jax MN (talk) 20:49, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

At University of Minnesota, I presume. Yeah, more GLOs in 1925 than in 1975, I think. I was actually hoping the guy who was changing the Iota Phi Theta alumni would stay around. But I think the articles covered by WP:FRAT are strong than they were a few years ago. Now if we could just manage to justify all of the NALFO and APIDA groups having pages.Naraht (talk) 19:09, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Yes, at the U of MN. You graduated from Carnegie Mellon, right?

I am motivated to write or improve pages for all of these legitimate societies which serve collegiate populations. Thriving or small, it doesn't matter. I've less concern for high school and non-collegiate societies, but yet for them it does seem valuable that we identify them and support maintenance (and inclusion in the Watchlist) in order to distinguish which ones are which. That's one reason I'm so pleased with the addition of an Affiliation parameter. Baird's had it right, by the 8th or 10th edition or so, to set the bar of inclusion as a "national" to require at least three chapters, even if one or more had closed. As I tend to be a Wikipedia Inclusionist around here, as opposed to Deletionist, I'm supportive of including the small or dormant groups as notable - following the updated inclusion rules of course. A topic our Project will have to address is the puffery and peacock language that fills the articles for the Divine Nine. They rarely get a significant cleanup, leading to a misperception of heightened importance for these organizations or an unfair and perhaps unearned assessment of the quality of the articles (leading to Featured Article (FA) candidates, Good Article (GA) candidates, etc.) whereas the NIC and NPC group articles are scrutinized and clipped far more aggressively. Another topic we should address is to help readers understand which type of honor society it is they are dealing with. One of the multi-discipline societies? A single discipline, independent group? A captive honor society, like the one owned by the association of insurance agents, and used as a funnel for employees? Or one of the high-cost, for-profit honor societies that may be a not-for-profit, but which clearly pays big salaries to its founder and directors. Lots to do.

Overall, yes, I agree with you: the pages supported by our Project are much improved. Jax MN (talk) 23:58, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Sigma Gamma Epsilon

http://www.sigmagammaepsilon.com/f11webchapterlist.pdf

As of Fall 2011.Naraht (talk) 19:13, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Beta Sigma Tau CoA image

https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uc1.32106019794517&view=1up&seq=248&skin=2021&q1=%22Beta%20Sigma%20Tau%22

Good enough to clip?Naraht (talk) 21:26, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

https://archive.org/details/LETTERTOMRHENRYMROSENWALDFROMALLENWDULLES80B01676R0038001800301/page/n1/mode/2up?q=%22Beta+Sigma+Tau%22 might be better for clipping.Naraht (talk) 21:38, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

@Naraht I happened to find one on a UNC Pi Lamb chapter website. Must have been from an earlier history. It matches the crests you found, but is in color. Jax MN (talk) 00:16, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Jax MN Cool!

Kappa Sigma Kappa

Just because we did so on Alpha Lambda Tau and Beta Sigma Tau, I think the table for the second incarnation should include the Theta Xi chapter that they became. (Possibly the first table as well). The list of Theta Xi chapters on the Theta Xi website makes it quite clear (they are all down at the bottom since they all start with Kappa). Let me know if you want to, if you want me to or if you don't think it is a good idea.Naraht (talk) 14:18, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

I don't mind either way. I like the formatting of this article slightly better, and was looking for consensus on this matter. Yes, certainly: I agree we ought to list the successor chapter name within the merged fraternity. To your point, the longer notes field where the new chapter name is listed could be helpful, but it widens the table somewhat - I don't know if that becomes a problem on smaller tablets or screens as I use two widescreen desk monitors when working on these. When I experimented with the formatting for Kappa Sigma Kappa (versus ALT and BST) I added additional detail in the footnotes to make the information more clear. Would researchers or readers be put off by not having the eventual chapter listed in the body text of the table? Or is a mention of the chapter name enough, where relegated to the footnotes like they are, here? I agree, too, that once we decide, we ought to adjust the other national organizations similarly. (This could become a year-long project in itself, updating list pages and adding them where they haven't yet been written, and in the same way, moving some of the notes to the EFN template.) Big picture, I'm pleased with this page, though it still has holes. --The lack of consistent source material has left it worse than most, with some missing dates and missing chapters. I am glad to see you found an additional possible chapter at Mount St. Mary's. I'm also intrigued by the placement of several foreign chapters. There may be an interesting story there, from their national publication, perhaps? I noted that the third iteration may have 30 or more chapters, but these may be legacy claims of the non-merged chapters that were actually dormant. Dunno...

I have two reflections, Naraht, as I mull these these options over. First, that we cannot place everything into body text or table text, and that casual researchers who aren't as picky as I am (maybe you, too, in that club), will find the bread crumb trail triggered by seeing the national letters alone, enough to spark them to read the references and notes. But I also note that where there is an open question or ambiguity, like for the SUNY Buffalo or Columbia chapters of BST, by promoting the issue to the visible table notes these fields may elicit answers from other readers. Jax MN (talk) 19:03, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

I'm not sure whether it makes it that much wider, in the second table, one entry goes on to the second line, Trine. I'm not sure that changing them from HT to AB of HT (don't feel like typing greek letters here) would make the boxes overall taller or wider, but Alpha Beta of HT probably would.

As for the holes. I know this one has lots. And I'd love to have a fraternity magazine. I dropped an email to U of Tasmania in Hobart, there do appear to be a few cases where the school is referred to as U of Hobart, so that might solve that.

As for the notes, my only real problem was the combination of refs and notes. And I decided a long time ago that your feeling on GLO articles especially ones that have gone under is closer to the way that you did the original document at U of Minnesota. Someday, someone may force us to pare the notes down. Until that point, I do find them quite interesting.Naraht (talk) 19:26, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Next ?

So which group (and I'm fine with one off of the unlinked at List of fraternities and sororities at the University of Minnesota is next?

I defer to you. My list at the U of MN is a starting point, as an (ahem) comprehensive list, though if there were a similar page of Illinois or Columbia GLOs it might even be longer. We might also start working through the list of dormant groups in Baird's. Jax MN (talk) 19:39, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Sigma Omega Psi

I think I've decided on my "next", Sigma Omega Psi. Merged with AEPi in 1940 with only 3 new chapters but had at least a dozen. However AEPI also absorbed one into the AEPi Alpha and considers several charterings to be restarts of Sigma Omega Psi chapters. Never made the main listing areas in Baird's but had quite a few chapters listed (though different in different editions and no chapter chartering dates. Actually pretty annoying that only 1914 is listed as a founding date. https://www.aepibama.org/our-history would be a good place to start as well, but it appears they won't know who owns the copyright for the pin image. :( Feel free to create the page if you want, but I'll try to put stuff in over the next copy of days.Naraht (talk) 21:29, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Here's the Archive page. Baird's Archive, document showing Sigma Omega Psi. As for the pin image, no worries if it is copyrighted. Wikipedia carves out the right to show a smaller version of an image to be used as the corporate identifier. When I have both a crest and a pin, the pin is OK, if shown in smaller format, as long as it is discussed in the body text. One of the yearbooks might have a more accurate founding date. Jax MN (talk) 22:25, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Alpha Kappa Sigma

Given that the page has been created and deleted *five* times, I've talked to an admin about creating it for the Law fraternity, I indicated that I would create it in my sandbox and let another member of the WP:FRAT take a look. Note, he asked me to use the Category:Professional legal fraternities and sororities in the United States as a guide. I realized that I'm the original creator for four out of the eight groups there. I really wonder sometimes what percentage of Greek Letter Organization pages that you or I are the original authors. :) Naraht (talk) 13:44, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Yep. I hold out hope that we will gather more volunteers. This is the reason I leave all those To Do pages, with instructions or suggestions for article improvements. Sort of a bread crumb strategy, to coax casual readers to do more. Jax MN (talk) 17:05, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

One of these days I have *got* to move some of this page into an archive. Once I take the time to figure that out. Jax MN (talk) 17:06, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Language Honoraries.

I've been working on Delta Phi Alpha including talking to their national president. I know that they want to keep the article under that name, but I've really been thinking of changing *that* to a dab page like French National Honor Society (and yes, <lang> National Honor Society vs. National <lang> Honor society can get confusing.) In addition, for the various "levels", a page about a specific honor society should only link to those at the same "level" or the same language, so for example, a page about the High School honorary in Spanish should only link to other High School honoraries and to any other Spanish Language honoraries regardless of Level. (I'm quite willing to move this disucussion to WP:FRAT) Naraht (talk) 14:23, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

These three (German, French and Spanish) seem to operate within their own bubbles, with little crossover to other GLOs. Did you check how they answer their phone? Do they start by calling themselves the German National Honor Society? or as Delta Phi Alpha? I fall back to self-determination as my rule of thumb, versus my (as an outsider) choosing how they ought to be labeled. --Thus naming conventions can get messy. But people are messy. Sigh. I don't know that a DAB is needed, but if these groups maintain usage of their GLO names I certainly support making those the primary name of the article, and using REDIRECTs for names like <lang> National Honor Society and National <lang> Honor society Jax MN (talk) 16:19, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Linking to chapters

It is probably better to create List of Mu Mu Mu chapters as a redirect to the section and then add that to the list of chapters category as well as to where you are adding in the articles.Naraht (talk) 19:06, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Yep. I'm working on a new section for the F&S project Talk page, a working (expanding) list of all the missing or substandard chapter lists. Almost done with the first pass.

My adjustment to the List of social fraternities and sororities is therefore a temporary improvement, and should be updated per your suggestion.

Sigma Iota Lambda?

I can't find anything in a quick google search on the group, is that what you meant to add?Naraht (talk) 16:35, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

Naraht, thanks for catching that. Typo. I fixed it. Jax MN (talk) 17:30, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

You made my weekend

		The Fraternity/Sorority Barnstar
		For finding the source for Sigma Mu Delta that we both missed

Rublamb (talk) 08:28, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Beta Kappa

What was the source for all of the information on where the chapters came from in the list, there are a lot of notes, but I couldn't find any indication on source. I'm specifically looking for where the Beta Kappa chapter at U of Illinois came from a group called Alpha Phi Omega. Naraht (talk) 13:17, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

It had been some time, but looks like that information came from the Baird's Archive, the "inactive men's groups" document. I was able to trace a second group that merged into the Beta Kappa chapter just prior to the Theta Chi merger, and have corrected this in the reference note, where I had mistakenly thought it was merely another local. Rather, it was the Alpha chapter of a sputtering regional fraternity. Moving on to the predecessor of the Beta Kappa chapter, while the Archive doesn't specifically call out that the earlier APO was a local, it does indicate that that group formed in 1920, fully five years before the formation of the national service fraternity, and 12 years before expansion to the Illinois campus. So it was by inference that I determined the prior Illinois group was a local chapter. A scan of Illinois yearbooks may elicit more information. Jax MN (talk) 14:20, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

I took a look at that sheet and don't see anything related (https://uofi.app.box.com/v/inactive-glos-mens).Naraht (talk) 18:27, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

That sheet has a listing for Beta Kappa, where that fraternity's Illinois chapter, Kappa chapter, is noted with a predecessor group called Alpha Phi Omega dating to 1920. It also has a reference, their inline reference #7, which notes its absorption of a chapter of Delta Alpha Epsilon. If you search for the entry for Delta Alpha Epsilon you will note this was the Alpha chapter of that small fraternity, which at one point had four chapters. That absorption came about the same year of the national merger into Theta Chi, for Beta Kappa as a national. Do I misunderstand your query? Jax MN (talk) 19:16, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Coincidentally, I have a friend who is an alumnus of Beta Kappa's Alpha chapter at Hamline University, now called Theta Chi's Beta Kappa chapter, who is quite knowledgeable about the history of that national. He joined in the 1990s, but that group remains a solid chapter, and is quite proud of their history as a former national fraternity. Jax MN (talk) 19:20, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Misread the entry. Note, I went to the 1922 Illio yearbook and didn't see any sign (Did see a chapter page for the Ku Klux Klan, made up of those from Social Fraternities, like a Fraternity honor society) https://libsysdigi.library.illinois.edu/OCA/Books2012-12/illio/illio1922univ/illio1922univ.pdf . So the question is where was the information on the sheet pulled from?Naraht (talk) 19:23, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

That may have been due to publication timing. Check the 1923 or 1924 books. Jax MN (talk) 19:25, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Nope, went through the 1920s Illios. There is a "Delta Phi Omega" that appears to disappear where Beta Kappa comes on campus, but no "Alpha Phi Omega". I'm going to see if I can find the school newspaper from that time.Naraht (talk) 19:44, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Carroll Lurdling would likely have additional material on this, that didn't make it into the archive. I have his email address, and could inquire on your behalf. Is your interest to clarify whether there was a relationship with the larger service fraternity? Jax MN (talk) 19:48, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Nope, to get a list of *every* time Alpha Phi Omega was used as the name of a Greek Letter Organizations. I would like to write him to *correct* the entry. I found an issue of the Daily Illini showing *clearly* that the predecessor of Beta Kappa was Delta Phi Omega, *not* Alpha Phi Omega. https://idnc.library.illinois.edu/?a=d&d=DIL19251024.2.86&srpos=16&e=-------en-20-DIL-1-byDA.rev-img-txIN-%22Delta+Phi+Omega%22---------

I have made a list through the years complete with school, when they existed, what they became and what the pin looked like if possible ranging from a Chemistry Honorary in North Dakota to an African American Beautician and Barber group. U of Illinois wasn't in my list, was on the wikipedia page for Beta Kappa (I go through and look for unlinked Alpha Phi Omega on Wikipedia) and I wanted to understand why. Answer appears to be that the archive has it wrong. (and for the school they are actually at!).Naraht (talk) 19:55, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

I'll send your reference, and request a correction. They'll file it until the next time they open that document. Jax MN (talk) 23:25, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Thanx.Naraht (talk) 18:41, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Phi Alpha Tau

Periodically I find groups that are listed on your F&S at University of Minnesota. A list of Phi Alpha Tau through Pi is in the 1934 Emersonian.https://ia800407.us.archive.org/11/items/emersonianemerso1934unse/emersonianemerso1934unse.pdf Naraht (talk) 02:04, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Thank you very much. I added this as a reference, for future capture in a WP article about the fraternity. Jax MN (talk) 17:51, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Psi Chi Omega

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Psi Chi Omega, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:08, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Honor Society Caucus

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Honor Society Caucus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. If you reply here, please ping me. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 23:07, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Jax MN. Thank you for your work on List of Phi Delta Epsilon chapters. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Consistent with style and structure of other similar articles in Category:Lists of chapters of Professional Fraternity Association members by society.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 10:01, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

Replaceable non-free use File:The hall of the Euphemian Literary Society.png

Thanks for uploading File:The hall of the Euphemian Literary Society.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 00:11, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The hall of the Euphemian Literary Society.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The hall of the Euphemian Literary Society.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Infobox Fraternity

Let me know if you want be to figure out a search for all of those usages of Infobox Fraternity that *don't* have the equal signs all in the same column. I *think* if there are less than 4 spaces between the type and the equal sign after it, then it can't line up with the equal sign for founded.Naraht (talk) 21:17, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Got curious, the following is probably a good start https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=fraternity+insource%3A%2F%7C+%2Atype+%7B0%2C3%7D%3D%2F+insource%3A%2Fbox+%5BfF%5Drat%2F&title=Special:Search&profile=advanced&fulltext=1&ns0=1 Naraht (talk) 21:24, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

I tend to update these, but as they all work without specific spacing it is more of a convenience for editors, versus a burning issue. I therefore wouldn't waste time making a category for these. As they crop up and as I have time, I adjust them. I also move params up and down, so there is consistency. Users of the Visual Editor don't care, but I use courier standard spacing and the regular editing window, so it is glaring to me. Thanks for the suggestion though. Jax MN (talk) 22:18, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

NP. I'm not convinced it will find the all, but a start. Wish there was a tool to help, but I don't think VE or AWB will do so.Naraht (talk) 01:40, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

July 2024

Hi Jax MN! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of University of Pittsburgh several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:University of Pittsburgh, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Re https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=University_of_Pittsburgh&diff=1233191263&oldid=1232429521.. VQuakr (talk) 20:27, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Even more concerning is the WP:CANVASS violation here. Please adjust course promptly. VQuakr (talk) 20:29, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

template oweb

is a redirect for official website.Naraht (talk) 19:28, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

File mover granted

Hello Jax MN. Your account has been granted the "filemover" user right, either following a request for it or due to a clear need for the ability to move files. Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:File mover for more information on this user right and under what circumstances it is okay to move files. When you move a file please remember to update any links to the new name as well! If you do not want the file mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Elli (talk | contribs) 19:45, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The logo of Upsilon Phi Delta.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The logo of Upsilon Phi Delta.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The crest of Alpha Sigma Delta.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The crest of Alpha Sigma Delta.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The pin of Alpha Sigma Delta.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The pin of Alpha Sigma Delta.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Replaceable non-free use File:The badge of the Wolf's Head Society.png

Thanks for uploading File:The badge of the Wolf's Head Society.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 04:24, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

Replaceable non-free use File:The badge of the Military Order of the Serpent.png

Thanks for uploading File:The badge of the Military Order of the Serpent.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 23:58, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

File:The badge of the Military Order of the Serpent.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The badge of the Military Order of the Serpent.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 12:11, 19 November 2024 (UTC)