Jump to content

User talk:Jax 0677/Archive 20

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 15←Archive 18Archive 19Archive 20Archive 21Archive 22→Archive 25

Speedy deletion nomination of Nevada Romo

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nevada Romo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. – Broccoli & Coffee (Oh hai) 22:44, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

SML

Just out of curiosity, what does { { LR } } do? ~SML • TP 00:20, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Sorry, nevermind now. ~SML • TP 00:27, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Jax, I'm looking for a way to split the main section of a navbox (not the header and footer) into 2 colums. Any idea if there's a built-in solution for this? Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 06:07, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

OK, thanks. - BilCat (talk) 13:26, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Reply - @BilCat:, please let me know what you find out. --Jax 0677 (talk) 00:52, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
I haven't looked any more for help on that. - BilCat (talk) 00:03, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

You know it's not the responsibility of people who make articles to add them to a navbox. Also, that template tag you've added now appears on all articles where the template is transcluded. Aloneinthewild (talk) 17:32, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Mark Hausknecht listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mark Hausknecht. Since you had some involvement with the Mark Hausknecht redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 20:05, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

List of killings by law enforcement officers in the United States, August 2018

There is nothing to reference right now in List of killings by law enforcement officers in the United States, August 2018. It's merely an introductory sentence that summarizes things. Once there actually are people listed on it, then you can tag it for being poorly referenced. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:26, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

The page has been updated with three events now. 'Speedy deletion' and 'single reference' objections should be removed. (It has been less than 24 hours for these killings; more sources will become available.) -- User talk: PeteGaughan; 16:20, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve The Road & the Rodeo

Hi, I'm Doomsdayer520. Jax 0677, thanks for creating The Road & the Rodeo!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Thanks for creating the article for the album "The Road & the Rodeo". Please consider expanding the article with information found in the sources that you have already used, plus additional reviews if available.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:29, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

The Road & the Rodeo

The Road & the Rodeo doesn't seem to meet WP:NALBUMS. Per the sources you put in the article:

This source is more about Watson himself and only dedicates one sentence to the album.

This source was self-published by a radio station and is not a reliable source.

This source is paywalled so I can't tell if it even mentions the album at all. But the title suggests that it's more about him than about the album.

The Artist Direct link is also broken and redirects to the home page.

I have been topic-banned from AFD for the time being, so I am not allowed to take it to AFD. While the album did chart, there is nothing out there on the album other than Roughstock's review. Hell, I can't even find a producer credit for it, it's that obscure.

That said, I have a compromise in mind. What would you think of moving the discography to Aaron Watson discography and, for every album prior to Real Good Time, putting the tracklistings in the table like I've done below? Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 23:15, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Title Album details"Music". Aaron Watson. Retrieved 14 December 2017. Peak chart positions Sales
US Country
"Aaron Watson Album & Song Chart History - Country Albums". Billboard. Prometheus Global Media. Retrieved March 24, 2016. 		US
"Aaron Watson Album & Song Chart History - Billboard 200". Billboard. Prometheus Global Media. Retrieved March 24, 2016. 		US Heat
"Aaron Watson Album & Song Chart History - Heatseekers Albums". Billboard. Prometheus Global Media. Retrieved March 24, 2016. 		US Indie
"Aaron Watson Album & Song Chart History - Independent Albums". Billboard. Prometheus Global Media. Retrieved March 24, 2016.
The Road & the Rodeo
  • Release date: October 12, 2010
  • Label: Big Label Records
  • Track listing:
  1. Road & the Rodeo
  2. The Road
  3. Walls
  4. Best for Last
  5. Fast Cars Slow Kisses
  6. Bless Her Crazy Heart
  7. Zero to Sixty
  8. Sweetheart of the Rodeo
  9. Conflict
  10. Houston
  11. Hollywood
  12. High Price of Fame
  13. The Things You'll Do
  14. Drivin' All Night Long
 25 150 4 28
  • Reply - @TenPoundHammer:, one sentence is enough. A radio station can be a reliable source. The abqjournal tells under which label the album was released. The Artist Direct link worked at the time it was created. The roughstock review is substantive. The allmusic review is substantive. I am reverting your change, which you should not have done per WP:BRD. If the article should not remain, then someone else will take it to AFD. Redirecting the article twice could be perceived as a way of skirting around {{speedy}}, {{PROD}} or AFD. IMO, at this time, the discography section is not long enough to split off. --Jax 0677 (talk) 14:10, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
  • I cleaned it up with the sources from Roughstock and Allmusic. A radio station is not a reliable source since the page in question was published by the station's own DJs; see WP:SPS. I am now satisfied that the article has just enough content per the Roughstock and Allmusic reviews. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 16:31, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of 2017–18 North American cold wave for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2017–18 North American cold wave is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017–18 North American cold wave until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — JFG talk 10:10, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Laura Bell Bundy

On Laura Bell Bundy, one single sentence being unsourced does not warrant the {{refimprove}} tag. If you still had an issue with "That's What Angels Do" being unsourced, then use your old friend {{Citation needed}} instead. That said, I have added a source verifying it as a single. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 20:34, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

  • Reply - @TenPoundHammer:, I have been told to avoid overtagging articles. On engineering drawings, when the number of revisions are numerous, I put "Extensively Revised" for the list of changes. I had a few {{CN}} tags on the article which were deleted. --Jax 0677 (talk) 17:47, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

All of It

All of It is by no means a stub. There is sufficient content. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:21, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Agonia Records listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Agonia Records. Since you had some involvement with the Agonia Records redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Blue Edits (talk) 10:42, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Westchester Medical Center

I was wondering why you felt the tragic shooting was sufficiently important in the history of the Medical Center to include it on the wiki page? It's not really an encyclopedia-level event, I don't think. -DrGaellon (talk | contribs) 14:11, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Kangaroo Court (song)

Re: Kangaroo Court (song). This is definitely not a stub. Two sentences is a stub; two paragraphs is not. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 20:14, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kenexa Corporation Logo.gif

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kenexa Corporation Logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Sharptooth

In this edit on Sharptooth, I reverted because you had misspelled "Nicg" in the template name, causing a big red error to show up. I didn't realize "Nicg" was the name of a citation template, so I thought it was an editing error by someone else. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:09, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Problems with a page I edited

Hello

I used to work for the Clive Lewis on the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clive_Lewis_(business_psychologist) and I set up the page for him. I have not been an editor on Wikipedia before so was not familiar with the conflict of interest rules - I of course understand completely and even in my unawareness of the rules, endeavoured to make the page as objective as possible.

Nonetheless, there is a message on the page now that shows there are problems with NPOV (which I have just read up on). My former employer has reached back to me to find out if anything can be done about this. My gut is no, but if there is anything that can be done - can someone else fact check and edit the article perhaps? - please do let me know.

I do not want to do anything else that is contrary to Wikipedia's rules, I totally respect the reasoning behind them, and I'm not particularly interested in being an editor in the future. I would just like to have a concrete answer.

Many thanks Amber 

AmberBullingham (talk) 11:42, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
  • Reply - @AmberBullingham:, I am not sure if there is anything for you to do at this point, other than allow other people to edit Clive_Lewis_(business_psychologist). You may visit WP:COI for more information. You are welcome to remove incorrect information or visit WP:BLPN, but you should not add information for topics about which you have a conflict of interest. I also do not want you to think that my answer is concrete, so you are also welcome to request additional answers at WP:HD. Does this help? --Jax 0677 (talk) 13:31, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Ghostland Observatory

Why would you intentionally add unsourced content to Ghostland Observatory? You added their new album and then immediately afterward slapped it with a [citation needed]. Please don't add content unless you also add a source. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:55, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Defund listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Defund. Since you had some involvement with the Defund redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 01:12, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Nikki Yanofsky

Sorry, I went kind of overboard there. Labels never need citations, I've said that before. Still, good call on bringing the discography to attention, since it did contain a lot of questionable content (the "Canadian Jazz" chart doesn't seem to actually exist, and I got no google hits for some of the songs she supposedly released). I removed the "Big Mouth" album entirely since I could not verify that the album actually has that name. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 13:28, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Jamie Lee Curtis

If only one part of an article lacking sources, such as Jamie Lee Curtis, please use {{refimprove-section}} or {{unreferenced-section}} on just that section. Don't put a {{refimprove}} all the way at the top. Because you put it at the top, I scrolled almost all the way down and didn't see anything that was lacking in sources. Also, filmographies are usually summaries of content that is verified in other articles, so they don't need super extensive citations. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 14:11, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

  • @Jax 0677: The leads of articles generally don't need references, because they are summarizing key points that are verified elsewhere in the article. As an introduction, it doesn't need to repeat citations for content already cited in the article proper. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:52, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Template:WPEP listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:WPEP. Since you had some involvement with the Template:WPEP redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 15:25, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Maddie & Tae

Exactly what was unsourced on Maddie & Tae? Please, if something is unsourced, use {{refimprove-section}}. Just slapping a {{refimprove}} at the top when there is nothing immediately obvious in need of sourcing is unhelpful. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 14:15, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

"Friends Don't" is cited already in the discography section. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:31, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Also, there is no such thing as "too many corrections" on Wikipedia. It took me hundreds, if not thousands of edits to get certain articles to GA status. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:52, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Reply - @TenPoundHammer:, actually, "Friends Don't" is not cited under the "Music videos" section. Furthermore, the reference is dated before the time that the song peaked. --Jax 0677 (talk) 13:15, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Nuthin' 2 Prove

On Nuthin' 2 Prove, there is literally not a single sentence that is unsourced. Exactly how can more sources be added if there is literally zero unsourced content? Also, the album is only two days away from release. If the release date is less than a week away, then give it a chance to build up the notability (see WP:CHANCE). Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 14:02, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

  • Also, I did add a couple more secondary sources. Still, if a track listing is verified, and the release date is less than a week away, then give the article a chance to grow when the release date comes. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 14:15, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Area21

Please explain this edit in Area21. What does the term "duo" have to do with the "where" tag? The tagging makes zero sense. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:03, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Template:LinkedIn

Please don't put {{Citation needed}} tags on templates, as you did on Template:LinkedIn. If you do that, it'll make every page using the template show up in the "Articles needing additional references" category. If you think there is a factual error on the template, please ask on its talk page. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 17:47, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Glass cactus listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Glass cactus. Since you had some involvement with the Glass cactus redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. MB 02:32, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Singular: Act 1

Please develop the Draft:Singular: Act 1 article at the draft, not at the redirect. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:42, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

EXCELLENT JOB GUYS BUT YOU FORGET TO NAME ELQUEMEDO WILLET FIRST LEEWARD ISLANDER FROM NEVIS TO MAKE WESTINDIES TEAM

Post to facilitate archiving. --Jax 0677 (talk) 16:45, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Pop Evil discography

I told you before. If only part of an article needs more sources, as is the case with Pop Evil discography, please use {{refimprove-section}}. I didn't scroll all the way down, so I didn't see that the videos still needed more sources, because literally nothing else in the article is unsourced. Please use {{refimprove-section}} at least sometimes. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:52, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

All Out Life

All Out Life is by no means a stub. Please read WP:STUB to find out what one actually is. Just because an article isn't seven pages long doesn't mean it's a stub. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 13:46, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Chartwell and Chartwell Mansion

Hi, just wondering if a similar disambiguation note should be put on the Chartwell Mansion page. My guess is that the majority of searches will be looking for Churchill's gaff, but I could be wrong. All the best. KJP1 (talk) 18:36, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Corey Taylor

What is unsourced on Corey Taylor? It's a GA class article so there shouldn't be sourcing issues. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:39, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of X (Nonpoint album) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article X (Nonpoint album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/X (Nonpoint album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:40, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Slipknot discography

Which songs need to be moved on Slipknot discography? Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 07:28, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Using defaultsort in templates

I see that you create a lot of musical artists navigational templates and I ask that you start using Template:DEFAULTSORT to place the them in the proper surname, forename alphabetical order. Thank you, Aspects (talk) 01:20, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Template:WP8T listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:WP8T. Since you had some involvement with the Template:WP8T redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 02:06, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Album and song project template shortcuts

Please look at all these fabulous uses of shortcuts available for WikiProject Albums and WikiProject Songs project tagging, and not a one creates a nonsensical, never-before-existing term for albums or songs. They actually all use the letters needed to spell ALBUM or to spell SONG. 4-letter and 5-letter words do not need further abbreviating to one-less-letter shortcuts that don't even make sense. It's not like the benefit of using Template:WPALT (although I'm sure even this is way too long for you but at least is logical) for {{WikiProject Alternative music}}. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 22:45, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Thompson Square

If only one section is lacking in sources, as is the case on Thompson Square, don't put the {{+R}} at the top of the article. The [citation needed] tag you have in the awards section is sufficient, if no other part of the article lacks sources. But if you feel another tag is worthwhile there, please use {{refimprove-section}} on just the section(s) that you think need more sources. Good catch on "Masterpiece", as I can confirm the album but not the single. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:17, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Masterpiece (Thompson Square album)

I improved Masterpiece (Thompson Square album) for you. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 03:37, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jax 0677. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Poor judgment

Your template is unhelpful and does absolutely nothing to diffuse the situation. Your edit warring to restore the unhelpful and unneeded template using an all caps summary is equally ill advised. You can't teach nuance. -- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:22, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

  • Reply - @Ponyo:, I use computer aided design, which is why my message was in all capital letters. The message that I wrote was in reference to an uncivil message, and it is not right to remove constructive messages from the pages of other users. Additionally, one should link to the page referred to in a talk page thread. --Jax 0677 (talk) 23:33, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
There was no reason to place that template whatsoever, and certainly no reason to restore it. You continue to show poor judgment in edit warring to restore the post after it was, again, removed by another admin. Can't you find something helpful to do, preferably something that improves Wikipedia? Please don't bother answering, just go do it. -- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 23:44, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

The bottom line is that the comment in question was in no way uncivil, although it was very frank. An editor was disrupting Wikipedia on multiple pages and I felt I needed to get their attention quickly. I am grateful to those who removed your ill-considered and completely unnecessary comment from my talk page, and I ask you not to restore it again. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:47, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

November 2018

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 01:06, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Jax 0677 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The specific disruptive edits for the block were not specified in this thread by @Bbb23:, nor was consensus obtained at WP:ANI. A message was left at User talk:Lurking shadow with the subject line "What the hell are you doing", which in my opinion violates WP:CIVIL, so I was in my right to leave {{uw-npa1}} on the page of the user who left the message. The message should probably not have been removed by users other than Beyond My Ken. Once Beyond My Ken told me to stop leaving the "NPA" message, I stopped leaving the "NPA" message on their page, and I have no intention of leaving the "NPA" message on their page in the future. --Jax 0677 (talk) 14:01, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Procedural close; you are no longer blocked. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:43, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

MMF

Sorry about this edit to MMF. That was a misclick on my part that I didn't realize immediately. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:33, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

Poet Warrior listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Poet Warrior. Since you had some involvement with the Poet Warrior redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:00, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

FYI

See Talk:2018–19 UEFA Europa League#Category:Pages where template include size is exceeded Hhkohh (talk) 21:16, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Broken (Memphis May Fire album) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Broken (Memphis May Fire album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Broken (Memphis May Fire album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Steel1943 (talk) 16:26, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of 2011–12 UEFA Europa League first qualifying round for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2011–12 UEFA Europa League first qualifying round is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011–12 UEFA Europa League first qualifying round until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hhkohh (talk) 05:00, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of 2011–12 UEFA Europa League second qualifying round for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2011–12 UEFA Europa League second qualifying round is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011–12 UEFA Europa League second qualifying round until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hhkohh (talk) 05:08, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of 2011–12 UEFA Europa League third qualifying round for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2011–12 UEFA Europa League third qualifying round is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011–12 UEFA Europa League third qualifying round until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hhkohh (talk) 05:08, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of 2011–12 UEFA Europa League play-off round for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2011–12 UEFA Europa League play-off round is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011–12 UEFA Europa League play-off round until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hhkohh (talk) 05:08, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

Bobby McFerrin

Don't forget to add {{Bobby McFerrin}} to the appropriate articles. Thanks. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 09:03, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

Your continued excuses fall on deaf ears. If only there was some previous discussion regarding your behavior with templates. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 19:01, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
This one isn't a large navigation box. I would think copying and pasting into articles would be easier than creating the navbox itself, and doing whatever's easier is right down your alley. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 22:43, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Reply - @Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars:, the navbox is now on all applicable pages. The navboxes that I have done in recent years have made it on to most if not all applicable pages in due time. As I said before, working on a large navigation box without doing other things in between steps on such navboxes becomes monotonous, try it some time. --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:24, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

ButterFace listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ButterFace. Since you had some involvement with the ButterFace redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Muzilon (talk) 02:30, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Zodiac/Safran seats

I see that you are asking whether the name of the article should be changed. Do you have a reliable source that indicates that such a change has taken place? Could you also refrain from pursuing this in multiple places. The talk page of the article is your starting point here. Britmax (talk) 17:06, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

I have replied on the talk page of the article to attract further, centralised, input. Britmax (talk) 17:58, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

Please read templates

Hello Jax! Please read templates before adding them to articles such as your edit here. It uses the plural "URLs" whereas the article had one bare URL. It also calls into question your critical thinking skills if you use two edits to add the wrong tag rather than fixing the problem. Thank you and have a nice day! Killiondude (talk) 00:08, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

  • Reply - @Killiondude:, I was on a phone when I added the {{LR}} tag, so it is difficult to fix the links. It is not a big deal if I add that tag to an article with one bare URL, as the problem has been fixed on many occasions. --Jax 0677 (talk) 03:00, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Reminder

Jax, I believe I've brought this up with you previously, but I'll ask again: can you please not make redirects unless they are mentioned at the target article? This can be seen as WP:OR because it's not referenced or backed up by anything at the target article, so these can be speedily deleted for being implausible namespaces. You created about six or seven of these today but the titles are nowhere to be found at the articles you've pointed them to. Ss112 06:43, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

I nominated the redirects you created for deletion. Maybe instead of asking Anthony Appleyard why, you could instead put that effort into actually mentioning the names at the target articles with sources? I'll nominate them at RfD if you don't think it's worth your time to bother. Ss112 02:18, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

Template:+b listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:+b. Since you had some involvement with the Template:+b redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:33, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Brett Young (singer)

On articles about living people, such as Brett Young (singer), please use {{blp sources}} and not {{refimprove}}. This also applies to groups and bands that are currently active. That said, I did source all of the music videos and awards, which seemed to be the only unsourced sections. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:14, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nikki Stringfield, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Femme Fatale (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

List of killings by law enforcement officers in the United States, November 2018 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of killings by law enforcement officers in the United States, November 2018. Since you had some involvement with the List of killings by law enforcement officers in the United States, November 2018 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:19, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Your edit to Template:Hangon preload A7

Your change here was unconstructive. It may have been what you wanted for your one following contested A7, but you changed the default text for all subsequent contested A7's. I have reverted the change. —teb728 t c 10:58, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello Jax 0677, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019.
Happy editing,
Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 05:58, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

A page you started (History of Amazon) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating History of Amazon.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for developing the new article on the History of Amazon. I wonder if this article now makes the related Timeline of Amazon.com obsolete. Have you considered merging the two, or calling for the timeline article to be deleted as redundant?

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:52, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Tag bombing

Please stop tag bombing these pointless, misused and misplaced tags onto articles. Either fix the problem yourself if it's so bad, stop creating this problem by not checking after your own edits, and stop edit-warring over other editors who are trying to clean up your mess. "I'm on a phone" is not an excuse. WP:COMPETENCE still applies – if you can't edit properly, don't do it on that device. Andy Dingley (talk) 01:30, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

January 2019

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Amazon (company) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Andy Dingley (talk) 01:31, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Andy Dingley (talk) 01:43, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

4TFD listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 4TFD. Since you had some involvement with the 4TFD redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 23:19, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Crane Co.

Template:Crane Co. has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Chetsford (talk) 07:54, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Heaven Below, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Femme Fatale (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

January 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at On This Holiday, you may be blocked from editing. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:30, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Don't bother expanding the article from the redirect. I would only mention a little bit more at Decker's article. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:49, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Reply - @AngusWOOF:, because your requests to redirect the article were denied, I have reinstated the article. I am happy to have an AFD discussion so that the wider community can be involved in the decision. --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:05, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
It just pisses me off that there's been weeks, even months, of MFD'ing to clean out that mess of an article, all to be undone because salting at the mainspace was not done, and that the reinstatement was done in a "screw you and your process" way. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:17, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Reply - @AngusWOOF:, "The album may be notable (the artist is notable), but this draft is now at the point where it needs to be blown up and started over". AFD or AFM will resolve this issue in a collaborative manner putting it in front of the populous. --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:43, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
If you can turn it into a useful notable article, then that'd be great. The previous versions were very poor and were persistently resubmitted, written by fans with no sense of notability. Maybe you can put a note on the talk page that you've WP:TNT'ed the article and are rebuilding it from scratch? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:36, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Reply - @AngusWOOF:, three reviews, a few tour announcements and Billboard charts. I think that should suffice. --Jax 0677 (talk) 16:39, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jax_0677/Archive_20&oldid=882443939"