User talk:Jaspreetsingh6

Jaspreetsingh6, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Jaspreetsingh6! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GoingBatty (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Cricket statistics

Hello. I note that you updated the statistics in a cricketer's infobox before the source has been updated. Please don't do that again. We need to wait for the source to be updated and, in particular, do not update stats in the infobox during a match. This requires WP:ORIGINAL RESEARCH, which is a serious problem throughout Wikipedia. It tends to lead to errors, omissions, duplications and generally makes the statistics in the infobox even less reliable than they already are. If you have a question about this please leave it here, on my talk page or on the talk page of the player you updated. Thank you. Blue Square Thing (talk) 14:16, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sikhs. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IIBxtrerII (talk • contribs) 09:47, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Cameron Donald Green

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Cameron Donald Green. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Cameron Green. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Cameron Green. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Shirt58 (talk) 12:51, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hi. Please note that everything you add to an article must be verified with reliable sources, and the burden is with you to provide them. Please do not add unsourced content into an article, such as the edits you made to Cameron Green. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 09:16, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please STOP re-adding unsourced information into this article (and others). If you continue, you will be blocked from editing. Please reply here to state you have read and understood this. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 13:20, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Cameron Green did not play a T20 international against India in 2020. That's why it's not listed in Cricinfo, he didn't play in the first T20I and was then removed from the T20I squad. These are all reliable sources, you claiming something is not verifiable. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:20, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Jaspreetsingh6! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Tow (talk) 00:15, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hindu mythological wars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arjun. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Guru Ram Das, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. FMSky (talk) 08:50, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This link says video not available. Get consensus in the talk page first per WP:BRD, do not edit war. It is a case of WP:SYNTH. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:15, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Provide a working link with proper timestamp in the talk page section I've opened for you. I'll be happy to restore your edits if proven correct. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:17, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've re-added it with proper link. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:31, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Sidhu Moose Wala shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You have already reverted 3 times. Discuss your issues with the other editor in the article talk page. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:18, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note that we do not need to name each and every celebrity condolences. Wikipedia is not a news portal, not to mention condolences are not part of 'Memorial' or 'Legacy'. You other edits regarding murals are fine in my opinion. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:28, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the Memorial article for relevance. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:42, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Sidhu Moose Wala. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. No consensus for these edits on the talk page. Venkat TL (talk) 13:27, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Sidhu Moose Wala shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Czello 10:41, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indent

Please read Help:Talk pages#Indentation and correctly WP:INDENT your comments on Talk pages. Venkat TL (talk) 13:13, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This page needs improvement-

Draft:Kulbir Jhinger

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Kulbir_Jhinger Daredevil5911 (talk) 07:32, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

doubts regarding to legacy

hey, just to inform you that, legacy head in wiki is meant for some contribution to the artist by another in the rememberance or we can say as a tribute, take a minutes of yours and research another artist's wikipedia article how they're been written, sidhu announced prem, nseeb it doesnt have anything to do with legacy. hope you understand that...thanks! WikiUser1211 (talk) 08:07, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I understand thanks you Jaspreetsingh6 (talk) 08:25, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jaspreetsingh6. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 09:28, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jaspreetsingh6 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am really sorry for vilioted sockpuppet policy and guidelines I realised my mistake please forgave me in future I will take care that such mistake does not happen again and I also will take care that I not vilioted any Wikipedia policy and guidelines again please forgave me and unblock my I'd and give one chance to me

Decline reason:

There is an obvious language issue here, among other things. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:24, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request for unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jaspreetsingh6 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I Vilioted sockpupet policy and I realised my mistake please forgive me and give me one chance I promised you that such mistake Doesn't not happen again In future I will take care that I didn't not Vilioted any Wikipedia policy and guidelines please forgive me and give me only one chance form now on I will use only this account

Decline reason:

Your English skills need to be improved before you participate here. In the meantime, you are free to edit the version of Wikipedia that is in your primary language. 331dot (talk) 08:38, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request for unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jaspreetsingh6 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have violated the sockpuppet policy and realized my mistake. At that time, I did not know much about the sockpuppet policy. please forgive me I will take care that such mistake Doesn't not happen again and i will also improve my behavior please give me a chance to correct my mistake i will only use this account from now on and i will also improve my english

Decline reason:

Confirmed block evasion as Hargun singh sandhu. Yamla (talk) 13:05, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Someone else will look at this request, but I would suggest that you improve your English first, and then return to request unblock. It is very unlikely that you will be unblocked before six months from now, per the standard offer. 331dot (talk) 07:28, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disscus

Hello Yamla Sir if you are free can you please reply me I want to talk with you Jaspreetsingh6 (talk) 07:26, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jaspreetsingh6 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Reason why I Got Banned because I repeat Same mistake and didn't listen Admins advise and again created others accounts with different name and ids and

why should I got Unblocked=It is difficult for me to be unblocked because of My Poor edit history I too had given up hope that I would be unblocked. Even after apologising so many times and even I promise that I will use only one account If I got Unblocked I request to Admins Would you please let me know what should I do so that I get unblocked? can you please give me Second chance i am ready to do whatever you tell me to do if I got Unblocked I am interested to editing and improving Indian Musicians articles which was my main interest i am also intrested in Indian King's and worrier article but I would ignore these articles because of Copyright Issue

Decline reason:

As Yamla says, your best option is to take the standard offer. PhilKnight (talk) 06:52, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Confirmed block evasion as Jaspreetsingh78. Reminder: this user is banned by the community (under WP:3X). No admin is free to unilaterally lift the ban from this chronically abusive user. --Yamla (talk) 09:26, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla Sir I accept my Mistake And I am just 16 year old so I am very impatient I am very sorry that I am repeating Same mistake Sir Can you please tell me any solution so I can get unblocked I am ready to do whatever you tell me please sir

WP:SO is your only chance, and given your long history of abuse, the chance is small. You'll need to go six months with zero edits, then you'll need to address the problems that lead to your original block and your chronic refusal to abide by your block. Six months. Zero edits. Starting now. Then, WP:SO and WP:UNBAN. Zero edits. --Yamla (talk) 09:35, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Sir Yamla I am ready to wait six months and this period time I will make sure that I will improve my knowledge about Wikimedia guidelines and also improve my English thanks you sir for help and suggestion