User talk:Jamesallain85

Welcome!

Hello, Jamesallain85, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 04:13, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong Link

Actually the correct link for your explanation of your recent edit to 6.5mm Grendel was in general WP:MOSFLAG or more specifically WP:INFOBOXFLAG instead of WP:INFOBOX which is just a redirect link dumping the reader into the Wikiproject page. Just in case somebody reverts you'll have the info at your fingertips. Trilobitealive (talk) 00:34, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of John Deere tractors, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Model A (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kluge House

Hi, I reverted your edit at Kluge House. Your info may be correct, but it is not sourced to the footnotes cited. You will need to add a proper citation to back up your material. Please see WP:CITE, WP:RS, and WP:V for more information. Montanabw ^(talk) 22:05, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed the source a bit and found some of the material was there. I moved a few things around to make it flow better. The freemasonry bit I missed as the AF&AE bit didn't register with me as a Masonic term. Rather than use identical sources in each sentence, If you want to better cite the source, put the source at the end and for inline cites use page numbers. 20:54, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gene Simmons, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Welcome to Sweden. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Hello, I'm Yamaguchi先生. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Florence, Missouri, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 23:04, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Frank Wesley Fenno Jr.

added a link pointing to Distinguished Service Cross

Jack C. Titus

added a link pointing to Silent Service

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jamesallain85. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jamesallain85. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jamesallain85. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Albert H. Clark for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Albert H. Clark is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albert H. Clark until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gbawden (talk) 07:22, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jamesallain85

Thank you for creating Robert H. Rice.

User:TheLongTone, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

I think you need to add details of the engagement for which he won the Navy Cross.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TheLongTone}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TheLongTone (talk) 13:04, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Loking at the ref, I see he actually won two, which I assume is fairly unusual.TheLongTone (talk) 13:14, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Having read WP:Soldier I see that it is actually necessary for somebody to have won the secong-highest award twice to be notable, so don't be surprised if Willard A. Saunders gets nominated for deletion. Me, I see to many articles on sportpeople who are considered notable to nominate an article about somebody who actually did something of value.TheLongTone (talk) 13:33, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jamesallain85 I think Willard A. Saunders is safe because he meets part 2 of WP:Soldier, "Held a rank considered to be a flag, general or air officer, or their historical equivalents"

Nomination of Timothy J. Edens for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Timothy J. Edens is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy J. Edens until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 08:27, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

passing by to check in view of the many nominations, I think it's reasonable to say that this articles waz kept at t 2 afds, followed by a non-consensus at a third. DGG ( talk ) 23:28, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

John Corbus moved to draft space

Your recent article is moved to draft space. Kitaab Ka Kida (talk) 16:48, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And now moved back. I'm not sure just what inspired this instant draftification, but please use full refs rather than bare URLs and remember to add the "References" section. Thanks. PamD 07:56, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

But looking at your article creations, I see a pattern. Please stop creating stubs with no References section, bare URLs for references, no categories, no DEFAULTSORT. You are expecting other editors to tidy up after you, but it would take very little more time for you to create much better stubs. PamD 08:44, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lawrence G. Bernard moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Lawrence G. Bernard, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 09:25, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lawrence G. Bernard has been accepted

Lawrence G. Bernard, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 18:57, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Frank Dechant Wagner

Hello, Jamesallain85,

Thank you for creating Frank Dechant Wagner.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Frankly what there is is a bit rubbish and would fail RS on the whole.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Slatersteven}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Slatersteven (talk) 19:11, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to WikiProject Military History

Hey, I just saw you´ve recently returned to editing (welcome back) and created lots of articles about military history. I don't know if you´re already aware but there is WikiProject Military history where you can find resources, structure, a discussion platform and many other history editors. You might be interested e.g. in the task forces about United States military history or Maritime warfare. It´s free, so if you want take a look and like what you see consider signing up. Anyway, thanks for the time and for editing about military history and please continue with your work. ...GELongstreet (talk) 23:49, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy J. Edens (2nd nomination) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy J. Edens (2nd nomination) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy J. Edens (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mztourist (talk) 10:38, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

coming here to check in view ofthe many nominations, I think it's reasonable to say that this articles waz almost unanimously kept. DGG ( talk ) 23:26, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alexander K. Tyree

The article Alexander K. Tyree has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:SOLDIER and WP:GNG. [[User:Mztourist

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mztourist (talk) 06:32, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

passing by to check in view ofthe many nominations, I think it's reasonable to say that this articles waz almost unanimously kept. DGG ( talk ) 23:21, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alan B. Banister

The article Alan B. Banister has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:SOLDIER and WP:GNG. No SIGCOV in multiple RS [[User:Mztourist

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mztourist (talk) 07:36, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alan B. Banister for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alan B. Banister is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan B. Banister until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mztourist (talk) 14:51, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

passing by to check in view of the many nominations, I think it's reasonable to say that this articles waz almost unanimously kept. DGG ( talk ) 23:22, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Jamesallain85 and WP:REVENGE Thank you. Mztourist (talk) 03:43, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alexander K. Tyree for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alexander K. Tyree is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander K. Tyree until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mztourist (talk) 03:56, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

passing by to check in view ofthe many nominations, I think it's reasonable to say that this articles waz almost unanimously kept. DGG ( talk ) 23:24, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please date your signatures.

Thank you. --NotReallySoroka (talk) (formerly DePlume) 06:19, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jamesallain85, I second this request. FYI, three tildes signs without a date. Four tildes signs and dates (this is the most commonly used). Five tildes dates but does not sign. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 16:23, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. Editors are expected to treat each other with respect and civility. On this encyclopedia project, editors assume good faith while interacting with other editors. Here is Wikipedia's welcome page, and it is hoped that you will assume the good faith of other editors and continue to help us improve Wikipedia! Please don't make accusations of bad faith without providing diffs showing the actual bad faith edits. Please do not nominate articles for deletion simply to take revenge on other editors for nominating articles of yours. —valereee (talk) 21:46, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Incase you're unaware, WP:DIFF will guide you on how to provide diffs as evidence. If you feel Mztourist is being uncivil, then diffs will be required in order for other editors to determine the merits of your accusations. – ².O.^Boxing 23:19, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander K. Tyree has been nominated for Did You Know

Hello, Jamesallain85. Alexander K. Tyree, an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed, has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. EnterpriseyBot (talk!) 12:01, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work. -- GreenC 06:50, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Alexander K. Tyree

On 13 July 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Alexander K. Tyree, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Alec Tyree (pictured) won two Navy Crosses commanding USS Bowfin, and his voice now speaks to those who visit the museum ship? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Alexander K. Tyree. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Alexander K. Tyree), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jack C. Titus for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jack C. Titus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack C. Titus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mztourist (talk) 06:09, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 05:09, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jamesallain85 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not created separate accounts. My wife created an account yesterday and therefore we share the same IP. I found the template to declare a shared IP, but wasn't sure where it was supposed to be posted. Jamesallain85 (talk) 07:23, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As noted, this is a clear case of meatpuppetry. Please also be familiar with how users on the same IP address may be treated. We don't know who is sitting at the computer/holding the device at any given moment, and when two editors edit in similar areas, we must think that they are the same person. 331dot (talk) 10:24, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This: [1], specifically "I was just recently introduced to wikipedia editing through my husband who was complaining about articles being deleted. So I thought in my spare time I could also contribute to wikipedia and vote." by Weber1982 is clear case of WP:MEAT. Mztourist (talk) 07:43, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My wife created the account without even informing me about it. What am I supposed to do? Jamesallain85 (talk) 07:59, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So one of you is not telling the truth. Which one of you is it? 331dot (talk) 09:32, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I showed my wife what wikipedia was about and how it worked using my account, but didn't know she created her own account until today when I received a block notice. Jamesallain85 (talk) 09:41, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Timothy J. Edens for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Timothy J. Edens is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy J. Edens (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mztourist (talk) 11:31, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

just passing by, I think it's reasonable to mention the article was kept. DGG ( talk ) 23:19, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Willard R. Laughon

The article Willard R. Laughon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:BASIC, search reveals a few listings of promotions and commands but no real detail about him

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

passing by, I think it's reasonableto mention the article was kept. DGG ( talk ) 23:18, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stanley C. Norton

The article Stanley C. Norton has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:BASIC, existing sources are not RS, search reveals a few listings of promotions and commands but no real detail about him

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

passing by to see if there were problems here, I think it's reasonable to mention the article was kept. DGG ( talk ) 23:19, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stanley C. Norton for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stanley C. Norton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stanley C. Norton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mztourist (talk) 14:39, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

again, almost unanimous keep. DGG ( talk ) 23:22, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rob Roy McGregor (admiral) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rob Roy McGregor (admiral) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob Roy McGregor (admiral) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mztourist (talk) 12:09, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Dobos torte for you!

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.

To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:53, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]