User talk:Itsalleasy

Speedy deletion nomination of Colin Winnette

Hi, Itsalleasy. I appreciate your thoroughness in protecting the neutrality of Wikipedia. However, I wish you would reconsider the Speedy deletion nomination of my Wikipedia page. Granted, I provided the bulk of the information for the page, but sited reliable sources. While I have a personal interest in seeing the article posted, I'm also made reference to on other Wikipedia pages (see:: Spork Press, see:: Joe Wenderoth) and I thought providing a short, factually accurate article to meet those references would be preferable for the site, rather than dead links. Please know I am not spamming the site. I feel that this brief article has just as much right to be listed as any of those dedicated to other young authors.

Speedy deletion nomination of Rick Rosas

Regarding your speedy deletion of the article I wrote on Rick Rosas, what gives you the right to decide what is or isn't biographical? He is one of the premiere bass players in US, having played with the Buffalo Springfield, Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young, Joe Walsh, Neil Young, Johnny Rivers and many other legends. I wrote up a lengthy biographical piece that you misclassified as promotional.

Now, I admit I had trouble citing references due to formatting issues I had, but I had citations for everything I wrote. I contacted Wikipedia but got no assistance, so if that was why the article was deleted I understand. But the article itself was solid biographical fact, not what you describe as promotional. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikey909 (talk • contribs) 20:18, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Udo Remmes

Hello Itsalleasy, the article is not promotional because Udo Remmes' famous and new photography is known in many countries and worth to known in the english wikipedia as well as in the german wikipedia: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Udo_Remmes I know I have to upgrade the article (categories, links etc.). If you can offer any advice on how I can edit the article to make it more encyclopedic I would be happy to rework it. --87.79.113.60 (talk) 19:29, 19 March 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Udo4stephanie (talk • contribs)

Welcome!

Hello, Itsalleasy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Bearian (talk) 15:12, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion converted to PROD: Gold Apollo Co., Ltd.

Hello Itsalleasy. I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on GoApollo Co., Ltd. to a proposed deletion tag, because I do not believe CSD applies to the page in question. Thank you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:31, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bowral and District Hospital

Hi Itsalleasy. You reviewed and tagged my recent article for speedy deletion as advertising, but then removed the tag shortly after. I am a bit confused by this. Whilst I acknowledge the article may need some work, I'm sure there are far more contentious hospital articles - for example those which contain no citations. I have done my best to back up my work with a range of sources, and while the tone of the article is generally positive, it is also factual and verifiable. Please be aware that the hospital is government funded, operating under Medicare Australia, and there be minimal benefit of advertising such as it is a basic public service. If you can offer any advice on how I can edit the article to make it more encyclopedic I would be happy to rework it. Dfadden (talk) 19:52, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

about INTREPID by Ao'c

hello,

I want to know why you have mark https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/INTREPID_by_Ao%27c for speedy delatation ? INTREPID by Ao'c is a women’s apparel company owned by Aerin O’ Connell

I want you to reconsider your decision, Also plese check this references

http://news.yahoo.com/photos/nolcha-fashion-week-york-presented-20130911-224415-912.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2418386/Fashion-model-night-Jennie-Garth-41-looks-pale-interesting-sashays-runway-NYFW.html http://nolchafashionweek.com/2013/08/10/intrepid-by-aoc/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vishal1811 (talk • contribs) 17:54, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Examine.com deletion

Hello!

Not sure why Examine.com would get deleted? It is similar to Natural Standard, and if anything, seems to be more present in the mainstream media as a source for supplementation.

Guidance and clarification would be much appreciated!

ScienceandFitness (talk) 19:59, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

— Preceding unsigned comment added by ScienceandFitness (talk • contribs) 19:56, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OldApps

You started a AfD nomination for this article, but it was done incorrectly. I've fixed it, but next time please review WP:AFDHOWTO before nominating. Ansh6 6 6 21:03, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion: Lead Creation

Hey Itsalleasy

I understand the speedy deletion, however do not understand how to prevent this in future, and will be editing the pages to aim to rectify this. The page created was the start in a series to provide detailed information on the most extensive B2B Social Media study globally, funded by the Australian Government. I understand that this can be viewed as promotional, but do not understand how exactly to make it information based without it being promotional. i.e. what is necessary to fall within the guidelines if we feel we already are falling within the guidelines? The text was intended as informational, not promotional so would appreciate to know how I might edit these two examples:

1. Lead Creation is a privately held company founded in 2008. They are best known for their BizClout study on the Social Media influence of B2B companies.

2. BizClout is a study of the Social Media influence of B2B companies globally. The study was first conducted in 2012 assessing a small group of listed Australian companies.

Grumiocantat (talk) 00:07, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

She's All The World To Me

Thank you for leaping on to look over my She's All The World To Me article. However, I have issues with the orphan and refimprove tags that you added.

Re. the orphan tag, it was not an orphan as there was another article that linked to it (The Deemster). I have now added another reference (Hall Caine). I have also now deleted the orphan tag.

Re. the refimprove tag, I don't understand what further references can be expected. There are unreferenced sections, but these relate to the plot of and quotations from the novel under discussion - the only references here would be to the novel itself. The only other section is heavily referenced, notably to the definitive biography of Hall Caine amongst others.

Jamesfranklingresham (talk) 20:21, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion : Parthenography

Hello Itsalleasy. Parthenography should not be speedy deleted as pure vandalism or a blatant hoax, because... Parthenography is not a made up word or a hooax, it's a real neologism based on the greek root. If you would like to see what parthenography is you can look on the following web site www.retrodelirium.com and see for your self. It's a technique in photography just like lightpainting is in photography ref: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light_painting). I know that parthenography is a new thing but I can assure you that's real and therefore not much reference out there. But new things need to start somewhere and I hope that Wikipedia is looking forward to go along this way. Thank you --Retrodelirium (talk) 20:56, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited VPNBook, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ubuntu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review request

Please review few articles created by me recently:

Thanks in advance.Skr15081997 (talk) 04:54, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Column still may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| url=http://books.google.co.in/books?id=0aWR3fuA7QIC&pg=PA276&lpg=PA276&dq=Coffey+still+analyzer)+in+a+column&source=bl&ots=qB-oL6qm4r&sig=2dbMOGiQKJWIbHsACCmclKlzV2s&hl=en&sa=X&ei=
hl=en&sa=X&ei=rjAvU6yUFceJrAexsoCACw&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Coffey%20still%20analyzer)%20in%20a%20column&f=false | title=Fermented Beverage Production | publisher=Springer | author=

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:20, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Wgolf. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Hook, Lion & Sinker, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Wgolf (talk) 05:13, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion: Price & Myers

AKT II, Buro Happold, Ramboll - all clearly far more promotional. Do you have an explanation as to how they came to be? — Preceding unsigned comment added by G0lfer92 (talk • contribs) 14:55, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited First Alarm (company), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page San Jose (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent spam report

Is there spamming going on, or are the links you reported just spammy ones you removed? --Ronz (talk) 19:35, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

speedy no context

As reviewing administrator, I removed the speedy tag from Libraries and the deaf community. No context means that it impossible to tell what the subject of the article is--for a example, an article about a town library that doesn't say what town it is. . This particular article isn;t really satisfactory--it's too much like an essay, and I've tagged it accordingly, but it is a reasonable topic & does have sources, so I'm giving the editor some needed assistance DGG ( talk ) 02:56, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stanley F. Battle Article

Hello Itsalleasy, I wanted to reach out to you regarding the refimprove, COI, and POV tags that you added as part of your review of the Stanley F. Battle article. The refimprove tag was added while the article was being rapidly edited and more information, references included, were being added. As for the Conflict of Interest and Neutrality issues, I cannot understand the reasoning there as the majority of sources stem from articles, and biographies written by 3rd parties. I'm appreciative of you reviewing the article, however I'm confused as to the basis for which the aforementioned tags were added and would appreciate it if you could provide some insight or examples to make the article better. Thanks! --Educatedblkman1914 (talk) 03:57, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Page directly or indirectly promotes subject and most of the content is un-referenced or references do not cover it. My suggestion will be to make page encyclopedic rather than a personal biography. Itsalleasy (talk) 04:33, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion for Telerik

Hi Itsalleasy,

Just checking to see if you have any additional feedback regarding the Telerik page. This was a first draft, and I tried to make it as NPOV as possible. There are no superlatives, no slick marketing messages, just a straightforward overview of Telerik and select activities over the past 12 years. Some of the company's products have their own long-standing pages, and other similar organization have active pages that have not been flagged for speedy deletion.

When I posted this, I noted that prior Telerik pages had also been deleted. I don't know the specifics of those pages, but I hope I not being punished for the sins of others. That said, I'm more than willing to edit with your feedback in mind. Also, I have additional information about the company's role with the EU Digital inititives in Eastern Europe and other content that can help further define their role in the software tools industry.

Please let me know what I can do to reverse this decision.

Thanks,

Max MaximZero (talk) 18:18, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/node/67204/

"Bulgarian Company Homes In on Technological Niche". New York Times.

"How the founders of the "Telerik" made their company a global player?". Forbes Bulgaria.

Please lighten up on the speedy-deletions

I've looked through the last few days of your contributions.

A significant percentage of your speedy-deletion nominations have been declined, including at least two by me.

Please be a little more tolerant when deciding whether to nominate a page for speedy deletion. When in doubt, go with WP:PROD or WP:AFD.

Thanks. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 03:44, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vision therapy -> frauenfeld clinic?

Hi! Why you added The Frauenfeld Method to the Vision Therapy article? Frauenfeld Method has not any medical proof or any peer review data. I've deleted Frauenfeld from the article. 83.242.73.116 (talk) 08:52, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Al-Fadl ibn Rawh ibn Hatim al-Muhallabi

Hi Itsalleasy,

Thanks for reviewing Al-Fadl ibn Rawh ibn Hatim al-Muhallabi. I'm afraid I don't understand why you tagged the article with a refimprove tag. Every piece of information was sourced with an in-line citation; for paragraphs that had a single source at the end, that was because everything in that paragraph came from the same source and page number. Please let me know if there's anything specific that you'd like to see addressed, but I'd like to ultimately have that tag removed. Thanks, Ro4444 (talk) 15:13, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Ichor, LLC

Hi,

I feel that I thoroughly explained the importance of our principle product in my description. Do I mainly just need to take out the biased opinions of the product to make it less "promoting?" Let me know what I need to do to fix this. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lmboozer (talk • contribs) 19:27, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nilufar Usmanova

Hello, Itsalleasy! What is problem with page Nilufar Usmanova? She is most famous singer in Uzbekistan You can see youtube/google and etc: https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=nilufar+usmonova

Yuyuh (talk) 15:41, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yuyuh, you have written an advert page where it clear that you have a conflict of interest, which means you are directly related to the subject. Do not create or add spam content on Wikipedia.Itsalleasy (talk) 15:46, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

- It's not advert page! I'm fan of Nilufar Usmanova! And i know all facts about her! And it's not spam. If you want, i can remove some adjectives Yuyuh (talk) 15:51, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

- - Strange, how do you all page formatting at once Yuyuh? I took months to learn that, something is definitely suspicious and I know what it is. Itsalleasy (talk) 15:54, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

- - If you can provide me a strong reason why you want to create a page for her, I will do that myself. Yuyuh Itsalleasy (talk) 15:59, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

- - - Itsalleasy First of all, I'm a web developer and i know how to formate the pages. Second of all, recently she visited the school of my junior sister on school-leaving party and sang some of her songs and spread a little happiness among the children. Principal told me that it was not planned and we all were surprised. So I was pleased with her attitude. Now I have some time to share some information about her. In Uzbekistan there are not many guys who is interested in such kind of activity as editing or posting. Why I don't have to do it if I can do it? Is it your policy to block any activity of page creator? I don't think so. I just want to spread the info about her because a) I like her songs b) I like her as a person. Then please advice what kind of corrections I have to make in order to post this page? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x57cvngmNSw Yuyuh (talk) 16:16, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

- - - How can I recover the page? 213.230.73.144 (talk) 15:33, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of free flight simulators

I will heed your advice.

Thanks,

Jetfighterace212 Jetfighterace212 (talk) 21:12, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have reconsidered and agree with Nabia that the page should not be deleted and should merely be edited. Jetfighterace212 (talk) 21:16, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nabla — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jetfighterace212 (talk • contribs) 21:30, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ake rice mill co., ltd Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ake rice mill co., ltd Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ake rice mill co., ltd Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ake rice mill co., ltd Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Concern about undisclosed paid editing

Hello Itsalleasy. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a black hat practice.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Itsalleasy. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Itsalleasy|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message.

Examples of articles that I am concerned about include:

PlaceSpeak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
CMS Energy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Yapp (mobile application) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Mohammed Al Habtoor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Regards SmartSE (talk) 09:47, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you are going to deny that you are paid, please explain where you obtained File:Mohammed Al Habtoor.png as it is not online anywhere. SmartSE (talk) 09:51, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yekhai, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

SmartSE (talk) 12:54, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Brianhe (talk) 17:49, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:6G Internet logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:6G Internet logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. TheDragonFire (talk) 10:48, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Vamont Group Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Vamont Group Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Bri (talk) 18:28, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Laura Mercier Cosmetics logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Laura Mercier Cosmetics logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:30, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Livecoding.tv logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Livecoding.tv logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]