Jump to content

User talk:Indubitably/Archive 17

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 10Archive 15Archive 16Archive 17Archive 18Archive 19Archive 20

Happy New year!

Happy New year!! --FadedSoul (talk) 18:56, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, you too. :) LaraLove 19:19, 1 January 2008 (UTC)


Haha, the Chronic, thanks! XD Happy new year! LaraLove 20:21, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 20:12, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, Jossi! :) Happy new year! LaraLove 20:20, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

wp:aiav

I apologise, I failed to explain properly, User talk:Mcspoosh is a sockpuppet of a previously banned editor. Sorry for the inconvenience. Sacharin (talk) 20:54, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Has this been confirmed by a CU? LaraLove 20:57, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
This was a vandal who created several accounts to vandalize the same page. The first account was blocked (not a banned user, different things). Since the page is now protected and the vandal is inactive there is no reason to block the other accounts. shoeofdeath (talk) 21:00, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
I recognise the vandalism. Sacharin (talk) 21:03, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
In that case, WP:SSP would be the place to report it. LaraLove 21:04, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Any particular reason this needs to be protected? I need to talk with him. Guy (Help!) 00:09, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

I think it's clear from looking at the talk page. LaraLove 00:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Dear friend, I hope you had a wonderful New Year's Eve, and that 2008 is your best year yet! ~ Riana 02:26, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Happy New Year! Here is the latest edition of the WikiProject GA Newsletter! Dr. Cash (talk) 04:01, 3 January 2008 (UTC)


Bathrobe in one hand, camera in the other...

Whenever. I'm heading to sleep, but I'll be back around full time. Whenever is good for you. Gimme until tomorrow to respond if you start it tonight, but I am definately in... --Jayron32|talk|contribs 05:44, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to the longest week ever. Haha. the_undertow talk 06:08, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
ROFL. OMG, so true. But not for people like you and Jay. Only people like me and DHMO. ROFL! XD LaraLove 13:01, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Responded to questions. All set. --Jayron32|talk|contribs 20:58, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

You'll Never Understand Me

This is good. the_undertow talk 06:18, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Dude... that so does not look teh good. But you know what, I trust you. I'd have to pick some shit off, though. Haha. LaraLove 13:02, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Were you dipping it in ranch!? LaraLove 15:14, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Strange quota. the_undertow talk 19:42, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Ur gonna be so teh mad, but I only captured my way to the target location. Something happened with my surveillance equipment and my objective was blown. However, the mission was a success! You are lucky-best wiki-friend ever! the_undertow talk 06:26, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

WTF?! Masterchip theater results in a car ride to your mailbox? Nice Superman pajama pants, tho. I have a ridiculous collection of pajama pants. I thought I was getting too old for them, but I've just reevaluated my position on the matter. Anyway, do0d, I'm so glad you like it... great band. A couple years ago and I probably would have sent you Maroon 5, which I'm sure that would have resulted in a less impressive smile. So yea, good times. Your camera's work ethic last night was teh suck. Bad times. BFF, LaraLove 13:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
OMG WTFWAL*MART? the_undertow talk 04:32, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Adopting users?

Hello, I noticed you over at GlassCobra's talk and it seems s/he's not around at the moment. I had an offline conversation with a blocked user in which he agreed he had made mistakes and wanted to be able to edit under the rules. He is evidently an expert in his field, but his field is controversial. I'd like to be able to tell him someone is looking into giving him some guidance which will allow him to contribute to Wikipedia. If you are willing to adopt this user perhaps he can be unblocked for mentorship. —Whig (talk) 09:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Who is the user? LaraLove 13:23, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Ah, I see. User:Danaullman. I'm not sure if I'm the best person for the job, but if him getting unblocked is contingent on being adopted, then I'll do what I can. LaraLove 15:05, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Specifically he does not want a mentor who is involved in his field either as an advocate or opponent. There are people on Wikipedia who do not want anything but a particular POV to be represented and seek to condition his unblocking on being disallowed from editing in any article or talk space where his expertise is relevant. He objects to this constraint but accepts temporary limits will be placed on him while he learns how not to make mistakes that break policies or guidelines of Wikipedia. I hope that someone will be able to help him become a constructive editor. —Whig (talk) 17:29, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
If you're willing I've e-mailed him to let him know about our conversation here. Is there anything that I should do further to ask for help from another admin or seek a different mentor? —Whig (talk) 17:36, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
I'll do it. It should be a positive experience. If I need assistance from another editor/admin, I've got a Rolodex-worth of resources. I didn't even know what homeopathy was until I just read over the article, so I have no opinion one way or the other. Nor do I have an interest in picking a side. LaraLove 18:29, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks and good luck! :) —Whig (talk) 19:05, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!

Dear LaraLove,

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, post a message on the discussion page or join our IRC channel #vandalproof.

Snowolf How can I help? 15:38, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Page views

Just noticed: "#3 on the list of 100 most viewed user pages (January 2008)... how funny is that?" actually WikiCharts haven't been updated in a long time, so that data is correct, but not relative to this month. Snowolf How can I help? 20:45, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

So what are you saying? I have the #3 page, just not for January, but rather, since like October or something? LaraLove 20:58, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Happy New Year, LaraLova

Wishing you the best for 2008! Acalamari 02:35, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks, Acalamari. :) You, too. LaraLove 05:53, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Notability and adoption

Thanks for your response. I have a lot of questions. How do I undelete a profile?I dont agree with the notabilty statement because I people I was making profiles for are semi-famous. They are on TV so I would think that would make them lagit. do you wannna adopt me?

Please read over the notability policy (WP:N). Being a TV personality does not in itself assert notability. I'm not accepting new adoptees at the moment because of limited free time. However, there are many editors accepting new adoptees listed at the link I provided. LaraLove 18:11, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Um.

That was really a lot of bullshit that you left on my talk page. Now I have to fucking archive. I don't know which file could have been corrupt. Your MP3 player must have corrupted it. Shit! Can it be grad school teim now plz so I can live in teh dorms?!

Did you really just say 3rd Eye? Yeah...um...good times. Although 4 degrees is really teh song that makes me think about you. It's about a boyfriend who is trying to convince his girlfriend that anal sex is a way to bring them closer than 'dying, and cancer, and crying.' Note the 'cavern of treasures,' 'lets go digging' and the fact that the anus is four degrees warmer than the female genitalia. Die Eien Von Satan is a recipe for brownies, just FYI. Anyway, have fun at work. I'll have a beer or 10 for you tonite. I am teh jealous about the ham. You know the shit I can do with a ham is really quite amazing and illegal in 52 states! (that makes teh nonsense). the_undertow talk 20:07, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

WTF? Glad to know why 4 Degrees makes you think of me. That's so random... and nasty. XD Just drink your beers tonight and paste the drunk dial message over this section. Haha. Fun at work... this is teh possible? LaraLove 20:11, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Anything is possible through trust and compromise. O, you mean work? No, that's way less likely to happen. the_undertow talk 20:17, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Are you talking about anal sex again, or something far more appealing? LaraLove 20:44, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Leik I said - teh dorms?! chip talk 21:03, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
I don't get teh connection. :/ LaraLove 05:13, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Sorry to butt in, but this is one of the funniest discussions I've seen on a talk page in ages. Please continue. --rm 'w avu 12:21, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Arbcom 141

I think I finally figured out all of the formatting to get the Arbcom submittal ready. I just looked at some of the "verifiable, well sourced" but incorrect material 141 put in the Steve Allen and Ed Sullivan Show articles. It's very sad, but I don't even want to get into it in those articles. And I am ready to do this. I will file on Monday, so I will have to time to notify everyone. Thanks for the input. I'll post a link to the Arbcom case on Monday, too. Steve Pastor (talk) 20:38, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

I'll be there. LaraLove 20:41, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

The Arbcom case has been filed. [1] I think the next move is up to 141. What a pain this is! Steve Pastor (talk) 16:32, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Heads Up

As no one bothered to let you know (as far as I can see anyhow - ) Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:LaraLove/Bathrobe Cabal - just to let you know! Pedro :  Chat  01:23, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

I know your Bathrobe cabal's being deleted, but...

...we have a sock on the loose. Special:Contributions/Milomolaria. BoL 05:10, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Could you protect User talk:Milomolaria? She does like to keep making threats and taunt people until her Talk pages get protected. Corvus cornixtalk 05:17, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

I was going to say that too, yo. BoL 05:20, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Adopt me?

Does that title come across as pleading? Hope so, because I've got my puppy dog eyes in.

I've recently started being a bit more active on Wikipedia having used it for many years. I'm definitely in the WikiGnome category. I've spent some time patrolling new articles and recent changes (manually) and had a go at Wikifying a few articles but I do rather feel that I need a bit of stretching and exposure to other aspects of Wikipedia so I can make sure I'm actually directing my energies where they are best suited and have the best effect. Gaffertape (talk) 17:42, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for adopting me. My interests - well, in terms of things to do on Wikipedia, I'm definitely of gnome stock so I won't be planning on writing huge numbers of articles. However, I am aware that I know very little about the place, so want to at least try most things so I can get a flavour of it all. I definitely need to improve my policy knowledge.
When it comes to subject interests they are wide, but not that deep. In that I am quite into a number of topics, but there aren't many I have a really in depth knowledge about. If pushed I'd probably go for something UK geography and history as some of the things I am most interested in, perhaps with anything geeky as a secondary topic. Gaffertape (talk) 22:27, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
The other thing I should have mentioned is that I had a name change request pending. Gaffertape is no more... I am now BlinkingBlimey (talk) 10:16, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your support in my RfA. It was definitely a dramatic debate, that landed on WP:100! I paid close attention to everything that was said, and, where possible, I will try to incorporate the (constructive) criticism towards being a better administrator. I'm taking things slowly for now, partially because of the holidays and all the off-wiki distractions. :) I'm also working my way through the Wikipedia:New admin school and double-checking the relevant policies, and will gradually phase into the use of the new tools. My main goals are to help out with various backlogs, but I also fully intend to keep on writing articles, as there are several more that I definitely want to get to WP:FA status! Thanks again, and have a great new year, --Elonka 18:13, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi

Damn you're good looking. Brains and beauty. I envy a very lucky guy.

Congrats on your cabal victory. May the Bathrobe Cabal live forever!

By the way, is your lesson on good article development complete? If not, it would be a shame to let it just sit there unfinished.

I look forward to your reply, so we can figure out what to do about it.

The Transhumanist 22:14, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. :) And thanks for your support on the BRC MfD.
I had meant to finish that lesson and I forgot. It's close to being done. I'll finish it this week. LaraLove 03:22, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Cool. I'll start looking for proofreaders. The Transhumanist 07:43, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Small request

Given your flair for signature changes, I'm wondering if you might tell me which of these three you prefer? I'm being indecisive as usual... Thanks, VanTucky talk 07:11, 7 January 2008 (UTC) P.S. How the hell are you?

I would like #2 if 'Tucky' was green. But NOBODY asked me, haha. the_undertow talk 07:12, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
I like #2. Stick with the colors. They're you. Too many people have the blue/green. LaraLove 07:14, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the advice, both of you :) VanTucky talk 01:32, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for fixing my userboxes. :) ----Seans Potato Business 09:54, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Not a problem. :) You're quite welcome, LaraLove 13:21, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

looks good on you. chip talk 17:05, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

There's still a little left in me. ;) LaraLove 17:07, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
This is teh suck. John Wayne is not. chip talk 20:46, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
John Wayne it is. LaraLove 21:05, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Likin' this idea. :) Rudget. 18:14, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Hello

Good morning. chip talk 15:24, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

:) Good morning, sweets. LaraLove 15:28, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Theft

I am stealing some things from Chips userpage. Thanks for making it all for me. :) Trevor "Tinkleheimer" Haworth 17:11, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

NVM, I can't figure out how to steal it. I've gotten by without it for awhile, so I don't need it. :) Trevor "Tinkleheimer" Haworth 17:12, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

O yeah, you Need it. Have her help you figure it out before she gets her mani/pedi. chip talk 17:19, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Nah, I'll be fine without having your afd closing hnds on my userpage. Trevor "Tinkleheimer" Haworth 17:22, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Haha. I can help you build a different version... and it's not a mani/pedi... I'm getting a brow shaping and facial (STFU, hahaa). LaraLove 17:23, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Chip, your sig code was jacked; not only not working but fucking my page code up. I fixed it... nice color? LaraLove 17:27, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

I was just going to steal the "Shortcuts" part. I don't want you to make me a huge design. I <3 my lame design :D. :) Trevor "Tinkleheimer" Haworth 18:03, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
You have two options: {{User:LaraLove/InfoCenter}} or {{User:The undertow/Shortcuts}}. LaraLove 18:23, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
So you're making me play favorites? Trevor "Tinkleheimer" Haworth 18:25, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
It's just a box of shortcuts. I'm sure we'll understand no matter your decision. But even if one of us does stop speaking to you, there's always the other one. :) LaraLove 18:36, 9 January 2008 (UTC) P.S. I designed both of them, btw. LaraLove 18:37, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Not expecting a reply, *wink*, but thanks for letting me use it. :D Trevor "Tinkleheimer" Haworth 18:58, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Oh! Oh! Okay. I see how it is. You pick his over mine!? That's fine, whatev. LaraLove 19:00, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

a way to get nickname back after a block ?

I use DzzD as my nick name since more than 10 years on severals website, anyway to unblock this nick or do I am really forced to use another one, if so please tell me why ?

DzzD 18:35, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

The name is blocked. There's no getting it back. Had you not used it to promote a site of the same name, it wouldn't have been blocked. LaraLove 18:53, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
seems that doing such wiki call me a sock pupper or something like that DzzDDzzD 20:55, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

I might have stuck my foot somewhere where I shouldn't have. User:DzzDDzzD has been created to make the same COI, SPAM article that he got banned for as User:DzzD. I tagged his userpage with a WP:SOCK and db-banned the article he made. I have a feeling I may have gone about this the wrong way. What do you say? --Pmedema (talk) 21:03, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

If he's doing the same things he's already been warned not to do, I'd say you handled it fine. LaraLove 22:11, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Ehud Lesar

Contribution evidence was posted by another user at User:Fedayee/LesarBaguirov Evidence. I was considering a block since it's quite apparent Ehud = AdilBaguirov from the evidence, but I waited to see what Khoikhoi would do. Khoikhoi is probably the admin who can make the best judgment here, since he has been involved with these users (see AA and AA 2) for the last two years and knows their ways. Khoikhoi has also blocked the last few Adil socks based on contribution evidence.

CheckUser did not confirm Ehud = Adil, but from his previous socks, it's apparent that CU will be of no help here. Adil is an Azeri lobbyist, and he is constantly traveling around the globe (his IPs in the past have been traced to six states including California and Texas and cities in other countries such as Baku and Moscow). I'm sure if you contact Khoikhoi now, he will give you a sufficient rationale for the block. Best, Nishkid64 (talk) 19:06, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

It appears Khoikhoi may not be on Wikipedia for days/weeks, so you may not get a reply if you ask him about the block now. In that case, I ask you to reconsider the unblock, based on the evidence link I posted above. Nishkid64 (talk) 19:12, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Do you mind if I re-block the account? Nishkid64 (talk) 02:09, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Do what you will, but I'm not endorsing the blocking of a user based on assumptions. I see no evidence that he's a sock. Didn't Durova just take some heavy shit for something like this? LaraLove 02:16, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
It was a slightly different situation, but yes, Durova did take the heat for a block based on evidence she collected. Also, this block is not based on assumption, but evidence. It may be a bit circumstantial, but I feel it is good enough to show that Ehud is a sockpuppet of Adil. Besides me, there are two other admins who have reviewed the evidence and feel the same about this user. Nishkid64 (talk) 02:23, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Do what you feel is best. I'm more of an unblocker than a blocker. But that's just how I roll. LaraLove 02:26, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

I have reviewed the block and it appears to be correct, Ehud Lesar is almost certainly a meatpuppet or sockpuppet of Adil Bagirov. The user should be kept blocked Alex Bakharev (talk) 03:52, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Sorry for interfering, but why don't you ask for official investigation of this? This is certainly going to reach arbcom, so I suggest we get someone officially investigate the allegations of Ehud being a sock of Adil. There's not a single piece of evidence to support such a claim, checkuser also does not support this, and blocking people based on assumptions is certainly no good. So my suggestion is to get this properly investigated. Please remember that people are innocent until proven guilty. Thanks. Grandmaster (talk) 05:56, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Ladies and gentlemen, please be aware of this: [2] Grandmaster (talk) 07:33, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Hey Beautiful

My computer went down hard - another HP down the drain. I've had it what, 3 months? Fuck. Anyway, I'm taking it in, so I don't know what to tell ya. Arg! Can you look at Chet Zar and see if you can integrate the last the ELs into the article? Whatev. I'm frustrated. Motherfuck. chip talk 20:48, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

I'll take care of it. So sorry to hear about your computer. I hope it's fixed soon. :( LaraLove 21:43, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
It's the same signature. How can you leave this message here, and then call me a bitch on my talk page. I don't have access to the 'tow' here and you'll be fucking sorry when my computer is in the shop for a month and I have to resort to fucking skywriting, which I won't do, because you're comment sucked. So long. chip talk 23:34, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Dude, calm down!! XD I did not call you a bitch. I said your sig is a bitch. It fucks with my page code like the dumb bitch that comes to a party and starts messing with the knick knacks. If you will notice, after your sig above, the text color changes from black to indigo. Then, after another instance of your sig, the font changes from verdana to dreaded arial. Bad. Times. That's all I'm saying. Mad love, don't leave me. <3 LaraLove 01:47, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Much obliged

Thank you. Want to come to Talk:Romania and see the follies? Septentrionalis PMAnderson 21:59, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

I'd rather gouge my own eyes out with a spork. But thanks for the invite. You're welcome, by the way. LaraLove 22:00, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
If nobody does, the nationalists run wild, which is why I have been over-combative; but to each her own. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 22:39, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Peer review?

I notice you're still not doing GAC at the moment. Are you not doing PR too? Because I was after a favour, but only if you're active (if not, you should take your name off the volunteers list). I was hoping for I Don't Remember to be peer reviewed so we can get it up to FA. Let me know (or, feel free to dive right in, if you want). --rm 'w avu 08:41, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

I'm not really doing GA, kind of depends. But I am doing PR. I'll look at it today. LaraLove 15:14, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks Love! We've got some really good reviews so far from a couple of other guys, but all the eyes that are cast upon the article at PR make its chance of passing FAC so much better. Thanks heaps! --rm 'w avu 08:28, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

... appears to be some straggly noinclude thingies in there for some reason. (or no reason?) Compare with Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Liruxoyo which doesn't have them. I'm not sure what is actually going on so I dasn't change it. You CU clerks are too smart for me, so hopefully you can sort it out? ++Lar: t/c 20:17, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

I forgot to subst the template. Thanks for the heads up. It's fixed now. LaraLove 05:00, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Teh Lonely Ramen & Ham Sandwich

I had it today! chip talk 20:20, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

I hope that was Ramen with a ham sandwich as opposed to a Ramen and ham sandwich, which sounds like something Al Bundy would fix for lunch if he had some money. LaraLove 05:01, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Ramen and ham? Gross. GlassCobra 05:57, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
No. I had one of those expensive Nissin noodles with a ham and cheese sandwich on Hawaiian bread. Man, cut a cracker some slack. the_undertow talk 05:59, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Oh dude, I love Hawaiian bread. LaraLove 14:24, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Need evidence and motion

Can you provide the motion and evidence that Morven requests on the Onefortyone arbitration request? A motion on the previous case will be simpler and faster. I am not familiar with these matters, and am occupied with the waterboarding dispute, or else I would try to help more. Jehochman Talk 21:20, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Arg, I hate ArbCom. I'll try to do it tomorrow. LaraLove 05:01, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for your support
Thank you SO MUCH for your support in my unanimous RFA. Take this cookie as a small token of my appreciation.--Jayron32|talk|contribs 05:49, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Support? Dude! I effin' nommed you and all I get is a lousy cookie?! I should at least get a keychain or a tee-shirt or something... but fine, I'll take your cookie in the spirit in which it was given. Whatev. But I better get a hot shot of you in a bathrobe with the customary thumbs up or I'm recalling your ass over this shit. I don't care if you're in that stupid category or not. LaraLove 14:31, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

hi, this is me sushant again after a bit long time. can you please review this for GA please. i request you, no actually i beg you; please please please review this article. Sushant gupta (talk) 08:43, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry. I don't have time right now. Beginning of my work week today and my to-do list is backed up from last week. In fact, I'm reminded of a peer review I forgot to do to, bah. Sorry. LaraLove 14:33, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Userbox

HA, well I saw your comment about the userbox that I made, and I know it is kind of hideous. I just threw it together really quick. Feel free to make some changes to it at User:Rjd0060/temp. Thanks, Rjd0060 (talk) 16:09, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

It reminds me of Wal-Mart now, but it will do. LaraLove 16:14, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Thank you ;-) Looks much better. - Rjd0060 (talk) 16:26, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

So you hate rollback?

Do you hate me because I have it? D= (Forgot to sign) Trevor "Tinkleheimer" Haworth 16:25, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

No. I'm pro-rollback, anti-stupid discussions like it's a big deal. LaraLove 16:27, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Hear hear! - Rjd0060 (talk) 16:30, 11 January 2008 (UTC)