User talk:Imakewikipedianpages

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, Imakewikipedianpages, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to Mongol Invasion of Ossetia seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Introduction and Getting started
Contributing to Wikipedia
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 20:46, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Mongol Invasion of Ossetia, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 21:02, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Mongol Invasion of Ossetia. Last time. Stop removing valid notices. Drmies (talk) 14:27, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Imakewikipedianpages! Your additions to Mongol Invasion of Ossetia have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 23:01, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mongol Invasion of Ossetia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 17:50, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Georgian Attacks during Russo-Georgian War has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 13:23, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Byzantine's Cede of Ani to Georgia moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Byzantine's Cede of Ani to Georgia. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 19:04, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cut and paste move

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Byzantine's Cede of Ani to Georgia. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:44, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Defense Of Dariali (1918)

This is not ready for mainspace, and I moved it to draft space. Drmies (talk) 17:19, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Drmies, Hello. Could you tell me When You are going to Remove it From Drafts? Its my first Masterpiece. Imakewikipedianpages (talk) 17:22, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not, and it is not a masterpiece, at least not yet. Drmies (talk) 17:25, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was for me, Anyways Thank you and goodbye Imakewikipedianpages (talk) 17:27, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I added some references, Can You put the "Submit for the review" Thing? (Cuz I dunno how) Imakewikipedianpages (talk) 07:18, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Akhaltsikhe (1918) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Battle of Akhaltsikhe (1918). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 19:45, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Artvin (1919) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Battle of Artvin (1919). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 20:35, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sir ARandomName123, I am Sorry that I Didn't Added any sources, Can I change it somehow? (To add Sources Of Course) Imakewikipedianpages (talk) 16:30, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, just click the edit button at the top of the page/section. The draft is here. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 17:07, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{ping|ARandomName123}} Sir ARandomName123 I have added Sources (Both Turkish and Georgian) In The Wikipedia Page. Could you tell me if it wants more Sources for It to get Undrafted? Sorry for pinging. I am just Confused Imakewikipedianpages (talk) 20:36, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @Imakewikipedianpages (Just type "@", then choose my name, to ping)

If you believe it is ready for publication, you can press the button that says "Submit this draft for review!" or move the page yourself. However, I would suggest you edit it some more, as it is currently very hard to understand. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 20:42, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thanks for advice Imakewikipedianpages (talk) 20:44, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since u are the one that drafted my wikipedia page it feels better to talk to u about it lol Imakewikipedianpages (talk) 20:50, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

aw man, I couldnt ping Imakewikipedianpages (talk) 20:43, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Byzantine's Cede of Ani to Georgia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Byzantine's Cede of Ani to Georgia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Byzantine's Cede of Ani to Georgia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Annwfwn (talk) 14:54, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright Imakewikipedianpages (talk) 16:41, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Samtskhe-Javakheti moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Battle of Samtskhe-Javakheti. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it provides insufficient context and appears to be a work in progress that is not yet ready for the main space. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:14, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello "Hey man im josh" Since my wikipedia pages arent Popular, and people would get them in like once a day. I Didn't putted much Effort and Work in it. now bye Imakewikipedianpages (talk) 16:39, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Georgian Attacks during Russo-Georgian War for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Georgian Attacks during Russo-Georgian War is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgian Attacks during Russo-Georgian War until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Walt Yoder (talk) 22:09, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you sir Walt Yoder for telling me This. I will do anything to not let it Delete. Imakewikipedianpages (talk) 16:40, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Akhalkalaki (1918) (October 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Read WP:VERIFY.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Akhalkalaki (1918) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 20:41, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Imakewikipedianpages! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 20:41, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to List of Georgian battles. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 20:56, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Akhalkalaki (1918) (October 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Akhalkalaki (1918) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 22:13, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. Imakewikipedianpages (talk) 20:02, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Akhaltsikhe (1918) (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Edward-Woodrow was:

Too many grammar and prose issues. Use of periods, capitalization, etc. For example, what does General G. Under the leadership of Kvinitadze mean?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Akhaltsikhe (1918) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Edward-Woodrow • talk 12:37, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok Imakewikipedianpages (talk) 16:04, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Edward-Woodrow Sorry to tell you but, I can't Change it anymore since I got banned, Unfortunately, He didn't even sent notification that I got banned or why I got banned. It was supposed to be "Under the Leadership of General Giorgi Kvinitadze". I am sorry for the Misunderstanding text. Imakewikipedianpages (talk) 20:00, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Samtskhe-Javakheti (November 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tails Wx was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Samtskhe-Javakheti and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tails Wx 03:24, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Artvin (1919) has been accepted

Battle of Artvin (1919), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:47, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:List of battles During the Georgian-Ottoman Wars has been nominated for renaming

Category:List of battles During the Georgian-Ottoman Wars has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 15:14, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I want to do that, I want to change the name but I am blocked. So that's why its not changed. Can you change it? I mean, only one change and nothing else, also thank you for reminding me this. Imakewikipedianpages (talk) 15:32, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Block About me

Hello, I am Imakewikipedianpages‬. I have been blocked by the person that goes by @Ivanvector, and I would like to say Why I don't deserve to be Blocked.

Adding Reasons and References. First of all, I would like to Start with me adding Reasons and References. I have added reasons why I changed something, Like "Kakhetian Uprising (1812)". I typed reasons in "View History". and Also, I have made edits with adding References to them.
Adding useful Wikipedia articles (To people from Georgia (country)). I have been adding Articles that were useful sometimes, (Unfortunately Some of them got Deleted). Like Mongol invasion of Ossetia or Battle of Artaan. These articles were useful for more and had nothing bad to do with it.
Expand of Other Articles. I have expanded Other articles a bit like Caucasian campaign, List of Georgian battles, etc. and Guess what? They were not deleted by anyone. and although I Have made some mistakes, Why do you have to give 1 month Block? That is too much for some little mistakes.

Imakewikipedianpages (talk) 15:29, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Unblock.

Hello, I am Imakewikipedianpages‬. I would like to say Why I don't deserve to be Blocked. (Version 2 because last time I didn't used template)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Imakewikipedianpages (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

1. Adding Reasons and References. First of all, I would like to Start with me adding Reasons and References. I have added reasons why I changed something, Like "Kakhetian Uprising (1812)". I typed reasons in "View History". and Also, I have made edits with adding References to them. 2. Adding useful Wikipedia articles (mostly to people from Georgia (country)). I have been adding Articles that were useful sometimes, (Unfortunately Some of them got Deleted). Like Mongol invasion of Ossetia or Battle of Artaan. These articles were useful for more and had nothing bad to do with it. 3. Expand of Other Articles. I have expanded Other articles a bit like Caucasian campaign, List of Georgian battles, etc. and Guess what? They were not deleted by anyone. and although I Have made some mistakes, I am truly sorry.

Decline reason:

None of this is relevant. Yamla (talk) 18:12, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request for Unblock.

Second Try of Unblocking myself

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Imakewikipedianpages (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

First of all, I would like to say an apology for the stuff I have done. Secondly, In the IP block thingy, It says that I was an aggressive, which I am not. I am just adding stuff that in my opinion are Great for the article, Thirdly I won't do the stuff that was my mistake ever again, If I am making something, I will look after it and think If it is good or not, I have known What I have done Bad and what I did terrible. Fourthly, It was Unfair for Someone to block me because of Small Edits, Small articles or Small mistakes I have done, And lastly, I haven't Used my other Accounts, This is my main account that I Always use. Sure, I have used other accounts sometimes but Thats when my Laptop or My PC isn't on, I use "Andriaofiphone" on My Iphone and "Georgianandria" on my Main phone.

Decline reason:

You can't be unblocked by an ordinary administrator, because the block is based on WP:Checkuser findings. You have to appeal to the WP:ARBCOM. And, in the appeal, you need to explain your connection to users Nugo20299 and Nugoooooo. Vanjagenije (talk) 10:50, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I think what I wrote was a free deletion of my talk page and waste of time. Imakewikipedianpages (talk) 11:38, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What does this have anything to do with your violations of WP:SOCK?!? Are you just deliberately wasting our time again? --Yamla (talk) 12:10, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is this about using other accounts? I am not using other accounts tho? I have only edit4ed once in another account Imakewikipedianpages (talk) 12:46, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edited* Imakewikipedianpages (talk) 12:46, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On the one hand, you say you aren't using other accounts. On the other hand, you say you are using another account. This is a direct contradiction. In any case, you need to modify your unblock request to address this, without contradiction. --Yamla (talk) 13:52, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So what your saying is that I should Edit my own request Imakewikipedianpages (talk) 14:03, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do what you like. I'm done responding to you. --Yamla (talk) 17:52, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Unblock.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Imakewikipedianpages (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Alright, I have seen "Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/NormalguyfromUK" Article And This will be My Last Request for Unblock. In the article, Its said: 1. "Adding Georgianandria, created August 2023. The usual precocious edits, then recreated Battle of Artaan, last created by blocked sock User:Nugoooo (four "o"s). Edited seconds later by Imakewikipedianpages, then Caucasian127, who then moved it to Battle of Artaani. The usual edit overlap, and the usual topic focus"

Well I got an answer Why I did that. So Since mobile Doesn't have that great Editing style like Computer/Laptop Does, Like I can't add add References or Topics, And Because there was no References I knew someone would see it and then they would make it into a Draft. PLUS I didn't wanted to Restart the Article that was Started In Mobile. So Thats only the first.

2. "Going down the rabbithole... adding Imakewikipedianpages and blocked User:Nugo20299. Imakewikipedianpages was created 29 August, and submitted Draft:Battle of Akhalkalaki (1918) at AfC on 19 Oct [3] and added a ton of copyvio to same draft, four days after draft creator User:Nugo20299 was blocked. Very similar topic focus to User:Nugo20299 and previous socks, and edit overlap with Nugoooooo (that's six "o"s). Requesting CU."

I don't Really know What I have to say about it, I didn't know if someone wanted that article as a Draft, Also I forgot to add more references (which I have now) So thats why it got declined (Probably).

3. "Adding AndriaOfIphone, created 8 Oct. Four minutes after account creation, went straight into Draft:Byzantine's Cede of Ani to Georgia, running into 9 Oct: [4] (created by Imakewikipedianpages), then one more edit to List of Georgian battles, shortly after Imakewikipedianpages: [5]" So basically As I said, mobile Doesn't have that great Editing style like Computer/Laptop Does.

Decline reason:

You have already been told that your only pathway forward is appealing to WP:ARBCOM. 331dot (talk) 14:56, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Delete my Talk page if you want to, But I am done Requesting for Unblocks Imakewikipedianpages (talk) 14:15, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Unblock.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Imakewikipedianpages (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My name is Imakewikipedianpages (not my real name), and I am reaching out to request the reconsideration of my ban from editing on Wikipedia. I understand the importance of the Arbitration Committee's role in maintaining the integrity of Wikipedia, and I appreciate the opportunity to present my case.

I became aware of my ban from the advice of two administrators referencing the "Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee" article. Although I am uncertain about the specific reasons behind my ban, I wish to address the situation and provide context to seek a resolution.

To be candid, my enthusiasm for contributing to Wikipedia has waned over time, leading to my disinterest in active participation. Consequently, I find myself in a position where I am unsure why I am requesting an unblock. However, I acknowledge the significance of abiding by Wikipedia's policies and respect the decisions made by the Arbitration Committee.

I want to emphasize that I have decided to step away from Wikipedia editing. Therefore, I no longer consider it a focal point of my online activity. I recognize the importance of maintaining a peaceful and respectful editing environment and assure you that if my editing privileges are reinstated, I will approach any contributions with greater care and restraint.

Moreover, I commit to not engaging in any aggressive or disruptive editing behavior. I fully understand and respect the guidelines set by Wikipedia and the severity of the consequences for violating these standards. I also affirm that I will not use alternative accounts to bypass any restrictions or to edit in any manner that goes against Wikipedia's principles.

I sincerely apologize for any disturbances or disruptions I may have caused during my time as an editor. I greatly value the work of the Wikipedia community and the efforts taken by the Arbitration Committee to maintain a high standard of content and conduct.

Thank you for taking the time to consider my appeal. I am open to any guidance or conditions for reinstatement that the Committee deems necessary.

Respectfully,

Decline reason:

Chatbot generated unblock requests are not considered. GPTZero score: 91%. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 22:19, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Imakewikipedianpages (talk) 21:02, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Unblock.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Imakewikipedianpages (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello Admins. I am sorry for Disrupting you all (For sending 3 "Request for Unblock"). I am not an expert or a "great wikipedia page maker" or user, But I want you to understand that I created those accounts for Different devices. ALSO I didn't even know who Nugo20299 was and I am Definitely not sockpuppet account of him, as I know he made those accounts because of blocks He was getting (I texted him because I was told to, as I remember he said he had 2 or 3 accounts and that nugooo and some other accounts aren't him), Also I am sorry if I have done anything wrong. If I'll get Unblocked, I would be very thankful, I promise you that I Will not be bad person in wikipedia who will ruin the whole app just for fun, Goodbye. Imakewikipedianpages (talk) 20:55, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please appeal to ArbComm as you have been instructed to do. at least I think so doesn't cut it. Star Mississippi 01:55, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Did you appeal to ArbCom? 331dot (talk) 12:40, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

you mean the Arbitration committee Imakewikipedianpages (talk) 18:13, 24 December (UTC)

if so, then yes. atleast I think so. Imakewikipedianpages (talk) 18:16, 24 December (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Indenpendence Of Georgia (1918)

Hello, Imakewikipedianpages. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Indenpendence Of Georgia (1918), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:06, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Unblock.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Imakewikipedianpages (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Firstly, the only article I'm focused on is List of Georgian battles which is NOT sourced at all. in the past those Georgian "defeats" were actually Georgian victories with an actual source (They made articles about the battles unlike now). So if you will let me be unbanned I'll fix that problem. Secondly I don't know who Nugo is and I don't know why you're making me , I don't know what he did in Wikipedia but that really isn't my problem because my account was made before his (probably) and I made more articles than he ever did. Thirdly I made much mistakes In the past But I understand Wikipedia and its use. also about Nugo, He would've left Wikipedia probably because if this was his alternative/other account, he would've use this template on his main. I Promise I won't do some mistake ever again which I did in the past. Thank you for Reading this and I would be more thankful if you unbanned me :)Imakewikipedianpages (talk) 19:55, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As you were told in November, your only pathway of appeal is ArbCom. If you did and they turned you down, there is nothing more we can do for you. 331dot (talk) 23:10, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Concern regarding Draft:Byzantine's Cede of Ani to Georgia

Hello, Imakewikipedianpages. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Byzantine's Cede of Ani to Georgia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:10, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Akhaltsikhe (1918)

Hello, Imakewikipedianpages. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Akhaltsikhe (1918), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:06, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Defense of Dariali (1918)

Hello, Imakewikipedianpages. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Defense of Dariali (1918), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:06, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Byzantine's Cede of Ani to Georgia

Hello, Imakewikipedianpages. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Byzantine's Cede of Ani to Georgia".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:23, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Battle of Akhaltsikhe (1918)

Hello, Imakewikipedianpages. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Battle of Akhaltsikhe".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:14, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]