User talk:Huyandrew99

January 2016

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Can-Am Duel, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. United States Man (talk) 20:17, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Joe Gibbs Racing has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Joe Gibbs Racing was changed by Huyandrew99 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.855306 on 2016-02-01T00:05:16+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:05, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Cat and the Fiddle (Batman Episode)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on The Cat and the Fiddle (Batman Episode) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Insert CleverPhrase Here 00:07, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Live with Regis and Kelly (season 16)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Live with Regis and Kelly (season 16) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 06:40, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Live with Regis and Kelly (season 16)

Hello Huyandrew99,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Live with Regis and Kelly (season 16) for deletion, because it doesn't seem to have any encyclopedic content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 00:05, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Cat and the Fiddle (Batman Episode)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on The Cat and the Fiddle (Batman Episode) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wgolf (talk) 01:21, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to He Meets His Match, The Grisly Ghoul have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 11:42, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Yintan. I noticed that in this edit to Team Penske, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Yintan 19:29, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:1204140-julesdejongh.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:1204140-julesdejongh.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:32, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RAV4 trivia

Hi! Regarding your recent changes to the Toyota RAV4 article. The guide WP:CARTRIVIA discourages adding trivia like TV show appearances unless it had a tangible effect on the RAV4's design, reputation or sales. However, if you disagree and think that it is worthy, another guide WP:BRD suggests that we talk about it on the article's talk page (talk:Toyota RAV4) instead of just reverting each other (also called WP:edit warring). If we still disagree then there are further steps to escalate it up but we can start with these steps. Stepho talk 03:42, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been warned about this before. If you disagree, discuss the issue on the articles' talk pages. If you continue without discussing it first, you will be blocked from editing. - SummerPhD^v2.0 14:39, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Batman: Arkham. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SummerPhD^v2.0 14:43, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to List of The Electric Company (2009 TV series) episodes. Donner60 (talk) 02:24, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Capital letters. Every word of a sentence should not be capitalized. Helpful information about editing Wikipedia can be found on various Wikipedia guideline and policy pages including: Getting started; Introduction to Wikipedia; Wikipedia:Simplified ruleset; Wikipedia:Simplified Manual of Style; Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources; Help:Footnotes; Wikipedia:Verifiability; Wikipedia:No original research; Wikipedia:Neutral point of view; Wikipedia:Notability; Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons; Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not; Wikipedia:Words to watch; Help:Introduction to talk pages; Wikipedia:Copyright Problems and Help:Contents. Thank you. Donner60 (talk)

Also, please note that you have been warned more than once not to add the type of information (trivia; no real notability) to articles more than once already, which is the reason your warning level is where it is. Donner60 (talk) 02:29, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:1204140-julesdejongh.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:1204140-julesdejongh.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. SummerPhD^v2.0 03:01, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Please stop making disruptive edits.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. You've been warned before for disruptive editing to NASCAR articles. You're at risk of a ban if you continue adding the same false information. Nascar king 13:41, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Hello, I'm Jusdafax. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Hendrick Motorsports— because it did not appear constructive. However, on further review it appears instead of deleting material, you were working on the article. I would like to strongly recommend that you use edit summaries when you are in the process of moving material. Had you done so, I would not have reverted. Thanks. Jus da fax 02:40, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Live! with Regis and Kelly (season 16)

Hi! I moved your article to the WP:draft namespace: Draft:Live! with Regis and Kelly (season 16) (rather then deleting it). The list is empty, so there is no point for it to stay in the main namespace. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:11, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links

I have reverted your edit at Jennifer Berry as per WP:LINKNO: "one should generally avoid providing external links to social networking sites." Please read this content guideline before reverting me again. --- PageantUpdater (talk) 03:49, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please explain why you reverted my edits without further discussion in contravention of guidelines? --- PageantUpdater (talk) 03:54, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jennifer Berry. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. MarnetteD|Talk 23:12, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

- @Huyandrew99: As has been pointed out to you multiple times, adding facebook, instagram, twitter links etc is in contravention of the WP:ELNO guideline. Please read the guideline and stop adding social media links to Jennifer Berry --- PageantUpdater (talk) 01:59, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced material

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Miss New Jersey. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --- PageantUpdater (talk) 02:39, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles such as Miss New Jersey or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --- PageantUpdater (talk) 01:16, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Editing while logged out

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. --- PageantUpdater (talk) 05:53, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at List of Daytona 500 broadcasters.

Your recent editing history at List of Daytona 500 broadcasters shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Zappa 24 Mati 00:13, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notification

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --- PageantUpdater (talk) 00:38, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 01:05, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Toy Story Toons, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Carniolus (talk) 08:02, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at 2018 Monster Energy NASCAR Cup Series, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Zappa 24 Mati 21:20, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to 2018 Monster Energy NASCAR Cup Series. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Zappa 24 Mati 21:39, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at 2018 Monster Energy NASCAR Cup Series. Zappa 24 Mati 21:47, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:09, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Thomas & Friends 500 at Talladega.png

Thanks for uploading File:Thomas & Friends 500 at Talladega.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 05:45, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Alabama 500 (fall), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Zappa 24 Mati 03:23, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Alabama 500 (fall).

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Zappa 24 Mati 00:56, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Laura Kaeppeler.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Laura Kaeppeler.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 04:46, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 2018 Monster Energy NASCAR Cup Series. Zappa 24 Mati 02:44, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 21:13, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Huyandrew99. Zappa ⚡Mati 03:46, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Mjroots (talk) 18:30, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Huyandrew99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #19211 was submitted on Sep 12, 2017 02:51:17. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 02:51, 12 September 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Huyandrew99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #19237 was submitted on Sep 14, 2017 22:23:57. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 22:23, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Live! with Regis and Kelly (season 16)

Hello, Huyandrew99. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Live! with Regis and Kelly".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 14:10, 23 September 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Huyandrew99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #19868 was submitted on Nov 28, 2017 06:18:33. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 06:18, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Huyandrew99/Lindsey Giannini

Hello, Huyandrew99. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lindsey Giannini".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 13:13, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]