User talk:Hubdb39

Welcome!

Hi Hubdb39! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Philroc (talk) 12:37, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gill Stegall (October 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TipsyElephant was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please provide multiple independent and reliable secondary sources that discuss Gill Stegall in some depth before resubmitting the draft.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gill Stegall and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gill Stegall, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TipsyElephant (talk) 15:02, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hubdb39! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TipsyElephant (talk) 15:02, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gill Stegall (November 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gill Stegall and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gill Stegall, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 08:40, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Carl Allison

added a link pointing to Scout

Harding Bisons football

added a link pointing to Kurt Adams

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Tank-400x620.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Tank-400x620.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:30, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Johnprock.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Johnprock.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:31, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Joe Bailey Metcalf.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Joe Bailey Metcalf.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:31, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Tank-400x620.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Tank-400x620.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 00:19, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Johnprock.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Johnprock.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 00:22, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Larry Richmond

The article Larry Richmond has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Could you add sources? It seems like the topic is not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Leomk (Don't shout here, Shout here!) 02:43, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Two references added, looking for more.

Your thread has been archived

Hi Hubdb39! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, My Gill Stegall article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

Click this link to read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, you can create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of W.T. Henry

Hello, Hubdb39

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Dan arndt, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, W.T. Henry, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Dan arndt}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dan arndt (talk) 17:08, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tank-400x620.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tank-400x620.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:52, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tips when creating/expanding articles

Hi Hubdb39. I have a few tips for when you create or expand articles: (1) at the end of the prose content, a reference section should be added, which can be placed with the following code:

==References==
{{Reflist}}

(2) At the end of each paragraph, and sometimes within one, a citation should be added (add immediately following the period, leaving no space); each quote must have a citation following it. (3) After citing the sources using <ref> </ref>, to avoid bare URLs, you may wish to fill them using reFill or manually by {{Cite web|url=|title=|website=|date=|author=}} (more at Template:Cite web). (4) Categories should be added at the very bottom of the page by adding [[Category:category name]]. You can also add them with the tool HotCat. You can come to me or the teahouse if you have any questions. BTW your article on Lane College Dragons football I believe should be named Lane Dragons football. You can change the title by: copying all the content of the article you made, pasting it in the redirect "Lane Dragons football", and then redirecting "Lane College Dragons football" to that page by replacing everything with "#REDIRECT [[Lane Dragons football]]". BeanieFan11 (talk) 19:09, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Harding Bisons dormant football years of 1932–1958 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Harding Bisons dormant football years of 1932–1958, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Right now, there is not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to show notability. All sources are primary. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:34, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hubdb39 here: Why are you questioning sources coming directly from the yearbook annuals of the university? It's from 80 to 90 years ago from small town Arkansas. I doubt the New York Times is going to weight in. It's absolutely verified with suitable sources, as is.

Proposed deletion of Josh Jones (American football coach)

The article Josh Jones (American football coach) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG, WP:GRIDIRON or WP:COLLATH.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:27, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Josh Jones (American football coach) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Josh Jones (American football coach) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josh Jones (American football coach) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:43, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Harding Bisons dormant football years of 1932–1958

Hello, Hubdb39. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Harding Bisons dormant football years of 1932–1958, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Harding Bisons dormant football years of 1932–1958

Hello, Hubdb39. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Harding Bisons dormant football years of 1932–1958".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:51, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tray Scott moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tray Scott, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:39, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Tray Scott

Hello, Hubdb39. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tray Scott, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Harding seasons

Hi I created 2023 Harding Bisons football team today. It still needs work adding sourcing to independent, reliable sources. Any help you care to offer would be appreciaed. Cbl62 (talk) 05:55, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On a related point, I noticed the article you created in 2021 on the 1926 Harding Bisons football team. The artice lacks any independent sourcing with WP:SIGCOV about the team. (The school's yearbooks do not qualify as WP:INDEPENDENT. If you can find any SIGCOV, it needs to be added to the article. Absent such coverage, the article may be deleted.) Cbl62 (talk) 05:58, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Many universities have entries from a century ago with their school yearbooks. It's two years old. It's fine. Hubdb39 (talk) 20:04, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
the 1926 season thread has been deleted already anyway Hubdb39 (talk) 20:07, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Well, not deleted... The reason for it being called "1926 Harding Bisons football team" is that the "coach" was a junior player, Clyde Matthews. They didn't have an actual hired coach, so he was the player-coach. Hubdb39 (talk) 02:15, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Congrats on your team advancing to the championship game. However, the fact that there are other deficient articles is no excuse. If SIGCOV from reliable independent sources cannot be found and added, 1926 Harding Bisons football team is likely to be sent to AfD and deleted. Cbl62 (talk) 02:32, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Love it! Hubdb39 (talk) 20:02, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Buck Arnold moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Buck Arnold, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 01:17, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just started it an hour ago. I'm still working on it. Hubdb39 (talk) 01:22, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Buck Arnold

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Buck Arnold requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Instant History (talk) 04:07, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Buck Arnold

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Buck Arnold, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 15:17, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why? I had just started the article and someone came in saying "you didn't cite references." Duh, I was just starting, and then someone last night waited until I had finished the entire article, with about 4 or 5 references, and deleted it.

??? Hubdb39 (talk) 15:25, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hubdb39, articles in mainspace are expected to at a certain level of presentability and completion within an hour in order to avoid maintenance tagging or deletion. I can see a draft version of the article was created yesterday at Draft:Buck Arnold; you can use that page to work on for as long as you need, then publish it to mainspace when ready. Let me know if you have any questions. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 15:31, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

90% of what I wrote is gone on it! Where is it? Hubdb39 (talk) 15:35, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I need what I wrote back at least. Text, the schedule from 1930 I put up, etc.

This was a coach from the 1920's and 1930's. Same type of brief article on any coach from any program 100 years ago. It's historical, and it had cited references. Hubdb39 (talk) 15:34, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pinging Bbb23, the deleting administrator, here for your benefit. Bbb23, would you mind restoring the requested content to draft space for this user to work on? —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 15:37, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Why would they do that? I messaged the person back saying "I'm working on it. And there are cited references." They deleted it anyway

I've been contributing for about 3 or 4 years now... I have a minor in journalism, I don't publish garbage Hubdb39 (talk) 15:40, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The user has made such a mess of the article and draft post-deletion, I'm having trouble restoring it to draft space. Maybe find someone else who's willing to restore the draft. BTW, the user needs to get a grip. Their conduct is decidedly suboptimal.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:45, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've restored the draft. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 15:47, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Where is it located? Hubdb39 (talk) 15:53, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Buck Arnold. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 15:57, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Hubdb39 (talk) 16:02, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1972 Harding Bisons football team moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 1972 Harding Bisons football team. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 17:29, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I've added some citations on top of the ones that were already there. It's newsworthy in that 1972 team was the very first conference championship for the entire history of the program, a program that actually won the national championship this past year. I certainly don't plan on doing new links to every year, although many college have that. Thanks again. Hubdb39 (talk) 09:59, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1972 Harding Bisons football team (October 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I would agree with the reasoning of the user who moved this to draft. It needs significant coverage which is not present in the draft. Fails WP:NSEASONS.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:1972 Harding Bisons football team and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 20:25, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Buck Arnold (October 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Buck Arnold and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 16:20, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]