User talk:Historicallibrarian

October 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please stop removing maintenance templates from articles. They are there for a reason, and should not be removed until the issues they highlight have been properly addressed. You can discuss those issues on the talk pages of the articles concerned. DuncanHill (talk) 11:05, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sergei Prokofiev. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —CurryTime7-24 (talk) 05:43, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why in your opinion do they 'appear' to constitute vandalism? Is it because they don't agree with what you have decreed? Historicallibrarian (talk) 15:12, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dr., NPOV tags and SPI

Hi, just wanted to let you know that Dr. generally isn't used, per MOS:DOC, and NPOV tags require a corresponding explanation on the talk page. As such, I've reverted those edits. Also, I'm not sure if you're aware, but you are mentioned in a sockpuppetry case at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AndresHerutJaim, in case you want to chime in. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 14:43, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I came here to say the same thing about the titles of doctor and professor, which I saw you had added to the lead for a couple of articles - I have reverted this. Best wishes, Tacyarg (talk) 15:41, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have only added the prefix 'Dr' when its clear through the body of the text and attached citations that the subject has a medical degree or a PhD. Historicallibrarian (talk) 23:01, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Thanks for contributing to the article Priory Group. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 09:16, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Historicallibrarian! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Tacyarg (talk) 15:43, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Miriam Adelson, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please see MOS:DOCTOR. Peaceray (talk) 16:56, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Alhambra, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. R Prazeres (talk) 15:56, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I apologise for not stating my reasons for the edit, especially if you have originated the article or contributed to it constructively since. I have provided my reasons now. Thankyou. Historicallibrarian (talk) 16:15, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bengalis. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ekdalian (talk) 05:09, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sweets from the Indian subcontinent, you may be blocked from editing.

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Template:Antisemitism sidebar. Thank you. RolandR (talk) 02:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your edit. I thought it wise to simply remove the whole section on those people who could be considered controversial. Many of those left on the list are still living and you were wise to point this out. This subject is obviously of great interest to both of us! Thanks. Historicallibrarian (talk) 20:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]