User talk:HenryCrun15

Archives

Happy holidays, fellow WP:Webcomics editor ^_^

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021!

Hello HenryCrun15, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021.
Happy editing,
~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 10:19, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

@Maplestrip: Thank you very much for the wonderful message, and I will keep seeing you around this wonderful project. HenryCrun15 (talk) 06:06, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Nimona

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nimona you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Whiteguru -- Whiteguru (talk) 10:41, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Nimona

The article Nimona you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Nimona for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Whiteguru -- Whiteguru (talk) 08:01, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping out at peer review!

		The Peer Review Barnstar
		For your considered review of Resolute desk --Tom (LT) (talk) 09:51, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tom (LT) (talk) 09:51, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HenryCrun15 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is 168.149.128.0/18 . This is the IP for my place of employment; I sometimes edit articles in spare moments. I have tried hotspotting from my phone's mobile data without success. It would be great to be able to continue working on articles while at my desk. HenryCrun15 (talk) 01:03, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed proxy, rather than your place of employment. Please disable your symantec proxy if you wish to edit here. Yamla (talk) 10:33, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proposed deletion of Johnny Bullet

The article Johnny Bullet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to pass WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:45, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Fantome-Stein

Hello, HenryCrun15,

Thank you for creating Fantome-Stein.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

We need more references, the first two references are primary, so the article is at risk of deletion. So what we need here includes reliable published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, magazine articles, books, television documentaries, websites, and published reports by consumer watchdog organizations. Big list, yes, but notability is important. Thank you.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 05:33, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Hiveworks Comics

Hello, HenryCrun15,

Thank you for creating Hiveworks Comics.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

These references do not present reliable information. What is needed includes reliable published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, magazine articles, books, television documentaries, websites, and published reports by consumer watchdog organizations. Thank you.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 05:38, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi HenryCrun15, I'm SiberianCat, former purveyor of feline foods to Minnie Bannister. I've added some details and references to your Hiveworks Comics page. I'm having trouble getting my head around the page reviewer's assertion that the page needs "published works in all forms" such as "published reports by consumer watchdog organizations" in order to be deemed reliably sourced. I hope the page isn't deleted. SiberianCat (talk) 04:42, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @SiberianCat:, and pleased to see another goon about. Sorry for not replying sooner. It looks like the Hiveworks page has held on and not been deleted - yet, and your edits have much improved it. HenryCrun15 (talk) 07:03, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Could I interest you in a peer review?

Hi there! You did such a fantastic job peer reviewing Resolute desk, I thought you might be interested in reviewing my next Oval Office desk article, Theodore Roosevelt desk. The review page can be found here. If it isn't right for you, no worries, I just appreciated your last review so much I thought I would reach out!--Found5dollar (talk) 19:41, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Found5dollar:, thanks for the compliment! I can do this review but it might be a week or two until I can get to it, if that is okay? HenryCrun15 (talk) 09:21, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

HenryCrun15, feel free to take your time! I appreciate whatever you are willing to do.--Found5dollar (talk) 19:08, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tour Aotearoa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ninety Mile Beach.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Let's Play (webcomic), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Game developer.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tour Aotearoa - core description order

Hi HenryCrun15, thanks for working on the Tour Aotearoa page. I'm a novice Wiki editor so need all the help I can get. I'm also - and this is a little awkward - one of the people who created the route and the "event".

I'd like to suggest that the route is more significant than the event and should be the core of the article. I also acknowledge that the event garners more mainstream media attention than the route so is more prominent on standard websites - hence your comment about "most sources". I can see I should have started the article with a lot more detail than I did - my bad.

Riding the length of New Zealand has always been the ultimate tour for those wanting to experience New Zealand, by any means of transport, since the roads made it possible. Usually this would involve a lot of Highway 1 - which these days is a terrible idea for a person on a bicycle. But by 2012 the New Zealand Cycle Trail had created 22 Great Rides that provide safe riding away from motor traffic. So in late 2012 the Kennett Brothers published a guidebook Classic New Zealand Cycle Trails (ISBN 9780986464126) to the 22 existing Great rides plus 24 "heartland rides" on quiet back-country roads to connect the Great Rides together. At the end of that book (pg 266-268) we strung together Great Rides and heartland rides to create "The ultimate New Zealand ride" from Cape Reinga to Bluff.

We're now on the 4th edition of Classic New Zealand Cycle Trails and it has sold almost 21,000 copies. With each edition the Tour Aotearoa route has been updated and refined. We also publish a route guide Tour Aotearoa Official Guide (ISBN 9780994118967), (4 editions and 600 copies sold since 2016) and a coffee table book Tour Aotearoa - New Zealand's 3000 km bikepacking Odyssey (ISBN 9780994118981). All of these exist outside the scope of the event.

Our (purely anecdotal, sadly) understanding is that more people ride the route outside the event than during it. This understanding comes from our book sales and talking to cafe owners along the route.

Also - leading the article with the event may lead to a misunderstanding in the reader. Typically, when a naive reader thinks of "cycling event" they might think Tour de France, or if they live in New Zealand they might think Lake Taupo Cycle Challenge. Certainly they're likely to blur the distinction between event and race. As the organisers of the event we work quite hard to disabuse people of that natural bias.

For example, the Tour Aotearoa brevet event:

has no entry fee
has no prizes for completing the ride
we don't start people off at Cape Reinga - they just go at the agreed time
there's no-one at the finish to greet those who have completed it
there's no support service provided along the way (by the organisers)
there's no penalty for taking "too long"
you can stop and start wherever you choose
you can leave the route where-ever and when-ever you want
there's no penalty for taking short cuts

What we do is define the route and set some start times (that are dependent on low tide at 90 Mile beach). It's the most un-event-like event we could devise.

And here's the kicker; we created the event to trick people into having their own ultimate New Zealand cycle tour/bikepacking odyssey. It's our trojan horse for the route.

Also, the route is one of the bikepacking rides included under the umbrella of the Ngā Haerenga The New Zealand Cycle Trail Inc. https://www.nzcycletrail.com/find-your-ride/bikepacking/popular-bikepacking-routes/tour-aotearoa/

Would it be OK to switch the article focus back to the route instead of the event?

Cheers, Paul

Paul Kennett (talk) 02:30, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Kennett: Hi Paul and thanks for your message. Sorry it's taken me a while to get back to you.

When I researched Tour Aotearoa to add to this article, all the independent sources that I found reported on "Tour Aotearoa" as an event, and either noted secondarily that it was a route that could be ridden any time, or didn't mention this at all. This is why, when I edited the article, I described "Tour Aotearoa" as an event first and route second.

I do acknowledge that Tour Aotearoa is described as a route in works like Classic New Zealand Cycle Trails, but these are not independent sources; they are written by the creators of the route and event. Wikipedia focuses on secondary sources; in this case I am trying to determine what people are most often referring to when they say "Tour Aotearoa", rather than what its creators would like people to mean.

I think that if the focus of the article is to be the route, 0not the event, then we would need to find and add more reliable, independent sources that use the name to primarily refer to the route. I acknowledge that, since the route creators are also the main experts on guides to cycling in New Zealand, this is a bit difficult, but if the route is commonly used then I would expect it to be covered in independent sources. If you know of any, feel free to add them to the article or to mention them here or on the article's talk page. Thanks for everything, HenryCrun15 (talk) 22:15, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: SubZero (webcomic) has been accepted

SubZero (webcomic), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Bilorv (talk) 15:28, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Let's Play (webcomic) (July 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by M-Mustapha was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Let's Play (webcomic) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Let's Play (webcomic), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Living love ^talk 17:34, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HenryCrun15! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! The Living love ^talk 17:34, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bluechair (July 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tamingimpala was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bluechair and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bluechair, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tame (talk) 09:23, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: UnOrdinary (July 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tamingimpala was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:UnOrdinary and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:UnOrdinary, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tame (talk) 10:25, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Scurry (webcomic) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Scurry (webcomic), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). Right now it only has a single review (interviews are primary sources, and are not used to show notability). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:37, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 07:39:59, 3 September 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Gunlomboy

Gunlomboy (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Robyn Mudie (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I am happy to add more references, but I'm wondering why there is a need when looking at other entries for the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Australian_women_ambassadors page. Many of the entries on there are virtually empty but have active entries. I used some of these pages as a model/example for this entry. Do newspaper articles count as valid references?

Gunlomboy (talk) 07:39, 3 September 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Hi Gunlomboy. All articles on Wikipedia need to be about notable subjects, and in general Wikipedia's test for notability is that it has received significant coverage by reliable sources independent of the subject. The article can include other sources, so citing a press release from the Australian government in the article is fine, but it doesn't help to demonstrate notability. And yes, newspaper articles are valid references, and substantial news articles on a subject is a good way to show that the subject is notable. Thanks for your work, HenryCrun15 (talk) 08:39, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Demon (comics) up for DYK

Just to let you know, I did a 12× expansion of Demon (comics), which you created a while ago as a requested article. I've nominated it for DYK at Template:Did you know nominations/Demon (comics). Feel free to check over the article or make DYK suggestions. BTW, let me know if you have an idea of who made the article request. I tried checking back but it looks like a couple different request lists were merged... maybe I'll figure it out later. Cheers! – Reidgreg (talk) 17:03, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Brooke van Velden birth date

Not sure if it is independent research as no direct article with birth date but Facebook announcement here [1] and bought house may this year age 28 [2] ShakyIsles (talk) 07:39, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Demon (comics)

On 7 November 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Demon (comics), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the original release of Jason Shiga's comic Demon included a four-page issue, a sixty-page issue, and an issue in which all the panels were black? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Demon (comics). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Demon (comics)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Julie Brougham

On 14 December 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Julie Brougham, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 01:05, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Scurry (webcomic)

Hello, HenryCrun15. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Scurry (webcomic), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"in George Street"

That was actually in the article from the original expander, the one who put it on PR in June after they were done with it. I left it in because I thought it might be some peculiarly Australian usage, much as British English (at least) describes people as living "in" an island rather than "on" one, which to most people outside the UK (or at least in North America) seems only to be accurate for James Bond movie villains.

I will change it ... just thought I'd let you know why it was in there. Daniel Case (talk) 18:45, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, "roughly six storeys" reflects that the wing is hardly a regularly rectilinear building. But, you are right. Daniel Case (talk) 19:52, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the "see accompanying images", per WP:OI that's not original research. Ideally we would not have to cite passages that refer to accompanying images, but I've been through enough reviews where, even after pointing that out, the reviewer said they were still more comfortable with some sort of footnote, so we agreed on that as a compromise. (Really, you need to have an explicit exemption to the citation requirement for their absence to be accepted, such as plot summaries or, when there is consensus it isn't necessary, the intro. And I've done that ever since.

As for Google Maps Street View, I view basing descriptions on it as essentially covered by WP:TRANSCRIPTION as long as they are purely descriptive and can be verified by anyone looking at the image. We have always allowed externally published images as sources subject to the usual vetting for reliability, and I have never heard anyone raise any question as to that with Google ... frankly their images are probably among the most reliable. Daniel Case (talk) 19:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AFC Helper News

Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.

AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Allie Brosh

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Allie Brosh you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of An anonymous username, not my real name -- An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 22:01, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Allie Brosh

The article Allie Brosh you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Allie Brosh for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of An anonymous username, not my real name -- An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 03:21, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Allie Brosh

The article Allie Brosh you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Allie Brosh for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of An anonymous username, not my real name -- An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 18:21, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Invisible Barnstar
		For reviewing at least 3 points worth of articles during the January 2022 GAN Backlog Drive, I hereby present you with this barnstar in my capacity as coordinator. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 03:37, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Goblins (webcomic) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Goblins (webcomic), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goblins (webcomic) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hiveworks Comics

The article Hiveworks Comics has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

All promotional, tangential mentions in listicles, or primary sources. Doubly tagged for notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:57, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hiveworks Comics for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hiveworks Comics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hiveworks Comics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:32, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Chester Borrows

On 27 February 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Chester Borrows, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Thryduulf (talk) 21:37, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Jim Allen (artist)

On 16 June 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Jim Allen (artist), which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Anarchyte (talk) 15:19, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Takutai Moana Kemp

On 11 January 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Takutai Moana Kemp, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a third of the MPs elected in the 2023 New Zealand election were new to Parliament, including Carlos Cheung, Grant McCallum, Suze Redmayne, Dana Kirkpatrick, Ryan Hamilton, James Meager, Greg Fleming, Vanessa Weenink, Mike Butterick, Katie Nimon, David MacLeod, Miles Anderson, Carl Bates, Rima Nakhle, Nancy Lu, Cushla Tangaere-Manuel, Reuben Davidson, Scott Willis, Darleen Tana, Takutai Moana Kemp (all pictured), Kahurangi Carter, Todd Stephenson, Laura Trask, Cameron Luxton, Tākuta Ferris, Mariameno Kapa-Kingi, Casey Costello, Jamie Arbuckle, and Tanya Unkovich? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Vanessa Weenink. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Takutai Moana Kemp), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Schwede 66 00:21, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Nancy Lu

On 11 January 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Nancy Lu, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a third of the MPs elected in the 2023 New Zealand election were new to Parliament, including Carlos Cheung, Grant McCallum, Suze Redmayne, Dana Kirkpatrick, Ryan Hamilton, James Meager, Greg Fleming, Vanessa Weenink, Mike Butterick, Katie Nimon, David MacLeod, Miles Anderson, Carl Bates, Rima Nakhle, Nancy Lu, Cushla Tangaere-Manuel, Reuben Davidson, Scott Willis, Darleen Tana, Takutai Moana Kemp (all pictured), Kahurangi Carter, Todd Stephenson, Laura Trask, Cameron Luxton, Tākuta Ferris, Mariameno Kapa-Kingi, Casey Costello, Jamie Arbuckle, and Tanya Unkovich? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Vanessa Weenink. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Nancy Lu), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Schwede 66 00:22, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]