User talk:Hehdisk

Romi Brown moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Romi Brown, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:35, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sofia Nair moved to draftspace

Thanks for creating Sofia Nair. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:44, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sofia Nair (November 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sofia Nair and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 15:17, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hehdisk! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 15:17, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sofia Nair (November 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Insufficiently referenced (Fandom.com is not an acceptable source). No evidence of notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sofia Nair and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:55, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sofia Nair (November 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I don't know how reliable and independent the source (Gymternet) is, but a single source isn't enough to establish notability by WP:GNG. Meanwhile, there is nothing in this short draft to suggest that the person has achievements which would make them notable per WP:ATHLETE, either. Merely existing, and taking part in a sport, is not enough to warrant inclusion in a global encyclopaedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sofia Nair and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:02, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sofia Nair

The article Sofia Nair has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:NGYMNAST. Searches indicate she's not ranked highly in gymnastics and does not have another claim to notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:00, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve List of Current Rhythmic Gymnasts

Hello, Hehdisk,

Thank you for creating List of Current Rhythmic Gymnasts.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Meatsgains}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains^(talk) 22:31, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Hello, I'm RPI2026F1. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2023—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. RPI2026F1 (talk) 13:38, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Container categories

Container categories, such as category:Sportspeople, are for grouping subcategories. You should not place individual articles in them.-gadfium 21:36, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded. Adding Category:Athletes is doubly problematic, as that category should never be used, per the note at the top of the page. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:06, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info Hehdisk (talk) 18:35, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hehdisk, I think you're moving too fast with your category work. Could you focus on other types of edits while you familiarize yourself with the categorization policy? I'm hoping when you read it, you'll see at least two problems with your creation of Category:Sports Competitors and addition of it to many articles. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:52, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will read the policy and see what I can do to improve the category. I will also focus on other edits in the mean time Hehdisk (talk) 16:01, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hehdisk, since you've begun categorizing articles again, you have been making the same mistake as before. Articles belong in the most specific categories applicable. As an example, Evan Bates does not belong in Category:Sports competitors because he's already in a more specific category, Category:American male ice dancers.

You can click through narrower and narrower categories to get from the first to the second. It goes Sports competitors > Sports competitors by sport > Figure skaters > Figure skaters by nationality > American figure skaters > American male figure skaters > American male ice dancers, where we find Bates properly categorized.

Properly placing pages in the most specific category like this is a vital part of categorization work. Placing articles in overly broad categories like you did is unhelpful, as Bates is now in Sports competitors twice. I was hopeful that reading WP:CAT and asking questions would be a path to productive category work for you. So far that does not seem to have worked. Are you sure you would like to continue categorization work, and if so, do you have any ideas about how you can improve your understanding of the policy? Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 03:19, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the info

Category:Events in 2023 has been nominated for deletion

Category:Events in 2023 has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 04:33, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding it to articles. See above for the reasons. Kante4 (talk) 18:03, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sports Competitor has been nominated for deletion

Category:Sports Competitor has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:13, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Sports Competitor

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Category:Sports Competitor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 December 21#Category:Sports Competitor. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:21, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hehdisk,

This category was deleted after a CFD discussion. Please do not recreate it as it will just be deleted through speedy deletion, CSD G4.

If you have questions about Wikipedia's deletion processes, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:24, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Montenegrin rhythmic gymnasts

A tag has been placed on Category:Montenegrin rhythmic gymnasts indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:20, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of current rhythmic gymnasts

Hello, Hehdisk. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of current rhythmic gymnasts, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of current rhythmic gymnasts

Hello, Hehdisk. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of current rhythmic gymnasts".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:40, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]