User talk:HearbreakingSuperman

Welcome!

Hello, HearbreakingSuperman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

If you are interested in Germany-related themes, you may want to check out the Germany Portal and WikiProject Germany, particularly the New article announcements and the German-speaking Wikipedians' notice board. You may even want to add these boards to your watchlist.

Again, welcome! Orchastrattor (talk) 16:04, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

ITN recognition for Issam Abdallah

On 18 October 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Issam Abdallah, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 02:38, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of European Gospel Radio

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on European Gospel Radio requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fram (talk) 09:52, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nature Conservation Youth moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Nature Conservation Youth. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Annh07 (talk) 11:03, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Fischer (politican) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Anna Fischer (politican). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:36, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Anna Fischer (politican) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Anna Fischer (politican). Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:38, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Issam Abdallah for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Issam Abdallah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Issam Abdallah until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

An anonymous username, not my real name 14:56, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lukas Schön moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Lukas Schön. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and more citations to support the contents better. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:08, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Lukas Schön has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Lukas Schön. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:12, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notability and referencing

Hi, may I suggest that you review our rules on notability? I've now sent two of your recent publications into drafts when doing new page patrol, and I can see that others have had similar experiences.

You may also wish to revise the policy on referencing articles on living people, WP:BLP, which has very specific requirements for privacy etc. reasons.

I don't know if you're translating from the German-language Wikipedia, given that your topics seem to relate to Germany, but if so, can I just point out that our notability and referencing requirements are stricter (than in any other language version that I'm familiar with), and for that reason it often happens that an article may exist in another language version, but cannot with the same sources be accepted here in the English-language Wikipedia.

HTH, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:18, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stephan Stetter moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Stephan Stetter. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:01, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stephan Stetter (October 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Phuzion was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stephan Stetter and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Phuzion (talk) 16:57, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HearbreakingSuperman! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Phuzion (talk) 16:57, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Friedjof per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Friedjof. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spicy (talk) 23:34, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nature Conservation Youth

Hello, HearbreakingSuperman. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nature Conservation Youth, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.