User talk:Lovemankind83

Alexander Dugin may 2019

I want to thank you for your bias-reducing edit on Dugin's page. Unfortunately, users Galassi and Bbb23 keep pushing their agenda. You can see that the people who they went against with were very mild on them, as those people didn't remove the fascism claim, but simply made the introduction more balanced and less personal opinion based as the Wikipedia's policy requires. Galassi and Bbb3 banned all of them (I hope not you) instead of participating in a civil discussion and justifying their radical claims. Thus there's no doubt that their action is completely against the Wikipedia's rules and shall not be tolerated. Your talk page demonstrates that you have survived numerous attacks from users like those two and you're experienced with such stuff. I'd be very thankful if you take some action and make Bbb3 respect Wikipedia's rules. Cheers!

June 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Jenna Haze, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Morbidthoughts (talk) 22:03, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Berlin Schönefeld Airport. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Berlin Schönefeld Airport was changed by Hatemankind (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.873112 on 2018-06-16T22:52:10+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:52, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Pope Sylvester III, you may be blocked from editing. L293D (☎ • ✎) 02:11, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to INSEAD. -★- PlyrStar93 _{→Message me. ←} 02:49, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Condor (TV series), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. – BoogerD (talk) 00:36, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message... But they said my edits were vandalism and threatened to take away my privileges! Which I have had for years! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harrchurch (talk • contribs) 03:25, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia with this username. This is because your username, Hatemankind, does not meet our username policy.

Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below) and continue editing.

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

Adding below. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "Email this user" on their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.

If you think that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below this notice, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. 331dot (talk) 07:31, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Lovemankind83 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

lovemankind (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Accept reason:

Renamed and unblocked, welcome back. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:09, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That name is already in use. Please choose again. 331dot (talk) 15:26, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

'Lovemankind83'. I hope this one is available.

Hatemankind (talk) 01:50, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Young Alternative for Germany, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. R9tgokunks ⯃ 02:11, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Account needs a block

@Boing! said Zebedee:, @331dot:, This user has done nothing but edit disruptively and engage in vandalistic editing since being unblocked, and has already been warned numerous times against these edits. Also, per the comment by Harrchurch (talk · contribs) above(here), it appears the user is also using sockpuppets. R9tgokunks ⯃ 02:19, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I only have one Wikipedia account... I don't understand these allegations, I've not even been told what my other ID is supposed to be.. Can someone tell me? I have only made a few edits in the years that I've been an editor... I find these allegations to be very strange.

What has "hatemankind" got to do with me? He complimented me on a edit I made, I don't see why that is ground for suspicion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harrchurch (talk • contribs) 07:40, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry,but this claims are not true. I was only blocked because of my former Username ,'hatemankind' and I am engaged in serious editing like Bundesagentur für Arbeit and in erasing of Marketing Content.

Serious editing? This account has been warned against vandalism numerous times and has made blatant vandalistic edits in the past few days. In these edits, user removes sources and content, some edits have no edit summary:

User blatantly removes an alternative title for an article. [5]

R9tgokunks ⯃ 02:38, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And what's wrong with socks? You can walk much easier and wider with them, if you get my meaning, zwinker, zwinker.

What @R9tgokunks: is mentioning is WP:SOCK. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one account to circumvent a block. It can get you into serious trouble, possibly blocked indefinitely without the chance to appeal. IanDBeacon (talk) 03:39, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

joke I hope this settels the case.

ANI Discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Please refer to [[6]]. IanDBeacon (talk) 03:47, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Harrchurch, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

IanDBeacon (talk) 04:30, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Christian Democratic Union of Germany, you may be blocked from editing. Gluons12 ^☢|☕ 16:06, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Christian Democratic Union of Germany. IanDBeacon (talk) 16:39, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page

The statement you posted on your user page violated WP:POLEMIC, so I have deleted it. If you restore it, I will take the page to MfD. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:38, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fander Falconí, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yasuni (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Walter Stennes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page German Social Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please add more references to new articles

Local politicians are notable only if they meet certain criteria. All articles should have multiple independent references in order to meet the basic notability threshold. When creating articles such as Roland Heintze, please try and remember this. Deb (talk) 08:48, 18 August 2018 (UTC) I understand, but Roland Heintze is no local politican, but the chairman of the biggest german Party for an entire federal state. So his Wiki importance is out of question.[reply]

Sources instead of deleting contents

Hi Lovemanknd83, Many thanks for your help patrolling auricles! This is much appreciated. I have, however, just restored a deletion you made on Abdel Rahman Swar al-Dahab. It's preferable to check if there are sources supporting unsourced statements than to remove them. In this case, there were a number of sources. Thanks. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 17:58, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OR/Editorializing

Just a reminder that this [7] is OR/editorializing and also should not have been marked as a minor edit. Geogene (talk) 14:24, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Suicide of Vince Foster, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Fiske (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deaths in 2018

Your edit has been reverted, for the following reason(s): Notability as a basic guide is judged by 1) internet mentions or other sources; 2) the occupation or trade for which the deceased was known; 3) the existence of an article, whether that be in the Engish Wikipedia or foreign version of the encyclopedia. After passing basic notability requirements, the entry (as a redlink) then gets thirty days grace, in order that an article might be written in English Wikipedia. If no article by a month after the date of death, then the entry can get removed. Thanks. Ref ^(chew)(do) 16:01, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Lovemankind83. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bill Browder, etc

I strongly recommend you avoid highly controversial edits given your history here. Bill Browder has been targeted by Russian propaganda accounts. You do not want to be confused with one of them. Moreover, please avoid the word "alleged" or other weasel words. Wikipedia follows what sources say. Either things happen, or they don't or if there is doubt we say who said "yes" and who said "no". As an example, "The New York Times reported that Donald Trump engaged in massive tax fraud," not "Donald Trump is alleged to have engaged in massive tax fraud." Jehochman ^Talk 16:09, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Straelen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CDU (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lovemankind83 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is __ 77.247.85.71_____. Place any further information here. Lovemankind83 (talk) 13:04, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. You forgot to tell us your IP address so we can't investigate your claim. You can find this using WhatIsMyIP. If you don't wish to provide this publicly, you may use WP:UTRS to provide the IP address privately. Yamla (talk) 13:13, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You subsequently edited the above to indicate your IP address is 77.247.85.71. That IP address is confirmed as a proxy. You'll need to disable your use of the proxy if you wish to edit here. --Yamla (talk) 14:53, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Westerkappeln, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CDU (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Mississippi. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 17:10, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Hi Lovemankind83, I'm sorry I'm reaching out to you via your talk page (or maybe this is the way it's supposed to be?). Anyway, I'm interested in your opinion on how Skyspace Lech is not relevant to the Vorarlberg article. –Wimue (talk) 11:00, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New religious movements

When removing content Lovemankind83, please provide evidence for why you are removing it or otherwise include citations for what you are changing when you change it. This is something that was not done with the initial edit and subsequent revert you did with the New religious movements article, where I asked for your citing reliable sources as evidence to support your claims per WP:VERIFY. Please cite evidence in your edits or within the article itself and not just the revision history. Doing that within the article itself will more directly benefit readers. --- FULBERT (talk) 00:51, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Jim Justice. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Acroterion (talk) 00:46, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 15:26, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Neoliberalism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Howell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited George Soros, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aventura (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Leinefelde-Worbis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CDU (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:41, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Karl-Heinz Paque

Hello, Lovemankind83,

Thanks for creating Karl-Heinz Paque! I edit here too, under the username Lefcentreright and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Hello. Please do not use bare URLs as sources, because they tend to link rot. For help, look at Help:References.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Lefcentreright}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Lefcentreright (talk) 17:20, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Udo Hemmelgarn

Hello, Lovemankind83,

Thank you for creating Udo Hemmelgarn.

New Page Reviewer I has tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and notes that:

Please take a look at WP:CIT and WP:CITE on how to format references and footnotes.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:52, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hammelburg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CSU (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:49, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wemding, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CSU (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:29, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lars Hermann

The article Lars Hermann has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Misspelt article title. It should be Herrmann with double r. An article Lars Herrmann already exists. I have moved some complementary information form this to that article. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 21:50, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Discretionary sanctions notice for post-1932 American politics and living or recently deceased people

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 12:12, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider this a reminder of this notice, and please take care with your editing around these subjects. --Hipal (talk) 16:42, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at MintPress News. Doug Weller talk 12:14, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wallis Day

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wallis Day requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. N0nsensical.system^(err0r?)_(.log) 13:48, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wallis Day moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Wallis Day, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 14:15, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Slavoj Zizek's final book will prove to be the book of the century.

Slavoj Zizek's book Soul King Pusher is based on the article "Philosophical Symmetry," an article of mine that can be found by searching for my name, Jordon Roy Gowans, with old Windows Word models, on the website philpeople.org. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Philosophical Symmetry (talk • contribs) 02:39, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Warning on Million Dollar Extreme

This edit and its summary are completely unacceptable, and should not be done again. Nate • (chatter) 23:07, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Erik Prince. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Keep making political statements in articles like that, you'll get banned. Tarl N. (discuss) 06:02, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed your edit to Erik Prince today - better than your previous edit, but I'll note that "offical Wiki wording" is an oxymoron. Wikipedia itself is not a reliable source which can be used to justify edits. Tarl N. (discuss) 17:02, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, you may be blocked from editing. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 21:43, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Was Not intended, sorry Lovemankind83 (talk) 21:47, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted Edit

Hello, sorry about reverting your edit on the 2020 Congressional insider trading scandal page. After thinking about I decided that your edit was in the right general area but just needed some improvement. Sorry about giving you that annoying red notification. Jon698 (talk) 06:08, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Spelle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CDU (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:53, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Removing sourced info

Please stop removing sourced information from articles with no consensus to do so after discussion on the article talk page. Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:04, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Before I am forced to bring your editing behavior to the attention of administrators and the community by opening a report at WP:ANI, I suggest that you stop remooving information from articles. Your judgement about what is and isn't relevant ("kinda boring" is not a legitimate reason to delete information} is very bad, and I have had to revert many of your deletions because they did not improve the articles. Also, unsourced material, if it's likely to be accurate, can simply be marked with a "citation needed" tag, it does not need to be removed unless you think that it is actually false. "Leaning the lead" was not necessary fo most of the times you did it, since those leads were hardly bloated (see WP:LEAD: a lead is expected to be about 4 or 5 paragraphs. In one case you removed two sentences from a six sentence, 2 paragraph lead that didn;t in any way need pruning, but which removed pertinent information about a person whom I beli3eve aligns with your personal POV. See WP:POV) In any case, I think you'd best not make any deletions until you've got a better idea about what is and isn't appropriate and can control yourself from making POV edits. 10:01, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gerald Braunberger moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Gerald Braunberger, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:23, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Removing sourced material - Wikipedia does not prohibit the mention of advertising campaigns if such material is reliably sourced

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 23:35, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marina Salye, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ostrov.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Winfried Wolf moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Winfried Wolf, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 06:59, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wallis Day (March 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I don't see starring roles per WP:ENT. Do not cite IMDb. Needs more external news sources to cover Wallis's career. Most of the references are just passing mentions and cast announcements.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wallis Day and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Wallis Day, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 14:57, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lovemankind83! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 14:57, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at 2021 Atlanta spa shootings. It's not in the cited source. You also incorrectly marked the edit as "minor". —Bagumba (talk) 01:45, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This happens when you dare to criticize China!

Wallis Day

I have brought it to the mainspace after expanding. You may further expand it using this, this and this. --Kailash29792 (talk) 06:23, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bodenwerder, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CDU.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Christian Kmiotek

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Christian Kmiotek requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — Czello 21:48, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Banzkow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Left.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Gerald Braunberger

Hello, Lovemankind83. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gerald Braunberger, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Hello, I'm NebY. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Julius Caesar, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. With that edit, you reinstated material that had been tagged as needing a citation since January 2021 and that had now been removed with a further reasonable challenge in the edit summary, yet you reinstated it without a source and with the citation-needed tag, indicating that you knew the material you were placing in the encyclopedia was in breach of the verifiability policy. NebY (talk) 09:55, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Daily Mail reference at Roman Protasevich

Hi. Please do not use the Daily Mail as you did at Roman Protasevich. It is not a reliable source. See WP:DAILYMAIL. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 10:38, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Gerald Braunberger

Hello, Lovemankind83. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gerald Braunberger".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 16:24, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Atherton reference

You've been repeatedly cited for adding unsourced content to different pages. Why would you add "cured" when there is absolutely no indication of this anywhere? Sources already there that are not yours are unreliable--gossipy, contain a dead link, a four decades old ad that doesn't substantiate the edit. How many times can an editor add unsourced content to a page before Wikipedia administrators block them from editing?Db0274 (talk) 17:57, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Winfried Wolf

Hello, Lovemankind83. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Winfried Wolf, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:03, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

CUPIDICAE💕 14:03, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Lauren Boebert. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. ––FormalDude talk 19:27, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to The Batman (film). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. —El Millo (talk) 22:58, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorrry, but i have to counterargue Lovemankind83 (talk) 23:01, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Bucha massacre, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Firestar464 (talk) 11:23, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Lovemankind83

Thank you for creating Rainer Semet.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 14:29, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 03:57, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 monkeypox outbreak task force invitation

Hello! I know you have an interest in the ongoing 2022 monkeypox outbreak, so I wanted to invite you to the new monkeypox outbreak task force, which I started from the WikiProject of current events. The task force’s goal is to improve any and all articles relating to the new outbreak. I hope you consider joining! Elijahandskip (talk) 23:50, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Lovemankind83

Thank you for creating Moritz Oppelt.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start for the article, though I think this should be expanded. Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:51, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Lovemankind83

Thank you for creating Claus Christian Claussen.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 16:45, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Curbon7

Hello, Lovemankind83. You have new messages at Curbon7's talk page.
Message added 21:05, 5 July 2022 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Curbon7 (talk) 21:05, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ernst-Wilhelm Gohl moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ernst-Wilhelm Gohl, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 14:44, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sebahat Atli moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sebahat Atli, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:45, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ernst-Wilhelm Gohl

Hello, Lovemankind83. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ernst-Wilhelm Gohl, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:03, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ernst-Wilhelm Gohl

Hello, Lovemankind83. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ernst-Wilhelm Gohl".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:29, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sebahat Atli

Hello, Lovemankind83. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sebahat Atli, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:04, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sebahat Atli

Hello, Lovemankind83. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Sebahat Atli".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 11:58, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding an edit to "Radical Party of Chile (2018)"

Greetings and felicitations. Despite the fact that your last edit was in March, I hope that you are still paying attention to this account. I'm trying to confirm the existence of the book you added when you created the Radical Party of Chile (2018) article's "Further reading" section, as well as the spelling of the title ("Leftpopulists" in particular). An ISBN would also be helpful. DocWatson42 (talk) 02:57, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since you haven't replied, and I have been unable to find any more information on the book, I have commented out the article's "Further reading" section. —DocWatson42 (talk) 04:08, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]