Jump to content

User talk:Hassan Nazeer Chaudhry

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Hassan Nazeer Chaudhry, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 00:19, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to WikiProject Pakistan

[edit]
Welcome!

We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Pakistan. There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much — or little — you like:

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask me or at the Wikiproject Pakistan noticeboard, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around!

March 2018

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Saqib. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Shehbaz Sharif, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Saqib (talk) 15:03, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Shehbaz Sharif, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Saqib (talk) 15:08, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I added the information in good faith, Shahbaz Shareef , Chief Minister of Punjab , had 5 marriages and the information is correct. However, i agree to your point that the reference quoted are not authenticated , so didn't re-added them on the page, your point is taken. Hassan Nazeer Chaudhry (talk)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Hassan_Nazeer_Chaudhry reported by User:Saqib (Result: ). Thank you. Saqib (talk) 15:11, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've closed this report with a warning to you. --NeilN talk to me 14:45, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Junoobi Punjab Suba Mahaaz for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Junoobi Punjab Suba Mahaaz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Junoobi Punjab Suba Mahaaz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Saqib (talk) 08:40, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Abdul Quddus Bizenjo, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Saqib (talk) 12:26, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove the sourced material. --Saqib (talk) 12:35, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The valid reason was provided, however, if you want to retain existing information, i willn't modify it. Hassan Nazeer Chaudhry (talk)

May I know why you continuously deleting well sourced material from the said page and citing some dubious unreliable sources? --Saqib (talk) 14:14, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Which source is dubious? I have not removed any well sourced material from BLP (Abdul Quddus Bizenjo) , no dubious material from unreliable source is included . I have included the reasons below for removing material. The article is biased to shape the certain opinion posed by ruling party PML-N instead of neutral information. For example:

He secured 544 votes in a constituency where there were 57,666 registered voters.Geo News noted Bizenjo was elected to Balochistan Assembly by getting least number of votes in the electoral history of Pakistan This sentence reflects that he obtained very low number of votes, still he became C.M. , this is position maintained by Ouster Prime Minister’s daughter Maryam Nawaz. He had same number of votes when PML-N nominated him for deputy speaker? As matter or fact, the turn out in Balouchistan was very low , and this constituency had several threats, he still contested the elections strengthening federation.

Bizenjo was named as a potential candidate to overtake Jamali as the succeeding Speaker however he could not. This shows that he was nominated as speaker , instead the fact is he wanted to be become speaker and Rahila Durrani was nominated , this is major reason why he resigned.


Dawn in its editorial termed the election of Bizenjo for the office of chief ministership as "Undemocratic poll", noting how Bizenjo - who received 544 votes in the election - being the weakest candidate for the slot of chief ministership could become the "best" candidate Wikipedia is an information page, what is point of highlighting an editorial view of news paper in information page of Bizenjo. Clearly, the information is tilted to create a biased towards PML-N narrative that a conspiracy is going against them, and as thing are part of grand plan. Wikipedia pages shouldn’t be used for narrative building.


The Express Tribune in its editorial noted that in a significant move, PML-N "stood dislodged from the government of the province" after governing it for four and half year. Yet again, the similar narrative is shaped, the page is meant to contain information about Bizenjo or narrative of how PML-N wasn’t able to maintain it’s government in Balouchistan? What this stuff had to do with Chief minister ship section of the page?


PML-N, which was the largest single party in the assembly with 21 members including the votes of dissident MPAs of PML-N, a party considered to be the arch rival of PML-Q As matter or fact PML-N won only one seat of national assembly in Balouchistan, i.e. NA-271 Kharan Washuk Panjgur by General (R) Abdul Qadir baloch and 9 provisional assembly seats. 21 members were made by including independent members . As matter or fact , Sana Ullah Zehri wasn’t able to run government due to lack of his interest, and , other players in province broke independent groups and collations. Give it a colour of PML-N narrative is unfair commentary on wikipedia page.


‘’’Is the page meant for Bizenjo and should contain information about him or should contain information about editorials of balouchistan politics and PML-N’s politics in Balouchistan? The existing content violates basics of fairness. I Hope you will do judge the decision based on facts.’’’

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( in the enhanced toolbar, or if you use the old "classic" toolbar) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. NeilN talk to me 14:55, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 00:40, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Imran Khan

[edit]

Hello Hassan Nazeer Chaudhry. You are risking a block for edit warring at Imran Khan. You should use the article talk page or WP:BLPN to get agreement for your changes before reverting again. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 04:15, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Swarm 00:15, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Fundamentally, you are not behaving as is expected on a collaborative encyclopedia. Please note that indefinite blocks are not meant to be permanent, and you can continue contributing here, but if you wish to do so, serious changes to your attitude and approach to editing will be necessary, and I don't see you taking any of that seriously right now. Given that this is a lot to respond to in an unblock request, I strongly advise you to read the guide to appealing blocks and follow the advice there. Swarm 00:23, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
While we have had difference of opinions on several occasions, but I am sorry to see you blocked indefinitely. It seems very likely that your block will be lifted so I hope you will decide to come back with a more calmer and open perspective. --Saqib (talk) 08:48, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Saqib: Thank you for your support, having a difference of opinion is beauty of information presentation. Every experience gives you some thing in the life, lets hopes wikipedia decides to uplift the ban. Even if it doesn't it have many good editors like yourself, i can read your contributions, cheers. Hassan Nazeer Chaudhry (talk) 15:01, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hope you're aware of WP:APPEAL. --Saqib (talk) 15:07, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]