User talk:Harrybabbar

Singh

Dear User:Harrybabbar

This is a request to you to Kindly do not VANDALIZE wikipedia article "Singh". You are most welcome to leave your comments on the Discussion page of the article. At the top of the article, please click on discussion to reach talk page for the article and leave your comments there.

By the way I have had some friends with the name "babbar", babbar are "Mair Rajputs", many Rajput families that have been living in Punjab have been baptizing their first born son as a khalsa traditionally to join the guru's army of protectors against invaders.

You could find out more about Mair Rajputs here in case you are interested:

http://mairrajputs.tripod.com/

http://mairrajputs.tripod.com/gothras.html

http://mairrajputs.tripod.com/notable.html#babbar

Best wishes

Thanks

Atulsnischal (talk) 13:29, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 06:10, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like you are involved in a content dispute on the Singh article, and you have been asked to discuss this issue above and on the articles talk page. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted and if you continue you will be blocked from editing. If you have any problem, or wish to discuss this issue please don't hesitate to get in contact. ^Khukri 13:45, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 3days from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. For controversial edits, discuss any changes you wish to make and gain consensus prior to making them. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. ^Khukri 07:29, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

No, I am a Khalsa. I feel sorry for you because you are misguided in your edits. As a Sikh I live by Guru Gobind Singh's teachings, as Guru Gobind Singh said, "A Sikh has high Wisdom but is humble". We should respect everyone the Guru would be horrified if we did not respect & help everyone. A Sikh is NEVER aggressive, rude or offensive and we are ALWAYS flexible, open-minded and help our fellow human brothers. The only exception is on the battlefield in war, where you fight as a very last resort in self-defence (only then is God on your Side and you will be victorious, if you break this rule then God is against you and you will be defeated). If you are a Sikh then you are my brother then I will help you. Those RSS idiots have got nothing to do with this.--Sikh scholar (talk) 11:17, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You stupid dumb FU*K MY great great great great grandfather was Mani Singh the greatest of Sikh matrys. Its scum like you that needs to be executed. You deserve execution - you stupid dumb fu*k everyone in my family over 500 members are Baptized Khalsa SIKHS. We have been Khalsa Sikhs for over 300 years you dumb fu*ker. Because you have insulted me and broken the teachings of the Guru Granth Sahib you deserve death -you dumb fu*ker.--Sikh scholar (talk) 04:25, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Kingturtle (talk) 06:31, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hi

point noted AliveFreeHappy

Harrybabbar (talk) 07:52, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Block extended to 12 days from now

I have extended your block for using IPs to post on other editor's talk pages. A block means you cannot edit anything other than your talk page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stephen (talk • contribs) 11:39, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thank you

thank you stephan for all your help..you been very kindHarrybabbar (talk) 15:41, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:29895835.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:29895835.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:26, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Warrior.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Warrior.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:26, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Singh. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. utcursch | talk 12:13, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The issue is clear -- you're adding unsourced statements to the article, and its truthfulness is being challenged by others. Please back your changes with reliable references. utcursch | talk 15:24, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The pronunciation has been explained on the talk page earlier -- the word is spelled with an anusvara, and the pronunciation of anusvara varies greatly. It's not always "n" (Sinha), as you state. utcursch | talk 11:34, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

you are twisting hindi language to your advantage..please refer which hindi manuel states what you are saying....so how should it be written in hindi script please state that... Harrybabbar (talk) 16:40, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just read the article on anusvara, or in case you don't trust the article, search books.google.com for "Anusvara" . utcursch | talk 04:19, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, by the way, just saw your comment on Talk:Sardarji jokes. In case you didn't know already, I'm not a Hindu. You've already been blocked by three different admins for different reasons. If you continue to make disruptive comments and edits, you may be blocked indefinitely. Please see Wikipedia:Civility. utcursch | talk 11:46, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD process

Regarding this edit: that's not the way you list an article for deletion. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion; there are instructions there about what to do. Mango juice^talk 16:05, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

This is your final warning. Please stop making disruptive edits and adding unsourced material to the article Singh. utcursch | talk 10:38, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gurkhaboy and others are not trying to claim that Sikhs copied the name "Singh" from the Rajputs. On the other hand, you're indulging in disruptive editing by adding unsourced information, and claiming that the non-Sikhs copied the name from the Sikhs. If Gurkhaboy, adds something like "The non-Rajputs copied the name from the Rajputs", I'd warn him as well.

Your claims are contested by other users, and you've failed to provide any source for them. The pronunciation /Siŋɣə/ is not unique to Punjabi language or Sikhism -- it's same in many other languages derived from Sanskrit as well. Here are some refs for you to read:

Classical Dictionary of Hindu Mythology and Religion by John Dowson, Page xviii, ISBN 0766175898.
Jats, the Ancient Rulers: A Clan Study by Bhim Singh Dahiya, Page 5.

You're trying to turn the entire issue into an ethnic dispute in a Sikh vs Rajput, which is against the Wikipedia's collaborative spirit (by the way, I'm not a Rajput; also, there are many Sikh Rajputs -- by posting comments like these, you're portraying yourself in a very negative light). utcursch | talk 05:43, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think other editors have argued enough with you. You asked for sources, which have been provided in article, as well as above. On the other hand, you've been adding unsourced claims to the article in spite of being requested not to do so. You've been blocked twice in past, so I think a block of one month seems fair enough. utcursch | talk 11:31, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

up yours..i will be back. Harrybabbar (talk) 07:46, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]