User talk:Atulsnischal

; List of Archived Talk Pages
	1 \| 2 \| 3 \| 4 \| 5 \| 6 * (Current) \| 7 \| 8

Welcome!

Hello, Atulsnischal, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! - UtherSRG (talk) 11:47, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Leave a message | Send an e-mail

Remember that people's comments on this page may be only one side of a story.

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 04:56, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Wildlife templates!

Hi. This is Farjad... I have noticed that your archive 5 appears in the Category:Wildlife templates for no reason (I cant put the link here otherwise this archive too will get into the category). Can you please remove the link to this category from your rachive 5. I don't want to stalk your archive you know. -,- Cheers! Farjad0322 (talk) 09:48, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Sarnath Lion Capital of Ashoka.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Sarnath Lion Capital of Ashoka.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 15:07, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Indian reunification

An article that you have been involved in editing, Indian reunification , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. ^Jguy_Talk^Done 18:36, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edits at Decline of Hinduism in Pakistan

This is regarding your edits at Decline of Hinduism in Pakistan They are already under discussion here. Please have your say over there before reverting legitimate edits. Thanks. Sarmadhassan (talk) 09:57, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edits at Decline of Hinduism in Pakistan 2nd Post

It is noticed that you are continously adding ambigous information [1] without any reference and absolutely out of context. i-e Decline of Hinduism in Pakistan. I am reverting your edits back to consensus located Talk:Decline_of_Hinduism_in_Pakistan. Have your say before you add or subtract information and implement your agenda Sarmadhassan (talk) 05:41, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

This permission does not give you any special status or authority
Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 11:22, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Zoos in India

I have created a Zoos of India navbox to handle what are essentially a long lists that keep getting longer in India Zoo articles (and are hard to maintain when added individually to articles). I have meant to do this for a long time now (sorry it took so long), but had not gotten around to it. If there are other items that need to be in every India zoo article we can add them to the navbox and they will be updated in all of the articles where they are present. Donlammers (talk) 16:17, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Survey for new page patrollers

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Atulsnischal! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 11:22, 25 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In Bhalswa horseshoe lake, you recently added links to the disambiguation pages Dyke and Embankment (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Talk:Pakistan studies

Hello, Atulsnischal. You have new messages at Talk:Pakistan studies.
Message added 14:32, 11 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Participation needed at Talk:Pakistan studies

Hello Atulsnischal. Since I saw your name on the above talk page, here is a link to a note which I left to JCAla on the matter: User talk:JCAla#Pakistan studies needs your participation on the talk page. Depending on your degree of interest in the article, this advice may also apply to you. TopGun has complained at WP:AN about the lack of response by people who disagree with him. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:35, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sanctions

Just a gentle note, bearing in mind your recent revert to a very old version of the Mair Rajputs article. You seem not to have been terribly involved in caste-related articles of late and therefore may be unaware that there are sanctions in place that apply to all involved in such articles. For your information, I have inserted the standard notice below. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 20:42, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions.

Sitush You are involved in editing this article so do not leave admin warnings at my page, this articla i originally sourced and wrote find better sources. Do not leave threats on my page and do not blank sourced articles.

mrigthrishna (talk) 20:50, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I did not blank the article and I have not left an "admin warning" here. Please discuss any issues that you may have regarding the article at Talk:Mair Rajputs. The burden is on you to source information that you want to see included in the article, not other people. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 20:59, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 7

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Najafgarh drain bird sanctuary (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Demoiselle

Najafgarh lake (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Demoiselle

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Aravalli Biodiversity Park, Vasant Kunj

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Aravalli Biodiversity Park, Vasant Kunj, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.dda.org.in/greens/biodiv/aravalli-biodiversity-park.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:55, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I did try to use my own language but the DDA link mentioned above is very much in "Public Domain", text from Public Domain can be used, as DDA is a Government of India and/or State Government of Delhi institution. Please refer to following news article where it says DDS is a Government institution, it was earlier under Central Government of India and now the news says..... House votes for bringing DDA under state govt, TNN, Jun 27, 2015, Times of India

mrigthrishna (talk) 23:47, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Your addition to Aravalli Biodiversity Park, South Central Ridge, Delhi has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:12, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I did try to use my own language but the DDA link I used for reference: http://www.dda.org.in/greens/biodiv/aravalli-biodiversity-park.html. This link from DDA website is very much in "Public Domain", and text from Public Domain can be used, as DDA is a Government of India and/or State Government of Delhi institution. Please refer to following news article where it says DDA is a Government institution, it was earlier under Central Government of India and now the news says..... House votes for bringing DDA under state govt, TNN, Jun 27, 2015, Times of India

mrigthrishna (talk) 00:00, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reintroduce listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Reintroduce. Since you had some involvement with the Reintroduce redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 05:48, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Atulsnischal. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Your addition to Talk:State Emblem of India has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. John of Reading (talk) 07:54, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you've done this on several other pages too. -- John of Reading (talk) 07:56, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In some articles that I edited on Wikipedia I had archived on respective "Article Talk/Discussion Pages" full news articles as "News Archive" with full acknowledgement of "Source links", I also enclosed the full News Article in "Quotation Marks" when I archived them in article talk/discussion pages not on main article page, I made the "News Archive" on talk pages because I noticed the original News articles are often taken down from original News websites after a couple of years and they are then not available on internet.

My suggestion to Wikipedia would be to Archive all News and other sources that Editors are using in an Internet Archive so researched and referenced sources are always available online. Thanks mrigthrishna (talk) 23:28, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Narmada Kothi (Maharajah of Indore Retreat Palace), Barwaha, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Britain, Hydro and Punjabi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed above links, thanks mrigthrishna (talk) 11:43, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sources for history-related articles

Hi, it's great to see your enthusiasm for history-related articles, but you need to be more cautious about the sources you are using. Please read WP:HISTRS.

A lot of material that you've recently added to the articles such as Bourbons of India, Descendants of defeated Maratha Warriors after Battle of Panipat (1761), articles related to Heo Hwang-ok is WP:FRINGE material regarded as pseudo-history by mainstream historians.

For example, in this edit you added some content about the Bourbons of India being mentioned in Mughal records. The reference you cited was this news article.

If you refer to peer-reviewed scholarly sources, you will find that this is a mere speculation by some Goa-based authors, who misinterpret the Persian title "Maryam Makani" as a Portuguese name "Maria Mascarenhas". For example, see Visions of Juliana: A Portuguese Woman at the Court of the Mughals published in the Journal of World History:

“

(p. 772) Gracias also discusses the speculation that the wife of the Mughal king Akbar (d. 1605), Maryam Makani, could potentially have been a Portuguese woman called Maria Mascarenhas, whose sister, also named Juliana, was married to Jean-Phillipe de Bourbon de Navarre [...] This is faulty; Maryam Makani (d. 1604) was the title given to Akbar's mother, Hamida Banu Begum, who came from a Persian family [...] The honorific title translates to “she who dwells with Mary,” and royal women often held such titles, regardless of religion...

”

“

(p. 784) What Mughal documents do reveal is that the villages held in Juliana's name seemed to have passed to the D'Eremao family, who claimed to be direct descendants of hers, and to be linked with the Bourbons as well. [...] nostalgia fueled some of the more elaborate claims of the D’Eremao family. At the time of Maclagan’s writing, the D’Eremao family claimed that the title of D’Eremao came from the title of Durr-i Yaman or Durr-i Oman (pearl of the Yemen or Oman) conferred by the Emperor Bahadur Shah on their ancestress, Juliana. There is no evidence that Juliana was given such a title, nor is there evidence that she had any ties to the Bourbons.

”

A news article about sensationalist claims in a newly-released book is rarely a good source for history-related articles. Sources affiliated with the subject (e.g. bourbon-bhopal.org which you added in this edit) are not acceptable at all.

Various book authors and news writers make extraordinary claims, because these claims sell their writings (e.g. Bourbon Bhopal-France link Ror-Maratha link, Heo-Ayodhya link etc.) However, that does not mean that such claims are accepted as true by mainstream historians.

You can find better sources for history-related articles at the archives mentioned at Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Library. If you do not have access to a particular source, you can request it at Wikipedia:WikiProject Resource Exchange/Resource Request. utcursch | talk 16:24, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Despite multiple editors trying to counsel you over the years, you don't seem to have learned anything and continue pushing your original research and synthesis on here. If this continues then you are likely to be topic banned from this area and/or have your editing privileges revoked.—SpacemanSpiff 15:26, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Present day descendants of the defeated Maratha Warriors of the Battle of Panipat (1761) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Present day descendants of the defeated Maratha Warriors of the Battle of Panipat (1761) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Present day descendants of the defeated Maratha Warriors of the Battle of Panipat (1761) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Capitals00 (talk) 15:43, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stop spamming

There has to be a limit to this quest of yours and it is currently very disruptive. Stop spamming multiple article talk pages like you're doing here. —SpacemanSpiff 04:53, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am just hoping some editors will get interested in bettering the article. mrigthrishna (talk) 04:57, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Cease this disruptive editing including spamming unrelated article talk pages immediately or you are likely to be blocked soon. —SpacemanSpiff 05:07, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I just let editors of generally related articles on their talk pages know that if they might be interested in bettering this article. Marathas and Rajputs are related tradtional warrior classes of people in India and most Indians know that and as this article conserns those Marathas converted to islam so Muslim Rajput article is related to this article directly as per Indian culture. Stop threatneng me. mrigthrishna (talk) 05:14, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Despite multiple editors trying to counsel you over the years, you don't seem to have learned anything and continue pushing your original research and synthesis on here. If this continues then you are likely to be topic banned from this area and/or have your editing privileges revoked.—SpacemanSpiff 15:26, 7 September 2017 (UTC)"

WHAT KIND OF LANGUAGE IS THAT, DO not talk down to me about my contributions if you have time fix what is wrong and make wikipedia better. Got That!!! mrigthrishna (talk)

Your behavior is the problem, if you can't understand that then you shouldn't even be editing here. I'm done trying to discuss reasonably with you as it's nothing more than a futile exercise that just wastes my time. —SpacemanSpiff 05:48, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have no business getting personal with me and talking down to me telling me not to edit, other editors have to improve on people less skilled not come to their talk page and thereaten them to leave wikipedia. I dont want to see you on my talk page, VANISH mrigthrishna (talk) 05:55, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Interested editors find out from the deletion sorting pages, and this deletion discussion has been added to a number of those (as you can see on the discussion page itself). I have just removed the AfD notice for Present day descendants of the defeated Maratha Warriors of the Battle of Panipat (1761) from about 8 article talk pages, where it definitely did not belong. Think about it: any editor can potentially be interested in editing any article, and every article has something in common with a hundred other articles or more. Article talk pages cannot be littered with deletion notifications for other articles, it would be meaningless and they would not be used for anything else. So please do not add the AfD notice anywhere else. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 06:09, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ok seems to make sense :-) you are right they were added, was just trying my bit mrigthrishna (talk) 06:15, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No longer autopatrolled

Hi, Atulsnischal. In view of the warnings above concerning copyright violations, original research, and other problems, it seems to me it would be an advantage for you to have your new articles reviewed, rather than having them automatically listed as "reviewed"; see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled for how it works with and without the autopatrolled right. Therefore, I have removed the autopatrolled right from your account. I hope you don't mind. For my part, I think it will be helpful for you. Bishonen | talk 18:20, 10 September 2017 (UTC).[reply]

No worries as it's always better to have other editors help collaborate and make articles better on Wikipedia and if someone is weak in some writing skills or is temporary unwell due to poor health to do further research and do a thorough good job then others can collaborate and fill in were there are shortcomings.

Regarding Descendants of defeated Maratha Warriors after Battle of Panipat (1761), in this article I referred to major newspaper sources a list of which I am providing below, the synthesis was not personal or pov as I only used what was written in the News/Newspaper Sources from major News Organisations and duly acknowledge these in the references, due to poor health I was not able to take the time attach in line references .

Previously in some articles I had archived full news articles as "News Archive" with "Source links" in article talk/discussion pages not on main article page, I made the "News Archive" on talk pages because I noticed the original News articles are often taken down from original News websites after a couple of years.

As far as the Descendants of defeated Maratha Warriors after Battle of Panipat (1761) article is concerned the News sources I used and listed in references were:

References used for writing Descendants of defeated Maratha Warriors after Battle of Panipat (1761)

Meeting after 244 years By Kay Benedict, Nov 27, 2005 DNA India.
Descendants Of Defeated Marathas Living In Balouchistan, 2004, sulekha.com
The lost Marathas of third battle of Panipat, By UDAY MAHURKARTHURSDAY, JANUARY 12, 2012, India Today
Rods in Haryana trace their lineage to Maratha soldiers, By UDAY MAHURKARSATURDAY, JANUARY 14, 2012, India Today
Sultan of COURAGE (Jassa Singh Ahluwalia), Sunday, May 3, 2009, The Tribune
250 years on, Battle of Panipat revisited, January 13, 2011, Rediff.com
[2],[3]
Makar Sankranti: Marathas’ Loss at Panipat Resonates Even Today, By Kirti Phadtare Pandey, January 12, 2017, TheQuint.com
Bhadar rekindles its link with Maratha warriors, By Deepender Deswal, TNN, Jan 15, 2011, Times of India
Maratha stir gets support from Pakistan (and Afghanistan), Aug 9, 2017, The Asian Age

I think I am having Concentration and Anxiety issues due to poor health and must wait to get well first before being able to collaborate on articles. Thanks

mrigthrishna (talk) 23:07, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Atulsnischal. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Atulsnischal. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Atulsnischal. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mayo College, Ajmer, India - Badge.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mayo College, Ajmer, India - Badge.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:30, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sikh Rajputs for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sikh Rajputs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sikh Rajputs (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. regentspark (comment) 19:36, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sarnath Lion Capital of Ashoka.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sarnath Lion Capital of Ashoka.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Maharaja of Jammu and Kashmir" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Maharaja of Jammu and Kashmir. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 10#Maharaja of Jammu and Kashmir until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Soumya-8974 (he) ^talk _contribs ^subpages 18:18, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mayo College, Ajmer, India - Badge.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mayo College, Ajmer, India - Badge.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Jammu and Kashmir–related articles for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Jammu and Kashmir–related articles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Jammu and Kashmir–related articles until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DTM (talk) 13:39, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]