User talk:Happy Evil Dude

Welcome! (We can't say that loud/big enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page.

We're so glad you're here! -- Essjay · Talk 13:07, July 14, 2005 (UTC)

Image:Alexis_Bledel.jpg

Hi Happy Evil, We can't use images in Wikipedia that aren't free. Since this image you uploaded contains neither copyright nor source information I've put it up for deletion. Please review the Wikipedia:Image use policy before uploading any other images. - Mgm|^(talk) 16:48, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If they're not deleted yet, you can still edit the image information page to add the info. You don't need to reupload yet. - Mgm|^(talk) 05:58, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Samaire Armstrong.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Samaire Armstrong.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chowbok ☠ 23:01, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More replaceable fair use images

Image:Sophia Bush.jpg

—Chowbok ☠ 19:24, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Bloodsport Promo 1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bloodsport Promo 1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:06, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MA Userbox

Today, there was a merger of Category:Martial Artist Wikipedians into Category:Wikipedian martial artists. This resulted in a userbox {{User:TonyTheTiger/Userboxes/Martialartist}} being added to the category. This userbox is available to you. TonyTheTiger 20:33, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Bloodsport Promo 4.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bloodsport Promo 4.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:41, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Bloodsport Promo 3.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bloodsport Promo 3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:41, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Bloodsport Promo 2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bloodsport Promo 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:42, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Bloodsport Promo 1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bloodsport Promo 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:42, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Bloodsport Italian.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bloodsport Italian.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:42, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Bloodsport German.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bloodsport German.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:42, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Bloodsport French.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bloodsport French.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:42, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Bloodsport DVD Bulgarian.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bloodsport DVD Bulgarian.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:42, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Bloodsport DVD American.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bloodsport DVD American.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:42, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bloodsport DVD American.jpg

Hello, Happy Evil Dude. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Bloodsport DVD American.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Happy Evil Dude/Bloodsport Workshop. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 01:39, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bloodsport DVD Bulgarian.jpg

Hello, Happy Evil Dude. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Bloodsport DVD Bulgarian.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Happy Evil Dude/Bloodsport Workshop. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 01:39, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bloodsport French.jpg

Hello, Happy Evil Dude. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Bloodsport French.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Happy Evil Dude/Bloodsport Workshop. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 01:39, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bloodsport German.jpg

Hello, Happy Evil Dude. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Bloodsport German.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Happy Evil Dude/Bloodsport Workshop. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 01:39, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bloodsport Italian.jpg

Hello, Happy Evil Dude. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Bloodsport Italian.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Happy Evil Dude/Bloodsport Workshop. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 01:39, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bloodsport Promo 1.jpg

Hello, Happy Evil Dude. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Bloodsport Promo 1.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Happy Evil Dude/Bloodsport Workshop. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 01:40, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bloodsport Promo 2.jpg

Hello, Happy Evil Dude. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Bloodsport Promo 2.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Happy Evil Dude/Bloodsport Workshop. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 01:40, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bloodsport Promo 3.jpg

Hello, Happy Evil Dude. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Bloodsport Promo 3.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Happy Evil Dude/Bloodsport Workshop. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 01:40, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bloodsport Promo 4.jpg

Hello, Happy Evil Dude. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Bloodsport Promo 4.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Happy Evil Dude/Bloodsport Workshop. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 01:40, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bloodsport Soundtrack.jpg

Hello, Happy Evil Dude. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Bloodsport Soundtrack.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Happy Evil Dude/Bloodsport Workshop. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 01:41, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bloodsport.jpg

Hello, Happy Evil Dude. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Bloodsport.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Happy Evil Dude/Bloodsport Workshop. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 06:41, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Abeautifulmindposter.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Abeautifulmindposter.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 07:31, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Bloodsport VHS Brazilian.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Bloodsport VHS Brazilian.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:32, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Bloodsport VHS American.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Bloodsport VHS American.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:32, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bloodsport III.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bloodsport III.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:32, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bloodsport II- The Next Kumite.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bloodsport II- The Next Kumite.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:32, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bloodsport 4.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bloodsport 4.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:32, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Lorie-WeekEndTour.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Lorie-WeekEndTour.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:50, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Lorie-Tendrement.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Lorie-Tendrement.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:50, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Lorie-PrèsdeToi.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Lorie-PrèsdeToi.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:50, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Lorie-LiveTour.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Lorie-LiveTour.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:50, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Lorie-Attitudes.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Lorie-Attitudes.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:51, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:The Fearless Hyena Poster.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:The Fearless Hyena Poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:13, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Genesis Poster.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Genesis Poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:03, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:The Fearless Hyena Poster.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:The Fearless Hyena Poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:26, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:The Last Castle Theatrical.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:The Last Castle Theatrical.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:52, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:Vertical Limit.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Vertical Limit.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:36, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Lorie.jpg

I have tagged Image:Lorie.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG 09:59, 18 September 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Resolved :) Sfan00 IMG 10:07, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Maximum Risk Poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Maximum Risk Poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:25, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:House Of Sand And Fog Poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:House Of Sand And Fog Poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:36, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hero poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hero poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:09, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Gorgeous Poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Gorgeous Poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:02, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Nowhere to Run.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Nowhere to Run.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:16, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Snake Eyes Poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Snake Eyes Poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:51, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sniper Poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sniper Poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:01, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Le Pacte Des Loups.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Le Pacte Des Loups.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Burstmeets (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Hitcher (2007) Poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The Hitcher (2007) Poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 08:23, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:De-Lovely Poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:De-Lovely Poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:44, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Lorie

Hi Happy Evil Dude! Beware, if you add red links in this template, you must also create these articles (it's a joke!). ;-) Europe22 (talk) 23:54, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Trilogies

[1] for bond, Ghostbusters III, The Dark Knight 2, XXX3 and Transformers 3 haven't even entered pre-production. Imdb entries are not considered reliable. There are no Riddick 2 or 3 in production or even with a script. And there is no point listing a series which has no wikilinks, or in the case of the Spider-man "trilogy" is nothing more than a bunch of TV episodes. Darrenhusted (talk) 12:00, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Imdb cannot be used as an RS that a film is being made, however if you read the Daniel Craig link then you would see that the imdb are quoting an interview with The Sun. When the sequels to Dark Knight, Transformers 2, xXx and Ghostbusters are released then add them. Otherwise that page will be lists of films people wish were being made rather than actual trilogies. Darrenhusted (talk) 12:22, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I agree with Darrenhusted. There will always films that are announced and partially developed but never actually make it to production. In addition, I think it is too shift to label three films in a row, if they have all at least been in production, as a trilogy. For example, why would Craig being in Bond 23 mean that Casino Royale, Quantum of Solace, and Bond 23 is a trilogy? What if Craig continues to make the films? What if someone replaces him but keeps the contemporary angle? As for Nolan's Batman films, it's still not set in stone that a third Batman film will be made. Even so, how can you be sure it will be a trilogy? What if it's a two-part film? There are a lot of questions, and if the films are not in production and there is no certain "finality" to the film series (a better term, in my opinion), we should hold off on calling them trilogies. —Erik (talk • contrib) 14:13, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Let's focus on discussing trilogies... I am not sure if having the section heading "Happy Evil Dude VS Darrenhusted" is assuming good faith. First of all, regarding Nolan's Batman films, of course the franchise has a good future. But why are we writing in a potential trilogy? We could argue that there are two or three more films in store under Nolan based on its success so far. It seems arbitrary to determine the cutoff to be a "trilogy"... the best way to group three films as a trilogy is if that has been the intent all along or if it is perceived as such retrospectively. We can't look into the crystal ball and extract something that resembles a trilogy based on released films and one that's merely being developed. Hollywood has many films based on major franchises that still wallow in development hell, like Jurassic Park IV or Spider-Man 4. If we are sure that more films are forthcoming, let them actually go into production before claiming that it is a new addition to the film series or that it bookends a film trilogy. Wikipedia needs to report information as published elsewhere; we can't be the trailblazer in such topics. —Erik (talk • contrib) 15:16, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can I ask you to read WP:AGF? This is a disagreement over content, and I do not think it is fair to assume that Darren is out to get you. Can it not be said that you are making it your mission to add such entries based on your own criteria? That is why we need to focus on the validity of the content. I was using the Batman films as the driving example in our dialogue, but if you want to use another example, we can. In the meantime, I am a little confused about how the Batman films are being treated. First, the trilogy was identified as Batman Begins, The Dark Knight, and the purported follow-up. Now it's Batman Begins, Batman: Gotham Knight, and The Dark Knight? Having worked on the film article for The Dark Knight, I can attest that it is universally acknowledged that The Dark Knight is the sequel to Batman Begins. Other editors have discussed the sequence and have filled the film infoboxes' "followed by" and "preceded by" fields accordingly. The same sequel reasoning of not counting these minor fillers applies to the Riddick films. You are partially right when you say that three films make a trilogy, but it has to be specifically recognized as such with narrative and production consistency. And please don't get frustrated by Wikipedia in general. There are a lot of viewpoints being exchanged, like here for example, and there is bound to be conflict. I've gotten frustrated myself with some conflicts, which is why I try to diversify my activities... if one activity is bringing me too much grief, I can fall back on other activities. If we need to, we can discuss the criteria for film trilogies further at WT:FILM. —Erik (talk • contrib) 13:59, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have passed 3RR

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Version reverted to [2], 1RR [3], 2RR [4], 3RR [5]. Darrenhusted (talk) 12:26, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:AI Poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:AI Poster.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:15, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Policy

If the film has not begun filming then there is no point adding it to a page which exists as a method of navigating between pages. You are identifying American Pie 7 as a 2009 film, when is has not begun filming. Because you seem to be slow here it is for you one more time, do not add films until they have started filming. Once they have a confirmed filming date, and then have an article page to link to, then feel free to add it. Paul Walker is quoted as saying that F&F5 will happen, but until it films there are only four F&F films, so it would be a tetralogy, I have no problem with that, but if editors started adding F&F5 to the pentalogies page then I would remove it. The reason is the simple, Wikipedia policy. Read WP:NFF and then have some patience. Darrenhusted (talk) 23:34, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Army of Crime

Nice work on expanding this article! Lugnuts (talk) 08:27, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gorgeous Poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gorgeous Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:17, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of film series with two entries

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of film series with two entries. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of film series with two entries (3rd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:03, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Louis Letterier

The reason I removed it is because up until recently there was no proof anywhere that he in fact directed it. Most places listed Corey Yuen as director.--TheMovieBuff (talk) 16:18, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Playboy

There were several notices in the Celebrities section of the Playboy article that said "ATTENTION EDITORS: Please see the talk page Re: "Celebrities" before adding another name to this list." Consensus has been reached long ago that the list of celebs should be kept to ten (10) names per category. Why did you ignore these notices? Dismas|^(talk) 21:28, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:FridayNightLights S4.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FridayNightLights S4.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:44, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mere Brother Ki Dulhan promo 2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mere Brother Ki Dulhan promo 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:49, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RE Warning

1) You cannot tell any editor which articles they may or may not edit 2) EVERY edtior can and should determine whether sources are reliable and remove those that fail to have a reputation for fact checking and accuracy 3) There is so reason the add "scheduled" to future dates as Wikipedia is not a crystal ball and should not be making proclamations about events that have not happened. Active Banana (^bananaphone 19:27, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Band Baaja Baaraat Press Kit Cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Band Baaja Baaraat Press Kit Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:50, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Asylum

Please add sources from verifiable, neutral sources when adding titles to this list, such as newspapers. Cite only sources that refer to the films as "mockbusters". Entries without references will be removed immediately. Entries with references that do not directly mention the title will also be removed. Direct links from The Asylum do not count as sources! Any questions regarding mockbusters may be posted to the Discussion section. - Areaseven (talk) 12:43, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Band Baaja Baaraat promo 1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Band Baaja Baaraat promo 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 03:56, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Band Baaja Baaraat promo 1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Band Baaja Baaraat promo 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:09, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Band Baaja Baaraat promo 1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Band Baaja Baaraat promo 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 16:37, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Band Baaja Baaraat promo 1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Band Baaja Baaraat promo 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 08:25, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:A Walk To Remember Poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:A Walk To Remember Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:07, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:A Walk To Remember Poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:A Walk To Remember Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:50, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to WikiConference India 2011

Hi Happy Evil Dude,

The First WikiConference India is being organized in Mumbai and will take place on 18-20 November 2011.
You can see our Official website, the Facebook event and our Scholarship form.

But the activities start now with the 100 day long WikiOutreach.

As you are part of WikiProject India community we invite you to be there for conference and share your experience. Thank you for your contributions.

We look forward to see you at Mumbai on 18-20 November 2011

Orphaned non-free image File:Shahrukhbola.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shahrukhbola.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:38, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited XIII: The Series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Martinez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:06, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Danse avec les stars (France season 3), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sia and Grégoire (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Mockingbird Lane (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Jason Taylor

Métal Hurlant Chronicles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sparkling

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Flight of the Storks (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Congo

Vincent Elbaz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to The Challengers

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:34, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mere Brother Ki Dulhan promo 1.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mere Brother Ki Dulhan promo 1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 04:03, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited No Limit (TV Series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spring (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Episode title formatting + OR

Please take a look at the documentation and the subsequent discussions at the {{Episode list}} and talk page. As well as WP:MOSTV on how to format episode titles. And when you're looking around check out WP:OR which is what "which is presumably correct" is, pure speculation and completely unfounded. _Xeworlebi ^(talk) 12:42, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Earth: Final Conflict episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tibor Takacs (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Danse avec les stars (France season 4), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lorie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jo (TV series), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Orthodox and Saint-Ouen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:19, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Partners (2012 TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macedonia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Donkey Kong Country: Tropical Freeze, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Archer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:04, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Amber Heard

Hello, Happy Evil Dude. You have new messages at Aaaccc's talk page.
Message added 21:43, 14 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Edit warring, BLP requirements

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Mandy Moore. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Adding unsourced claims of personal relationships to BLPs is simply unacceptable. Not only did you do this several times yesterday -- "justifying" your inappropriate behavior with an exceptional uncivil, policy-defying edit summary. Fouling up an article which editors have taken pains to clear of gossip and tabloidery, and edit warring to add back such content is unacceptable. You were warned about this by other users at the Amber Heard article, so you have simply moved on to malform other articles. This should stop now. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 01:55, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 02:24, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Emily VanCamp, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chris Evans and Gregory Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Happy Evil Dude. You have new messages at NickCT's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

License tagging for File:Lætitia Milot.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Lætitia Milot.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:05, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Lætitia Milot.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Lætitia Milot.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Hammersoft (talk) 20:40, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Lætitia Milot.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Lætitia Milot.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. LGA _talk^edits 22:29, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is a picture of a fictional character. As such, there can be no free equivalent. Happy Evil Dude (talk) 23:12, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is being used as a picture of the person not the character; it is therefore replaceable LGA _talk^edits 23:16, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the warning tag and response from the image. The image is now being used solely on the Plus belle la vie. The image can not be used anywhere else. It is likely not suitable for even this article, as mere depiction of a character is insufficient warrant for use of the image. Else, you could include images of every character, one by one by one. We do not allow that. A cast photo would be far more pertinent and allowable. For an example of what I am saying, see Cheers#Original_main_characters. --Hammersoft (talk) 00:16, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:DKCTropicalFreeze.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:DKCTropicalFreeze.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 02:07, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Lætitia Milot Dancing.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Lætitia Milot Dancing.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 20:27, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Lætitia Milot Dancing.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Lætitia Milot Dancing.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 11:23, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Lætitia Milot Dancing.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Lætitia Milot Dancing.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 11:30, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Michael Morris (director), without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 23:50, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited X-Men (film series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elizabeth Wright (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TheDivisionLogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TheDivisionLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:47, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Your recent editing history at Heartless (2014 film)‎ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Thomas.W ^talk 21:10, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're now at three reverts (#1, #2, #3) within the past 8-9 hours, plus one revert yesterday (#4), reverts to a version with an assertion that is not supported by the reference in the text. So stop. Thomas.W ^talk 21:16, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marie Drucker, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Weather girl. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Assassin's Creed Syndicate has been nominated for Did You Know

Hello, Happy Evil Dude. Assassin's Creed Syndicate, an article you either created or significantly contributed to, has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 04:05, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Assassin's Creed Syndicate

On 19 May 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Assassin's Creed Syndicate, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Assassin's Creed Syndicate was called Assassin's Creed Victory prior to its official reveal? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Assassin's Creed Syndicate. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Harrias ^talk 00:02, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BURDEN is a policy and must be followed

Contrary to your recent edit summary challenged content must NOT be restored without in line citations to reliable sources. in addition, the claims of "frequent" collaboration is pure trivia and false (working together twice is NOT "frequent") and original research - putting forth claims that have not been made by third parties. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 22:06, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Call of Juarez chronology

Template:Call of Juarez chronology has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bertaut (talk) 01:08, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Belle et Sébastien, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian Duguay. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Beard (companion), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page In the closet. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Watch Dogs 2 has been nominated for Did You Know

Hello, Happy Evil Dude. Watch Dogs 2, an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed,has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 12:01, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jacques Martin (comics), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spin-off. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Watch Dogs 2

On 19 June 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Watch Dogs 2, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Ubisoft Montreal intended to take risks when creating Watch Dogs 2? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Watch Dogs 2. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Watch Dogs 2), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Band Baaja Baaraat soundtrack.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Band Baaja Baaraat soundtrack.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:26, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Happy Evil Dude. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring to restore a BLP-violation

There is a clear explanation on the Odette Annable talk page as to why the addition of unsourced and poorly sourced dates of birth have been removed from the article. If you continue to edit war to restore the material contrary to our bright line policy regarding its inclusion, you will likely find yourself blocked from editing. You need to continue the discussion on the article talk page and get consensus as to why our policies and guidelines do not apply in this specific case in order for the material to be included when the requirements of "widely published by reliable sources" required by policy has not been met.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:24, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not a single link that you provided in your last pointy edit to the article meets our reliable sourcing criteria. As you don't seem familiar with what a reliable source is, in is imperative that you join the discussion on the talk page to vet your sources prior to using them.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:07, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mirror Image cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mirror Image cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Happy Evil Dude. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Happy Evil Dude. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Life-Size 2; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Amaury (talk | contribs) 15:19, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

To follow up on this, once your move was reverted it is considered a controversial move and is supposed to go to a WP:Requested move if the original mover thinks the previous article title is "incorrect". Also, article titles are not governed by "WP:OFFICIALNAME" – IOW, The Empire Strikes Back is at that title, and not the onscreen title of Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back (which is just a redirect). So just because there's an "onscreen title" does not mean it's the film's WP:COMMONNAME which is where article are supposed to be titled. Bottom line: If you feel strongly about this, you now need to initiate a WP:Requested move, and cite your evidence for why you think the article should be moved. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 15:55, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of feature film series with three entries, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Body of Evidence (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited All Inclusive (2014 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Philippe Lefebvre (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:44, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Happy Evil Dude,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikipedia and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 16:29, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Happy Evil Dude,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:37, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I added avengers series and thor series in 4 movies series wiki page

Why did you remove it. Do you guys recognise all mcu movies to be 1 franchise. MCU is a series with many series ZuhayrRoha (talk) 20:25, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ZuhayrRoha, yes that's exactly the case, all the MCU films are listed in a single entry in the "over twenty entries" page here. As such, they shouldn't sub-series like Thor, Iron Man, etc, shouldn't be duplicately listed on other pages. Also, announced films like Thor: Love & Thunder or Dr. Strange in the Multiverse of Madness should only be added once they actually start filming. I hope this clears things up for you! Happy Evil Dude (talk) 20:58, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spider-man sam raimi trilogy

So where will sam raimi's trilogy go Movies with 3 entries or with all other spidey movie 8 movies now Then homecoming and ffh is being repeated twice ZuhayrRoha (talk) 11:00, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Homecoming and FFH are part of the MCU so they are with the other MCU films here. The Sam Raimi films and Amazing Spider-Man films are two separate series, so the ASM ones are in the "two entries" page here and the Raimi ones in the "three entries" page here. It's similar to the Batman films for example: The Tim Burton and Joel Schumacher ones are part of the same series so they're in the four entries page, the Christopher Nolan trilogy is its own separate thing in the three entries page and the films with Ben Affleck are part of the DC Extended Universe and are listed with the other DCEU films like Man of Steel, Aquaman & Wonder Woman in the nine entries page. Happy Evil Dude (talk) 11:44, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Happy Evil Dude,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:38, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Avril Lavigne

Hello Mr Troll. Just because a foreign government considers a person to be a citizen through birth does not necessarily mean that person is a citizen. She was born in English Canada - deal with it. She lived in LA, but she wasn't an American. She lives in France (where she did get a passport), but who wants to live in Canada with the way things are going? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tex99999 (talk • contribs) 08:10, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:16, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Deus Ex chronology

Template:Deus Ex chronology has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. TarkusAB^talk/contrib 08:58, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Department Q (film series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Variety.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of French films of 2023, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sergi López.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bloodsport III.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bloodsport III.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:11, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of French films of 2023, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mamadou Diallo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Films

Where can I watch Le Mystère Parasuram and Son épouse. Can you suggest some French songs. DareshMohan (talk) 06:12, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Daresh, I was surprised to see you ask this question on my talk page (what prompted it?) but looked into it anyway. I don't have very good news I'm afraid:

1. For Le Mystère Parasuram, I'd never heard of it, but it looks like it was broadcast on French TV 10 times between August 2000 and April 2009. It has not been broadcast since, has never been released on DVD and doesn't appear to be streaming anywhere. Maybe contacting the production company through their e-mail demd@demd-productions.com can help?

2. For Son Épouse, it is available on DVD in France for as little as 4 euros as well as digital copies through Google Play or YouTube for 7 euros (but I don't know if those would work outside France). Much of the film's dialogue is in French however (there is also Tamil and English dialogue) and neither the DVD nor the digital copy have English subtitles. There do not seem to be English subtitles available for any copy you may find. The film was also released on DVD in the Netherlands where it comes with Dutch subtitles and it appears it can also be found in Russia with Russian subtitles.

3. As for French songs, this is a very vast topic and I don't know what kind of songs you like? Classic hits from the 1940s, 50s, 60s? Vintage bops from the 1970s, 80s, 90s? Modern beats from the 2000s onwards? Pop music? Rock? Hip-Hop/Rap? R&B? And so on... Happy Evil Dude (talk) 09:13, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Omg, thanks for the response. I listen to mostly Indian songs but I would like to listen to recent songs like post 2000s like Dernière danse. I don't know what genre I like but I like Ed Sheeran, Steal the Show from Elemental and Enamorate. DareshMohan (talk) 04:13, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Editor's Barnstar
		Merci pour vos articles. [6] DareshMohan (talk) 01:20, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of French films of 2023, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Take Me Home.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Almost Legal moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Almost Legal. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 13:45, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The Beast (2023 film), you may be blocked from editing. I see you have been warned countless times in 17 years, I strongly suggest you consider the statements I made in my edit summary, which was clearly not "vandalism". ภץאคгöร 21:24, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Take your own advice maybe? And I have not "been warned countless times in 17 years"... Happy Evil Dude (talk) 21:30, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are adding an unreliable source AND original research then reply to me to take my own advice? Everyone can see the warnings above. ภץאคгöร 21:45, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source is as reliable as humanly possible and no original research was undertaken. Try again. Happy Evil Dude (talk) 22:01, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Riight... "Scriptoclap.fr" is as reliable as humanly possible and "Estimated on the basis of multiplying the number of tickets sold in France by the €7,20 average movie ticket price in France and adding that amount to the international box-office gross" isn't original research. Who are you trying to convince here? ภץאคгöร 22:25, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Scriptoclap is an industry website. The method of calculation of French box-office I presented is the method all box-office analysts in France use to determine a movie's domestic gross. The number of tickets sold and the price of a movie ticket are not original research. They're facts. Unifrance is the authorative, industry source for all international numbers. I kinda know a lot more about this than you do... Happy Evil Dude (talk) 23:42, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of French films of 2026 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of French films of 2026 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of French films of 2026 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bearcat (talk) 14:17, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Acts Of War cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Acts Of War cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Almost Legal

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Almost Legal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 02:58, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Christmas Carole for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christmas Carole, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christmas Carole until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:00, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]