User talk:HankWilliamsGeorgeJones

November 2022

Hello, I'm Dudhhr. I noticed that you made a change to an article, I'm So Lonesome I Could Cry, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – dudhhr^talk _contribs (he/they) 03:38, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If I've Only One Time Askin' moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to If I've Only One Time Askin'. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Moriwen (talk) 17:40, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Come Cry With Me moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Come Cry With Me. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. voorts (talk/contributions) 17:50, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: If I've Only One Time Askin' (July 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:If I've Only One Time Askin' and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 19:14, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HankWilliamsGeorgeJones! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 19:14, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Closest of Friends. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Edit warring, making the same exact edit as blocked IP Special:Contributions/47.223.111.239. Binksternet (talk) 23:51, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

By other editors do you mean yourself? Not to mention, there is no listed genre, so how is adding one wrong? HankWilliamsGeorgeJones (talk) 01:20, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If there is no explicit source for the genre, then we don't list a genre. Binksternet (talk) 17:52, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then you certainly have a lot of editing to do on around half of the album pages of many classic country artists who are listed as “Country” with no source. HankWilliamsGeorgeJones (talk) 20:56, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A generic genre is okay for an obvious example of that genre, for instance "Rapper's Delight" is clearly a hip hop song. See Wikipedia:You don't need to cite that the sky is blue. But more specific genres need to be sourced. This edit of yours was completely unacceptable, changing to genres that aren't supported by the cited sources, even changing the title of the AllMusic webpage. Binksternet (talk) 21:57, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, a valid argument would be that he promoted the album on hee haw and it was also produced by Jerry Butler: therefore it would make this a generic genre. HankWilliamsGeorgeJones (talk) 22:10, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, while on the topic, I want to commend and thank you for editing “Heartache Tonight” with a source. Keep up the amazing work with source finding! HankWilliamsGeorgeJones (talk) 02:24, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for violating Wikipedia's policy regarding neutrality by genre warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 18:21, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Blue Over You

Hello, HankWilliamsGeorgeJones. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Blue Over You, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:10, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Lonely and Blue. Binksternet (talk) 04:00, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The album “Lonely and Blue” features cover songs of four different country music hits at the time. That would make it a partially country album, not to mention it is a Rock and Roll album, not a rock album. HankWilliamsGeorgeJones (talk) 04:01, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You were blocked for this before. What you need is a published source explicitly supporting the genre you want to add. Binksternet (talk) 04:30, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That will have to wait ...

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one month for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 19:54, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited East Texas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hank Thompson. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Blue Over You

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Blue Over You, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:01, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HankWilliamsGeorgeJones. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk) 23:05, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]