User talk:HLMC98

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alison Goss Eng (September 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thsmi002 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alison Goss Eng and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Alison Goss Eng, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thsmi002 (talk) 00:52, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Cehelmuth! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Thsmi002 (talk) 00:52, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Cehelmuth, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Draft:The New Children's Museum have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 💴Money💶💵emoji💷^{Talk💸Help out at CCI!} 12:22, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Alison Goss Eng concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Alison Goss Eng, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:45, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Alison Goss Eng

Hello, Cehelmuth. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Alison Goss Eng".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 23:00, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Quyen T. Nguyen

The article Quyen T. Nguyen has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 03:49, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Quyen T. Nguyen moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Quyen T. Nguyen, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Capewearer (talk) 08:08, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

April 2020 at Women in Red

April 2020, Volume 6, Issue 4, Numbers 150, 151, 159, 160, 161, 162 April offerings at Women in Red. Online events: New: Gender studies / Dance / Geofocus: Caucasus Photo and image campaign: #VisibleWikiWomen Continuing initiatives: #1day1woman / Sports! Editor feedback: Schedule planning at the Virtual Ideas Cafe Join the conversations on our talkpage Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

TJMSmith (talk) 16:34, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The New Children's Museum

Hello, HLMC98. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The New Children's Museum".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 09:33, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Problem with your custom signature

You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your preferences are set to interpret your custom signature as wikitext. However, your current custom signature does not contain any wikitext.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:

1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
2. Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
3. Remove anything in the Signature: text box. (It might already be empty.)
4. Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)

Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:

1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
2. Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
3. Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page.

More information about custom signatures is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Thank you. 18:03, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Judy bernstein portrait.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Judy bernstein portrait.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:30, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kilma Lattin.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kilma Lattin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kilma S. Lattin

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kilma S. Lattin, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Praxidicae (talk) 15:01, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

The nature of your edits

I've noticed for quite a while that many of your edits are highly promotional and you've repeatedly uploaded photos as either your own work or noted that they were released by the author. Do you have any connection, personal or professionally to any of the subjects you have written about? Can you also indicate where in the link you provided for this file that the author explicitly granted usage rights? Please read the relevant policies: WP:PAID WP:COI and respond before editing any further. Praxidicae (talk) 15:38, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Response

Thank you Praxidicae for helping to keep Wikipedia a reliable source of information. Here are answers to your comments and questions. 1) I don't have many edits. I have only written 2 other articles, one published, one unfinished. I do not feel that any of these are promotional, any more than any other biography I have seen on Wikipedia. I write about individuals who have done unusual things, but have used reliable sources to verify these. 2) Most images that I post are not from the subject, but from news sources about the subject and these should fall under fair use. 3) I do not have any connection, personally or professionally, to the subjects I have written about. I am not paid to write. I am an educator, and like many people who write on Wikipedia, I am inspired by individuals who are making unique contributions to their communities and society as a whole, and who are role models for minorities. 4) I believe I have attributed the image of Kilma Lattin and the Emmy Award to UC Santa Barbara, his alma mater, where I was informed that they took this photo for a press release for the alumni association.

Additionally, please note that each accomplishment listed on the page for Kilma Lattin has been carefully researched and cited with reliable and verifiable sources.

Please consider that deleting this page would be contributing to the imbalance of diversity represented on Wikipedia, which should equitably include the contributions and stories of living Native Americans as well as individuals of all backgrounds, religions, ethnicities, and genders.

HLMC98 16:08, 24 September 2020 (UTC)HLMC98

How did you come to write about this individual? You seem to have some sort of connection, as you say above " I was informed that they took this photo". Who informed you? 331dot (talk) 20:47, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

UC Santa Barbara. It was a photo I thought would be good for the post and I emailed the alumni association at UC Santa Barbara for permission. I sent out several emails about various photos I had wanted to use to different sources and they were the first to respond. I am researching the issue of tribal sovereignty and came across this individual who seemed to have an unusually wide variety of activities listed on google and I found it fascinating. CHelmuth 21:08, 24 September 2020 (UTC)HLMC98

September 2020

Hello, I'm Giraffer. I noticed that in this edit to Kilma S. Lattin, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Giraffer ^munch 16:38, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Response

Thank you for letting me know, Giraffer. I will be more careful to cite edits from now on. I realized that the introduction repeated information already listed below, so I condensed the text, to address some of the concerns in the tag.

Kilma S. Lattin

I started the process of trimming the article down to what is encyclopedic. It may seem brutal, but when it comes to topics that barely qualify for an article in the first place under Wikipedia's notability criteria, less IS more. Why? Because too much makes people think the page's purpose is to promote the topic. There is more information on Talk:Kilma S. Lattin.

Even with this gutting, there is still the possibility that it will be nominated for deletion. If it is, I predict it will barely survive with a "no consensus to delete" outcome, which is basically a "neutral, barely qualifies to stay" outcome. However, there is a small possibility that it may be deleted after a week-long deletion discussion. There isn't much you can do to prevent this, other than hope he runs for statewide office or the state assembly or something else that will get him enough coverage that he is clearly "over the line" when it comes to being "notable enough to have a stand-alone article in Wikipedia." davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 22:29, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Article further trimmed, so now about 1/3 of largest size and 1/3 of largest number of references. Should stand as acceptably encyclopaedic. David notMD (talk) 09:00, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Signature

Hi. I noticed, in your post at The Teahouse, that your signature is not properly formatted and contains no link to your user or user talk pages, a requirement of WP:CUSTOMSIG. The easiest solution is to reset to the default signature as described in #Problem with your custom signature "Solution 1" above. Please also take care that, when you post to a discussion page, that you place the four tildes ( ~~~~) at the very end of the last line of your post – nothing should come after them. This is necessary to make sure that archivers and other types of scripts can correctly locate the timestamp. Thanks. —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 00:08, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Native American Financial Officers Association moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Native American Financial Officers Association, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Roller26 (talk) 03:33, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited KPRI, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Witch Creek. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:11, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Rob Wellington Quigley

Hello, HLMC98. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rob Wellington Quigley".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:10, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Kilma Lattin.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kilma Lattin.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 17:15, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Kilma Lattin.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Kilma Lattin.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.comm.ucsb.edu/news/announcement/849. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 17:41, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

This file has been deleted from the English Wikipedia. The file you see when you click on the link is a completely different file with the same name on the Wikimedia Commons. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 18:17, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Judy bernstein portrait.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Judy bernstein portrait.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:49, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Judy bernstein portrait.jpg

Whatever you did to get the people at https://www.theypouredfirebooks.com/authors/#judy to update their web site to show that the photo was released under the {{cc-by-4.0}} license, thank you. I have updated the file's description page and removed the deletion template. Consider moving the file to the Wikimedia Commons. If you do, consider renaming it with a capital B in Bernstein. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 18:39, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

I added the photo to the infobox at Judy A. Bernstein as well. If you rename the file, this infobox will need to be updated. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 18:53, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi HLMC98! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Not just deletion, but "speedy deletion" :-(, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kilma S. Lattin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BA.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:40, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Alison Goss Eng

Hello, HLMC98. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Alison Goss Eng".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 15:50, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Native American Financial Officers Association

Hello, HLMC98. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Native American Financial Officers Association, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:04, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Rob Wellington Quigley has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rob Wellington Quigley. Thanks! Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:50, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Hello Calliopejen1, thank you for looking at this. I will try to simplify the language so it sounds more encyclopedic and less narrative. Thank you also for the links, those are good ones. There's a great deal of biographical information from his Rizzoli monograph as they interviewed him. Should I cite page numbers perhaps? [[User:HLMC98|HLMC98]] ([[User talk:HLMC98|talk]]) (talk) 04:12, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Yes please. I recommend citing every sentence in the article individually with the relevant page number/article where that information appears. Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:20, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rob Wellington Quigley has been accepted

Rob Wellington Quigley, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

HenryCrun15 (talk) 07:21, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)