User talk:H3nrique Bregie

License tagging for File:José Manuel Bolieiro (cropped).PNG

Thanks for uploading File:José Manuel Bolieiro (cropped).PNG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:31, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2026 Portuguese presidential election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page João Ferreira. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to Portugal, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 11:38, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop edit-warring

Please, stop edit-warring over Portuguese opinion polling articles. You were bold in conducting your edits, but those were contested, so now you should seek a consensus rather than keeping edit-warring (see WP:BRD). On your particular comments, opinion polling tables are not listings of events. Some users unilaterally added these across Wikipedia throughout the years, but the current trend is for these to be removed over a large number of issues (I can explain further if necessary). Opinion polling for the next United Kingdom general election has a very specific consensus which is not exportable to other articles (though you may notice in the talk page that a number of new events were proposed AND rejected. This is not something you can apply to other articles). In the case of Opinion polling for the 2011 Portuguese legislative election, that is one of these few instances in which events were unilaterally added and not removed, though it's curious you use that as an argument for adding events into the rest of the polling pages and not the other way around (using the fact that 2019, 2022 and next do not show events in order to remove the events from 2011, which is the actual correct thing to do. We could also cite 2015, 2009 or 2005 as examples of polling articles not citing events. 2011 was not following consensus, thus not an example to follow). Hope this was clarifying. Cheers! Impru20^talk 18:58, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rui Rocha moved to draftspace

Thanks for creating Rui Rocha. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 00:32, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Seven Wonders of Portugal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mafra.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mariana Mortágua, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alvito.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Next Azorean regional election" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Next Azorean regional election has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 18 § Next Azorean regional election until a consensus is reached. Rusalkii (talk) 21:22, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 14th Legislature of the Third Portuguese Republic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page António Filipe.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your attempt to move an article using copy/paste/delete

Please read Wikipedia:Moving a page. I reverted your attempt to move José Manuel Barroso for the reasons explained in that article.

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi H3nrique Bregie. Thank you for your work on Filipe Sousa (politician). Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:24, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Portuguese constituencies

Hi, I wanted to explain my reverts of your additions to the Portuguese constituencies articles as you may it view it as harsh. The content you added was a reptition of content that was already given in the articles. If you were adding the current MPs, then this information is given in the infobox under "Deputies". But having checked your addition to the Assembly of the Republic website, they weren't the current MPs. Most probably they were the MPs elected at the election but this is also a repetition as this information is given in the results section in the article. Also, when you add a list of content please sort them into a logical order, such as alpahbetical, that everyone can understand. Please remember that Wikipedia has a global readership, not just followers of Portuguese politics. Thank you. Obi2canibe (talk) 10:27, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think you got it wrong, that information weren't the elected MPs, they were the current MPs, I checked that information from https://www.parlamento.pt/DeputadoGP/Paginas/Plenario.aspx. I know that information was avaliable in the infobox, but the infobox should reflect the information from the rest of the article, and as such I was adding that information to the article itself.

Also, I think the order in the infobox looked more arbitrary than that of my tables. My tables listed the MPs first by the party (from most to less voted) and then by the order of the actual party list. I think that information is also very important to be in the article, and I think that order is more relevant than alphabetical order.

I personally don't think my edits have made it any harder for everyone to read and understand the page. If someone is checking a page about a constituency, they might like to check the list of current MPs.

I get that perhaps you might not agree with me that the tables were the best way to add that information to the article, but I think we can discuss a better way to add that information in a way that it becomes more compreensible and accessible to the general public. H3nrique Bregie (talk) 12:55, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, there are the current MPs, it would have helped if you had provided the source when you added the content to the articles. Yes, the infobox should reflect the content of the article but the content you added was right next to the infobox so it was unnecessary duplication. The order in the infobox isn't arbitrary, it was in alphabetical order by surname which is the standard way English Wikipedia sorts biographical articles. You may think that the order in which the MPs were elected is very important but I doubt most readers would share your view. If they are searching for an individual they would be able to find them quickly if they are sorted by name but not if they're sorted by your preferred order--Obi2canibe (talk) 18:55, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think that sorting every MP by the order in the party list is more relevant than by surname alphabetically. Maybe one way to change that would be making the table sortable, that way it could be arranged in alphabetical order. And if the tables are readded I will add a source, that's not really complicated and I should have thought about doing so in the first place.

I just think that the information should be in the page in a way that could be easier for readers to see and understand, if you think there's a different solution then I'm all ears. H3nrique Bregie (talk) 20:20, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We'll have to agree to disagree on the issue of whether anyone really cares which order the candidates were elected.--Obi2canibe (talk) 19:00, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]