User talk:Gws57
You are not really new to Wikipedia, but it is never too late to:
Welcome!
Hello Gws57, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
- Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
- If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!
-Poli (talk • contribs) 22:20, 2005 July 25 (UTC)
Gibson City > How to Move a Page
[edit]I moved Gibson to Gibson City, Illinois WikiDon 21:43, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
How to Move a Page
[edit]Do NOT do a copy+paste!
READ How_to_move_a_page. You use the "MOVE" button, at the top of most every page, this moves the talk pages, the watch pages, the links, everything. If the page you want to move to has never been edited, any user can do it. If it has, or there is content there you have two choices:
You can use: Requested moves
- and/or
Go to the admin page and see who is online now, then hit one up. Or an admin you already know. It is ten to 100 times faster than putting it on "Requested moves" I have seen pages stay on there over a month.
Once the page has been moved, go to and click "What links here" in the toolbox on the left pane. Then you can begin your link fixes, fix the "re-directs" (I recommend looking at this list before the move). I wouldn't worry to much about the "user" pages, if any, that are linked to that particular page, those users can fixs the re-directs if they want to.
WikiDon 21:43, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
Re: CGW
[edit]Honestly, I only skimmed through it and didn't give it the thorough read that it really deserves. I was going to add the president names and data to List of railroad executives before leaving for work today but ran out of time; the Derasmus typos just stood out for me. Slambo (Speak) 15:08, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
Since you mentioned an interest in the Chicago railroad scene on Wikipedia:WikiProject Trains, I thought you might be interested in contributing to the Chicago Railroad Fair article which I created yesterday. The information in it so far is all based on the official program whose cover is scanned as the image for the article (an acquaintance of mine gave me the program over the weekend). Slambo (Speak) 19:58, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
Rockford
[edit]Hey! Thanks for Wikifying the links! :) Iffer 06:57, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
Metra stations
[edit]I did read your plea about the Metra stations-- just didn't have time to address it.
I don't know beans about Chicago and trains (other than knowing a very little about the various belt railroads) but I'm willing to help. Mangoe 14:43, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 05:31, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
Nice cleanup job!
[edit]Hi Gws57, I just read your cleanup of the Metra article and think you did a great job! MKoltnow 04:20, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Linguistics Inquiry
[edit]Hey, I was just perusing the edit history of kretek and I noticed your little note that says the Indonesian word "kretek" has no S in plural form. If this is true, is the word even meant to be spoken in English? And if so, should there be an S or not? I don't exactly run into a lot of people who have any experience with the Indonesian language, so I figured I'd take a shot in the dark and see if you happened to know. Plus, I'm not even sure if I'm pronouncing it properly. I look forward to your insight, should you have any! :^) -- Randall00 Talk 21:13, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
New WikiProject Illinois Collaboration Division
[edit]Hey, saw you were a participant in the Illinois WikiProject. I thought I would let you know that there is a new Collaboration Division up for the project. The goal of the division is to select an article or articles for improvement to Good article standard or higher. There is a simple nomination process, which you can check out on the division subpage, to make sure each candidate for collaboration has enough interested editors. This is a good way to get a lot of articles to a quality status quickly. Please consider participating. More details can be seen at the division subpage. IvoShandor 11:26, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Re: I-290 (IL)
[edit]Sounds pretty legitimate to replace the comments about the banker with the inertia concept. In the 1950s Oak Park was pretty much developed out (something I can't quite cite yet), so it would make sense.
My first edits to the history section from the copious source material at http://www.cookexpressways.com/ haven't quite addressed this yet, so I'll work on that. It really doesn't help that the source isn't in chronological order. But it seems that the 6-lane Maywood section opened in 1955, while the 8-lane section from 1st Avenue to Laramie opened in 1960. Odds are a combination of cost constraints and pressure to open caused the reduction in lanes. —Rob (talk) 19:43, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Illinois 2007 Census
[edit]
|
The WikiProject Illinois 2007 membership census has concluded. If you did not add your name during the last week, you were declared "inactive" in the project, your name is still listed at The Participants Page. You can change your status by replacing {{member inactive}} with {{active}} in the table. Any members should also feel free to fill in any missing details on the list below. | 
|
IvoShandor 11:08, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
I just thought you should know, that I posted the info regarding Naperville Station to make the distinction between that one and Route 59 Station. ----DanTD 02:22, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Germany Invitation
[edit]
|
--Zeitgespenst (talk) 17:13, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Unspecified source for Image:BandOBasculeBridgeAtChicagoRiver.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:BandOBasculeBridgeAtChicagoRiver.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:06, 1 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 19:06, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
As the major contributor to this article, I wanted to make certain that you were aware of its GA Sweeps review, in which it has been placed on hold pending the resolution of a few relatively minor isues. --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 19:27, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
You are by far the number one editor of this page. Please come help at Talk:Grand Central Station (Chicago)/GA1.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 19:26, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
[edit]Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.
On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.
For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.
Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:26, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Gws57. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Winston Tunnel
[edit]Winston Tunnel has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 15:01, 29 January 2023 (UTC)