User talk:GoldenGuy23

Welcome!

Hello, GoldenGuy23, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Graham87 02:37, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

Hello, thanks for your edit to Mahalia Jackson. While checking out your talk page, I noticed that you received an incorrect vandalism warning for your edit to Life After Death from an automated anti-vandalism bot called ClueBot NG, so I've undone the edit and removed the warning. If you have any questions about Wikipedia, feel free to ask me. Graham87 02:37, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Just for the Record (Barbra Streisand album), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages God Bless the Child and The Sweetest Sounds. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Hello, I'm Dan56. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Late Registration, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 14:34, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Private Dancer may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:53, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stay with Me Tonight (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Louis Johnson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited LeToya (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flash Technology. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Fame. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 01:40, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at The Fame, you may be blocked from editing. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 06:35, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at 1989 (Taylor Swift album). —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 20:10, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

IndianBio, The edits that I added to Lady Gaga's The Fame was not of my own personal opinions or analysis, but was based on the liner notes found on Discogs.com, which are in turn based on the physical liner notes for the same album. GoldenGuy23 (talk) 19:52, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015- Taylor Swift's 1989 album

Again, as with Lady Gaga's the fame, all I did was add the information that was based on the actual liner notes. I did not write down my own analysis or opinions on the personnel section of Taylor Swift's album, 1989. GoldenGuy23 (talk) 22:50, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Accidentally in Love, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brendan O'Brien. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Magical Mystery Tour (song). Sundayclose (talk) 18:07, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cinderella (1950 film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:03, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to One Hundred and One Dalmatians may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* [[Bill Lee (singer)|Bill Lee]]) as Roger Radcliffe's singing voice

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:09, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Monkey Business (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Johnson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Hello, I'm Loriendrew. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you unlinked one or more redlinks. Often redlinks can be helpful, so we don't remove them just because they are red. They help improve Wikipedia by attracting editors to create needed articles.

In addition, clicking on the "What links here" special link (in the Wikipedia Toolbox at left) on a missing article shows how many—and which—articles depend on that article being created. This can help prioritize article creation. Redlinks are useful! Please, only remove a redlink if you are pretty sure that it is to a non-notable topic and not likely ever to be created. Thanks! ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 22:20, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Soprano

Hi GoldenGuy23, thank-you for adding content to the History section of Soprano, it is needed. However, I have asked you a question over at Talk:Soprano#New content in History section; please leave your answer there. Thanks. Prhartcom (talk) 11:54, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Grammy Hall of Fame Award recipients (J–P), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lean on Me. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Grammy Hall of Fame Award recipients (J–P), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Milestones. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Grammy Hall of Fame Award recipients (E–I) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| [[RPM Records (United States|RPM]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:31, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Grammy Hall of Fame Award recipients (E–I) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| [[Neil Young]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:51, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Grammy Hall of Fame Award recipients (E–I) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| "[[It Had to be You (song)|It Had to Be You

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:15, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Grammy Hall of Fame Award recipients (Q–Z) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Tchaikovsky]]: ''[[Piano Concerto No. 1 (Tchaikovsky)|Concerto No. 1]] in B-Flat Minor Op. 23]] for piano and orchestra'' (live performance)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:30, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Grammy Hall of Fame Award recipients (Q–Z), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roxanne. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Grammy Hall of Fame Award recipients (E–I) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| [[1946 in music|1946

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:39, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Grammy Hall of Fame Award recipients (J–P) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| [[Aram Khachaturian|Khachaturian]]: Piano Concerto (Khachaturian)|Piano Concerto]] in D-Flat Major''

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:30, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Grammy Hall of Fame Award recipients (J–P) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Bjorling]], [[Robert Merrill]], [[Giorgio Tozzi]], [[John Reardon (baritone)|John Reardon]], etc. (with Orchestra & Chorus conducted by [[Thomas Beecham]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:17, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Exclusive (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Underdogs. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Late Registration.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Dan56 (talk) 22:50, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Graffiti (Chris Brown album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Keith Thomas. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, GoldenGuy23. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016: Kanye West's Late Registration Album

Dan56, I only added reliable information related to The Late Registration album by Kanye West from sites such as Genius.com (site with lyrics to the song), as that website has verifiable information, some of which come from the either the artist(s)/musician(s) themselves or other musicians who had actually worked (in the studio) with the artist. There are some cases when the Liner Notes alone doesn't credit all of the musicians, songwriters or samples that actually appear on the album. The added information wasn't of my own opinion but was based on facts. One example is on the song "Roses" in which background singer Tony Williams talks about Patti LaBelle recording her vocals on the song at the last minute (after the Liner notes had already been printed).<ref>Kanye West and Patti LaBelle. "Roses Lyrics". Genius.com. http://genius.com/Kanye-west-roses-lyrics</ref> Another example is the use of a Notorious B.I.G. vocal sample on the hidden track "Late", the same song where I added the source of the songwriting credits<ref>West, Kanye. "Late Lytics". Genius.com. http://genius.com/Kanye-west-late-lyrics</ref> (as information on the hidden track doesn't appear in the Liner notes).<ref>West, Kanye. "Late Registration (Digital Booklet). ''Album Artwork and Liner Notes''. Roc-a-Fella Records, LLC. 2005, 2014. http://albumlinernotes.com/uploads/Digital_Booklet_-_Late_Registration.pdf</ref>

Genius was found to be unreliable here; anyone with a registered account can edit or add information. Please consider finding other sources that verify this information. As far as the Biggie "sample", it's just one lyric I see that West used from a Biggie song; it really isn't necessary to deconstruct every rap song's lyrics, because--as in other music(s)--much of everything is borrowed in one form or another. Stick to the credits; if it's notable and not in the credits, it'll show up in reliable sources. Labelle's vocals are mentioned btw, in the article body, attributed to an interview she spoke in. Dan56 (talk) 15:14, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding arbitrary line breaks and disarranging the songwriters' names out of alphabetical order. Dan56 (talk) 17:35, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dan56, I was only doing that to make the track listing & personnel information look neater & easier for others to read, as the article can look pretty confusing without the line breaks. Also, I noticed you took out the other information that can actually be found in the Liner notes (such as DJ A-Trak scratching on "Gold Digger" and a female rapper by the name of "Strings" contributing additional vocals on "Addiction"). Please don't delete the additional Liner notes information on the musicians that appear in the actual Liner notes but wasn't on the website at first.

It looks fine on my screen; we cant customize article layouts for how it appears on your screen. If youre interested in neat, then please organize your changes rather than making a series of cluttered edits so they don't all get reverted. Dan56 (talk) 17:48, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WhoSampled is not reliable, as I explained in this edit summary earlier. Dan56 (talk) 01:23, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in King (T.I. album), disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 01:39, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Graduation (album), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 00:38, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Late Registration shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Dan56 (talk) 22:54, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To Dan56, TheAmazingPeanuts and other editors, I would like to apologize if I caused any confusion. I was only trying to slightly rearrange the names on the songwriting, production and other sections so that all of the artists whose names are connected to a web link could be together. For example, (I believe that) the songwriting credits for "We Major" should be written as "West, Williams, Nasir Jones, Warren Trotter, Warryn Campbell, Russell Simmons, Larry Smith, Maureen Reid" Instead of the current arrangement of "Warryn Campbell, Nasir Jones, Maureen Reid, Russell Simmons, Larry Smith, Warren Trotter, West, Williams". Also, I was trying to correct the names of artists The Game and Jay Z, who were written incorrectly as "Game (rapper)" and "Jay-Z". As far as the additional link for the Hank Crawford song "Wildflower", I added it because the original liner notes only mentions the sample used in "Drive Slow" as being from a "Hank Crawford recording" without specific information about the sample's title.<ref>West, Kanye. "Late Registration (Digital Booklet)". Roc-a-Fella Records. 2005, 2014. http://albumlinernotes.com/uploads/Digital_Booklet_-_Late_Registration.pdf</ref> GoldenGuy23 (talk) 23:25, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What is the benefit to arranging names that way?? There's less logic to this than alphabetizing the names, and if anything, creating a sea of blue by arranging the way you did is more likely to overwhelm the reader with consecutive, unseparated links. I wont entertain any more complaints about additions via WhoSampled; it's been explained before; please accept that it is not an encyclopedic/reliable source. Dan56 (talk) 23:34, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

While I now understand about the names being in alphabetical order, I'll have to respectfully disagree with you on the topic of music sites like WhoSampled.com, because while they might not be encyclopedic in the traditional sense, (to me) they're reliable if listeners can hear the actual sound(s) from both the original song and the song that uses that particular sound, melody or set of lyrics. GoldenGuy23 (talk) 23:41, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, disagree. Just don't add it to any article again. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 00:37, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New Amerykah Part One

Scans of the album's credited personnel are available here at Discogs; please adhere to those credits if you are to make more changes to the article's personnel section. Dan56 (talk) 23:36, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The main source (Liner Notes) seems to be the basis for this Discogs entry, as it has the "complete" credits: [1] GoldenGuy23 (talk) 00:40, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You do know that some unknown person(s) put that entry together, simply because they had a Discogs account (WP:SPS) Please stick to what you can actually prove are the official credits, i.e. the scanned images. Dan56 (talk) 00:50, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Christmas Duets"

Kellymoat, to answer your question on the edit page for the posthumous Elvis Presley album Christmas Duets, I only added the sources because not all of the information on personnel (such as some of the background singers) are mentioned on the main Discogs.com source. Some of the important information on the background singers who aren't mentioned on Discogs can only be found on the notes of those YouTube videos, which are based on the album's physical Liner notes. GoldenGuy23 (talk) 21:32, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To Kellymoat, Discogs.com is a reliable source, as the information on those web pages are adapted from (meaning "based on") the physical liner notes for that particular album &/or single. I added Discogs as the main source because that is where I got most of my additional information (such as the tracks that the additional musicians appeared on) from. GoldenGuy23 (talk) 01:41, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discogs is a wiki, therefore it is unreliable as a source. Anyone can go in and edit it to say whatever they want it to say - the same as you can do on Wikipedia. Kellymoat (talk) 02:00, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pop recordings of famous Christmas carols

Hi, what's the notability criteria you're using for this list? Are you intending to add every single performance of these carols available on record? What about recordings of choirs singing carols? I expect the list of cathedral choirs singing those runs to hundreds, so good luck with your quest. Rob (talk) 23:50, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not trying to add every single recording of these carols (which would probably be "book length"), I'm just trying to list a variety of artists (from different genres & time periods) who have recorded the song, as most of the other Christmas songs (both secular and gospel) have a list of artists (usually from various genres) who've recorded those songs on their web page, usually ranging from the time those songs were created &/or the time that sound recording technology became available for musicians & producers/engineers to record those songs. GoldenGuy23 (talk) 00:50, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:45, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:03, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I looked into this and see that this is a long-term problem and you seem to have simply ignored numerous previous attempts to get you to understand what a reliable source is. This is not acceptable. I would urge you to use this time off to finally read up on reliable sources and how to use them. If this behavior continues after this block is expired, expect to be blocked indefinitely. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:05, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
GoldenGuy23, you need to make an unblock request by following the instructions: don't include the {{tlx|}} code, and don't embed your request inside someone else's comment. However, if you'd posted that unblock request as written, it would've been declined, anyway. The majority of sources that you've added to the articles aren't reliable. WhoSampled, Discogs, the IMDb, Google search queries, and self-published blogs aren't reliable. This is part of the reason why you've been blocked: you seem unable to identify which sources are reliable. You really should read through WP:RS, as Beeblebrox advised. Once you can demonstrate that you understand how to identify a reliable source, it's likely you'll be unblocked. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 10:56, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GoldenGuy23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Reading the "Reliable Sources" article, I'm going to do my best to add "reliable sources" to the information I've added on certain web pages (such as Pages regarding "Christmas Songs", like "You're a Mean One, Mr. Grinch", for example. I'm asking that I pleased be unblocked now. The reason why I should be unblocked is because I'm also going to see if I can find any information (including the information that I had "already added") on sites that are based on the song's source (Album and/or Single) liner notes. The reason why I should be unblocked is because I added reliable sources from quite a few websites to the webpage You're a Mean One, Mr. Grinch immediately after I was warned a few times about the "Lack of sources". Also, even if it takes me a while, I always add sources to the information that I add to a web page, as my editing history will prove. I'm asking that you please reconsider my being blocked from editing. Thanks for your time

Decline reason:

Having regard to the extensive warnings you have received, I don't view a 1 week block as excessive. My suggestion is, on your return, to take the amendments that you wish to make, with the sources you have found, to the talk pages of the articles in question, and discuss the appropriateness of the changes and the sources before you make the changes. Just Chilling (talk) 00:06, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

February 2017

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 23:22, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Might be a good idea to participate in the ANI thread. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:52, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Grammy Hall of Fame Award recipients (A–D), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Come Fly with Me. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 06:50, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently citing content to self-published sources. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 13:04, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request to Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GoldenGuy23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

First, I would like to apologize for any confusion I may have caused in editing information on this website. I believe that I should be unblocked because when I edited the Discography for Hip-Hop producer J Dilla, I added important information regarding the production credits he (posthumously) received after his untimely death in 2006 at the age of 32, as his production credits list (the latest ones being released in 2016) without the notes on when the later releases were recorded or which J Dilla's productions were sampled, initially had implications that J Dilla was still alive and clearly contradicted the main J Dilla page. Now, In regards to the Illa J album Yancey Boys, I added the sample sources back and was in the process of adding Illa J & Mike Floss as co-producers (according to that album's Liner Notes), because I felt that the information that credited J Dilla as sole producer without adding co-producer information (not to mention sample credits which featured actual evidence of both the sampled & original sound recordings) would've been misleading. I will gladly research other "legitimate" sources and websites (such as articles & album reviews) to see if the same information that I added to the affected webpages is there as well and (if it hasn't been done already) delete any mention of Discogs & WhoSampled from the Pages I edited. Again, I apologize for any confusion that I may have caused on Wikipedia GoldenGuy23 (talk) 01:10, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have not convinced me you have read and understood WP:CITE and particularly, WP:RS. You are welcome to request another unblock, but you must very clearly convince the next admin that you understand why the sources you've used were inappropriate, and what exactly constitutes a reliable source. Yamla (talk) 12:57, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Talk:Frasier#NBC and Paramount

Hello. You have a reply; click above. --George Ho (talk) 21:50, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I answered your question already in your talk page. GoldenGuy23 (talk) 06:11, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 23:21, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Swarm ♠ 06:34, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is what it's come to. You're so persistent in this that we can't trust you to edit responsibly, even after two seriously harsh blocks. Please, feel free to request an unblock, but you'll need to make serious changes this time. You may be allowed to edit again, but it will certainly be your last chance. I strongly advise you read the guide to appealing blocks. Swarm ♠ 06:37, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GoldenGuy23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to please be unblocked. The reason why I believe me being blocked indefinitely is no longer necessary is because the majority of the information that I added for albums such as Kanye West's Late Registration and The Pharcyde's Labcabincalifornia was based on information I found in the actual Liner notes and not from unreliable sources. The only reason that I added information from WhoSampled.com for certain articles is because I couldn't find another more reliable website that stated, for example, where the drum loop for "Drive Slow" was sampled from, as I thought more information on that particular drum loop was important. I also didn't know that Songfacts, where I got the information for Kanye re-using the lyrics from Peter, Paul and Mary's "Leaving on a Jet Plane", was an unreliable source as well. As for the drum sample used on "Heard 'Em Say", I added a YouTube source for it because there wasn't any source for the information at first. I now know and have learned, again and again, to use only reliable sources include physical / digital liner notes & articles on album, musical &/or other reviews. I've also learned that the other sources considered "unreliable" are subject to change &/or be deleted at anytime for any reason. Also, I also don't think the indefinite block is necessary because I didn't mean to cause any damage or disruption to Wikipedia and promise to do my best to not cause any more damage or disruption to Wikipedia. Thanks. GoldenGuy23 (talk) 17:26, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You've promised before to stop adding unreliable sources, yet you've continued. I think you need to make a better case than this. If you can briefly summarize WP:RS in your own words, that would go some way toward reassuring admins that you finally understand it. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:22, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

September 2017

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GoldenGuy23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm requesting that I be unblocked from editing Wikipedia because I've read and understood how to properly edit Wikipedia via the Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources webpages. I would like to continue to add only reliable sources (such as articles, books & videos from reputable, verified websites) with the appropriate context that's neither "too new" (such as breaking News) or "too old" (outdated information) to use. I understand why self-published sources and user-generated sites such as WhoSampled.com would be considered "Questionable" and not acceptable for Wikipedia, as information featured on that site can also be incorrect at times. I also understand now that the only exception where self-published or otherwise questionable sources are acceptable on this website is when the information was created and / or credited to a either qualified editorial staff or a qualified member of an editorial staff. Also, I'm fully aware that, as a Wikipedia editor, I need to take extra care when editing information about living people and that Wikipedia prefers reliable secondary and tertiary sources to primary ones (which should also only be used with extra care). Quotations and other information from reliable sources should be accurate and Breaking News stories, like Primary Sources, should be used only if necessary and with caution. GoldenGuy23 (talk) 00:35, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks and no admin has decided to weigh in. You are welcome to request another unblock, but if you do so, please rewrite your request. Yamla (talk) 01:09, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

October 2017

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

GoldenGuy23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I’m rewriting my request to be unblocked from editing Wikipedia because I’ve read and understood how to properly edit Wikipedia via the Wikipedia:Identifying Reliable Sources webpages. I would like to continue to add only reliable sources (such as articles, books & videos from reputable, verified websites) with the appropriate context that’s neither “too new” (such as breaking news) nor “too old” (outdated information) to use. I understand why self-published sources and user-generated content such as Whosampled.com would be considered “Questionable” and not acceptable for Wikipedia, as information featured on that site can also be incorrect at times. I also understand now that the only exception where self-published or otherwise questionable sources are acceptable on this website is when the information was created and / or credited to a either qualified editorial staff or a qualified member of an editorial staff. Also, I’m fully aware that, as a Wikipedia editor, I need to take care when editing information about living people and that Wikipedia prefers reliable secondary and tertiary sources to primary ones (which should also only be used with extra care). Quotations and other information from reliable sources should be accurate and Breaking News stories, like Primary Sources, should only be used if necessary and with caution. GoldenGuy23 (talk) 20:27, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Alright, this sufficiently demonstrates to me that you have read up on sourcing policy and trust that we will not have any further issues. You are unblocked. Swarm ♠ 04:20, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Glee: The Music Presents the Warblers, you may be blocked from editing. The tracklists do not mention the performer name. They are part of the liner notes. You have already been blocked numerous times for adding incorrect information. Do you want to be permanently banned? —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 07:27, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, Sir / Ma’am. I don’t. GoldenGuy23 (talk) 07:30, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Album article formatting

Please see WP:MOSALBUM for guidelines on how to format album articles, because your editing is sloppy and it doesn't go by the guidelines, in which might be a problem with fellow editors in the future. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 00:11, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Destroy Rock & Roll. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ss 112 17:44, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Songwriters information on the Track Listing of the album Destroy Rock & Roll by Mylo are based on the album’s own Liner notes. I’m in the process of adding reliable sources (such as album reviews) to other important information that wasn’t in the Liner notes. GoldenGuy23 (talk) 17:52, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We need reliable sources for the information. You added a link to a blog on Destroy Rock & Roll—blogs are not reliable sources of information because anybody can make one and write whatever they want. Same with steelydan.nl—that looks like a fan-made website and is hardly a great source. Ss 112 04:55, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, Will Do. GoldenGuy23 (talk) 13:03, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, GoldenGuy23. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Life Stories (Earl Klugh album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Buddy Williams (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:29, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Crystal Aikin (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harold Martin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hairspray (2007 soundtrack), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Thomas Boyd and Andrew Martin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Eagleash (talk) 00:25, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Softly, as I Leave You (album), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages George Smith, Gail Martin and Robert Bryant (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Donuts (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Season of the Witch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Finding Forever, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Common (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your sloppy editing

Please see WP:MOS and WP:MOSALBUM for guidelines on how you edit Wikipedia, because your editing is sloppy and it doesn't go by the guidelines. I know you try to improve the articles but your style of editing doesn't help and when you added sources like this, please use Template:Cite web the next time you adding sources. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 22:48, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Use "straight" quotation marks, not “curly” ones, per (MOS:CURLY). TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 18:52, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do you want me to report you again and have you blocked? Follow Wikipedia's guidelines like anyone else, your editing and grammar is very problematic and typically, when another editor response to you about your editing, you are expected to answer it. Now please explain your editing. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 18:32, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The only reason I use the “curly” quotation marks because of the particular iPhone I have (for editing, I use an iPhone and the quotation marks come out as “curly” instead of "straight"). I sometimes have to copy and paste "straight" quotation marks from either other parts of the particular article I’m editing or from other articles that feature the "straight" marks. I apologize for any inconvenience I may have caused. GoldenGuy23 (talk) 08:21, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for responding to me. I get it now, you use your phone to edit but I asked you to be more careful with your editing in the future. I know you try to help but your editing can be very sloppy sometimes, that's why I give you tips on how to edit Wikipedia by follow the guidelines. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 12:52, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Famousbirthdays.com as a source

Hi GoldenGuy23. I noticed that you recently used famousbirthdays.com as a source for information in a biography article, List of sopranos in non-classical music. Please note that there is general consensus that famousbirthdays.com does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. (See Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_153#Is_famousbirthdays.com_a_reliable_source_for_personal_information). If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 18:06, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Alexander Hamilton (disambiguation). Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Nothing in Alastair Hamilton suggests he was ever named Alexander Macdonald Hamilton. Lwarrenwiki (talk) 04:51, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for any inconvenience this might have caused, but when I clicked on the link to “Alexander Macdonald Hamilton” (1925-2002), it had “Alastair Hamilton” on the top of the page with the notation stating (re-directed from Alexander Macdonald Hamilton). I was only trying to correct the link by putting Alastair Hamilton inside the link box, as the article itself stated that Alastair’s original name was “Alexander Macdonald Hamilton” and that he was only publicly known as “Alastair Hamilton”. GoldenGuy23 (talk) 12:59, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alastair Hamilton is what you keep typing and linking to. Alistair Hamilton is the target of the original link. Different spelling. Your edit changed the link to the wrong guy. Lwarrenwiki (talk) 15:33, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I meant to type Alistair Hamilton. GoldenGuy23 (talk) 19:51, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amazing Grace (Aretha Franklin album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ray Thompson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in WBAL-TV, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 02:46, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Mvcg66b3r. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, WPCW, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 01:15, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PTEN was not a network, it was a syndicated programming block from Warner Bros. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 22:27, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wild Ones (Flo Rida album), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Robert Orton, Robert Marks and John Hanes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, GoldenGuy23. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of songs recorded by Perry Como (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to It Had to Be You, It Could Happen to You, Marty Clarke and Between the Devil and the Deep Blue Sea

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of songs recorded by Perry Como, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Charles Fox, Let's Do It Again and Alex Rogers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of songs recorded by Perry Como, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Best of Times and About Face (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of songs recorded by Perry Como, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Newman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of songs recorded by Perry Como, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of songs recorded by Perry Como, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Young Love, Joe Young and You Light Up My Life (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

Hi! I see you have been warned and blocked before for using unreliable sources, so you should be aware that neither Queenpedia or Queensongs can be used. Please stop now before you are blocked again. Doctorhawkes (talk) 22:23, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited A Rose Is Still a Rose, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Janice Lee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:50, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited I'm in Love (Bobby Womack song), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bob James and Bobby Wood (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:23, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Boatlift, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rafael Martinez and Harold Jones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:26, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Still Unforgettable, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Patrick Williams (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:01, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chuck Domanico, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Wood (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:27, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Hare Remover. Binksternet (talk) 06:02, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Dream Merchant Vol. 2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Danny Pearson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at A Corny Concerto. Binksternet (talk) 02:37, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There’s an Expert Reviewer that stated cartoon director Bob Clampett performed additional voices in the cartoon. However, I couldn’t use the citation source due to it being part of BlogSpot, which is apparently forbidden from Wikipedia. GoldenGuy23 (talk) 05:57, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The field of cartoon fandom has too many self-published, low quality sources, which means you are pretty much stuck with BCDB and a few books. Cartoon Research is sometimes good, sometimes not. Blogspot is definitely one of the lowest quality sources. Binksternet (talk) 06:13, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed that you've used IMDB as a source for credits on several articles, but IMDB is not a reliable source. Please see WP:IMDB. Waxworker (talk) 17:41, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Milt Franklyn orchestrator

You have added "Milt Franklyn (uncredited)" to a few cartoons, for instance in this series of edits last March. Why do you think that we should add uncredited roles? If you want to mention Franklyn, do it in the article body, not the infobox. A specific connection to each cartoon must be shown, supported by citation. The Cartoon Music Book says[2] that Franklyn arranged Stalling's pieces for years, but a general statement like that is not enough to write his name in every cartoon. Binksternet (talk) 16:31, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think uncredited roles should be added because they actually contributed to the making of the cartoon that we see and hear just as much as those who were credited in the cartoons. GoldenGuy23 (talk) 19:28, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In film infoboxes, the "starring" parameter is always a representation of the billing block, or otherwise a summary of displayed screen credits. See Template:Infobox_film where it says to stick with official screen credits, possibly modified by local consensus ("Other additions by consensus.") I extend that restriction to other production roles such as director and music composer—they need screen credit to be listed in the infobox. The template instructions say "Composers credited for 'additional music' and songwriters should not be included." Wouldn't arrangers and orchestrators fall under that instruction?

The article body is for clarification and explanation of uncredited people who helped to make the film. And in every case the role must be WP:Verifiable, so you need a cite. Binksternet (talk) 20:34, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are still creating problems by adding personnel who don't have screen credit.[3] For instance, at Hare-Less Wolf, you added the producer's name and another voice actor's name,[4] even though they have no screen credit. That kind of stuff goes down in the article body. Binksternet (talk) 02:54, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Katnip Kollege. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 02:54, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Your edit to Hare Force has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Binksternet (talk) 01:00, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

When adding links to material on external sites, as you did to Meatless Flyday, please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube or Sci-Hub, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you believe the linked site is not violating copyright with respect to the material, then you should do one of the following:

If the linked site is the copyright holder, leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page;
If a note on the linked site credibly claims permission to host the material, or a note on the copyright holder's site grants such permission, leave a note on the article Talk page with a link to where we can find that note;
If you are the copyright holder or the external site administrator, adjust the linked site to indicate permission as above and leave a note on the article Talk page;

If the material is available on a different site that satisfies one of the above conditions, link to that site instead. Don't link to pdfcoffee. Binksternet (talk) 16:57, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I won’t use PDF Coffee again, but if you scroll down the website, it’ll explicitly state information regarding the original source book, it’s author, publishing and copyright date information: Webb, Graham (2011). "The Animated Film Encyclopedia: A Complete Guide to American Shorts, Features and Sequences (1900-1999)". McFarland & Company, Inc. ISBN 978-0-7864-4985-9. GoldenGuy23 (talk) 00:26, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on List of mezzo-sopranos in non-classical music

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of mezzo-sopranos in non-classical music, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:58, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jim Gilstrap, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page While the City Sleeps.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

When adding links to material on external sites, as you did to Popeye the Sailor filmography (Fleischer Studios), please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube or Sci-Hub, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you believe the linked site is not violating copyright with respect to the material, then you should do one of the following:

If the linked site is the copyright holder, leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page;
If a note on the linked site credibly claims permission to host the material, or a note on the copyright holder's site grants such permission, leave a note on the article Talk page with a link to where we can find that note;
If you are the copyright holder or the external site administrator, adjust the linked site to indicate permission as above and leave a note on the article Talk page;

If the material is available on a different site that satisfies one of the above conditions, link to that site instead. Please don't link to PDFcoffee, see WP:COPYLINK Waxworker (talk) 08:15, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Popeye the Sailor filmography (Fleischer Studios)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Popeye the Sailor filmography (Fleischer Studios), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:41, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Popeye the Sailor filmography (Fleischer Studios), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Donald Bain and Will Hudson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]