User talk:Gobonobo/Archive 25
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Gobonobo. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 20 | ← | Archive 23 | Archive 24 | Archive 25 | Archive 26 | Archive 27 | → | Archive 30 |
File:Gar Samuelson.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gar Samuelson.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Malconfort (talk) 22:50, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Elizabeth Smith (orientalist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caesar's Commentaries (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Don Budge.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Don Budge.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — NickK (talk) 22:05, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
"Read more"
Thanks for removing the "Read more" link from Bob Filner. I'm not sure if you know this, but that gets automatically appended to text copied from certain Web pages (by a program called Tynt). When you see it, make sure the text it's next to isn't a copyvio before you remove it (in this case it wasn't). Thanks, Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:06, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Jackmcbarn. Thanks for the note. I'm familiar with Tynt. I usually find the "read more" links embedded in references, a result of cutting and pasting article titles. I'll be sure to double check that the text next to it isn't a copyvio though. Gobōnobō + c 02:40, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Please take a look at this article. My comments are on the talk page. I believe you've been involved in some of the edits, and I'd like some feedback in trying to clean up this article, make it more objective. My talk page comments are here --- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Southern_strategy#Weak_intro.2C_maybe_even_a_one-sided_slant 10stone5 (talk) 21:07, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
DYK for Pork-knocker
On 8 August 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Pork-knocker, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that pork-knockers ate pickled pork of wild pig? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pork-knocker. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 03:34, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Luigi di Bella
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Luigi di Bella. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 12:16, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
Files missing description details
are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:54, 9 August 2013 (UTC)Better source request for File:F.W.Raiffeisen.jpg
Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:
You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 21:04, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 07 August 2013
- Arbitration report: Fourteen editors proposed for ban in Tea Party movement case
- Traffic report: Greetings from the graveyard
- News and notes: Chapters Association self-destructs
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Freedom of Speech
- Featured content: Mysterious case of the grand duchess
- Discussion report: CheckUser and Oversighter candidates, and more
Excuse me, and not to be rude, but who are you to judge if my edits are constructive or vandalism? — Preceding unsigned comment added by CraicMamaWeyHey (talk • contribs) 07:39, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
Also, band member Ashton Irwin tweeted on the 5 Seconds of Summer twitter account that he was laughing at his Wikipedia page. https://twitter.com/5sos/status/366771658133999617 He found the whole ordeal comical. And also, my '5sauce' edit was referring to what said member, Ashton, calls the band. I feel that there was no need for you to undo what I had done. I find no harm in any of my edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CraicMamaWeyHey (talk • contribs) 07:56, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Strong objectivity, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Objectivity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:22, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Burka Avenger
Hello! Your submission of Burka Avenger at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! DoctorKubla (talk) 20:29, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
- Please stop by the nomination again; there have been further comments and a new proposed hook which would require edits to the article, though you may prefer to propose one of your own. Thanks! BlueMoonset (talk) 00:36, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Edwin Newman.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Edwin Newman.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Arbor to SJ (talk) 23:53, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 August 2013
- News and notes: "Beautifully smooth" Wikimania with few hitches
- In the media: Chinese censorship
- Featured content: Wikipedia takes the cities
- Discussion report: Wikivoyage, reliable sources, music bands, account creators, and OTRS
- WikiProject report: For the love of stamps
- Arbitration report: Kiefer.Wolfowitz and Ironholds case closes
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Article titles
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Article titles. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 00:17, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
DYK for Burka Avenger
On 17 August 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Burka Avenger, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Burka Avenger is Pakistan's first animated female superhero? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Burka Avenger. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Alex ShihTalk 12:03, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Gap Creek novel.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Gap Creek novel.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 19:55, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Joan Marshall.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Joan Marshall.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 22:59, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Frederica de Laguna.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Frederica de Laguna.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 23:11, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
DturkS1917
Dear Gobonobo, You have no right to push people around the way you are doing so. You are not the person to be blocking anyone from editing if they have proof especially if it's given proof that everyone acknowledges. You will be blocked from a Wikipedia Supervisor(Myself) or someone else with authority if these non-rightful actions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DturkS1917 (talk • contribs) 03:04, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker)Gobonobo isn't an admin and didn't block anyone. However, making threats will lead an admin to block you. Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:09, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
99.252.174.129
LOL you're ridiculous. LEAVE IT THE WAY I HAD IT, I WILL CONTINUE TO CHANGE IT NO MATTER WHAT. It is a true fact and there is proof. Look at the stats you idiot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.252.174.129 (talk) 02:56, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- Repeatedly editing an article to call someone the worst player in history is a violation of our biography of living persons policy. Gobōnobō + c 23:33, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks!
Whoops--didn't mean to delete that infobox on Gap Creek. I think that was a VisualEditor accidental delete that I didn't even realize I made. Thanks for catching and reverting it, Jami430 (talk) 18:48, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
- No worries. I figured it was a mistake. It is very easy to delete infoboxes with the Visual Editor. Gobōnobō + c 23:33, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
I suppose it is more or less ready. I found so much conflicting information (obviously, she was something of a self-mythologist) that I pretty much abandoned it, but looking at it agin, I think its probably as good as anything you'll find on her anywhere else.Actually, I think I'll move it myself Ruskinmonkey. (talk) 10:16, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
- I think it looks great. Thank you for starting the article. Gobōnobō + c 19:24, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Civility
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Civility. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 13:16, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Files missing description details
are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:54, 25 August 2013 (UTC)Better source request for File:F.W.Raiffeisen.jpg
Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:
You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 21:04, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Intro to African American Studies
Hi!! I believe you have edited a page I created and a couple of pages I've visited. I am teaching a class at Penn State University called Intro to African American Studies and I'd like my students to edit and eventually create pages to add to the African American section of wikipedia. Would you be interested in working with me and my students? We meet MWF 11:15-12:05pm EST. Might you be interested in supporting our class this semester?
Best,
Moyazb (talk) 22:30, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Moyazb. I've sent you a reply via email. If you haven't already, I invite you to check out the Education Program page, which has some good advice on designing Wikipedia assignments. Gobōnobō + c 00:43, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 21 August 2013
- Recent research: WikiSym 2013 retrospective
- WikiProject report: Loop-the-loop: Amusement Parks
- Traffic report: Reddit creep
- Featured content: WikiCup update, and the gardens of Finland
- News and notes: Looking ahead to Wiki Loves Monuments
- Technology report: Gallery improvements launch on Wikipedia
Burka Avenger revertion
Hi,
I just need your help to make the Burka Avenger page more factual and include information from other sources than the one that are mentioned here. The criticism has been mentioned but the acknowledgements are missing. Can you please help me, as I tried editing the page but was unable to give it an objective feel. I need your help to add some references here.
Best
Ayso21
- Hi Ayso21. I'd be happy to try and help. I reverted the changes you made to the Burka Avenger article mostly because it read like ad copy and due to the inclusion of promotional language, peacock words, and poor grammar. You seem to have deleted all of the sourced critical commentary and replaced it with a glowing reception section without any inline citations. As such, your changes did not seem to adhere to the neutral point of view policy. Some of the wikilinks that you placed in the article were also problematic, as you linked to unrelated terms such as the Wearside Football League, Glider (sailplane), and Series (mathematics). We also don't link everyday words understood by most readers (see WP:OVERLINK). I understand that you want to include more of the positive commentary that the series has received. The references you added at the end of the article are a good start and we could probably incorporate some of them into the reception section. If you would like to help improve the article, I would suggest proposing changes on the talk page or starting out by making small, incremental changes. Let me know how I can help. Gobōnobō + c 22:00, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Thank you so much for your reply Gobonobol. I would like to add some references to the article along with the points that have already been mentioned there. I am not aware of wiki rules as you can probably make out so would request you to add the citations and references. The truth is that while the Tv series has received critical analysis, it has been positively received internationally and none of those facts are mentioned here. I just want to make sure some of those references are also cited in.
I am listing the suggestions here. Should I also put up the suggestion on the Page's talk section? What's the best way to go about it?
Suggestions:
http://www.policymic.com/articles/58003/burka-avenger-can-this-superhero-save-pakistan
http://thinkprogress.org/alyssa/2013/08/12/2451131/burka-avenger-superheroes/
http://www.biscuitsandbanarsi.com/?p=1813&preview=true
http://thinkprogress.org/alyssa/2013/08/12/2451131/burka-avenger-superheroes/
http://opinion.bdnews24.com/2013/08/17/the-curious-case-of-burka-avenger/#comment-
http://www.thenews.com.pk/Todays-News-9-195612-Meeting-Burka-Man
http://www.thedailybeast.com/witw/articles/2013/08/07/the-ridiculous-burka-avenger-backlash.html
http://www.themarysue.com/burka-avenger-first-episode/
Best
Ayso21
- Thank you Ayso. I've started a discussion on the Burka Avenger talk page for this and listed the suggestions there. I welcome your input. Gobōnobō + c 21:26, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Thank you Gobonobol. I have added my suggestions on the page. I really appreciate your help, if you could please guide me or make the changes yourself, I would be grateful. (Ayso21 (talk) 12:14, 31 August 2013 (UTC)) Ayso21
WikiCup 2013 August newsletter
This year's final is upon us. Our final eight, in order of last round's score, are:
- Hawkeye7 (submissions), a WikiCup newcomer who has contributed on topics of military history and physics, including a number of high-importance topics. Good articles have made up the bulk of his points, but he has also scored a great deal of bonus points. He has the second highest score overall so far, with more than 3000 points accumulated.
- Casliber (submissions), another WikiCup veteran who reached the finals in 2012, 2011 and 2010. He writes on a variety of topics including botany, mycology and astronomy, and has claimed the highest or joint highest number of featured articles every round so far this year. He has the third highest score overall, with just under 3000 points accumulated.
- Cwmhiraeth (submissions), 2012 WikiCup champion, who writes mostly on marine biology. She has also contributed to high-importance topics, seeing huge numbers of bonus points for high-importance featured and good articles. Previous rounds have seen her scoring the most bonus points, with scoring spread across did you knows, good articles and featured articles.
- Sasata (submissions), a WikiCup veteran who finished in second place in 2012, and competed as early as 2009. He writes articles on biology, especially mycology, and has scored highly for a number of collaborations at featured article candidates.
- Sturmvogel_66 (submissions), the winner of the 2010 competition. His contributions mostly concern Naval history, and he has scored a very large number of points for good articles and good article reviews in every round. He is the highest scorer overall this year, with over 3500 points in total.
- Ealdgyth (submissions), who is competing in the WikiCup for the second time, though this will be her first time in the final. A regular at FAC, she is mostly interested in British medieval history, and has scored very highly for some top-importance featured articles on the topic.
- Miyagawa (submissions), a finalist in 2012 and 2011. He writes on a broad variety of topics, with many of this year's points coming from good articles about Star Trek. Good articles make up the bulk of his points, and he had the most good articles back in round 2; he was also the highest scorer for DYK in rounds 1 and 2.
- Adam Cuerden (submissions) has previously been involved with the WikiCup, but hasn't participated for a number of years. He scores mostly from restoration work leading to featured picture credits, but has also done some article writing and reviewing.
We say goodbye to eight great participants who did not qualify for the final: Piotrus (submissions), Figureskatingfan (submissions), ThaddeusB (submissions), Dana boomer (submissions), Status (submissions), Ed! (submissions), 12george1 (submissions), Calvin999 (submissions). Having made it to this stage is still an excellent achievement, and you can leave with your heads held high. We hope to see you all again next year. Signups are now open for the 2014 WikiCup, which will begin on 1 January. All Wikipedians, whatever their interest or level of experience, are warmly invited to participate in next year's competition.
This last month has seen some incredible contributions; for instance, Cwmhiraeth's Starfish and Ealdgyth's Battle of Hastings—two highly important, highly viewed pages—made it to featured article status. It would be all too easy to focus solely on these stunning achievements at the expense of those participants working in lower-scoring areas, when in fact all WikiCup participants are doing excellent work. A mention of everything done is impossible, but here are a few: Last round saw the completion of several good topics (on the 1958, 1959 and 1962 Atlantic hurricane seasons) to which 12george1 had contributed. Calvin999 saw "S&M" (song), on which he has been working for several years, through to featured article status on its tenth try. Figureskatingfan continued towards her goal of a broad featured/good topic on Maya Angelou, with two featured and four good articles. ThaddeusB contributed significantly to over 20 articles which appeared on the main page's "in the news" section. Adam Cuerden continued to restore a large number of historical images, resulting in over a dozen FP credits this round alone. The WikiCup is not just about top-importance featured articles, and the work of all of these users is worthy of commendation.
Finally, the usual notices: If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 05:32, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:RCFCU logo.GIF)
Thanks for uploading File:RCFCU logo.GIF. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 15:11, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tom Tom Magazine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drumming (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 August 2013
- Recent research: WikiSym 2013 retrospective
- WikiProject report: Loop-the-loop: Amusement Parks
- Traffic report: Reddit creep
- Featured content: WikiCup update, and the gardens of Finland
- News and notes: Looking ahead to Wiki Loves Monuments
- Technology report: Gallery improvements launch on Wikipedia
Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 01:19, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
Article Feedback Tool update
Hey Gobonobo. I'm contacting you because you're involved in the Article Feedback Tool in some way, either as a previous newsletter recipient or as an active user of the system. As you might have heard, a user recently anonymously disabled the feedback tool on 2,000 pages. We were unable to track or prevent this due to the lack of logging feature in AFT5. We're deeply sorry for this, as we know that quite a few users found the software very useful, and were using it on their articles.
We've now re-released the software, with the addition of a logging feature and restrictions on the ability to disable. Obviously, we're not going to automatically re-enable it on each article—we don't want to create a situation where it was enabled by users who have now moved on, and feedback would sit there unattended—but if you're interested in enabling it for your articles, it's pretty simple to do. Just go to the article you want to enable it on, click the "request feedback" link in the toolbox in the sidebar, and AFT5 will be enabled for that article.
Again, we're very sorry about this issue; hopefully it'll be smooth sailing after this :). If you have any questions, just drop them at the talkpage. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) 21:48, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
Global Youth Studies Page
All I can say is WOW!!! Very nice!!! Many, many kudos and thanks!!! I'm going to send out to the students right away!!! Do I have enough exclamation points? Prof.Vandegrift (talk) 19:16, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
- I'm glad you like it. It could use some more red links (apart from the country-specific links). If any of the 'articles for improvement' are inappropriate or not within the scope of global youth studies, feel free to strike them. Gobōnobō + c 19:20, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
September 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Diana Nyad may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- to break distance-swim record"]; ''CNN Health News'', October 15, 2010; accessed July 18, 2011.]{{dead link|date=September 2013}}</ref>
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:00, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jean "Binta" Breeze may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- [[Category:British women poets]]]]
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:33, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Neerja Bhanot may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- jsp/nation/story_8741544.jsp "Pak frees Pan Am hijack quartet"], ''The Telegraph'', 4 January 2008]</ref>
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:12, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Xenia Shestova's birth year
Hi, can you provide a reference for the birth year of Xenia Shestova? Most sources state the year as missing. I have looked in the net but could only find 1560 as her birth year on blogs and wikipedia clones Alex Bakharev (talk) 22:28, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
- Sure thing. This link includes everything the reference had to say about her birth. I didn't see anything that would indicate what source they were using for the year though. The copy of Women in World History that I'm working from is 2001, so at least we can be sure that the date didn't come from a Wikipedia clone. Gobōnobō + c 00:01, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks!!!! Alex Bakharev (talk) 01:06, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:The Washington Examiner (front page).jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:The Washington Examiner (front page).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 21:16, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 04 September 2013
- News and notes: Privacy policy debate gears up
- Traffic report: No accounting for the wisdom of crowds
- Featured content: Bridging the way to a Peasants' Revolt
- WikiProject report: Writing on the frontier: Psychology on Wikipedia
- Arbitration report: Manning naming dispute case opens; Tea Party case closes ; Infoboxes nears completion
- Technology report: Making Wikipedia more accessible
File:Yellow dress of Reese Witherspoon.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Yellow dress of Reese Witherspoon.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. January (talk) 06:58, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Siona Benjamin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian mythology (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Captive Animals Protection Society logo.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Captive Animals Protection Society logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 18:33, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Better source request for File:F.W.Raiffeisen.jpg
Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:
You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 21:04, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
DYK for Florence Koehler
On 11 September 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Florence Koehler, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Florence Koehler was one of the best-known jewelers of the Arts and Crafts movement? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Florence Koehler. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Jorge Mas Canosa.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Jorge Mas Canosa.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 20:48, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 September 2013
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Indonesia
- Featured content: Tintin goes featured
- Traffic report: Syria, celebrities, and association football: oh my!
- Arbitration report: Workshop phase opens in Manning naming dispute ; Infoboxes case closes
Orphaned non-free image File:New Statesman (cover).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:New Statesman (cover).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:14, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:New Statesman (cover).jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:New Statesman (cover).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 11:27, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Jewish Bolshevism
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Jewish Bolshevism. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 01:26, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Snow Flower and the Secret Fan.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Snow Flower and the Secret Fan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:18, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Vikram Batra.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Vikram Batra.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:29, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Authoresses
Hi Gobonobo. I've checked the international Oxford Dictionary of English and it just says "authoress" is "a female author". It does not list it as archaic. And it seems a pity that in an era when we're trying to use gender-free instead of masculine-dominated language when we refer to both sexes, we can't use gender-specific (especially female) language when it's appropriate. Let's celebrate gender! Cheers. --Bermicourt (talk) 19:22, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Bermicourt. I seem to have posted simultaneously on your talk page. I know for British English, feminine forms haven't gone as far down a dysphemism cycle, but I'm basing these changes off of Wikipedia's Manual of Style, WP:MODERNLANG, and WP:GENDER. Virtually every appearance of 'authoress' in Wikipedia is redundant, as the gender of the author is already apparent. Unfortunately, this term has acquired a rather derogatory tinge, so rather than celebrating gender, it becomes a symbol of inequality. Gobōnobō + c 19:29, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Please see this book, which clearly outlines how this term is archaic. Gobōnobō + c 19:32, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Your reference is specifically American, whereas the ODE is international. Gender-neutral language is entirely reasonable when referring to both sexes and is taking over the historic use of e.g. "man" for "man and woman" or where professions like "fireman" now admit women, so we call them "firefighters". But it's unnecessary and sounds like political correctness or even feminist if we can't accept internationally recognised gender-specific terms like authoress being applied to female writers. However, don't worry I'm not planning to revert all your other changes; that's up to you to discuss with the editors of those pages. --Bermicourt (talk) 19:45, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- I note that the Oxford Dictionary of English lists the similar term "poetess" as 'dated'. That passage I linked is identical to that which appears in The Oxford Dictionary of American Usage and Style (section D), which does indeed note that British English is more hospitable to those forms. But it also says, "words ending in -ess such as poetess and authoress are mostly archaic... at some point they acquired a derogatory tinge, and they've never been the same. The quite understandable tendency has been to avoid sex-specific terms if the person's sex is beside the point. And it usually is beside the point when identifying a poet, an author, or a waiter." On any of the articles where you reverted my changing of 'authoress' to 'author' [1][2][3], is the feminine form necessary? I think your reversions are not supported by policy and am disappointed that something so trivial "sounds like political correctness or even feminist" to your ears. Gobōnobō + c 20:03, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Forgive me, but this is nothing to do with British English despite the view posited in the Dictionary of American Usage and Style. The ODE is international, recognizing all the dozen or so important regional variations of English, and clearly indicates if a word is regional. It does not indicate "authoress" as archaic or regional in usage, so you can hardly blame me for using the word in context when it is referring to a female writer. BTW the reason I use it is because I translate articles from German and they use the feminine form Authorin. That, of course, does not justify the use of "authoress" in English - I'm just explaining that I have no hidden agenda here; actually I am a genuine supporter of equality.
- I guess we take different views, but as both viewpoints are based on authoritative sources, we should not prefer one version over the other in this case. Bermicourt (talk) 22:12, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- I went ahead and checked out the OED to see what they had to say about 'authoress'. It said that the term is now used "only when sex is purposely emphasized; otherwise, ...author is now used of both sexes." So, while the OED doesn't indicate whether or not the term is archaic, it is prescriptive about the manner in which it is used. On those articles where you have reverted me, I continue to believe that the gender-neutral 'author' is more appropriate, both according to the OED and WP:GNL/WP:MODLANG.
- I am glad that you are a genuine supporter of equality and don't at all blame you for using the term - it's clear that gender-marking is approached differently in German and I don't want to diminish the importance of your contributions, especially the translations. Because it interests me, I've started a table over at User:Gobonobo/feminine forms to document instances of the marked feminine form in Wikipedia and I would welcome your feedback. Gobōnobō + c 23:28, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- I note that the Oxford Dictionary of English lists the similar term "poetess" as 'dated'. That passage I linked is identical to that which appears in The Oxford Dictionary of American Usage and Style (section D), which does indeed note that British English is more hospitable to those forms. But it also says, "words ending in -ess such as poetess and authoress are mostly archaic... at some point they acquired a derogatory tinge, and they've never been the same. The quite understandable tendency has been to avoid sex-specific terms if the person's sex is beside the point. And it usually is beside the point when identifying a poet, an author, or a waiter." On any of the articles where you reverted my changing of 'authoress' to 'author' [1][2][3], is the feminine form necessary? I think your reversions are not supported by policy and am disappointed that something so trivial "sounds like political correctness or even feminist" to your ears. Gobōnobō + c 20:03, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Your reference is specifically American, whereas the ODE is international. Gender-neutral language is entirely reasonable when referring to both sexes and is taking over the historic use of e.g. "man" for "man and woman" or where professions like "fireman" now admit women, so we call them "firefighters". But it's unnecessary and sounds like political correctness or even feminist if we can't accept internationally recognised gender-specific terms like authoress being applied to female writers. However, don't worry I'm not planning to revert all your other changes; that's up to you to discuss with the editors of those pages. --Bermicourt (talk) 19:45, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
P.S. I see you're working on a gender gap project. If there are any key articles on German Wikipedia that you would like translating, I'm willing to have a go (if they're not tooooo long!) HTH. Bermicourt (talk) 22:16, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you Bermicourt! That's a very kind offer. I would be just tickled to see an article on the English Wikipedia for the Flying Lesbians. They're a lesser known musical group, but important within lesbian music history. Gobōnobō + c 22:46, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Articles with missing Gender/Feminist Content
I teach courses as part of the education program and many of my students are interested in providng missing content relating to women and feminist concerns, neglected LGBT issues, and on other neglected topics relating to gender and human rights issues. Would it be ok if I direct some student queries to you? Thanks! DStrassmann (talk) 19:00, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- Certainly. I've been pleased to see the progress that your classes have made in previous semesters. The talk pages for WikiProject Feminism and WikiProject Gender Studies may also be good places to send students with questions. Gobōnobō + c 21:04, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
ThatCampPhilly Edit-a-thon Invitation
Please join the Wikipedia Edit-a-thon at THATCamp Philly, September 27, 2013, held at the Chemical Heritage Foundation. Bring your own content to work on, or get an early start on Ada Lovelace Day with our resources about women in science, chemistry and the history of science. Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 16:12, 18 September 2013 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 18 September 2013
- WikiProject report: 18,464 Good Articles on the wall
- Featured content: Hurricane Diane and Van Gogh
- Technology report: What can Wikidata do for Wikipedia?
- Traffic report: Twerking, tragedy and TV
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Edit warring
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Edit warring. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Gwendolen Mary John.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Gwendolen Mary John.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 15:04, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 September 2013
- Traffic report: Look on Walter's works
- WikiProject report: Babel Series: GOOOOOOAAAAAAALLLLLLL!!!!!
- Featured content: Wikipedia takes the stage
Feminine forms
Hi Gobonobo, just a note to thank you for setting up User:Gobonobo/feminine forms. I was really surprised recently to see someone change "television host Ellen Degeneres" to "television hostess." So thank you for working on this. SlimVirgin (talk) 17:30, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you SlimVirgin. Gobōnobō + c 17:54, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Georges Braque.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Georges Braque.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 15:32, 30 September 2013 (UTC)