User talk:GiovAngri

This is GiovAngri's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Francesco Zurolo has been accepted

Francesco Zurolo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 01:39, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello WikiOriginal-9, thank you for reviewing, correcting and finally approving this article on Wikipedia in English, with your collaborators from overseas. GiovAngri (talk) 08:47, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vico, and Vicoletto, of the Zuroli (November 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fix the WP:CITEBOMBs and please cite your sources properly.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vico, and Vicoletto, of the Zuroli and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:23, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, GiovAngri! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:23, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dearest administrator, I'm sorry that my draft in progress was not accepted by Wikipedia's parameters, evidently I have to do much more in the article, citing the appropriate sources, some ''archival sources'', as you can see, I have them too cited, they are verified sources, I will do my best in the next few days to improve it. I will also ask the group you linked to me, to get more support from them, thanks. GiovAngri (talk) 11:58, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear administrator, I inform you that the draft in progress is finally finished, I will shortly ask for a second processing of the same. GiovAngri (talk) 09:50, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Pio Monte della Misericordia. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:36, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Arjayay, thanks for the tip, I won't make the same mistake again, while I'm at it, could you take a look at this (Vico, and Vicoletto, of the Zuroli) draft? You could write to me in the next reply message if you're okay with how the work is going or if I need to make some changes, your opinion. Thanks again. GiovAngri (talk) 11:51, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry GiovAngri I am not a new page reviewer, and I don't speak Italian. Don't confuse quantity with quality - to prove notability, you should try to find 3 reliable, independent sources that discuss the subject in detail. Once notability is established you can fill in the detail with sources that give passing mentions. Good luck - Arjayay (talk) 12:03, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks again for the advice, I also asked the administrator who rejected the item if it was okay as I was doing. Best regards. GiovAngri (talk) 12:18, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Vico, and Vicoletto, of the Zuroli has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Vico, and Vicoletto, of the Zuroli. Thanks! Tagishsimon (talk) 18:46, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again, I saw that you wrote me some specific advice on improving the draft in progress, I will work as soon as possible to ''streamline'' it and improve it further as you have wisely described. Maybe we'll talk again when the job is finished. GiovAngri (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Very kind Tagishsimon I made the requested changes on the draft in progress, first resubmit the draft to the Wikipedia administrators, I would like to ask you to kindly read the text quickly, if possible, thanks in advance. GiovAngri (talk) 09:49, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vico and Vicoletto of the Zuroli has been accepted

Vico and Vicoletto of the Zuroli, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BuySomeApples (talk) 20:23, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello BuySomeApples and thank you for approving the article, but I always prefer to send the request to you administrators before creating content on Wikipedia in English. GiovAngri (talk) 08:46, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @GiovAngri: You are very welcome, although I am not an administrator. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! BuySomeApples (talk) 22:38, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again dear. GiovAngri (talk) 09:33, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Convent of Santa Maria del Gesù has been accepted

Convent of Santa Maria del Gesù, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BuySomeApples (talk) 18:59, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I approved the article but it would be good if you could add more in-line citations. Thanks for contributing and happy editing! BuySomeApples (talk) 19:02, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much. GiovAngri (talk) 08:58, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Priscus of Nocera moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Priscus of Nocera. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:47, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear administrator, thank you for your courtesy, unfortunately I had already started the process of creating the article and I hoped that it would not be deleted. I will do my best to improve the article in the coming days. Best regards. GiovAngri (talk) 10:36, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, although I am not an administrator which has a process, I can assure you that the draft is a great work, all you need to do now is cite your sources and it should be okay to be published to mainspace. Happy editing, Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:46, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, okay, thanks again. GiovAngri (talk) 16:07, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zurolo (surname) (February 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zurolo (surname) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:21, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear reviewer, as you have already forwarded the information to me in the previous message, I will proceed to improve my draft in progress, I will do my best to improve the article, I therefore ask you to let me know in the coming days and months if the sources and parts of text that I wrote, in the ''external links'', are fine. Already a few days ago I took the liberty of quoting a famous Italian encyclopedia, the Treccani institute, where the surname and name Zurlo is also described in the Venetian dialect, verified and cited with a note in the appropriate paragraph. I also noticed a page in which he appears only with the name of Zurlo, well here there are only a few personalities mentioned, I took the liberty of inserting a quote template with a reference to my draft in progress, how do you think my work is going now ? Thanks in advance for your reply. Kind regards. GiovAngri (talk) 19:49, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm adapting the rejected draft to the parameters of the English Wikipedia, you can check ''to see if I'm going in the right direction'' at any time. GiovAngri (talk) 18:40, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Priscus of Nocera (March 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spinster300 was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Priscus of Nocera and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spinster300 (talk) 21:52, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear reviewer, I will do everything possible to enrich the draft being prepared in the next few days, with Italian and foreign sources, cordially. GiovAngri (talk) 18:36, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zurolo (surname) (April 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zurolo (surname) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Toadette ^{(Let's talk together!)} 10:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear reviewer, I am very surprised by the fact that my draft which has been in preparation for months has been further rejected, among other things, it is rich in content and I even recovered it from a ''historical book'', with respect to the surname Zurlo or some other Italian guy there's a lot that I highlighted in the draft. It is true that I have included secondary sources but mainly, I have also highlighted and cited the ''official sources'', as you can see. GiovAngri (talk) 09:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Convent of Santa Maria del Gesù, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Italian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:56, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks. GiovAngri (talk) 18:16, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Convent of Santa Maria del Gesù, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lands.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:54, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your information, see you later. GiovAngri (talk) 16:36, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Priscus of Nocera has been accepted

Priscus of Nocera, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:13, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Safari Scribe and thank you so much for reviewing my article, it was in draft but I have made many contributions over the months. Thanks again for letting me know about that other news item. Kind regards and good luck with Wikipedia to you too. GiovAngri (talk) 16:35, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Giovanni Zurolo has been accepted

Giovanni Zurolo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OhHaiMark (talk) 04:26, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and thank you OhHaiMark, for your very kind review of the article, I am very satisfied to finally have it approved. Kind regards and good work on Wikipedia. GiovAngri (talk) 08:04, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]