User talk:Giants2008/Archive 21
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Giants2008. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 15 | ← | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | Archive 23 | → | Archive 25 |
Following the recent successful WP:FAC nomination of Juwan Howard, I am now nominating Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Tommy Amaker/archive1. Please come comment.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 13:26, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
- Could you come by and make some comments?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 22:47, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
- I responded to your latest.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 03:32, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
- At this point the nomination has 3 supports, one respondent who has said he is not doing a full review and you who has not stated his opinion.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 21:31, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- I responded to your latest.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 03:32, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
SheiKra FAC
Hello again, I don't know if you remember but just under a month ago you listed a bunch of improvements that should be made to the SheiKra article that was nominated FA status in this review. That review was closed due to a lack of consensus and I was wondering if you would be willing to leave some sort of opinion on the second review page just so the review doesn't stall again and can gain consensus for a decision. Thanks!--Dom497 (talk) 02:49, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- I have addressed or left comments to your points on the review page.--Dom497 (talk) 12:57, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
FLC question
I just wanted to know why my FLC was not promoted in your latest round of promotions. You've struck the only resolved comment you made and it already has 3 support votes. If there's something missing or anything that still needs to be addressed, please tell me. Cheers! —Bloom6132 (talk) 23:54, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- There was a question about what the title of the list should be that was asked only a day ago, so I figured waiting a few days for possible further input wouldn't hurt. I was very close to promoting the list, though. If nobody comments, it will probably go during the next run-through by one of the directors. Giants2008 (Talk) 01:36, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- Nearly a week has passed and just one response confirming the obvious. Everyone's had a 28 days to comment, all issues brought up have been resolved and nothing appears to be holding it up. I'm relying on this FLC as I am trailing badly in the WikiCup, so a timely response would be much appreciated. —Bloom6132 (talk) 23:53, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
FYI
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of international cricket centuries by Mark Waugh/archive1 —Vensatry (Ping me) 07:23, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Please comment. — HĐ (talk) 11:35, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Special Barnstar |
| For your valuable comments that significantly helped me to promote List of Academy Awards for Walt Disney, to Featured List status. Surge_Elec (talk) 09:03, 22 May 2013 (UTC) |
Deadalive FAN suggestions
Sorry it took me so long to respond. I believe I have addressed all of your concerns on the "Deadalive" FAN. Thank you!--Gen. Quon (Talk) 16:41, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Alt text
Hello Giants2008, I am SoapFan12, the nominator for Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Younger Actress in a Drama Series for a featured list. I finally understood what you meant by alt text. I've added to all the images. I was wondering if you could see that if I've done it correctly? Please and thank you, Regards. SoapFan12 10:08, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
FLC closures
Hey Giants, thanks for doing the updates again tonight. I note we're now running almost on fumes for reviewers and supports, hence the slight downturn in the support required for a promotion. I'll apply a similar approach until we get more folks back to review etc. Cheers. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:12, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
- Alrighty. I've always used four as my benchmark. Never mind. Sorry for any misunderstanding. The Rambling Man (talk) 06:50, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
2011 Lamar Hunt U.S. Open Cup Final Peer Review
Thank you for taking the time to read the article and provide comments and feedback on the peer review page. I believe I have resolved each of the concerns you raised. In particular, thank for the detailed feedback on the prose quality. Please let me know if you notice any other problems with the article. I'm planning to nominate it for FAC review once the PR closes. Thanks again for your help in that endeavor. --SkotyWATC 23:03, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
- Okay, I've fixed up the last two things. Thanks much for taking the time to double checking everything. Your review has been helpful and greatly appreciated. --SkotyWATC 01:20, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
FAC
Could you please look at Priyanka Chopra, which is now at FAC. You supported the article in its first fac. It has improved a lot since then. Your comments could improve it more. Thanks.Prashant 21:07, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi, the above FLC has been on-going for 2 and a half months now. It has 5 supports, one comment of approval, two capped lot of comments and one oppose, of which everything was addressed ages ago. — AARON • TALK 13:34, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Chopra FAC
FYI, Chopra article is at the FAC. You participated in the first FAC and helped in its improvement. We would like you to look at the article and the FAC for further improvement. Thank You. Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Priyanka Chopra/archive2.—Prashant 18:06, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- Your issues were resolved. Please, talkback on the Chopra FAC.—Prashant 04:12, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Another cricket PR!
If you get a chance, any comments you have about Archie MacLaren would be appreciated at PR here. No problem if you don't have the time. Sarastro1 (talk) 21:17, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- Much obliged. If you ping me when you are finished, I'll close the PR and probably open the FAC. Thanks again. Sarastro1 (talk) 13:52, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Could it be withdrawn/closed at my request please. There's a note on the review. Thanks. — AARON • TALK 10:23, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
This is my nomination, please write a review. Thanks! Luis Nuñez 01:08, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
Hey there, I was hoping if you can give me opinions and comments on Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Younger Actor in a Drama Series/archive1 as you have done for Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Younger Actress in a Drama Series/archive1? ? I would love to hear what you have to say. Please Thank you. It will be greatly appreciated! Regards. SoapFan12 00:00, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
WikiCup 2013 June newsletter
We are down to our final 16: the 2013 semi-finals are upon us. A score of 321 was required to survive round 3, further cementing this as the most competitive WikiCup yet; round 3 was survived in 2012 with 243 points, in 2011 with 76 points and in 2010 with 250 points. The change may in part be to do with the fact that more articles are now awarded bonus points, in addition to more competitive play. Reaching the final has, in the past, required 573 points (2012, a 135% increase on the score needed to reach round 4), 150 points (2011, a 97% increase) and 417 points (2010, a 72% increase). This round has seen over a third of participants claiming points for featured articles (with seven users claiming for multiple featured articles) and most users have also gained bonus points. However, the majority of points continue to come from good articles, followed by did you know articles. In this round, every content type was utilised by at least one user, proving that the WikiCup brings together content contributors from all corners of the project.
Round 3 saw a number of contributions of note. 
Figureskatingfan (submissions) claimed the first featured topic points in this year's competition for her excellent work on topics related to Maya Angelou, the noted American author and poet. We have also continued to see high-importance articles improved as part of the competition: 
Ealdgyth (submissions) was awarded a thoroughly well-earned 560 points for her featured article Middle Ages and 102 points for her good article Battle of Hastings. Good articles James Chadwick and Stanislaw Ulam netted 
Hawkeye7 (submissions) 102 and 72 points respectively, while 72 points were awarded to 
Piotrus (submissions) for each of Władysław Sikorski and Emilia Plater, both recently promoted to good article status. Collaborative efforts between WikiCup participants have continued, with, for example, 
Casliber (submissions) and 
Sasata (submissions) being awarded 180 points each for their featured article on Boletus luridus.
A rules reminder: content promoted between rounds can be claimed in the round after the break, but not the round before. The case in point is content promoted on the 29/30 June, which may be claimed in this round. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. We are currently seeing concern about the amount of time people have to wait for reviews, especially at GAC- if you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 10:26, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
I know I have asked you before if you can give comments, and you did! I am very grateful, I was wondering if you will be interested on reviewing : Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Supporting Actress in a Drama Series/archive1. If it's not possible for you, I understand. But it will be greatly appreciated! SoapFan12 03:25, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Bot
Hey there, I have few questions for you. First of all, can you please tell me what happen to the bot? The Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Younger Actor in a Drama Series/archive1 has been upgraded to an FL status few days ago, and the talk page has never been change by the bot. Secondly, I don't want to sound pushy or annoying but I was wondering if you will be still interested in reviewing: Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Supporting Actress in a Drama Series/archive1? If it's not possible for you, I understand and this time I would like to be replied of you're unability to do. However, it will be greatly appreciated! Thanks in advance. 
SoapFan12 23:21, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
July 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to History of the New York Yankees may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- the Senators 6–2. New York quickly fell out of contention for the AL [[Pennant (sports)|pennant]] (league championship]], falling to seventh place in the league after playing games away from Hilltop Park for a 24-day
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:04, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
2009 Oscars
I fixed everything you requested for regarding the 81st Academy Awards for Featured Article candidacy.
FL
Hello! Giants2008. I'm working on a list for a while now. The list is in a good position. Some suggestion on the list will be helpful. I'm planning to nominate it for FLC in few days.—Prashant 03:33, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
2009 Oscars typo
Hi,
I erased the extra 'the' in the presenters for Romance 2008 montage in the 81st Academy Awards list.
Strike
Hey there, I've seen that you have strike you're comment in Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Supporting Actress in a Drama Series/archive1, does this mean you are giving you're support? If you are, I would like to be addressed. Please and Thank you. SoapFan12 02:15, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
Hey Giants! Thank you for reviewing my FLC above. Could I trouble you to cap your resolved comments in a template; more comments have just been added and the page is getting rather cluttered now. Cheers! —Bloom6132 (talk) 18:16, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
Ping?
Hi Giants, I think we addressed your comments at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Oxbow (horse)/archive1 if you want to check. (I'm hoping to get this article promoted in the next couple weeks, if possible.) Thanks! Montanabw(talk) 19:30, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
Pony!
Congratulations! For your comprehensive FAC review of Oxbow (horse), you have received a pony! Ponies are cute, intelligent, cuddly, friendly (most of the time, though with notable exceptions), promote good will, encourage patience, and enjoy carrots. Treat your pony with respect and he will be your faithful friend! Montanabw(talk) 18:11, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
To send a pony or a treat to other wonderful and responsible editors, click here.
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello Giants2008. I have made the additions you suggested. I hope you can check them soon. Thanks. Parutakupiu (talk) 20:07, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
Featured list help
Hello! Would you please, suggest something for my flc. National Film Award for Best Supporting Actress as I will nominate it in few days. Right now I'm busy with Chopra FAC and an other article. So, some suggestions for preparing it for flc will be helpful. Please, reply.—Prashant 06:11, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry, I wasn't able to see that (now I can). I was busy with Priyanka Chopra FAC and traveling. Thanks for the comments and I think I'll be nominating when Chopra FAC is over. Thanks again.—Prashant 00:27, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Archie
Thanks for the kind words, and I think I got all of Brian's points. Sarastro1 (talk) 21:10, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
Nice work
Hello Giants2008,
I've been watching the Wayne Gretzky article for years, and have seen how many times you have intervened to revert shoddy edits or downright vandalism. Your alertness and dedication are much appreciated.
|
The Running Man Barnstar | |
| For outstanding work on the Wayne Gretzky article over a long time. |
-- EMP (talk 00:05, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks! Giants2008 (Talk) 01:10, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
FLC
Thanks for the comments on that list. Well, I'm working on a new list Priyanka Chopra filmography. It recently appeared on main page under DYK section. I have worked on it and is well-sourced. A look at the prose will be helpful. If you could help in prose tightening. Thanks.—Prashant 09:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello,
I noticed that the 2009 Oscars has been promoted to featured list status according to Wikipedia: Featured list. However, there is no star on the list itself, nor is the Featured list nomination talk page closed page closed, nor does the article's talk page indicate otherwise. I undestand you are busy, but can you update the information? This will be extremely appreciated!
Comments
I was wondering if you review my featured list article (Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Lead Actress in a Drama Series/archive1)? Please, it will be greatly appreciated! SoapFan12 21:41, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
Done
Done with your comments on the Talk:Priyanka Chopra filmography. Could you pls, tell me about the sorting columns and ways to correct them. Also, if you could list some more comments. Also, all her films to be released are started. Some are to be released, some are in shooting stage and one in pre-production. Thanks. Waiting for some more comments on prose tightening.—Prashant 03:29, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
FYI
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Allan Donald/archive1 —Vensatry (Ping me) 17:21, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
Re-review the article, and write clearly and precisely whats wrong... .. --TIAYN (talk) 05:47, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
- Done (or at least good enough for you to replace you're oppose with something else I hope). --TIAYN (talk) 00:02, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
- I've fixed it. --TIAYN (talk) 18:51, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
FAN Request
Hello! Since you were very helpful a few months ago when I nominated "The Sixth Extinction II: Amor Fati" for FA, I was wondering if you could drop by Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/X-Cops (The X-Files)/archive1 and cast a vote/provide suggestions. Thanks!--Gen. Quon (Talk) 00:27, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
FLC
Hey, I have noticed that you have promoted some featured list, and I was wondering why my FLC wans't? It has an excellent amount of supports and the canvassing disscussion has also been resolved (if you cleary read the disscusion). — SoapFan12 Talk 
00:28, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
Village pump discussion
Hello, you were the one who informed me about NFCC on DVD cover images for episode lists, could you drop a comment at Village pump if you're free? Thanks. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 00:34, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
WikiCup 2013 July newsletter
We're halfway through this year's penultimate round, and the competition is moving along well. Pool A's Sasata (submissions) currently leads overall, while Pool B's 
Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) is second. Both leaders are WikiCup veterans, and both have already scored over 600 points this month. If the round were to end today, 
Miyagawa (submissions), with 274 points, would be the lowest-scoring participant to make it through. This indicates that participants will need a score comparable to last year's (573, the highest ever) to qualify for the final. The high scores this year are a testament both to the quality of participants and to the increased focus on significant content (eligible for bonus points) in this year's competition. So far this round, both Sasata and 
Cwmhiraeth (submissions) have made up over half of their score through bonus points, with, for example, high importance FA koala earning Sasata a total of 440 points (from a multiplier of 4.4) and high-importance GA sea earning Cwmhiraeth a total of 216 points (from a multiplier of 7.2). Other articles on important topics submitted this round include a featured article on the Norman conquest of England by Ealdgyth (submissions), and good articles on Nobel laureate in literature Henryk Sienkiewicz, Nobel laureate in physics Hans Bethe, and the noted Japanese aircraft carrier Hiryū. These articles are by Piotrus (submissions), Hawkeye7 (submissions) and Sturmvogel_66 respectively.
Other than that, there is not much to report! If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 23:54, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
FLC: List of colonial governors of New Jersey
I addressed your comments at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of colonial governors of New Jersey/archive1. I would ask if you have a few moments, could you take a second look to make sure that I sufficiently addressed them? Thank you. --ColonelHenry (talk) 01:24, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 19:18, 9 August 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
King Jakob C2 19:18, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
--JDC808 ♫ 22:29, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
FLC: List of AFC Wimbledon seasons
Hi, thanks for your recent feedback on my featured list nomination for Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/List of AFC Wimbledon seasons/archive1. I addressed all of your comments, apart from the third bullet point 'All cells with colors should have matching symbols per WP:ACCESS' which I'm afraid I don't quite understand. If you have a few moments, would you mind explaining this to me so that I might rectify it. Thank you, with kind regards --Jodie25 (talk) 19:42, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
FLC: List of Olympic men's ice hockey players for Switzerland
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Olympic men's ice hockey players for Switzerland/archive1 - I understand your oppose vote regarding the large amount of redlinks. However, at this point less than 1/3 of players have redlinks, and I am continuing to create articles for the rest of the redlinked players. Keeping that in mind, can you please re-review the page and see if there are any other objections so I can address them and we can get this candidacy resolved one way or another? It's been over a month, and there's only one vote (yours). Anthony (talk) 17:40, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi!
Since you did a Pre-flc review of my list, I want you to know that I have nominated the article for flc. here.—Prashant 04:41, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
FLC: List of AFC Wimbledon seasons
Hi, I believe that I have now made all the changes which you asked for on my featured list nomination for Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/List of AFC Wimbledon seasons/archive1. Thank you for your swift response to my previous message, with kind regards --Jodie25 (talk) 21:56, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi there.
I was wondering if you will be could proofread: Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/76th Academy Awards/archive1. I would be grateful for the extra help and support.
Mike Capel
Hello, Giants2008. If you have the time, you should revisit Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Mike Capel/archive2, as the article has improved significantly since your review. Thank you. Albacore (talk) 12:28, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Responded to comments
I have responded to you're comments on my FLC. — SoapFan12 Talk :) 19:33, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
| This is an archive of past discussions about User:Giants2008. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 15 | ← | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | Archive 23 | → | Archive 25 |