User talk:Geezygee
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Geezygee, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Schazjmd (talk) 16:00, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
The article Bobby Wealth Craig has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Article doesn't establish notability. The references given are promotional in nature (e.g. The Statesmen article was written by "SNS Web"). Google search brings up 18 results for "Bobby Wealth Craig" and fewer than 100 for "Bobby Wealth", but not significant discussion of the subject in multiple reliable sources.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster talk 19:16, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi User:discospinster, thanks for drawing my attention to the above, meanwhile this a stub. I am working on adding more information, all I ask of is more time --Geezygee (talk) 19:47, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
- The proposed deletion process takes seven days. ... discospinster talk 19:49, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Sure User:discospinster. I will try and work within the time frame. Thanks Geezygee (talk) 19:53, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Nana Kwame Wiafe for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nana Kwame Wiafe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nana Kwame Wiafe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 05:31, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Bobby Wealth Craig for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bobby Wealth Craig is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bobby Wealth Craig until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ... discospinster talk 18:43, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
The article Awal Sulemana has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
BLP1E -- minor news event, not amounting to notability
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 01:49, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello DGG, even though it is a minor event, the article Awal Sulemana is Ghana's first pitch invader and it is historic enough to be in an encyclopedia. What I created was a stub, we can all come to improve it. Check https://www.google.com/search?q=Awal+Sulemana&rlz=1C1CHWL_enGH822GH822&oq=awal&aqs=chrome.2.69i57j69i59l2j35i39j0j69i60l3.11278j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 for more sources. --Geezygee (talk) 11:06, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Awal Sulemana for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Awal Sulemana is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Awal Sulemana until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 22:04, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
Editing while logged out
[edit]I saw the note on your user page, I just created this account to be visible but I will still work more using IP
. Please note that now that you have an account, continuing to edit anonymously is discouraged, and it's not allowed at all if the intent is to deceive or evade. Please see WP:LOGOUT for more on this policy. Thanks. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:05, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
Ok RoySmith, thanks for the notice --Geezygee (talk) 17:24, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
December 2019
[edit]
Hello Geezygee. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Geezygee. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Geezygee|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Praxidicae (talk) 17:10, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
An article you recently created, AJ Poundz, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 17:11, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Bismark Salifu
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Bismark Salifu, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Praxidicae (talk) 17:15, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Bismark Salifu for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bismark Salifu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bismark Salifu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 18:46, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Kojo Jones
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Kojo Jones, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
- It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jikaoli Kol (talk) 19:07, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
December 2019
[edit]Hello Geezygee. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Geezygee. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Geezygee|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Jikaoli Kol (talk) 19:08, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
Jikaoli Kol, I will like to bring to your know notice that I am not in any way being paid for making contributions to Wikipedia. I pick notable topics which are been ignored and make my contributions through my research. This paid-to-edit tag on me is false and it is gradually affecting all my contribution. All my references provided shows my created articles are notable and matches Wikipedia's policies. I can be advised on my style of writing even though they are not promotional rather than to tag me as a paid-to-edit editor. This is resulting in most of my contributions been deleted. Geezygee (talk) 07:49, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: AJ Poundz (February 17)
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:AJ Poundz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:AJ Poundz, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Geezygee!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 15:56, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
|
An article you recently created, Vudumane, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lapablo (talk) 18:35, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Gifty Ayew Asare moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Gifty Ayew Asare, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lapablo (talk) 19:08, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Chyzzi
[edit]Hello Geezygee,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Chyzzi for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Bᴇʀʀᴇʟʏ • Talk to me∕What have I been doing 09:19, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
[edit]
|
Hi Geezygee! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dabenja is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dabenja until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Versace1608 Wanna Talk? 18:33, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reklyn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reklyn until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Versace1608 Wanna Talk? 18:39, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Princess Wonda for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Princess Wonda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Wonda until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Versace1608 Wanna Talk? 18:42, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chyzzi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chyzzi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Versace1608 Wanna Talk? 18:46, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aremo Oba is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aremo Oba until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Versace1608 Wanna Talk? 18:51, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Obi Cubana for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Obi Cubana is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Obi Cubana until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Versace1608 Wanna Talk? 19:00, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Gifty Ayew Asare
[edit]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Zanimum (talk) 20:04, 18 April 2020 (UTC)The article Gifty Ayew Asare has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Footballer who fails GNG and NFOOTY
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BlameRuiner (talk) 14:24, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DJ Paak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Paak until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 18:33, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article TwoBars is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TwoBars until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 18:40, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Rahaile Foday for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rahaile Foday is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rahaile Foday until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 18:41, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Lamisi Nelson for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lamisi Nelson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lamisi Nelson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 18:50, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
The article Ghandour Cosmetics Ltd has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The sources cited in this article are either sponsored contents or press releases announcing launch of the company's new products.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Northern Escapee (talk) 18:13, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Youth Excellence Awards for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Youth Excellence Awards is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Youth Excellence Awards until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bbarmadillo (talk) 20:06, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Vudumane
[edit]
Hello, Geezygee. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vudumane".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:33, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:AJ Poundz
[edit]Hello, Geezygee. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "AJ Poundz".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:41, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Flyboy Geesus (musician) for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flyboy Geesus (musician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Celestina007 (talk) 20:14, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Advice
[edit]Hi. I strongly recommend that you don't create any further new articles unless you do so in draft space and get a review from more experienced editors. At the moment you are having a lot of problems with deletions because you are not yet experienced enough to understand the guidelines. You should practise by making small but constructive edits to new articles rather than trying to create brand-new ones. Deb (talk) 18:27, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
ANI
[edit]Hi - there is a discussion thread currently at WP:ANI in which you have been mentioned. The thread is WP:ANI#Vandalism. You may wish to comment there. Best GirthSummit (blether) 09:47, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Mizter Okyere for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mizter Okyere, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mizter Okyere until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Afia Amankwaah Tamakloe for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Afia Amankwaah Tamakloe, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afia Amankwaah Tamakloe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
The article Djsky has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG. Little coverage in reliable sources, even taking into account being based in Ghana.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 16:24, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Ghandour Cosmetics
[edit] Hello, Geezygee. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ghandour Cosmetics, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Ghandour Cosmetics
[edit]Hello, Geezygee. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ghandour Cosmetics".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 16:10, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Ali Jihami for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali Jihami until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
KH-1 (talk) 12:11, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Prince Anthony Bart-Appiah
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Prince Anthony Bart-Appiah, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PRAXIDICAE🌈 16:45, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:06, 4 August 2022 (UTC)Unblock request
[edit]
Geezygee (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I agree to my involvement with the kwekufrimpong account as created not too long ago to use for editing in places I do not trust the IP. My reason for involving it in the creation of Prince Anthony Bart-Appiah was not to protect/keep my spam articles as stated but rather to remove the speedy deletion tag (entity is a very notable figure, sources provided can confirm that) placed by the nominee and rewrite the article. We could all realize I moved the article to the draft space and left a note on the nominee's talk page. I had no bad intentions and I am sorry for my actions. Kindly unblock me to continue adding my quota to the community Geezygee (talk) 1:03 am, Today (UTC−4)
Decline reason:
Clear case of abusively using a sock.. The issue was not notability. It was promotional editing. I see a lot of pages you created that were deleted for promotional editing. Sock puppetry destroys the Community's trust. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:01, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Noting checkuserblock-account block in block log.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:05, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Following up on unblock appeal
[edit]Geezygee (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
My action was just once and I believe it is unfair to classify this case as 'abusively using a sock'. I agree I have previously encountered mass deletion of some pages I created which is different in recent contributions (most of the articles after discussion were kept) because I am learning and I have more to learn along the line. Please help me unblock my account. I promise to be good. Also, I have signed up for the Wikimania 2022 Virtual Portal and the block will mess up my lessons. Geezygee (talk) 19:14, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I just blocked a few more of your socks. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:44, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I am not associated with the accused accounts
[edit]Geezygee (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I do not know why I am falsely accused of using the accused socks. It is evidential that we share the same IP with millions of internet users down here Geezygee (talk) 17:18, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
The standard offer is available and I've revoked talk page access as two checkusers have confirmed the socking. WP:UTRS is available, but simply repeating the denial despite the technical and behavioural evidence won't lead to an unblock regardless of where you make your appeal. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 17:30, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Mary Got Fit moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Mary Got Fit, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Reading Beans (talk) 06:02, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Nana Ama (Ghanaian vocalist) moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Nana Ama (Ghanaian vocalist), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 11:48, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Kwaku Tabi Amponsah
[edit] Hello, Geezygee. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kwaku Tabi Amponsah, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Kwaku Tabi Amponsah
[edit]Hello, Geezygee. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Kwaku Tabi Amponsah".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 16:23, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Mary Got Fit
[edit] Hello, Geezygee. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mary Got Fit, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Nana Ama (Ghanaian vocalist)
[edit] Hello, Geezygee. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nana Ama (Ghanaian vocalist), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:09, 2 May 2023 (UTC)