User talk:Galamore

January 2024

Hello, I'm DreamRimmer. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to Material flow because they seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. – DreamRimmer (talk) 15:52, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

ok Galamore (talk) 15:53, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Could you please explain why my source is not good? Galamore (talk) 15:55, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Galamore. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. jp×g🗯️ 06:48, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello, yesterday I wrote two articles about companies dealing with artificial intelligence. Apart from being a teacher who uses these programs, I have no connection, business or otherwise, with them. As I presented in the sources, these are two articles that I understand from using Wikipedia for years, should exist here. How am I supposed to prove my "innocence"? And how do I transfer these two drafts to the article space? Galamore (talk) 07:12, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

@JPxG

I patrolled the article in NPP. I saw a likely GNG pass in terms of notability with Reuters (ref removed) and now [1] (unable to access but looked good enough) and [2] in the article when you draftifed.

Tonally, lead sentence is a bit off when I patrolled looking back. I don't see a clear COI with anything in any of the edits Galamore's made but rather a need to maintain a more neutral tone and focus more on secondary sources in the future :D

Galamore, I think its best if you'd click the "submit your draft for review" button on the top of the page. The backlog is... alright but slightly growing. Add the reuters source back in so reviewers would have an easier time. Trim usage of the primary sources and you should be mostly good. Justiyaya 13:12, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Perplexity.ai (January 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by BuySomeApples were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Perplexity.ai and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples (talk) 16:01, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Galamore! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! BuySomeApples (talk) 16:01, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

I will try to improve. But I really don't understand. I have already seen lots of less good articles than that. It frustrates me. Galamore (talk) 13:40, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Holmes Place moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Holmes Place. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ratnahastin (talk) 14:39, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about GoTo (Israeli company)

Hello Galamore, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, GoTo (Israeli company), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GoTo (Israeli company).

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TheLongTone}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TheLongTone (talk) 15:39, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, Galamore, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Marokwitz (talk) 10:00, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Don't worry if your first articles encounter resistance; I am sure you will get the hang of it soon. The secret to creating company articles without concerns of being overly promotional is to cite well-known business publications and avoid anything overly flattering or affiliated with the company. More citations are not necessarily better, as the weaker ones often obscure the good ones. Publicly traded companies are almost always notable enough for Wikipedia, while startups often are more challenging to keep, except for very high profile ones. Marokwitz (talk) 10:07, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Jesse Lyu moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Jesse Lyu. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Justiyaya 13:32, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

While I think Perplexity.ai could be notable, this article definitely is not. I haven't done a through search but none of the sources seems promising for meeting WP:GNG. Justiyaya 13:33, 14 January 2024 (UTC) (please  mention me on reply)

It frustrates me, but I don't despair. I think Wikipedia is a collaborative project, and if something isn't good enough, other editors help improve, rather than just draft it. All the articles I have written are very, very important topics in the high-tech world.Galamore (talk) 13:39, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jesse Lyu (January 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spinster300 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jesse Lyu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spinster300 (talk) 20:10, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of JFrog

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on JFrog, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. TLA (talk) 06:26, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Perhaps it would be wise to read the article and do a quick Google search, before writing that it's an advertisement or something like that. It's a super well-known company in DevOps field. And it's really tiring that every article I write is met with such suspicion.Galamore (talk) 06:40, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi, Galamore. I know that it is tough to see something you create be deleted. I have been there myself. I can only suggest that you understand where the Wikipedia community is coming from here. Notability and promotional tone are two different things. In addition, your editing has all the classic signs of having a conflict of interest. Note that the page JFrog was previously created a few times by paid editors and then deleted which raises a flag so accompanied by promotional tone does not help. Now, it is okay if you have a conflict of interest, but it would need to be disclosed. As far as the promotional tone, this one read like it was something the company would want the public to know and not something suitable for encyclopedia readers. What I would suggest is to create future drafts through WP:AfC. This way you can get feedback on everything form notability and tone. Once a few get through the process, you can get a better understanding of what is acceptable on Wikipedia. Good luck. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:59, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

I also need to ask if you have edited Wikipedia from any other accounts. I found some edits that raised an eyebrow as to possibly using multiple accounts. If so, please disclose that as well. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:01, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. jp×g🗯️ 03:42, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Now archived at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1147#Undisclosed paid editor making spam articles about non-notable companies. SilverLocust 💬 02:28, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

• Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
• State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
• Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

jp×g🗯️ 03:54, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Galamore (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The accusation is ridiculous and false. If there is anyone on Wikipedia that I can be exposed to with my name. Let him talk to me and understand that there is no way that I receive money from any company for my edits. I want to keep writing, And I want to keep writing about high-tech companies. Hope someone will read this and help me. Galamore (talk) 06:40, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

There's enough red flags here for me to not disagree with the blocking admin- but even if I did disagree, you are editing so promotionally that it's no different than if you were working for the subjects of your edits. Right now you can't be trusted to edit about companies- if there are other topics that you want to edit about, please tell what those might be; once you do that for awhile and learn more about Wikipedia guidelines, that can be revisited, but I decline to unblock you to edit about companies. 331dot (talk) 08:54, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Is it okay to write about people? I can also write about technologies... And be careful not to write about technologies unique to the company so that it won't be advertising...

Now I get it

I read Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Orangemoody And I understood why you were so suspicious of me. I don't know how to prove that I'm not related to them. For me, delete the articles I wrote. each and every one of them. I have no sentimental connection and I don't care about the companies themselves. Right, I'm new. But in the last few weeks I read and learned a lot here. I want to continue to be a part. Galamore (talk) 06:55, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

I also have to say that if I were part of that group, and I would take money for editing Wikipedia, I would do it smarter than publishing a lot of new articles in such a short time...Galamore (talk) 06:57, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

You need to put this in your appeal, not just on your talk page where it's possible no one will see it. Deb (talk) 09:26, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

I recommend writing a new appeal, explaining that you understand you created articles with an overly promotional tone, and asking for another chance to prove that you are not here for promotional reasons. Marokwitz (talk) 16:55, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Some advice

I have read this page and the section about you on an an administrator's noticeboard, and checked your editing history, and here are some of my thoughts on the matter.

I don't know whether you are an undisclosed paid editor or not, but there is nowhere near enough evidence to have persuaded me to block you from editing for that reason. On the other hand, I do think that the promotional character of your editing is enough to justify a block. As far as I know, that promotional character could be because you are being paid to use Wikipedia for advertising, but it could alternatively be simply because, being new to editing Wikipedia, you simply didn't realise that Wikipedia style is to write in a neutral way, without expressing approval or admiration of what one is writing about. What I am about to write is based on the assumption that the second of those two possibilities is true.

Creating new articles is probably the most difficult thing for new editors to do, because there are so many ways in which to fall foul of Wikipedia's policies, guidelines, and generally accepted style, which a new editor is unlikely to be aware of. Many new editors who try to launch straight into creating articles therefore have a frustrating and disheartening experience. My advice to new editors is that it is best to start by making small improvements to existing articles, rather than creating new articles. That way any mistakes you make will be small ones, and you won't have the discouraging experience of repeatedly seeing hours of work deleted. Gradually, you will get to learn how Wikipedia works, and after a while you will know enough about what is acceptable to be able to write whole new articles without fear that they will be deleted. Over the years I have found that editors who start by making small changes to existing articles and work up from there have a far better chance of having a successful time here than those who jump right into creating new articles from the start. It is also a mistake to try to get round the restriction on new editors creating articles by making trivial edits to get autoconfirmed, for at least two reasons. The more important of those reasons is that the block on new editors from creating new articles was introduced to help those editors to avoid problems, by stopping them from rushing in without knowing enough to avoid encountering problems, such as those you have experienced. Evading that block therefore exposes you to the problems it is intended to protect you from.

Assuming that you are a genuine good-faith new editor, not editing for pay, and that you are still interested in contributing to Wikipedia, my advice is to make a new unblock request in which you undertake not to try to create new articles, whether directly or via drafts, for a significant time, perhaps six months. It may also be a good idea to undertake not to write about businesses, but it is important to realise that the question of whether your editing is promotional or not is a totally different matter from the question of what topic you are writing about; promotion of a person, an opinion, or anything else is just as unacceptable as promotion of a business. JBW (talk) 18:04, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: D-ID (company) (January 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by LittlePuppers were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:D-ID (company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LittlePuppers (talk) 03:17, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Second unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Galamore (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Okay, I took some time to think. At this time I also saw that the article I created perplexity.ai had over 10,000 views, which made me realize that what I am doing here is significant. I think I have a lot to contribute, and I ask that you unblock me. If you decide that I am not allowed to write new entries concerning companies, I will respect that. I will start by improving existing articles about technologies, technology companies and people who deal with technology.Galamore (talk) 07:50, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You've already been told this approach won't work. Yamla (talk) 10:53, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Third unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Galamore (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Ok, I promise not to deal with commercial companies or anything related to that, I will only edit articles related to education and education in Israel, maybe also about people from Israel's history Galamore (talk) 09:26, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Accept reason:

You have been kept waiting for long enough, and I think in fairness to you this needs to be settled. JPxG has made hundreds of edits since the first time Deepfriedokra pinged them, and dozens since the second time, but has not responded here, so I assume they have nothing to say. On the basis of the assurances you have given about your future editing intentions, I'm willing to unblock to give you another chance. I hope you will now have a successful time contributing to Wikipedia. 🙂 JBW (talk) 15:59, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

@JPxG: Does this suit? Cheers, -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:08, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:14F:1F9:1600:1D8A:1459:4D9A:F331 (talk) 12:28, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

@JPxG: OK to unblock? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:49, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

please? Galamore (talk) 07:52, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

@JBW Thank you! Galamore (talk) 10:12, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Perplexity.ai for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Perplexity.ai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perplexity.ai until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Stuartyeates (talk) 09:32, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on The Streams Method in the Israeli education

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page The Streams Method in the Israeli education, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:31, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Holmes Place (February 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Herald was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Holmes Place and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 09:30, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Thanks @The Herald, but I'm not allowed to deal with these topics - do whatever you want with this article.Galamore (talk) 07:25, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Midreshet Tavor for Zionist Leadership

Hello Galamore, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Midreshet Tavor for Zionist Leadership, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Midreshet Tavor for Zionist Leadership.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Remsense}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Remsense诉 15:12, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on Kfar HaRoeh Yeshiva

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kfar HaRoeh Yeshiva, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:22, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Ways to improve Weizmann Prize for Research in the Exact Sciences

Hello, Galamore,

Thank you for creating Weizmann Prize for Research in the Exact Sciences.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

While some of the references individual prizes are referenced, most of the list elements aren't and we're missing key references describing the details of the prize.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Klbrain (talk) 08:24, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Galamore. Thank you for your work on Weizmann Prize for Research in the Exact Sciences. Klbrain, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for helpfully creating this page. The main problem is the lack of referencing (and I'm not sure if the Hebrew article helps there either) and, at least for me, several of the references have security warnings or blocks. So, referencing is something to work on, particularly those that focus on the prize rather than the prize winners.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 08:28, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

@Klbrain Okay thank you. I will try to work on it. Galamore (talk) 05:51, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Iranian attack on Israel

Hello, I have noticed that you have created this page. However, a page on the topic already exists: 2024 Iranian drone attack on Israel. Could you merge content to the original page? AusLondonder (talk) 20:37, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

This is what the article he created looked like while I created the other article.

Unfortunately I did not see the first article. In any case, there's no point in merging... You can delete make it a redirect. Galamore (talk) 20:42, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Your version has superior content so would be worth moving that content to the other article. AusLondonder (talk) 20:44, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

My name is better too. This is an attack that never been seen before. Galamore (talk) 20:46, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

You have violated the 1 revert rule at 2024 Iranian strikes in Israel

You are only allowed to make 1 revert every 24 hours on Arab-Israeli conflict articles.

You have violated this: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2024_Iranian_strikes_in_Israel&diff=1218856099&oldid=1218855967

and then again here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2024_Iranian_strikes_in_Israel&diff=1218858190&oldid=1218858044

Please revert yourself. Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 07:45, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

this is not a revert....Galamore (talk) 07:48, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

@Supreme Deliciousness I looked again. I understand why you might think it's a revert. I restored the content I deleted. Thanks. Galamore (talk) 07:53, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

It is a revert as it was added in the edit right before: [3]--Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 07:55, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

If you look, you will see that the number of characters that I removed is not the number of characters that the editor before me added. Galamore (talk) 08:01, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Isaidnoway (talk) 08:20, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Operation True Promise (disambiguation) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Operation True Promise (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation True Promise (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:12, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Query

Hi Galamore. Could you let me know if this edit was made as a result of receiving an email from Dizmonreau‬? I ask because if it was, there would be policy considerations. Best, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 15:21, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi, no, I do not know this user and I have never received a message from him. Galamore (talk) 06:53, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

Population transfer

Look, there was an ongoing discussion on the talk page when yourself (and the other editor) were making those reverts (both of you breached 1R, btw). Please join that conversation and discuss, the original edit was a good faith effort to resolve some issues (jvl is an unreliable source, btw) so just edit warring (by either of you) isn't going to resolve anything. Selfstudier (talk) 21:28, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Galamore. Thank you for your work on State Education Law (Israel). Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:23, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

WP:ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Ecrusized (talk) 16:04, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Galamore. Thank you. Ecrusized (talk) 18:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi, I am posting this here so everybody can see.

My name is Gal, Gal the teacher (in Hebrew with English letters it comes out GALAMORE). I entered Wikipedia because I wanted to write about technology, I wrote the article on Perplexity.ai (which received 568,902 views so far!!), after I wrote about a few more high-tech companies I was temporarily blocked and warned not to engage in business matters probably for fear of receiving money for it. Almost every morning, before I start teaching, I go to Wikipedia to edit and I enjoy it very much. I am Israeli, so the Israel related topics interest me. If it is relevant, politically, in Israel I believe in peace with our neighbors and want an end to wars. When I see something that is biased, I try to balance it and bring sources from both sides. Even if there is an Israeli editor who makes claims that are "in favor of Israel" but are not substantiated, I will correct it - because I truly believe in balanced coverage of topics. I am not obssessive to my edits, I just enjoy adding information and I think it is productive to humanity.

On this occasion, may I ask where and when can I request that the prohibition to write on tech companies be removed? ~~~~ Galamore (talk) 07:23, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

Edit warring

As a result of the AE filing against you I am cautioning you against edit warring, which includes continuing long-term edit wars. This is even more important when dealing with an edit war that was targeted by sockpuppets and likely off-wiki canvassing efforts. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:22, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

OK. Thank you.Galamore (talk) 13:24, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

June 2024

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Yehezkel Chazom article, and I couldn't find one either. If you have a reliable source please let me know and we can change the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. GiantSnowman 18:20, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

I added the information to the body of the article and a source. Galamore (talk) 04:35, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:D-ID (company)

Hello, Galamore. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:D-ID (company), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:06, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

Unfortunately I'm not allowed. Do whatever you want with the draft. Galamore (talk) 06:18, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Shalom! You're in the news

Shalom Galamore, you are in the news. [4]. HaOfa (talk) 08:02, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

		The Press Barnstar
		You were mentioned by Al Jazeera for your contributions to Nuseirat rescue operation, well done! HaOfa (talk) 08:06, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Correction request

Hello, Galamore.

At the top of the protected article Mossad, can you replace the mislabelled term of "the Levant" (because it describes the region encompassing Syria, Lebanon, Hatay province of Turkey, Jordan, and not just Israel) with "British Mandatory Palestine, and later the State of Israel"?

Yours sincerely, Moroike (talk) 12:26, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Galamore.

I am withdrawing the request, because another user to whom I did not send a request, has corrected the term.

Yours sincerely, Moroike (talk) 14:18, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

AE

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Statement by Levivich (Nishidani) Levivich (talk) 05:50, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

companies and technology

@JPxG @331dot @Yamla @JBW @Deepfriedokra

Hello to everyone who has been involved in blocking and unblocking me in the past. Half a year ago I made a commitment not to engage in editing about companies, since then, almost every morning, before I go out to my students, I go to Wikipedia and add a little knowledge from what I can.

I would very much like to come back and write a little about business companies as well. I declare and promise that I do not receive payment from anyone, neither from a commercial company nor from anyone related to them. I simply enjoy reading about the innovations in the world and companies dealing with technologies and I also want to write about them.

Note that the article I wrote at the beginning about Perplexity.ai has over a million views! (1,149,005)

It's fun to be a part of Wikipedia, and even if I don't get approved to work in technology, I'm happy to take part in this amazing project.

Do I need to make a formal application?

Galamore (talk) 04:59, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:D-ID (company)

Hello, Galamore. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "D-ID".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:27, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:July 2024 events in Israel

A tag has been placed on Category:July 2024 events in Israel indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 12:57, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

It is not empty. Galamore (talk) 05:28, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Srugim (website)

Hello, Galamore. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Srugim (website), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:05, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Tiberias Ancient Jewish Cemetery moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Tiberias Ancient Jewish Cemetery. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and Per concerns outlined in added tags and on Talk page.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 11:05, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Translating

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from he:ישיבת בני עקיבא כפר הרא"ה to Kfar HaRoeh Yeshiva. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. For example:

Content in this edit is translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.

It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you must add attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Richard Nevell (talk) 23:41, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Holmes Place

Hello, Galamore. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Holmes Place, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:08, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Srugim (website)

Hello, Galamore. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Srugim".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:22, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

Arab citizens of Israel

Still waiting for your talk page response there. Makeandtoss (talk) 08:32, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Hey, sorry, busy days, school is back so I don't have much time for WIkipedia except in early mornings. Check the talk page soon. Galamore (talk) 07:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Two months have passed since being requested to elaborate on the mass reversions you performed. This cannot wait any longer. Makeandtoss (talk) 11:35, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

ITN recognition for 2024 Lebanon pager explosions

On 18 September 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2024 Lebanon pager explosions, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. El_C 05:56, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar

Thank you for your creating the article 2024 Lebanon pager explosions which was nominated to the In the News section of the main page in less than 24 hours. In my view, this event marks a significant escalation in the ongoing Middle East conflict and represents the most serious security breach since the Assassination of Ismail Haniyeh, a similar incident which occurred 7 weeks ago in Iran. Congratulations! cyrfaw (talk) 12:01, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Galamore. Thank you for your work on The Streams Method in the Israeli education. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for your work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:09, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Request

Hello.

In the 2024 Hezbollah headquarters strike article, can you actually display the specific bomb Mark 84 bomb with its name, which has been obscured in the Wikilink under the label "2,000-pound bombs", when the other bunker buster bombs like BLU-109 bomb are displayed with their names in the article?

(Also, if units have to be displayed, both the metric and imperial units must be displayed in Wikipedia articles, not one or the other. 95% of the world population use only the metric system.)

Thank you. Oirattas (talk) 20:21, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Galamore! Your additions to 2016 Counter-Terrorism Law have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:25, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Non-attributed translations

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from he:גן החי בפתח תקווה to Petah Tikva Zoo. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. Sample wording for this is given here. If you forgot, or were not aware of this requirement, attribution must be given retroactively, for example:

NOTE: Content in the edit of 01:25, January 25, 2023 was translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.

Retroactive attribution may be added using a dummy edit; see Repairing insufficient attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you must add attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 23:41, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Jesse Lyu

Hello, Galamore. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jesse Lyu, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:07, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Icewhiz per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Icewhiz. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Barkeep49 (talk) 20:49, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

Don’t take this from me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Galamore (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I think people here have known me for quite a while. At first, I was blocked for writing about commercial companies, and I committed not to do that again. Now I’m being blocked based on the ridiculous claim that I’m someone else? Does that seem reasonable to you? My name is Gal, and if necessary, I’m willing to have a conversation and reveal my identity. A phone call, video call, whichever way you prefer. Look at what I’ve done here over the past year, I’ve created many articles on various topics, mostly related to Israel, the place where I live.

I’m not ashamed of being Israeli.

I am asking that my block be reconsidered.

It appears that this Icewhiz stopped contributing in 2019, and I joined long after that. I enjoy being here and feel that I am contributing. I show my students the things I write and hope that one day they will also start editing on Wikipedia. Please don’t take this from me. Galamore (talk) 07:46, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural, now locked. Izno (talk) 14:49, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Galamore (talk) 07:46, 3 November 2024 (UTC)