User talk:Gairathimonikagairathi

This is Gairathimonikagairathi's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stiven Mikhail (November 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tails Wx was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stiven Mikhail and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tails Wx 02:21, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gairathimonikagairathi! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tails Wx 02:21, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop canvassing reviewers

Our function is to review what is submitted.

Your job, if you wish the draft to be accepted, is to do the work required. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:55, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Ponyo^{bons mots} 15:47, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bog standard UPE spammer, comfirmed to Rathorenareshrathore.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 15:47, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have read all the privacy policies of Wikipedia. From now on I will never make any such editing which violates the privacy policies of Wikipedia, so please unblock me from editing. Gairathimonikagairathi (talk) 05:31, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gairathimonikagairathi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will not violate the privacy policies set out by Wikipedia in the future.I am sorry for the mistake I have done so please forgive me.Please unblock me.

Decline reason:

This is completely without any meaningful attempt to address the multiple problems that lead to your block. Yamla (talk) 12:18, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gairathimonikagairathi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I requested that Stiven mikhail's draft be deleted or corrected.If you think my comment is not appropriate then please forgive me.I will not make any edits in the future that will cause you trouble.Nor will this account be misused by me.Please give me permission to edit And please unblock me. Gairathimonikagairathi (talk) 08:40, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This doesn't address your sock puppetry. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:37, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock from editing

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gairathimonikagairathi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yes sir, I maintain more than one Wikipedia account. But I have not misused any Wikipedia account. I have used my Wikipedia account to create drafts or edit articles. I used my Wikipedia account to edit the article, but I was blocked from editing. So I had to create a new Wikipedia account. But my new Wikipedia account was also blocked. I request you please unblock my Wikipedia account and give me permission to editing.

Decline reason:

This is the same appeal as you made at User talk:Lalmohanlal. Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:33, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Let me get this straight.

You had an account
It was blocked
You created another account to evade the block
This is that other account
This account was also blocked

That seems to be a summary of what you have just said. If correct I view your chances of an unlock as possible but slim. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 17:31, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) "I was blocked from editing. So I had to create a new Wikipedia account". That's a blatant abuse of multiple accounts. There's simply no way you could have read WP:SOCK and WP:BLOCK and thought otherwise. --Yamla (talk) 17:32, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We're up to five confirmed accounts at this point. Girth Summit _(blether) 17:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]