Jump to content

User talk:Gaff/Archive 4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 < Archive 3    Archive 4    Archive 5 >
All Pages:  1 -  2 -  3 -  4 -  5 -  6 -  7 -  8 -  9 -  ... (up to 100)



Ramona splashing in the fountain

Hello! I noticed your recent edit to Grant Park. The photo on the page of the Ramona statue clearly shows that the statue is not splashing in a fountain. Was there once a fountain there, or is the source wrong? Regards, Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 07:29, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • The source is correct. The fountain is just not turned on when that pic was taken. But the Falcon Guide source reports she is splashing in the fountain. I confirmed this as well, while playing there with my daughter earlier today! Cheers! --—Gaff ταλκ 07:33, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I see— looking at another picture I took that day (not uploaded here) I can see that there is indeed a perforated slab in the middle of the concrete that could be a fountain, but apparently it isn't turned on in the winter. I should visit Portland more often in the summer! Thanks & regards, Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 07:43, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Glenn Otto Park
added a link pointing to Sandy River
Grant Park, Portland, Oregon
added a link pointing to Lee Hunt

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Need help to clear flag on Rakesh Khanna

Dear Gaff,

I have made the required edits to Rakesh Khanna's page. I have also added few new sections and diluted the language a bit.

Can you please help me clear the "flag"/"notifications" for this page.

Regards, Vishal Yajnik 12:07, 10 September 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vishalyajnik (talk • contribs)

my talk page[edit]Hi MJT21

Thank you for your comment on my talk page. Please note that I didn't leave a message on your talk page? Kind regards, MJT21 (talk) 17:45, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK with the bees

I very much doubt that you will get that through at DYK. But well done being bold to submit it. If I can help in any way to scrub this up, let me know. I don't know much about bees but I know a lot about editing.

Nice pic!

Si Trew (talk) 21:17, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Megachile campanulae

Hello! Your submission of Megachile campanulae at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 15:27, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Megachile campanulae

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hello! I saw now that u taged my article ro remove! But i cant understand why! Im arrist and want to promote my work also in wikipedi! What's the problem?

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.64.176.131 (talk) 02:18, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

==Speedy deletion nomination of FoodiesCompass

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on FoodiesCompass, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Marv Scholes (talk) 05:06, 30 September 2014 (UTC) Marv Scholes ==[reply]

FoodiesCompass is an online food restaurant guide and food travel agency concept in India. Unlike others this website gives user an added advantage of pre-booking their tickets, I mean food. Already it has 200 restaurants in its rosters and that too only in Gurgaon, a city at the hub of National Capital Region in India with an area of just 738.8 km square. It shows the pace at which the company is getting fame for its unique idea.

The vision of the company's ceo is innovative and sort of new in India's Food porn sector. Maybe the content of its wikipedia page offers promotion but honestly speaking to turn this page into a biographical piece we need awareness of such an unique idea. Once the page is created, with such ideas the company will blossom through more food friendly cultures.

I am gathering more sources by the way. Let me know if the idea looks great.

Marv Scholes (talk) 05:06, 30 September 2014 (UTC)Marv Scholes Marv Scholes (talk) 05:06, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I know it's no promotion but it's a place to knowing and explaining about artists and art also! so i have no idea what's the problem? all the text and materials was copied for the original website with copy right! — Preceding unsigned comment added by PUNUNKUNKNOWN (talk • contribs) 10:05, 30 September 2014 (UTC) Reply: I don't know what article you are talking about. I'm very active on here reviewing many articles. I encourage you to read about what are appropriate articles for Wikipedia and to contribute! See Wikipedia:About. Cheers! —Gaff ταλκ 00:23, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article PUNUNKUNKNOWN is referring to is Sam Beklik, which was deleted for G11 and G12; it was a rewrite of this page.
To PUNUNKUNKNOWN: you need to read the rules on Copyright Violations and Promotion, and why they are not permitted. Stephen! Coming... 06:49, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Gaff. You have new messages at StephenBuxton's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Nature's Housekeeper

Prod was removed. I nominated it for AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nature's Housekeeper Bgwhite (talk) 06:57, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And the other one also... The Edward Snowden Affair: Exposing the Politics and Media Behind the NSA Scandal Bgwhite (talk) 07:06, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments on Snowden Page

The content of this page is different than the other, see subject headings. The other was deleted because it didn't clarify the "noteworthiness" of the book, i.e., media citations. This one documents that it was the topic of an ABC Network discussion, amongst other media (print, online, radio) in New Orleans, Phoenix, Boston, etc. Journalstudent (talk) 23:32, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Question about DYK process

Hi, Gaff - I was just wondering about the order for reviewing DYK noms. I did a DYK self-nom for American paddlefish back on Sept 4 right after it made GA. It is now under review for FA. The Bowfin article I nominated much later was reviewed first. Is there no chronological order to reviewing articles? If not, how long is an unreviewed article to remain on the list of noms before it is reviewed? Atsme☯Consult 19:07, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Atsme: I've only done two DYK noms. The first one Megachile campanulae had a nice photograph to go with it (like your bowfin), and was reviewed almost immediately. The second one, Cream-spotted cardinalfish does not have a photo and has been sitting for a few days unreviewed. So, the common denominator seems that interesting photos and/or really good hooks get the attention. As far as how long they sit around, I'm not sure, but the back-log on the page goes back quite a ways. I'll take a look at your other article; maybe we can help each other out. Also, since you have some experience boosting articles to GA status, can you look at the Megachile campanulae article for me? I'm wondering if it is something worth trying to build up to GA status, since it is really just an obscure resin bee... Thank you. —Gaff ταλκ 20:01, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutely. Collaboration gives me energy. Atsme☯Consult 21:31, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the review on paddlefish - it was quickly moved into the que. I'm not sure how the que thingy works, but posted my question at the Bowfin DYK since it still remains open. Also, I've been busy reading your article and doing a little research to see how best it could be expanded. I think you've done a great job so far. I came across the following: [1], and [2], and thought a section on human interaction, and a section on parasites, diseases and pesticides would be useful to readers. Atsme☯Consult 13:34, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for that advice & encouragement. The bowfin DYK should get taken care of. I'm not 100% sure how the procedure unfolds, yet... —Gaff ταλκ 15:41, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Kk

A tag has been placed on Template:Kk requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 23:12, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality mark South Tyrol

Hi Gaff, I would like to improve the deleted article, how can I do some changes? Do I have to create a completly new article? --Fanny Dürfeldt (talk) 07:36, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Fanny Dürfeldt: It's not much fun when your article gets deleted. I know from experience. I am not an administrator, so Ididn't delete the article and cannot "undelete." I was simply the editor who did the review. The concerns were listed on the tags placed on your talk page. The tag from me was generated automatically when the article was tagged. The other one is from the administrator, Jimfbleak - talk to me?. He can possibly get you a copy of the article. It can;t hurt to ask. The major concerns were that it was too closely word-for-word or "tightly paraphrased" from the company website and that it read like a promo or "spam." Aim for an objective, encyclopedic tone and include lots of references to sources other than the company web-site. Review WP:GNG for general notability guidelines, WP:CORP for guidelines about companies, and WP:MOS for guidelines on style for writing the articles. You may want to find something totally objective to work on for your first few artcles, like a city park, a plant, flower, or insect... Hopefully that is some help! —Gaff ταλκ 12:26, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Gaff:, I've already declined to restore, because that isn't acceptable for copyright violations, see her talk page Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:33, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jamesiskingll

Gaff, there were no multiple accounts so SPI is inappropriate--well, in a way there were, but you couldn't have known: that same article was created 7 years ago by a different account. Anyway, the persistent recreation of an article can be reported at WP:AIV and/or you can ask for the deleted article to be salted, at WP:RFPP. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 02:38, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aurangabad district, Bihar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aurangabad. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Values Modes

Hi there,

I wrote this article. As a social researcher Values Modes is a tool something I've come across and used a lot in work for charities/ local authorities etc, and is something which I felt didn't have enough of an online presence. The article was an attempt to rectify this.

It seems like something which is particularly salient at the moment, because - thanks to the rise of UKIP - quite a lot of political strategists on the left are using the tool (most notably in the case of the IPPR paper cited in the document, but in other spaces too).

I myself believe the model has genuine academic usage and practical application, and am broadly speaking a believer in the methodology behind it. However, it is not the only model of it's kind and so, to ensure it's completely balanced, I have just gone in and added a short section about 'criticism and alternative methods'.

I am a first time editor of Wikipedia so apologies if any of my footnoting was shoddy. I thought all of the citations I used did discuss Values Modes though, with the exception, perhaps of the 'Revolt on the Left' paper, which alludes but doesn't refer by name. Happy to amend/ remove...

Thanks! Chris

Clarkechris66 (talk) 14:20, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi Gaff, a couple of quick questions, as you were the person that officially flagged my Values Modes page. I firstly just wondered how long it generally takes to come to a view about deletion? Is my page still in danger of being taken down, do you think? Secondly, when I type "Values Modes" into Google the Wikipedia page doesn't come up. I wondered if this is because the page hasn't been given the formal Wikipedia thumbs up yet, or if it's for another reason...? Any advice you were able to give very much appreciated - as I said before I'm a bit of a novice! Thanks, Clarkechris66 (talk) 09:26, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Clarkechris66: discussions are typically open about a week. If after the week is up, it may get relisted, marked as no consensus (keep by default), deleted, or simply kept. If you can get another reference or two up to the topic, either secondary or tertiary is best, it will help your chances a lot. Maybe chapters, etc from Poli-Sci texts? Try google books search? Hope that helps! —Gaff ταλκ 13:29, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • That's great new - thanks Gaff. I've put in a couple more sources from slightly more academic places anyway, which should help, and I'll ask some of the people I've worked with in the past, who will know VM better than me, to help strengthen the page too. Cheers! Clarkechris66 (talk) 14:53, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Calitoxin

Hello! Your submission of Calitoxin at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 19:34, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GOCE October 2014 newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors October 2014 newsletter is now ready for review. Highlights:

– Your project coordinators: Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978 and Miniapolis.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Western honey bee


Thank you for the monarch butterfly reference

I knew that I had read this information somewhere in the past but could not put my finger on it. Thank you so much for helping improve the article with this reference.

  Bfpage |leave a message  00:06, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Bfpage: Happy to help.—Gaff ταλκ 00:09, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Calitoxin

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:28, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Megachile campanulae

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Megachile campanulae you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of IJReid -- IJReid (talk) 02:02, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Okay, I can get started on expanding that section. It should not be a problem. I've been trying to get a map made to cover the US distribution as well as Canada, but the process at the map workup has stalled. This is my first GA nomination. I'm looking forward to the review! —Gaff ταλκ 02:07, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Ozichthys

PanydThe muffin is not subtle 13:16, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Thomas H. Fraser

Hi There. You created an article about a living person (presumed living since he published in 2014) but left it in such a disarray it's almost worth deleting right off. You state links from other Wikipedia pages to claim notability, but that is insufficient per Wikipedia's notability policy. Please review the notability requirements for scientists and seek to establish secondary notability, otherwise it appears to be a fan page. I don't doubt that Fraser has published many articles, but that alone may not be notable enough, since publishing is what normal scientists do. You can find more tips at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography. Cheers. --Animalparty-- (talk) 19:04, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Animalparty: I've got too many of other projects to work on right now. If nobody in the WikiProject Fish community wants/needs this article, then have it deleted. It cleared up a lot of red links on a lot of pages for those articles, so that is why it was created. I'm not sure how it's a "fan page." I don't know the guy. I know nothing about fish. I am not sure how much of a fan anyone really is of a fish scientist. If you find the article objectionable you can either a) clean it up or b) propose it at AfD unless you can find an admin to CSD:A7 -- for which it fails criteria since it reads that he is notable and there is enough to at least support it not getting an A7. It might get you a delete at AfD. Happy editing! —Gaff ταλκ 21:01, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks I'll do what I can and bring it up on WP Fish. I meant fan page as in an article created without due consideration of the person's notability to the world at large (e.g. of interest to only a select few), and meant nothing derogatory. I don't believe all taxon authors need linking, and not all red-links are notable topics. Cheers. --Animalparty-- (talk) 22:00, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think he is a big fish in a small pond. According to the Australian Museum webiste, "He is a world expert on the taxonomy of Cardinalfishes." There are probably not many of those around, so I think that makes him notable. I will leave your notability tag on the page for a week, but unless there is a reason the page should not be up, I will take the tag down.—Gaff ταλκ 22:16, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rockette Morton may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • <ref>{{cite web|title=LoveSpace liner notes|url=http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/rockette}}|website=CD Baby}}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:22, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Megachile campanulae may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • the presence of dark pubescence on tergum 6. In the female, hairs on the pollen carrying appratus ([[Scopa (biology)|scopa]] are black at the 6th sternal segment. Distribution is along the

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:43, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of mammals of Oregon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Talus. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Starr (artist)

As per WP:SOFTDELETE, I've had to restore Matt Starr (artist), which you nominated for deletion. You may wish to consider filing a new AfD, as no new evidence has been presented, to the best of my knowledge, with respect to the notability of the subject. --j⚛e deckertalk 21:17, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Joe Decker: Re-nom done. I'm not seeing notability. —Gaff ταλκ 22:18, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hopefully this time we'll get participation, and I'll keep an eye on it. Thanks. --j⚛e deckertalk 22:24, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Carduus argentatus

Inflorescences of Carduus argentatus
Inflorescences of Carduus argentatus

If you don't object, I would like to do some editing to your article Carduus argentatus because there are some other botanical problems I didn't mention. As you say, it is a really nice photo and the hook is interesting. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:43, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Cwmhiraeth: You have really an amazing list of contributions. I would appreciate any assistance that you can give and the article will certainly benefit. (It isn't technically "my article" since we don't really WP:Own anything here, but thank you for asking before barreling through). It will be an education to watch you at work. I wound up starting this article because I'm an amateur beekeeper and liked the picture of the bee Eucera cinnamomea. (That article is on my to-do list). —Gaff ταλκ 20:01, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I did a bit of copyediting, particularly of the description, nothing special! About the "remarkable" feature, I think the Encyclopaedia Londinensis is referring to the fact that several Egyptian plants have white spots rather than that this plant is particularly remarkable. What do you think? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 21:23, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good @Cwmhiraeth:. I agree with you about the "remarkable" comment. I tried to make it sound interesting in the DYK hook, without stretching the truth or sensationalizing. I think that it is a fair comment as written. There is another image (for the article , not the hook), if you think it would help without cluttering the article. It could be cropped to better highlight the inflorecences. —Gaff ταλκ 22:11, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The image shows the whole plant and its habit of growth so it would be a pity to crop it. I'll leave a note on the DYK nomination page, but someone independent will be needed to review the nomination and they may or may not think the hook suitable. If you need any help with the bee article, you're welcome to ask. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:14, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Calitoxin

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Calitoxin you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sasata -- Sasata (talk) 02:42, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Megachile campanulae

The article Megachile campanulae you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Megachile campanulae for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of IJReid -- IJReid (talk) 03:42, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Megachile campanulae

The article Megachile campanulae you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Megachile campanulae for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of IJReid -- IJReid (talk) 03:42, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Camas pocket gopher, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pterygoids. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hello! I saw now that u taged my article ro remove! But i cant understand why! Im arrist and want to promote my work also in wikipedi! What's the problem?

Thanks

Hi

Hello! I saw now that u taged my article ro remove! But i cant understand why! Im arrist and want to promote my work also in wikipedi! What's the problem?

Thanks

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Calitoxin
added a link pointing to Homologous
Camas pocket gopher
added a link pointing to Raptors

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:28, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Calitoxin

The article Calitoxin you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Calitoxin for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sasata -- Sasata (talk) 20:02, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Camas pocket gopher

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Camas pocket gopher you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 15:01, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Coelioxys sodalis

Hello! Your submission of Coelioxys sodalis at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 20:50, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Camas pocket gopher, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sir John Richardson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 26 November 2014

DYK for Coelioxys sodalis

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Carduus argentatus

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:56, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

user talk:87.228.204.54

why have you put this to the administrators noticeboard.still didn't got it? I am NOT a vandal.to see what I mean check out this,this,and this.--87.228.204.54 (talk) 10:12, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

kindly refer to the admin notice board post for my rationale. —Gaff ταλκ 10:42, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
what?i don't understand--87.228.204.54 (talk) 11:45, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
how is that not clear? —Gaff ταλκ 13:45, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Camas pocket gopher

The article Camas pocket gopher you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Camas pocket gopher for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 21:03, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about List of pollinators of Oregon

Hello, Gaff,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether List of pollinators of Oregon should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of pollinators of Oregon .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Vanjagenije (talk) 16:25, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 03 December 2014

DYK: Lovesick Blues

I answered your question about the picture's copyright.--GDuwenTell me! 19:50, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GOCE coordinator elections

Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors
Candidate nominations for Guild coordinators to serve from January 1 to June 30, 2015, are currently underway. The nomination period will close at 23:59 on December 15 (UTC), after which voting will commence until 23:59 on December 31, 2014. Self-nominations are welcomed. Please consider getting involved; it's your Guild and it won't coordinate itself, so if you'd like to help coordinate Guild activities we'd love to hear from you.

Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978, and Miniapolis.
Message sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:17, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Gray-tailed vole

Mike V • Talk 06:44, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 10 December 2014

December 2014 GOCE newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors December 2014 Newsletter

Drive: Thanks to everyone who participated in November's Backlog Elimination Drive. Of the 43 people who signed up for this drive, 26 copy edited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

Progress report: The November Drive removed 26 requests from the Requests page and 509 articles from the {{copy edit}} backlog. We copy edited 83 articles tagged in the target months; July, August, and September 2013. Together with tag removals from articles unsuitable for copy editing, we eliminated July 2013 from the backlog and reduced August and September's tags to 61 and 70 respectively. As of 01:01, 1 December 2014 (UTC), the backlog stood at 1,974 articles, dipping below 2,000 for the first time in the Guild's history (see graph at right). Well done everyone!

Blitz: The December Blitz will run from December 14–20 and will focus on articles related to Religion, in recognition of this month's religious holidays in much of the English-speaking world. Awards will be given out to everyone who copy edits at least one of the target articles. Sign up here!

Election time again: The election of coordinators to serve from 1 January to 30 June 2015 is now underway. Candidates can nominate themselves or others from December 01, 00:01 (UTC), until December 15, 23:59. The voting period will run from December 16, 00:01 (UTC), until December 31, 23:59. You can read about coordinators' duties here. Please consider getting involved and remember to cast you vote—it's your Guild and it doesn't organize itself!

Thank you all once again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve anything without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978, and Miniapolis.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:15, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Creeping vole

Hello! Your submission of Creeping vole at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:27, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 17 December 2014

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Christian Gregor
added a link pointing to Silesian
Savitribai Phule
added a link pointing to Third Pandemic

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Long-tailed vole

Harrias talk 00:01, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 20 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GOCE December blitz award

The Modest Barnstar
This barnstar is awarded to Gaff for copy edits totaling over 2,000 words during the GOCE December 2014 Copy Editing Blitz. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:41, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GOCE holiday 2014 newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors Late December 2014 Newsletter

Blitz: Thanks to everyone who participated in the December Blitz. Of the 14 editors who signed up for the blitz, 11 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

January drive: The January backlog-reduction drive is just around the corner; sign up here!

Election time again: The election of coordinators to serve from January 1 to June 30, 2015 is now underway. The voting period runs from December 16, 00:01 (UTC), until December 31, 23:59. Please cast your vote—it's your Guild, and it doesn't run itself!

Happy holidays from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978 and Miniapolis.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:44, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 December 2014

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David Tannenberg, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages King George I and Diapasons. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jennifer Jones Patulli

Hi. Thank you for your comments on this page. The links you've provided me are indeed helpful and clarifies why the page may not be notable enough to warrant permanent residence on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bronxium (talk • contribs) 17:42, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Camas pocket gopher

Harrias talk 12:01, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Marsh shrew

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:02, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

PNG to SVG logo conversions

I've moved your question to the talk page, because the main page is for graphic requests. I have also responded to it, there. Just a friendly head's up. :) MjolnirPants Tell me all about it. 21:08, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why, but I could have sworn you posted that to the main page instead of the talk page. Ignore my previous message, except the part about responding. Sorry about that. MjolnirPants Tell me all about it. 21:10, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 December 2014

Special greeting...

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gaff/Archive_4&oldid=1190953197"